Cited by 478Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

United Kingdom prospective diabetes study (UKPDS) 13: relative efficacy of randomly allocated diet, sulphonylurea, insulin, or metformin in patients with newly diagnosed non-insulin dependent diabetes followed for three years

Open access
·1995·BMJ

Abstract

Objective : To assess the relative efficacy of treatments for non-insulin dependent diabetes over three years from diagnosis. Design : Multicentre, randomised, controlled trial allocating patients to treatment with diet alone or additional chlorpropamide, glibenclamide, insulin, or metformin (if obese) to achieve fasting plasma glucose concentrations </=6 mmol/l. Setting : Outpatient diabetic clinics in 15 British hospitals. Subjects : 2520 subjects who, after a three month dietary run in period, had fasting plasma glucose concentrations of 6.1-14.9 mmol/l but no hyperglycaemic symptoms. Main outcome measures : Fasting plasma glucose, glycated haemoglobin, and fasting plasma insulin concentrations; body weight; compliance; and hypoglycaemia. Results : Median fasting plasma glucose concentrations were significantly lower at three years in patients allocated to chlorpropamide, glibenclamide, or insulin rather than diet alone (7.0, 7.6, 7.4, and 9.0 mmol/l respectively; P<0.001) with lower mean glycated haemoglobin values (6.8%, 6.9%, 7.0%, and 7.6% respectively; P<0.001). Mean body weight increased significantly with chlorpropamide, glibenclamide, and insulin but not diet (by 3.5, 4.8, 4.8, and 1.7 kg; P<0.001). A similar pattern was seen for mean fasting plasma insulin concentration (by 0.9, 1.2, 2.4, and −0.1 mU/l; P<0.001). In obese subjects metformin was as effective as the other drugs with no change in mean body weight and significant reduction in mean fasting plasma insulin concentration (−2.5 mU/l; P<0.001). More hypoglycaemic episodes occurred with sulphonylurea or insulin than with diet or metformin. Conclusion : The drugs had similar glucose lowering efficacy, although most patients remained hyperglycaemic. Long term follow up is required to determine the risk-benefit ratio of the glycaemic improvement, side effects, changes in body weight, and plasma insulin concentration. Key messages: Key messages In this study after three years chlorpropamide, glibenclamide, insulin, and metformin were all more effective than diet alone with no differences in efficacy in reducing glycaemia Sulphonylureas and insulin tended to increase body weight, plasma insulin, and the risk of hypoglycaemia, whereas metformin did not affect weight, reduced insulin, and was associated with less frequent hypoglycaemia Long term follow up is required to determine the risk benefit ratio for each of these treatments

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.310.6972.83

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 1993 Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and 1998 United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study demonstrated definitive relationships between glycemic control and microvascular complications and showed that lower A1cs were associated with higher rates of severe hypoglycemia.

    “The 1993 publication of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial112 and 1998 United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study113–115 demonstrated definitive relationships between glycemic control and microvascular complications and showed that lower A1cs were associated with higher rates of severe hypoglycemia.”
  • A 0.5% reduction in HbA1c is similar to that achieved with medication.

    “with a reduction of 0.5% that was similar to that achieved by using medication (44,45)”
  • Hypoglycemia is very uncommon with metformin monotherapy but has been reported in combination regimens, likely due to metformin potentiating other therapeutic agents.

    “Hypoglycemia is very uncommon with metformin monotherapy [173] but has been reported in combination regimens [174], likely due to metformin potentiating other therapeutic agents.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1995-01-14
Volume
310
Issue
6972
Pages
83-88
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W4250413101
Cited by
478
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, sulfonylureas, chlorpropamide, glibenclamide, insulin therapy, metformin, dietary therapy, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, fasting insulin, body weight, hypoglycemia, obesity, treatment efficacy, newly diagnosed diabetes, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Body Weight, Chlorpropamide, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glyburide, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Insulin, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Compliance, Sulfonylurea Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review