Cited by 36Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal and Macular SurgeryRetinal Imaging and Analysis

Development of atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium around disciform scars

Open access
Sarks, J·2006·British Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Eyes with burnt out disciform scars secondary to age related macular degeneration (AMD) are regarded as visually stable. The aim of this study is to report the subsequent development of atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) around the scars and discuss the possible basis. METHODS: 20 eyes from 18 patients were observed to develop atrophy around choroidal neovascularisation (CNV). A method of measuring expansion of the atrophy over time is described using the Topcon Imagenet 2000 system. An additional 10 clinicopathological examples were reviewed. RESULTS: Clinically CNV became surrounded initially by a ring of pallor that progressed to an expanding band of atrophy of the RPE. It developed most rapidly in the first 3 years after CNV became quiescent but then continued to expand slowly to more than three times the size of the scar. Histopathological specimens showed large choroidal vessels entering the scars directly and a reduced number of small choroidal vessels beneath and around the scar CONCLUSIONS: Disciform scars may become surrounded by an expanding band of atrophy of the RPE, postulated to result from remodelling of the choroidal circulation. The ongoing enlargement of the resulting scotoma may need to be considered when planning management and assessing treatment outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjo.2005.083022

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Schatz H, McDonald R. Rate of spread of geographic atrophy and visual loss. Ophthalmology 1989;96:1541-51.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarks, J.
Affiliations
Neuroscience Research Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Sarks, J
Venue
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-04-01
Volume
90
Issue
4
Pages
442-446
ISSN
0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031202579
Cited by
36
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
retinal pigment epithelium atrophy, disciform scar, age-related macular degeneration, choroidal neovascularization, choroidal vasculature
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrophy, Cicatrix, Female, Fluorescein Angiography, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Pigment Epithelium of Eye, Disease Progression, Choroidal Neovascularization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review