Cited by 97Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsElasticity and Material ModelingRetinal Imaging and Analysis

An experimental study of the elastic properties of the human Bruch’s membrane-choroid complex: Relevance to ageing

Open access
Ugarte, M·2006·British Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the mechanical properties (stress-strain relation, elasticity, hysteresis, response to stress spikes and drops) of isolated human Bruch's membrane-choroid, as well as the effect of ageing and aged related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: 13 Bruch's membrane-choroid complexes were obtained from human donors (21-97 years). Two samples (aged 85 and 95) showed signs of AMD including large, soft drusen, choroidal neovascularisation, and/or disciform scars. Various hydrostatic pressures (stress) were applied to the choroidal surface of mid-peripheral samples mounted in a modified open Ussing chamber. Linear scans of the tissue were recorded by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the pressure induced deformation (strain), elasticity, hysteresis, and response to pressure spikes and drops measured. RESULTS: The elasticity of human Bruch's membrane-choroid complex decreased linearly with ageing (p<0.001) after the age of 21 with an approximate reduction of 1% per year. The decrease was not exaggerated in AMD. The recoil capacity of Bruch's membrane-choroid was not affected by ageing. The response to pressure spikes/drops was similar in age matched normal and AMD eyes. The results suggest that although the aged induced decrease in Bruch's membrane elasticity may contribute to breaks in this membrane in AMD leading to neovascularisation this is not sufficient. The presence of other factors is required for its development. CONCLUSION: The elasticity of Bruch's membrane-choroid complex decreases with age while recoil capacity does not. The decrease was not exaggerated in AMD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjo.2005.086579

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ugarte, M.
Affiliations
St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Ugarte, M
Venue
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-05-01
Volume
90
Issue
5
Pages
621-626
ISSN
0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060358793
Cited by
97
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
Bruch's membrane, choroid, elasticity, aging, age-related macular degeneration, stress-strain behavior, hysteresis, drusen, choroidal neovascularization, tissue mechanical properties
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Choroid, Elasticity, Freezing, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Middle Aged, Pressure, Rheology, Stress, Mechanical, Bruch Membrane

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review