Cited by 573Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Determination of the Core of a Minimal Bacterial Gene Set

Open access
Gil, Rosario, Silva, Francisco J., Peretó, Juli, Moya, Andrés·2004·Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews

Abstract

SUMMARY: The availability of a large number of complete genome sequences raises the question of how many genes are essential for cellular life. Trying to reconstruct the core of the protein-coding gene set for a hypothetical minimal bacterial cell, we have performed a computational comparative analysis of eight bacterial genomes. Six of the analyzed genomes are very small due to a dramatic genome size reduction process, while the other two, corresponding to free-living relatives, are larger. The available data from several systematic experimental approaches to define all the essential genes in some completely sequenced bacterial genomes were also considered, and a reconstruction of a minimal metabolic machinery necessary to sustain life was carried out. The proposed minimal genome contains 206 protein-coding genes with all the genetic information necessary for self-maintenance and reproduction in the presence of a full complement of essential nutrients and in the absence of environmental stress. The main features of such a minimal gene set, as well as the metabolic functions that must be present in the hypothetical minimal cell, are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mmbr.68.3.518-537.2004

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Estimating genome size of a minimal cell on basis of top-down analysis gives result in order of hundreds of genes.

    “What we can do is to estimate the genome size of what is called a “minimal cell,” on the basis of a top-down analysis [124] but the result is still in the order of hundreds of genes.”
  • The fpbA gene has been reported in several pathogenic species and in many LAB species.

    “The latter gene, which was considered non-essential, has been reported in several pathogenic species and in many LAB species [56, 57].”

    From EVALUATION OF ADHESIVE AND AGGREGATION PROPERTIES OF LACTIC ACID BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM DIFFERENT BIOTOPES (2025) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Introduction discusses prfB and other genes in reduced bacterial genomes, but it does not address the reported distribution of fpbA. Searches for fpbA, the possible spelling fbpA, and lactic acid bacteria found no passage supporting its presence in pathogenic or LAB species; the copy’s discussion of prfB is about a different gene. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For the most primitive genome, the length is estimated by Gil et al to be around a value in nucleotides.

    “For the most primitive genome, the length is estimated by Gil et al [5] to be around nucleotides”
  • The big gap between the maximum length maintainable in Eigen's theory and the primitive genome length is the famous error catastrophe paradox.

    “The big gap between and is the famous error catastrophe paradox.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Fares, M. A., M. X. Ruiz-González, A. Moya, S. F. Elena, and E. Barrio. 2002. GroEL as an enabler for bacterial endosymbiotic lifestyle. Nature 417:398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gil, R., Silva, F. J., Peretó, J., & Moya, A.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de València (ES)
  • Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de València, Valencia
Venue
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
Published
2004-09
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
518-537
ISSN
  • 1092-2172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5557
OpenAlex
W2115542536
Cited by
573
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 45
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
essential genes, gene essentiality, genome size reduction, comparative genomics, protein-coding genes, minimal cell, bacterial genomes
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Bacterial Proteins, Genes, Bacterial, Genome, Bacterial, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review