Cited by 84Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychiatric care and mental health services

Randomised controlled trial of therapeutic assessment versus usual assessment in adolescents with self-harm: 2-year follow-up

Ougrin, D., Boege, I., Stahl, D., Banarsee, R., Taylor, E.·2013·Archives of Disease in Childhood

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An earlier randomised controlled trial demonstrated improved treatment engagement in adolescents who received Therapeutic Assessment (TA) versus Assessment As Usual (AAU), following an emergency presentation with self-harm. OBJECTIVES: To determine 2-year outcomes for the same adolescents focusing on frequency of Accident and Emergency (A&E) self-harm presentations and treatment engagement. METHOD: Patients in the TA groups (n=35) and the AAU group (n=34) were followed up 2 years after the initial assessment. Their primary and secondary care electronic records were analysed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the frequency of self-harm resulting in A&E presentations between the two groups (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.23 to 2.13, p=0.53). Treatment engagement remained higher in the TA group than the AAU group. CONCLUSIONS: TA is not associated with a lower frequency of A&E self-harm presentations. The effect of TA on engagement is maintained 2 years after the initial assessment. Interventions to reduce self-harm in adolescents are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 81605131, http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN81605131/

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303200

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A further report provided two-year follow-up data for Ougrin 2011a.

    “A further report (Ougrin 2013) provided two-year follow-up data for one of the previously-included trials (Ougrin 2011a).”

    From Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as Ougrin 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ougrin, D., Boege, I., Stahl, D., Banarsee, R., & Taylor, E.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Zentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg (DE)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Ougrin, D.
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-05-25
Volume
98
Issue
10
Pages
772-776
ISSN
  • 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2044
OpenAlex
W2168540768
Cited by
84
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
self-harm, adolescents, therapeutic assessment, emergency department presentation, treatment engagement, long-term follow-up, self-harm prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Prognosis, Psychotherapy, Group, Self-Injurious Behavior, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review