Cited by 23Hormonal and reproductive studiesSexual Differentiation and DisordersGenetics and Physical Performance

Determination and regulation of body composition in elite athletes

Sonksen, Peter·2018·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

In 2011, the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) and IOC introduced a 'hyperandrogenism' rule that excluded women with a serum testosterone >10 nmol/L from participating in elite sport. This rule was based on the false premise that the greater lean body mass in men was a consequence of their higher serum testosterone. This rule did not have scientific backing and the Court of Arbitration for Sport subsequently rescinded the rule following an appeal from an Indian athlete barred from the Commonwealth Games. This review covers the scientific knowledge about the development and regulation of body composition in humans but also considers the lessons learnt from evolution and breeding in animals. The importance of heredity has been documented in family and twin studies. The roles of growth hormone and sex steroids are reviewed. The Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (AIS) is considered as a model of the role of testosterone in development of body composition and also as evidence of the importance of other factors carried on the Y-chromosome that are of prime importance but have been systematically ignored. Finally the key factors determining body composition are considered and placed in a suggested order of importance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096742

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is convincing evidence that sex differences in muscle mass and strength are sufficient to account for the increased strength and aerobic performance of men compared with women and are in keeping with differences in world records between the sexes.

    “There is convincing evidence that the sex differences in muscle mass and strength are sufficient to account for the increased strength and aerobic performance of men compared with women and is in keeping with the differences in world records between the sexes (116).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sonksen, P.
Affiliations
St Thomas’ Hospital and King's College, London, UK
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-11-22
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
219-229
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W2554358034
Cited by
23
References
109
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Physical Performance
Keywords
body composition, serum testosterone, elite athletes, sex steroids, growth hormone, androgen insensitivity syndrome, Y chromosome, heredity (biology), twin studies, lean body mass, sex differences, animal evolution, animal breeding, anti-doping
MeSH terms
Animals, Anthropometry, Body Composition, Female, Humans, Male, Phenotype, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Sports, Testosterone, Twin Studies as Topic, Human Growth Hormone, Inheritance Patterns, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review