Cited by 127Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsDoping in SportsHormonal and reproductive studies

The Effects of Growth Hormone on Body Composition and Physical Performance in Recreational Athletes: A Randomized Trial

Meinhardt, Udo, Nelson, Anne E., Hansen, Jennifer L., Birzniece, Vita, Clifford, David, Leung, Kin-Chuen, Graham, Kenneth, Ho, Ken K.Y.·2010·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Growth hormone is widely abused by athletes, frequently with androgenic steroids. Its effects on performance are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of growth hormone alone or with testosterone on body composition and measures of performance. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded study of 8 weeks of treatment followed by a 6-week washout period. Randomization was computer-generated with concealed allocation. (Australian-New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry registration number: ACTRN012605000508673) SETTING: Clinical research facility in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 96 recreationally trained athletes (63 men and 33 women) with a mean age of 27.9 years (SD, 5.7). INTERVENTION: Men were randomly assigned to receive placebo, growth hormone (2 mg/d subcutaneously), testosterone (250 mg/wk intramuscularly), or combined treatments. Women were randomly assigned to receive either placebo or growth hormone (2 mg/d). MEASUREMENTS: Body composition variables (fat mass, lean body mass, extracellular water mass, and body cell mass) and physical performance variables (endurance [maximum oxygen consumption], strength [dead lift], power [jump height], and sprint capacity [Wingate value]). RESULTS: Body cell mass was correlated with all measures of performance at baseline. Growth hormone significantly reduced fat mass, increased lean body mass through an increase in extracellular water, and increased body cell mass in men when coadministered with testosterone. Growth hormone significantly increased sprint capacity, by 0.71 kJ (95% CI, 0.1 to 1.3 kJ; relative increase, 3.9% [CI, 0.0% to 7.7%]) in men and women combined and by 1.7 kJ (CI, 0.5 to 3.0 kJ; relative increase, 8.3% [CI, 3.0% to 13.6%]) when coadministered with testosterone to men; other performance measures did not significantly change. The increase in sprint capacity was not maintained 6 weeks after discontinuation of the drug. LIMITATIONS: Growth hormone dosage may have been lower than that used covertly by competitive athletes. The athletic significance of the observed improvements in sprint capacity is unclear, and the study was too small to draw conclusions about safety. CONCLUSION: Growth hormone supplementation influenced body composition and increased sprint capacity when administered alone and in combination with testosterone. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: The World Anti-Doping Agency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-152-9-201005040-00007

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Endogenous GH plays no role in sex differences in muscle mass and function.

    “Finally, the evidence that endogenous GH plays no role in sex differences in muscle mass and function is supported by evidence from the most extensive interventional study of GH treatment to non-GH–deficient adults, daily GH administration for 8 weeks to healthy recreational athletes produced only marginally significant improvement in exercise performance of men and none in women (174).”
  • Daily GH administration for 8 weeks to healthy recreational athletes produced only marginally significant improvement in exercise performance of men and none in women.

    “Finally, the evidence that endogenous GH plays no role in sex differences in muscle mass and function is supported by evidence from the most extensive interventional study of GH treatment to non-GH–deficient adults, daily GH administration for 8 weeks to healthy recreational athletes produced only marginally significant improvement in exercise performance of men and none in women (174).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meinhardt, U., Nelson, A. E., Hansen, J. L., Birzniece, V., Clifford, D., Leung, K.-C., Graham, K., & Ho, K. K. Y.
Affiliations
Garvan Institute of Medical Research (AU)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2010-05-04
Volume
152
Issue
9
Pages
568-577
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2162155608
Cited by
127
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
Keywords
growth hormone, testosterone, doping in sport, body composition, physical performance, body cell mass, fat mass, lean body mass, endurance, strength, power, recreational athletes, anabolic steroid abuse, drug effects on performance, washout period, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adolescent, Adult, Androgens, Body Composition, Body Water, Female, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Testosterone, Body Mass Index, Human Growth Hormone, Extracellular Fluid, Athletic Performance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review