Cited by 126Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingPhysical Activity and Health

Validity of the Astrand-Ryhming nomogram for predicting maximal oxygen intake.

Open access
Cink, R. E., Thomas, T. R.·1981·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of the predicted VO2 max from the Astrand-Ryhming nomogram, using the cycle ergometer as the sole exercise mode and following the recommended submaximal test protocol. In addition, two sets of age correction factors were compared for accuracy. Using the Astrand age correction factors, the SEE of the predicted VO2 max for the 40 male subjects was .42 L.min-1 or 5.7 ml.kg-1.min-1, (r = .76 and .83, respectively); there was no significant difference between the measured and the predicted means. Although virtually identical SEE and r were found when applying the von Dobeln age correction factors, a significantly lower predicted mean was found (p less than .05), which indicated a consistent tendency to underestimate the actual VO2 max. These results suggest that the Astrand age correction factors should be used in conjunction with the Astrand-Ryhming nomogram, especially when classifying subjects into various fitness classifications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsm.15.3.182

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]8. Rowell, L. B., Taylor, H. L. and Wang, Y., 1964 "Limitations to prediction of maximum oxygen uptake". Journal of Applied Physiology 19: 919-927.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cink, R. E., & Thomas, T. R.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1981-09
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
182-185
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W1978053394
Cited by
126
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
VO2max, submaximal exercise testing, cycle ergometer, prediction error, cardiorespiratory fitness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Physical Exertion, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Fitness, Probability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review