The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vitamin D supplementation in early childhood and risk of type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether vitamin D supplementation in infancy reduces the risk of type 1 diabetes in later life. METHODS: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis using Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists of retrieved articles. The main outcome measure was development of type 1 diabetes. Controlled trials and observational studies that had assessed the effect of vitamin D supplementation on risk of developing type 1 diabetes were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Five observational studies (four case-control studies and one cohort study) met the inclusion criteria; no randomised controlled trials were found. Meta-analysis of data from the case-control studies showed that the risk of type 1 diabetes was significantly reduced in infants who were supplemented with vitamin D compared to those who were not supplemented (pooled odds ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.84). The result of the cohort study was in agreement with that of the meta-analysis. There was also some evidence of a dose-response effect, with those using higher amounts of vitamin D being at lower risk of developing type 1 diabetes. Finally, there was a suggestion that the timing of supplementation might also be important for the subsequent development of type 1 diabetes. CONCLUSION: Vitamin D supplementation in early childhood may offer protection against the development of type 1 diabetes. The evidence for this is based on observational studies. Adequately powered, randomised controlled trials with long periods of follow-up are needed to establish causality and the best formulation, dose, duration and period of supplementation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?
Hill, A. B. (1965) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/003591576505800503 · Cited by 6,974
Variation and trends in incidence of childhood diabetes in Europe
(2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)07125-1 · Cited by 755
Use of cod liver oil during pregnancy associated with lower risk of type I diabetes in the offspring
Stene, L. C., Ulriksen, J., Magnus, P., & Joner, G. (2000) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s001250051499 · Cited by 362
Cited by
Environmental risk factors for type 1 diabetes
Rewers, M., & Ludvigsson, J. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30507-4 · Cited by 676
Todd, J. A. (2010) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2010.04.001 · Cited by 560
Cooper, J. D., Smyth, D. J., Walker, N. M., Stevens, H., Burren, O. S., Wallace, C., Greissl, C., Ramos-Lopez, E., Hyppönen, E., Dunger, D. B., et al. (2011) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db10-1656 · Cited by 279
Mitri, J., & Pittas, A. G. (2014) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2013.09.010 · Cited by 258
Infant feeding and the risk of type 1 diabetes
Knip, M., Virtanen, S. M., & Åkerblom, H. K. (2010) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.2010.28701c · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Zipitis, C. S., & Akobeng, A. K.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-06-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 512-517
- ISSN
- 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2044
- OpenAlex
- W2169023051
- Cited by
- 662
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vitamin D supplementation in early childhood and risk of type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/adc.2007.128579
- The paper
- Zipitis, C. S., & Akobeng, A. K. (2008). Vitamin D supplementation in early childhood and risk of type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Disease in Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2007.128579
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.