Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 877

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Doctor-patient communication: the Toronto consensus statement.

Open access
Simpson, M, Buckman, R, Stewart, M, Maguire, P, Lipkin, M, Novack, D, Till, J·1991·BMJ

Abstract

of 25 000 are expected.'New legislation may be needed.This report was compiled on behalf of the staff at the Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, the staff at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, and the many people who helped at the scene.The efforts of hundreds of professionals and volunteers were vital and greatly appreciated.We thank

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.303.6814.1385

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Simpson, M., Buckman, R., Stewart, M., Maguire, P., Lipkin, M., Novack, D., & Till, J.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1991-11-30
Volume
303
Issue
6814
Pages
1385-1387
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2078841988
Cited by
877
References
2
FWCI
40.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.