Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 352

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Macular pigment and age related macular degeneration

Open access
BEATTY, S, BOULTON, M, HENSON, D, KOH, H-H, MURRAY, I J·1999·British Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

The yellow coloration of the macula lutea is attributable to the presence of macular pigment in the axons of its photoreceptors.1 In the 1980s several investigators demonstrated that macular pigment consists of the xanthophyll isomers, lutein and zeaxanthin.2 3 Although the role of the macular pigment remains uncertain, several functions have been hypothesised and these include reduction of the effects of light scatter and chromatic aberration on visual performance,4 5 limitation of the damaging photo-oxidative effects of blue light through its absorption,6-8 and protection against the adverse effects of photochemical reactions because of the antioxidant properties of the carotenoids.9 10 Age related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of visual loss in people over the age of 65 years in the Western world.11 Although the aetiopathogenesis of AMD remains a matter of debate, there is a growing body of evidence to indicate that oxidative damage plays a role.12-14 Consequently, the possibility that the absorption characteristics and antioxidant properties of macular pigment confer protection against AMD has been postulated.10 15 A proved protective effect of macular pigment may be of therapeutic value, as it has recently been reported that human macular pigment can be augmented with dietary modification.16 In this article we review the current literature germane to macular pigment and AMD, and examine the evidence that retinal carotenoids are protective against AMD. The absorption of blue light by the macular pigment was first described in 1866 by Max Schultze who concluded: “Therefore, under an otherwise equal organisation, a retina without a yellow spot would see more blue light than one with such a spot”.17 He believed that absorption of the “most refractable violet” reduced chromatic aberration, but also hypothesised that macular pigment might provide some protection against the hazards …

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjo.83.7.867

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 352

Metadata

Authors
BEATTY, S., BOULTON, M., HENSON, D., KOH, H.-H., & MURRAY, I. J.
Venue
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1999-07-01
Volume
83
Issue
7
Pages
867-877
ISSN
0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109045394
Cited by
352
References
9
FWCI
9.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Macular pigment and age related macular degeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.83.7.867
The paper
BEATTY, S., BOULTON, M., HENSON, D., KOH, H.-H., & MURRAY, I. J. (1999). Macular pigment and age related macular degeneration. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.83.7.867

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.