Cited by 43Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Services Management and PolicyInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Facilitating technology adoption in the NHS: negotiating the organisational and policy context – a qualitative study

Open access
Llewellyn, Sue, Procter, Rob, Harvey, Gill, Maniatopoulos, Gregory, Boyd, Alan·2014·Health Services and Delivery Research

Abstract

Reports are published in Health Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR) if (1) they have resulted from work for the HS&DR programme or programmes which preceded the HS&DR programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors. HS&DR programmeThe Health Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was established to fund a broad range of research.It combines the strengths and contributions of two previous NIHR research programmes: the Health Services Research (HSR) programme and the Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO) programme, which were merged in January 2012.The HS&DR programme aims to produce rigorous and relevant evidence on the quality, access and organisation of health services including costs and outcomes, as well as research on implementation.The programme will enhance the strategic focus on research that matters to the NHS and is keen to support ambitious evaluative research to improve health services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3310/hsdr02230

Cites

230 of 230 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent study suggests that the impact of the NHS National Technology Adoption Centre's Technology Implementation Projects and HowToWhyTo guides has been disappointing and points to the difficulties of making context-specific knowledge transferable and hence reusable in other contexts.

    “However, a recent study suggests that their impact has been disappointing and points to the difficulties of making context-specific knowledge transferable and hence reusable in other contexts [124].”

    From Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies (2017) · cites this paper as [124]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 233 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Fogg BJ. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do? San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 2003.
  2. Hendy J, Barlow J, Chrysanthaki T. Implementing remote care in the UK: an update of progress. Eurohealth 2011;17:21.
  3. Williams I, Dickinson H. Knowledge for Adoption: A Review of the Literature on Knowledge-Based Facilitators of Technology Adoption in Health Care. Birmingham: Health Services Management Centre/NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement; 2008.
  4. Ong N, Redmayne G, Sarmah R. The Development of a Tool for Assessing the Optimal Adoption of Healthcare Technologies in the NHS. Brighton: Health and Care Infrastructure Research and Innovation Centre; 2009. pp. 7-23.
  5. Dent M. Changing jurisdictions within the health professions? Autonomy, accountability and evidence based practice. In Ackroyd S, Muzio D, editors. New Directions in the Study of Expert Labour: Medicine, Law and Management Consultancy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008. pp. 101-17.
  6. Callon M, Law J. On the construction of sociotechnical networks: content and context revisited. Knowledge Soc 1989;8:57-83.
  7. Latour B. On technical mediation -philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowl 1994;3:29-64.
  8. Ling T, Soper B, Marjanovic S, Celia C, Yaqub O, Reding A, et al. Delivering the Aims of the CLAHRCs: Evaluating CLAHRCs' Strategies and Contributions. Interim Report: Phase 1. Cambridge: Rand Europe; 2011. 219.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Llewellyn, S., Procter, R., Harvey, G., Maniatopoulos, G., & Boyd, A.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Health Services and Delivery Research
Published
2014-07
Volume
2
Issue
23
Pages
1-132
ISSN
  • 2050-4349 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-4357
OpenAlex
W2056896446
Cited by
43
References
233
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services and Delivery Research (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research (08/1820/254)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
technology adoption, National Health Service, health service implementation, organizational context, health policy, implementation facilitation, health care delivery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review