Cited by 124Renal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesComplement system in diseasesRetinal Diseases and Treatments

Fundus changes in (type II) mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis simulating drusen: A histopathological report

Open access
Duvall-Young, J, MacDonald, M K, McKechnie, N M·1989·British Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

We report for the first time to our knowledge the histopathological findings in the eye of a patient with type II mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis (dense deposit disease) in which a deposit of material morphologically very similar to that which is pathognomonic for the disease in the kidney was demonstrated in Bruch's membrane. The nature of the deposit in the renal lesion is unknown but is considered to represent a structural alteration secondary to a reaction with anticomplement antibody. Clinically the fundus appearance resembled that seen in drusen.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjo.73.4.297

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Burkholder PM, Hyman CR, Kryer RP. Characterisation of mixed membranous and proliferative glomerulonephritis. In: Kincaid-Smith P, Matthew TH, Becker EL, eds. Glomerulonephritis. New York: J Wiley, 1973: 557.
  2. Klein BA. Ischaemic infarcts of the choroid. Am J Ophthalmol 1969; 66: 1069-74.
  3. Ellis PP, Fonkin HA. Retinopathies of chronic glomerulone- phritis. Arch Ophthalmol 1966; 75: 36-41.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duvall-Young, J., MacDonald, M. K., & McKechnie, N. M.
Affiliations
Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1989-04-01
Volume
73
Issue
4
Pages
297-302
ISSN
0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998406682
Cited by
124
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Glasgow
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Complement system in diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
dense deposit disease, fundus changes, drusen, Bruch's membrane, histopathology, fundus appearance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Basement Membrane, Choroid, Fluorescein Angiography, Humans, Male, Glomerulonephritis, Membranoproliferative

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review