Cited by 458Diabetes Treatment and ManagementHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Thiazolidinediones, Metformin, and Outcomes in Older Patients With Diabetes and Heart Failure: An Observational Study

Open access
Masoudi, Frederick A., Inzucchi, Silvio E., Wang, Yongfei, Havranek, Edward P., Foody, JoAnne M., Krumholz, Harlan M.·2005·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Insulin-sensitizing drugs of the thiazolidinedione class and metformin are commonly prescribed to treat diabetes in patients with heart failure despite strong warnings from the Food and Drug Administration against this practice. Whether this results in adverse outcomes is unknown. Methods and Results— We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 16 417 Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes discharged after hospitalization with the principal discharge diagnosis of heart failure. The association between antidiabetic drug prescriptions and outcomes was assessed in multivariable hierarchical Cox proportional hazards models, with adjustment for patient, physician, and hospital variables and accounting for the clustering of patients within hospitals. The primary outcome of the study was time to death due to all causes. Secondary outcomes included time to readmission for all causes or for heart failure. Crude 1-year mortality rates were lower among the 2226 patients treated with a thiazolidinedione (30.1%) or the 1861 treated with metformin (24.7%) compared with that among the 12 069 treated with neither insulin-sensitizing drug (36.0%, P =<0.0001 for both comparisons). In multivariable models, treatment with the thiazolidinediones (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.94) or metformin (HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97) was associated with significantly lower risks of death. There was no association with treatment with sulfonylureas (HR=0.99, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.08) or insulin (HR=0.96, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.05) and mortality. Admissions for all causes did not differ with either insulin sensitizer. There was a higher risk of readmission for heart failure with thiazolidinedione treatment (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.09) and a lower risk with metformin treatment (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.99). Conclusions— This observational study suggests that thiazolidinediones and metformin are not associated with increased mortality and may improve outcomes in older patients with diabetes and heart failure. Randomized trials are warranted to corroborate these findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000154542.13412.b1

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concerns regarding lactic acidosis with metformin have not been substantiated.

    “Concerns regarding lactic acidosis have not been substantiated.558,559”
  • Several retrospective studies in patients with congestive heart failure and diabetes reported lower risk of death from any cause, lower hospital readmissions for congestive heart failure, and hospitalizations for any cause.

    “Several retrospective studies in patients with CHF and diabetes reported lower risk of death from any cause [81-83], lower hospital readmissions for CHF [81], and hospitalizations for any cause [81,82].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masoudi, F. A., Inzucchi, S. E., Wang, Y., Havranek, E. P., Foody, J. M., & Krumholz, H. M.
Affiliations
Denver Health Medical Center (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2005-02-08
Volume
111
Issue
5
Pages
583-590
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2055769770
Cited by
458
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 23
FWCI
24.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Hartford Foundation for Public Giving
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (K08-AG20623, K08-AG01011, K08AG001011, K08AG020623)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
thiazolidinediones, metformin, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, insulin-sensitizing drugs, mortality, heart failure readmission, older adults, sulfonylureas, insulin therapy, antidiabetic drug safety, Medicare beneficiaries, FDA warning, hospital discharge outcomes
MeSH terms
Contraindications, Aged, Cardiac Output, Low, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Angiopathies, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Metformin, Patient Readmission, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Thiazolidinediones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review