Cited by 225Diabetes Management and ResearchFood composition and propertiesDiabetes Treatment and Management

The use of low-glycaemic index diets in diabetes control

Open access
Thomas, D. E., Elliott, E. J.·2010·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

The aim of diabetes management is to normalise blood glucose levels since improved blood glucose control is associated with fewer complications. Food affects blood glucose levels; however, there is no universal approach to the optimal diabetic diet and there is controversy about the usefulness of the low-glycaemic index (GI) diet. To assess the effects of low-GI diets on glycaemic control in diabetes, we conducted electronic searches of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. We assessed randomised controlled trials (RCT) with interventions >4 weeks that compared a low-GI diet with a higher-GI diet for type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Twelve RCT (n 612) were identified. There was a significant decrease in glycated Hb (HbA1c) with low-GI diet than with the control diet, indicating improved glycaemic control (seven trials,n 457, weighted mean difference (WMD) − 0·4 % HbA1c, 95 % CI − 0·7, − 0·20,P = 0·001). In four studies reporting the results for glycaemic control as fructosamine, three of which were 6 weeks or less in duration, pooled data showed a decrease in fructosamine (WMD − 0·23 mmol/l, 95 % CI − 0·47, 0·00,P = 0·05),n 141, with low-GI diet than with high-GI diet. Glycosylated albumin levels decreased significantly with low-GI diet, but not with high-GI diet, in one study that reported this outcome. Lowering the GI of the diet may contribute to improved glycaemic control in diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114510001534

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, or atherogenic dyslipidemia may benefit most from reducing refined carbohydrates and increasing proteins and vegetable fats.

    “Similarly, patients with diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, or atherogenic dyslipidemia may also benefit most from reducing refined carbohydrates and increasing proteins and vegetable fats.91-93”
  • Patients with diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, or atherogenic dyslipidemia may benefit most from reducing refined carbohydrates and increasing proteins and vegetable fats.

    “Similarly, patients with diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, or atherogenic dyslipidemia may also benefit most from reducing refined carbohydrates and increasing proteins and vegetable fats.91-93”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, D. E., & Elliott, E. J.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Thomas, D. E.
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2010-04-27
Volume
104
Issue
6
Pages
797-802
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2091101983
Cited by
225
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (457084)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
low glycemic index diet, glycemic control, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, HbA1c, fructosamine, glycated albumin, diabetic diet, blood glucose
MeSH terms
Albumins, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Fructosamine, Glycemic Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review