Cited by 76Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlVasculitis and related conditions

Real world experience with antiphospholipid antibody tests: how stable are results over time?

Open access
Erkan, D, Derksen, W J M, Kaplan, V, Sammaritano, L, Pierangeli, S S, Roubey, R, Lockshin, M D·2005·Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract

Objective To determine the stability and the degree of variation of antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) results over time in a large cohort of well evaluated aPL positive patients; and to analyse factors contributing to aPL variation and the validity of aPL in a real world setting in which aPL tests are done in multiple laboratories.Methods The clinical characteristics, drug treatment, and 1652 data points for lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies (anti-beta2GPI) were examined in 204 aPL positive patients; 81 of these met the Sapporo criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and 123 were asymptomatic bearers of aPL.Results 87% of initially positive LA results, 88% of initially negative to low positive aCL results, 75% of initially moderate to high positive aCL results, 96% of initially negative to low positive anti-beta2GPI results, and 76% of initially moderate to high positive anti-beta2GPI results subsequently remained in the same range regardless of the laboratory performing the test. Aspirin, warfarin, and hydroxychloroquine use did not differ among patients whose aCL titres significantly decreased or increased or remained stable. On same day specimens, the consistency of aCL results among suppliers ranged from 64% to 88% and the correlation ranged from 0.5 to 0.8. Agreement was moderate for aCL IgG and aCL IgM; however, for aCL IgA agreement was marginal.Conclusions aPL results remained stable for at least three quarters of subsequent tests, regardless of the laboratory performing the test; the small amount of variation that occurred did not appear to be caused by aspirin, warfarin, or hydroxychloroquine use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ard.2004.031856

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This was the first study to report that hydroxychloroquine use is associated with lower odds of persistently positive lupus anticoagulant and/or antiphospholipid antibodies.

    “This is the first study to show that HCQ use is associated with lower odds of having persistently positive LAC and/or aPL Abs.”

    From Hydroxychloroquine Use Is Associated with Lower Odds of Persistently Positive Antiphospholipid Antibodies and/or Lupus Anticoagulant in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (2013) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results report no difference in hydroxychloroquine use between patients whose anticardiolipin antibody titres decreased, increased, or remained stable. The Discussion explicitly says the authors found no relation between hydroxychloroquine treatment and change in titre, rather than an association with lower odds of persistent positivity. Page numbers were not provided for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Before this study, only one published study had examined the relationship between hydroxychloroquine and antiphospholipid antibodies, in a secondary analysis, and it found no association.

    “However, only one published study to date evaluated the association between HCQ and aPL Abs in a secondary analysis with a negative result (6).”

    From Hydroxychloroquine Use Is Associated with Lower Odds of Persistently Positive Antiphospholipid Antibodies and/or Lupus Anticoagulant in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (2013) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results report no association between hydroxychloroquine use and changes in anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) titres, and the Discussion says the study was not primarily designed to test that relationship. Our copy does not establish that this was the only published study to examine the association, and its negative finding concerns aCL titres specifically rather than all antiphospholipid antibodies. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The proportion of patients in the cohort who remained persistently LA+ (72%) was similar to rates in other studies that used different definitions of LA stability and positivity (78% in Gkrouzman et al, 71% in Zen et al, and 87% in Erkan et al).

    “However, the proportion of patients in our cohort who remained persistently LA+ (72%) was similar to the rates in other studies that used different definitions of LA stability and positivity (78% in the study by Gkrouzman et al, 71% in the study by Zen et al, and 87% in study by Erkan et al.).9,10,36”

    From Lupus anticoagulant test persistence over time and its associations with future thrombotic events (2022) · cites this paper as [36]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This finding contrasts with Erkan et al, who found that more than three-quarters of subsequent tests of lupus anticoagulant were consistent with baseline test results, regardless of the laboratory.

    “This contrasts with the results of Erkan et al,13 who found that more than three-quarters of subsequent tests of lupus anticoagulant were consistent with baseline test results, regardless of the laboratory.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Roubey RAS, Buxton G, APSCORE Investigators. The Antiphospholipid Syndrome Collaborative Registry (APSCORE): report on the first 546 subjects [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:S640.
  2. Erkan D, Sammaritano L, Levy R, Harrison MJ, Peterson M, Yazici Y, et al. APLASA study 2004 update: primary thrombosis prevention in asymptomatic aPL-positive patients with aspirin (ASA) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:S640-41.
  3. Erkan D, Sammaritano L, Yazici Y, Lockshin MD. Challenging clinical aspects of antiphospholipid syndrome: what do experts say? [abstract] Arthritis Rheum, 2001;44:S147.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erkan, D., Derksen, W. J. M., Kaplan, V, Sammaritano, L., Pierangeli, S. S., Roubey, R., & Lockshin, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Hospital for Special Surgery (US)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Morehouse School of Medicine (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Erkan, D
Venue
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
64
Issue
9
Pages
1321-1325
ISSN
0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048723083
Cited by
76
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Arthritis Foundation
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
Keywords
antiphospholipid antibodies, antiphospholipid syndrome, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies, interlaboratory agreement, aspirin, warfarin, hydroxychloroquine, Sapporo criteria
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Glycoproteins, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Antibodies, Antiphospholipid, Antibodies, Anticardiolipin, beta 2-Glycoprotein I

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review