Cited by 128Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and HealthSports Performance and Training

A new submaximal cycle ergometer test for prediction of VO2max

Ekblom‐Bak, E., Björkman, F., Hellenius, M.‐L., Ekblom, B.·2014·Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports

Abstract

Maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2max) is an important, independent predictor of cardiovascular health and mortality. Despite this, it is rarely measured in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to create and evaluate a submaximal cycle ergometry test based on change in heart rate (HR) between a lower standard work rate and an individually chosen higher work rate. In a mixed population (n = 143) with regard to sex (55% women), age (21–65 years), and activity status (inactive to highly active), a model included change in HR per unit change in power, sex, and age for the best estimate of VO 2max. The association between estimated and observed VO 2max for the mixed sample was r = 0.91, standard error of estimate = 0.302 L/min, and mean measured VO 2max = 3.23 L/min. The corresponding coefficient of variation was 9.3%, a significantly improved precision compared with one of the most commonly used submaximal exercise tests, the Å strand test, which in the present study was estimated to be 18.1%. Test–retest reliability analysis over 1 week revealed no mean difference in the estimated VO 2max (−0.02 L/min, 95% confidence interval: −0.07–0.03). The new test is low‐risk, easily administered, and valid for a wide capacity range, and is therefore suitable in situations as health evaluations in the general population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sms.12014

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ekblom‐Bak, E., Björkman, F., Hellenius, M. ‐., & Ekblom, B.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (SE)
  • Department of Medicine Karolinska Institutet Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
Corresponding author
Ekblom‐Bak, E.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11-06
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
319-326
ISSN
  • 0905-7188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0838
OpenAlex
W1696361779
Cited by
128
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
9.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
VO2max prediction, heart rate response, test-retest reliability, cardiovascular health, exercise testing
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Exercise Test, Physical Exertion, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Cardiovascular, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Fitness, Predictive Value of Tests, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review