The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two Polymorphic Variants of Wild-Type p53 Differ Biochemically and Biologically
Open accessAbstract
The wild-type p53 protein exhibits a common polymorphism at amino acid 72, resulting in either a proline residue (p53Pro) or an arginine residue (p53Arg) at this position. Despite the difference that this change makes in the primary structure of the protein resulting in a difference in migration during sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, no differences in the biochemical or biological characteristics of these wild-type p53 variants have been reported. We have recently shown that p53Arg is significantly more susceptible than p53Pro to the degradation induced by human papillomavirus (HPV) E6 protein. Moreover, this may result in an increased susceptibility to HPV-induced tumors in homozygous p53Arg individuals. In further investigating the characteristics of these p53 variants, we now show that both forms are morphologically wild type and do not differ in their ability to bind to DNA in a sequence-specific manner. However, there are a number of differences between the p53 variants in their abilities to bind components of the transcriptional machinery, to activate transcription, to induce apoptosis, and to repress the transformation of primary cells. These observations may have implications for the development of cancers which harbor wild-type p53 sequences and possibly for the ability of such tumors to respond to therapy, depending on their p53 genotype.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours
Donehower, L. A., Harvey, M., Slagle, B. L., McArthur, M. J., Montgomery, C. A., Butel, J. S., & Bradley, A. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/356215a0 · Cited by 4,649
Tumor suppressor p53 is a direct transcriptional activator of the human bax gene
Toshiyuki, M., & Reed, J. C. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90412-3 · Cited by 4,063
Crystal Structure of a p53 Tumor Suppressor-DNA Complex: Understanding Tumorigenic Mutations
Cho, Y., Gorina, S., Jeffrey, P. D., & Pavletich, N. P. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8023157 · Cited by 2,551 · cited 1×
“The majority of p53 mutations found in cancer cells are missense point mutations, occurring mainly in the DNA binding domain of the protein (4).”
BackgroundSpecific repression of TATA-mediated but not initiator-mediated transcription by wild-type p53
Mack, D. H., Vartikar, J., Pipas, J. M., & Laimins, L. A. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/363281a0 · Cited by 322 · cited 1×
“In addition to its role as an activator of transcription, it has also been reported that p53 acts as a transcriptional repressor of promoters containing a TATA element (14, 24).”
Background
Cited by
TP53 mutations in human cancers: Functional selection and impact on cancer prognosis and outcomes
Petitjean, A., Achatz, M. I. W., Borresen-Dale, A. L., Hainaut, P., & Olivier, M. (2007) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210302 · Cited by 884
The genetics of the p53 pathway, apoptosis and cancer therapy
Vazquez, A., Bond, E. E., Levine, A. J., & Bond, G. L. (2008) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2656 · Cited by 676
The role of the E6-p53 interaction in the molecular pathogenesis of HPV
Thomas, M., Pim, D., & Banks, L. (1999) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1202953 · Cited by 451
Self-citationp53 polymorphic variants at codon 72 exert different effects on cell cycle progression
Pim, D., & Banks, L. (2004) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.11548 · Cited by 408
Self-citationp53 Binds and Activates the Xeroderma Pigmentosum DDB2 Gene in Humans but Not Mice
Tan, T., & Chu, G. (2002) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.22.10.3247-3254.2002 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, M., Kalita, A., Labrecque, S., Pim, D., Banks, L., & Matlashewski, G.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-02-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1092-1100
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- OpenAlex
- W2101943966
- Cited by
- 701
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two Polymorphic Variants of Wild-Type p53 Differ Biochemically and Biologically. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mcb.19.2.1092
- The paper
- Thomas, M., Kalita, A., Labrecque, S., Pim, D., Banks, L., & Matlashewski, G. (1999). Two Polymorphic Variants of Wild-Type p53 Differ Biochemically and Biologically. Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.19.2.1092
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.