The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures
Open accessAbstract
Meta-analysis should be as carefully planned as any other research project, with a detailed written protocol being prepared in advance.The a priori definition of eligibility criteria for studies to be included and a comprehensive search for such studies are central to high quality meta-analysis.The graphical display of results from individual studies on a common scale is an important intermediate step, which allows a visual examination of the degree of heterogeneity between studiesDifferent statistical methods exist for combining the data, but there is no single ''correct'' method.A thorough sensitivity analysis is essential to assess the robustness of combined estimates to different assumptions and inclusion criteria.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Only one (1%) of the 93 included articles addressed all key items [29]”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Sixteen articles (17%) provided recommendations on the key item “protocol development” (Table 3), [29–44] with publication dates between 1994 and 2015 (median year of publication 2009).”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“The articles recommended that the protocol should state the objectives, hypotheses to be tested and the rationale of the review, [29] and that it should describe eligibility criteria [29, 33, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41], define the type of studies to be included [35, 37, 42, 44], and give the reason when including observational studies in the review [35, 37, 40].”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Twenty articles (22%) gave recommendations on the key item “research question” [29, 30, 35, 36, 38–43, 45–54], with publication dates between 1997 and 2015 (median year of publication 2009).”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Nine articles (10%) made recommendations on how to perform data extraction [29, 33–35, 38, 43, 47, 48, 74], with publication dates between 1995 and 2016 (median year of publication 2009).”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“The majority of articles discussed aspects general to systematic reviews including advantages and limitations of different literature sources and databases, search tools, the importance of identifying unpublished studies, literature searching techniques including how to build a search string and reporting [12, 29, 33–36, 46, 48, 50, 51, 53, 54, 57, 59–62, 67, 68].”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Twenty-two articles (24%) provided recommendations on the key item “study eligibility”, [12, 29, 30, 33, 34, 37–39, 41–43, 46–48, 54, 55, 61, 65, 70–73] with publication dates between 1995 and 2016 (median year of publication 2009).”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Thirty-three articles (35%) made recommendations about the key item “search strategy” [12, 29, 30, 33–36, 38, 39, 43, 46–51, 53–69], with publication dates between 1995 and 2016 (median year of publication 2007).”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Five articles gave recommendations about how to assess eligibility: it should be blind [29, 30, 46], independent [29, 33, 46, 48], and performed by two reviewers [29, 30, 33, 48].”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Most articles considered the combination of RCTs and non-randomised designs [29, 35, 38, 39, 49, 51, 56, 61, 75, 81].”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Several articles recommended that the data should be extracted by two independent reviewers to avoid errors [29, 33], or that blinding those assessing methodological quality to the names of the authors, their institutions and the names of journals would lead to more consistent extraction [29, 34].”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Twenty-five (27%) articles gave recommendations on item “considering different study designs” [8, 29, 34, 35, 37–39, 42, 44, 49, 51, 56, 61, 65, 70, 73, 75, 76, 77–83], with publication dates between 1995 and 2016 (median year of publication 2007).”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Recommendations were made mainly on 2 topics: whether different study designs should be included in a systematic review; [29, 34, 37–39, 49, 56, 65, 73, 75] and whether different study designs should be analysed together in a single meta-analysis [8, 34, 35, 37, 38, 42, 49, 51, 56, 61, 70, 75–78].”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“It was generally accepted that data extraction should be performed using a standardised form [29] to avoid omissions [74].”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“One article recommended neither including different study designs in systematic reviews nor combining their results in meta-analyses [29].”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Twenty (22%) articles reported on item “publication bias” [16, 29, 33, 34, 36, 46, 48–50, 55, 56, 61, 70, 78, 85, 95–99], with publication dates between 1994 and 2012 (median year of publication 2001).”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Thirty-nine articles (42%) made recommendations on the assessment of quality and risk of bias of individual studies, [12, 16, 29, 30, 32–35, 37, 38, 43, 47–50, 52–54, 56, 64–66, 70, 71, 73, 75, 77, 82, 84–94] with publication dates between 1994 and 2016 (median year of publication 2009).”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“The majority of articles advised against the use of scales but 12 articles recommended their use [29, 30, 48–50, 52, 53, 56, 66, 77, 86, 91].”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“One common recommendation was to explore heterogeneity in sensitivity analyses, comparing studies stratified by design or clinical features [12, 16, 29, 34, 39, 51, 55, 56, 66, 77, 85, 100, 102].”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Thirty-nine articles (42%) provided recommendations on heterogeneity and its assessment, [8, 12, 16, 29, 30, 33, 34, 36, 38, 39, 41–44, 47, 49–52, 54–56, 61, 66, 70, 72, 77, 82, 85, 87, 98, 100–107] with publication dates between 1994 and 2016 (median year of publication 2006).”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Fifty-two articles (56%), provided recommendations on the statistical analysis in the context of meta-analysis of observational studies [8, 12, 16, 29–31, 33–36, 38, 41–44, 47, 48, 52, 54–56, 61, 66, 70, 72, 73, 77, 79–83, 85, 87, 96, 100, 101, 103–105, 107–118], with publication dates between 1994 and 2016 (median year of publication 2006).”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Only one article, published in 1997, addressed each of the 10 methodological aspects we examined [29].”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Second, the use of a random-effects model for meta-analysis of observational studies by default was frequently recommended [8, 16, 29, 34, 70, 77, 100, 101].”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Although many authoritative articles providing sound advice exist, such as those included in this review by Greenland [85], Egger et al. [29, 97], and a series in Research Synthesis Methods [37, 40, 65, 71, 75], the inexperienced reviewer may find them difficult to identify among the many other papers with contradictory advice.”
From Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Visual inspection of funnel plots and Egger's tests were used to estimate publication bias [34].”
From Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in patients with mental disorders and comorbid insomnia: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“The presence of publication bias, when there were 3 or more independent estimates available, was assessed by visual inspection of the funnel plot of the meta-analyses and by using Egger's test (p b 0.05) (Egger, Smith, & Phillips, 1997).”
From Early risk and protective factors for problem gambling: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies (2017) · cites this paper as Egger, Smith, & Phillips, 1997
Citations
Cites
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Self-citationMeta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 · Cited by 17,582
Schulz (1995) · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520290060030 · Cited by 5,634
Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trials
Yusuf, S., Peto, R., Lewis, J., Collins, R., & Sleight, P. (1985) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/s0033-0620(85)80003-7 · Cited by 3,205
Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials: The CONSORT Statement
Begg, C. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030 · Cited by 3,127
Publication bias in clinical research
Easterbrook, P. J., Gopalan, R., Berlin, J. A., & Matthews, D. R. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-y · Cited by 3,109
Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews
Dickersin, K., Scherer, R. W., & Lefebvre, C. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1286 · Cited by 2,255
An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment
Laupacis, A., Sackett, D. L., & Roberts, R. S. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198806303182605 · Cited by 1,681
Risk Stratification and Survival after Myocardial Infarction
The Multicenter Postinfarction Research Group (1983) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198308113090602 · Cited by 1,599
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Huque, 1988, Experiences with meta-analysis in NDA submissions., Proceedings of the Biopharmaceutical Section of the American Statistical Association, 2, 28
- Dickersin, 1985, Perusing the literature: comparison of Medline searching with a perinatal clinical trial data base., Controlled Clinical Trials, 6, 306, 10.1016/0197-2456(85)90106-0 · DOI
- The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. In: Cochrane Library. CD ROM and online. Cochrane Collaboration (issue 1). Oxford: Update Software,1997.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Self-citationArcelus, J., Mitchell, A. J., Wales, J., & Nielsen, S. (2011) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.74 · Cited by 2,864
Associations of depression with C-reactive protein, IL-1, and IL-6: a meta-analysis.
Howren, M. B., Lamkin, D. M., & Suls, J. (2009) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e3181907c1b · Cited by 2,766
Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009 · Cited by 2,394
Taylor, R. S., Brown, A., Ebrahim, S., Jolliffe, J., Noorani, H., Rees, K., Skidmore, B., Stone, J. A., Thompson, D. R., & Oldridge, N. (2004) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.009 · Cited by 2,239
de Morton, N. A. (2009) · Australian Journal of Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70043-1 · Cited by 2,201
Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade
Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006) · Journal of Chiropractic Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0899-3467(07)60142-6 · Cited by 2,224
A Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Schizophrenia
Saha, S., Chant, D., Welham, J., & McGrath, J. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020141 · Cited by 2,168
Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, J., Hsu, R., Katbamna, S., Olsen, R., Smith, L., et al. (2006) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-35 · Cited by 2,289
Morley, S., Eccleston, C., & Williams, A. (1999) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00255-3 · Cited by 1,597
Estimation of the burden of active and life-time epilepsy: a meta-analytic approach
Ngugi, A. K., Bottomley, C., Kleinschmidt, I., Sander, J. W., & Newton, C. R. (2010) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02481.x · Cited by 1,447
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of incident cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis
Targher, G., Byrne, C. D., Lonardo, A., Zoppini, G., & Barbui, C. (2016) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2016.05.013 · Cited by 1,429
Hilgen, F. J., Lourens, L. J., Dam, J., Beu, A. G., Boyes, A. F., Cooper, R. A., Krijgsman, W., Ogg, J. G., Piller, W. E., & Wilson, D. S. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-59425-9.00029-9 · Cited by 1,428
meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61 · Cited by 1,374
Self-citationInsomnia as a predictor of mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hertenstein, E., Feige, B., Gmeiner, T., Kienzler, C., Spiegelhalder, K., Johann, A., Jansson-Fröjmark, M., Palagini, L., Rücker, G., Riemann, D., et al. (2019) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2018.10.006 · Cited by 1,201
Obstetric Complications and Schizophrenia: Historical and Meta-Analytic Review
Cannon, M. D., Jones, P. B., & Murray, R. M. (2002) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.7.1080 · Cited by 1,190
Bujold, E., Roberge, S., Lacasse, Y., Bureau, M., Audibert, F., Marcoux, S., Forest, J., & Giguère, Y. (2010) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181e9322a · Cited by 1,112
Conceptual and technical challenges in network meta-analysis
Cipriani, A., Higgins, J. P. T., Geddes, J. R., & Salanti, G. (2013) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-159-2-201307160-00008 · Cited by 1,072
van Melle, J. P., de Jonge, P., Spijkerman, T. A., Tijssen, J. G. P., Ormel, J., van Veldhuisen, D. J., van den Brink, R. H. S., & van den Berg, M. P. (2004) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000146294.82810.9c · Cited by 1,034
Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies
Egger, M., Schneider, M., & Smith, G. D. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7125.140 · Cited by 997
Self-citationBrunoni, A. R., Lopes, M., & Fregni, F. (2008) · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1017/s1461145708009309 · Cited by 972
Zhao, Q.-F., Tan, L., Wang, H.-F., Jiang, T., Tan, M.-S., Tan, L., Xu, W., Li, J.-Q., Wang, J., Lai, T.-J., et al. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.069 · Cited by 916
Interatrial septal abnormalities and stroke
Overell, J. R., Bone, I., & Lees, K. R. (2000) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.55.8.1172 · Cited by 937
Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M., & Donovan, J. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00064-3 · Cited by 921
McFarland, L. V. (2006) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00465.x · Cited by 872
Wright, J., Gundry, S., & Conroy, R. M. (2004) · Tropical Medicine & International Health · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01160.x · Cited by 881
Recognition of Emotions in Autism: A Formal Meta-Analysis
Uljarevic, M., & Hamilton, A. (2013) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1695-5 · Cited by 824
Davies, R., Myles, P. S., & Graham, J. M. (2006) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/ael020 · Cited by 786
Meta‐analysis of early nonmotor features and risk factors for Parkinson disease
Noyce, A. J., Bestwick, J. P., Silveira‐Moriyama, L., Hawkes, C. H., Giovannoni, G., Lees, A. J., & Schrag, A. E. (2012) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.23687 · Cited by 834
Yap, M. B. H., Pilkington, P. D., Ryan, S., & Jorm, A. F. (2013) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.11.007 · Cited by 848
Wahid, A., Manek, N., Nichols, M., Kelly, P., Foster, C., Webster, P., Kaur, A., Friedemann Smith, C., Wilkins, E., Rayner, M., et al. (2016) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.115.002495 · Cited by 715
Baral, S., Sifakis, F., Cleghorn, F. R., & Beyrer, C. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040339 · Cited by 732
Sjöström, C. D., Lissner, L., Wedel, H., & Sjöström, L. (1999) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1002/j.1550-8528.1999.tb00436.x · Cited by 685
Meta‐Analysis in Medical Research
Haidich, A. (2005) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470994894 · Cited by 692
Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants
Goodacre, C. J., Kan, J. Y. K., & Rungcharassaeng, K. (1999) · Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70208-8 · Cited by 674
Weiss, H. A., QUIGLEY, M. A., & Hayes, R. (2000) · AIDS · doi:10.1097/00002030-200010200-00018 · Cited by 669
Meta-analysis: Potentials and promise
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7119.1371 · Cited by 646
Self-citationBias in clinical intervention research.
Gluud, L. L. (2006) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwj069 · Cited by 636
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis
Mantovani, A., Byrne, C. D., Bonora, E., & Targher, G. (2018) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc17-1902 · Cited by 634
Verburgh, L., Königs, M., Scherder, E. J. A., & Oosterlaan, J. (2014) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2012-091441 · Cited by 617
Prioritizing GWAS Results: A Review of Statistical Methods and Recommendations for Their Application
Cantor, R. M., Lange, K. L., & Sinsheimer, J. S. (2010) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.11.017 · Cited by 638
Handwashing and risk of respiratory infections: a quantitative systematic review
Rabie, T., & Curtis, V. (2006) · Tropical Medicine & International Health · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01568.x · Cited by 556
Patel, V., Burns, J. K., Dhingra, M., Tarver, L., Kohrt, B. A., & Lund, C. (2018) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20492 · Cited by 582
Simmonds, M. C., Higgins, J. P. T., Stewart, L. A., Tierney, J. F., Clarke, M. J., & Thompson, S. G. (2005) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1191/1740774505cn087oa · Cited by 554
Systematic review and meta-analysis ofSaccharomyces boulardiiin adult patients
McFarland, L. V. (2010) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v16.i18.2202 · Cited by 611
Efficacy of ECT in Depression: A Meta-Analytic Review
Pagnin, D., de Queiroz, V., Pini, S., & Cassano, G. B. (2004) · Journal of Ect · doi:10.1097/00124509-200403000-00004 · Cited by 515
Is Low Birth Weight an Antecedent of CKD in Later Life? A Systematic Review of Observational Studies
White, S. L., Perkovic, V., Cass, A., Chang, C. L., Poulter, N. R., Spector, T. D., Haysom, L., Craig, J. C., Salmi, I. A., Chadban, S. J., et al. (2009) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.12.042 · Cited by 494
Burnout in university teaching staff: a systematic literature review
Watts, J., & Robertson, N. (2011) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00131881.2011.552235 · Cited by 560
Rusinamhodzi, L., Corbeels, M., van Wijk, M. T., Rufino, M. C., Nyamangara, J., & Giller, K. E. (2011) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0040-2 · Cited by 494
Mantovani, A., Petracca, G., Beatrice, G., Tilg, H., Byrne, C. D., & Targher, G. (2021) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322572 · Cited by 481
Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for internal jugular vein catheterization
Brass, P., Hellmich, M., Kolodziej, L., Schick, G., & Smith, A. F. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006962.pub2 · Cited by 476
Acetylcysteine for prevention of contrast nephropathy: meta-analysis
Birck, R., Krzossok, S., Markowetz, F. M., Schnülle, P., van der Woude, F. J., & Braun, C. M. J. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14189-x · Cited by 476
Aspirin for the Chemoprevention of Colorectal Adenomas: Meta-analysis of the Randomized Trials
Cole, B. F., Logan, R. F., Halabi, S., Benamouzig, R., Sandler, R. S., Grainge, M. J., Chaussade, S., & Baron, J. A. (2009) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djn485 · Cited by 473
Quantitative Research: A Successful Investigation in Natural and Social Sciences
Mohajan, H. K. (2020) · Journal of Economic Development Environment and People · doi:10.26458/jedep.v9i4.679 · Cited by 793
Friedrich, J. O., Adhikari, N. K. J., & Beyene, J. (2007) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-7-5 · Cited by 460
Understanding randomised controlled trials
Akobeng, A. K. (2005) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.2004.058222 · Cited by 458
White matter hyperintensities in late life depression: a systematic review
Herrmann, L. L., Le Masurier, M., & Ebmeier, K. P. (2007) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.124651 · Cited by 456
Intraocular Pressure–Lowering Effects of All Commonly Used Glaucoma Drugs
van der Valk, R., Webers, C. A. B., Schouten, J., Zeegers, M. P., Hendrikse, F., & Prins, M. H. (2005) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.01.042 · Cited by 448
Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis
Wajon, A., Vinycomb, T., Carr, E., Edmunds, I. A., & Ada, L. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004631.pub4 · Cited by 447
RetractedHow to write a systematic review
Wright, R. W., Brand, R. A., Dunn, W., & Spindler, K. P. (2007) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/blo.0b013e31802c9098 · Cited by 606
Dowling, N. A., Merkouris, S. S., Greenwood, C. J., Oldenhof, E., Toumbourou, J. W., & Youssef, G. J. (2017) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.008 · Cited by 439
Gaudiano, B. A., & Herbert, J. D. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.02.007 · Cited by 435
Mueller, M., D’Addario, M., Egger, M., Cevallos, M., Dekkers, O., Mugglin, C., & Scott, P. (2018) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0495-9 · Cited by 400
Self-citationDietary Fiber and Blood Pressure
Streppel, M. T. (2005) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.165.2.150 · Cited by 436
Natural history of untreated otitis media
Rosenfeld, R. M., & Kay, D. (2003) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1097/00005537-200310000-00004 · Cited by 428
Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression
Baker, W. L., Michael White, C., Cappelleri, J. C., Kluger, J., Coleman, C. I., & From the Health Outcomes, P. (2009) · International Journal of Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02168.x · Cited by 492
Hill, A. T., Fitzgerald, P. B., & Hoy, K. E. (2015) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2015.10.006 · Cited by 446
Weir, C. J., Butcher, I., Assi, V., Lewis, S. C., Murray, G. D., Langhorne, P., & Brady, M. (2018) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0483-0 · Cited by 437
Yap, M. B. H., & Jorm, A. F. (2015) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.050 · Cited by 474
Duncan, M. J., Spence, J. C., & Mummery, W. K. (2005) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-2-11 · Cited by 413
Does gratitude enhance prosociality?: A meta-analytic review.
Lawrence, K., Tunney, R. J., & Ferguson, E. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000103 · Cited by 458
Principles of evidence based medicine
Akobeng, A. K. (2005) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.2005.071761 · Cited by 415
Meta-analysis of probiotics for the prevention of traveler's diarrhea
McFarland, L. V. (2005) · Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease · doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2005.10.003 · Cited by 412
Uterine adenomyosis and in vitro fertilization outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Vercellini, P., Consonni, D., Dridi, D., Bracco, B., Frattaruolo, M. P., & Somigliana, E. (2014) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deu041 · Cited by 411
Cytokines in bipolar disorder vs. healthy control subjects: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Munkholm, K., Braüner, J. V., Kessing, L. V., & Vinberg, M. (2013) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.05.018 · Cited by 402
GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology
Efthimiou, O., Debray, T. P. A., van Valkenhoef, G., Trelle, S., Panayidou, K., Moons, K. G. M., Reitsma, J. B., Shang, A., Salanti, G., & on behalf of GetReal Methods Review Group (2016) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1195 · Cited by 401
Mantovani, A., Petracca, G., Beatrice, G., Csermely, A., Lonardo, A., Schattenberg, J. M., Tilg, H., Byrne, C. D., & Targher, G. (2022) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323082 · Cited by 402
Neuropsychiatric Syndromes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Meta-Analysis
Unterman, A., Nolte, J. E. S., Boaz, M., Abady, M., Shoenfeld, Y., & Zandman‐Goddard, G. (2010) · Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism · doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2010.08.001 · Cited by 394
Hertenstein, E., Trinca, E., Wunderlin, M., Schneider, C. L., Züst, M. A., Fehér, K. D., Su, T., Straten, A. V., Berger, T., Baglioni, C., et al. (2022) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2022.101597 · Cited by 391
A Systematic Review of Treatment Modalities for Primary Basal Cell Carcinomas
Thissen, M. R. T. M., NEUMANN, M. H. A. M., & Schouten, L. J. (1999) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.135.10.1177 · Cited by 385
Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions to Reduce Suicide Behavior: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Tarrier, N., Taylor, K., & Gooding, P. (2008) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445507304728 · Cited by 384
Systematic Evaluation and Comparison of Statistical Tests for Publication Bias
Hayashino, Y., Noguchi, Y., & Fukui, T. (2005) · Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.2188/jea.15.235 · Cited by 379
Diabetes and breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis
Boyle, P., Boniol, M., Koechlin, A., Robertson, C., Valentini, F., Coppens, K., Fairley, L.-L., Boniol, M., Zheng, T., Zhang, Y., et al. (2012) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.414 · Cited by 358
Corticosteroid use in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis on clinical outcomes
van Paassen, J., Vos, J. S., Hoekstra, E. M., Neumann, K. M. I., Boot, P. C., & Arbous, M. S. (2020) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-020-03400-9 · Cited by 388
Cairns, K. E., Yap, M. B. H., Pilkington, P. D., & Jorm, A. F. (2014) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.006 · Cited by 363
Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia
Shi, Z., Xie, H., Wang, P., Zhang, Q., Wu, X., Chen, E., Ng, L., Worthington, H. V., Needleman, I. G., & Furness, S. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008367.pub2 · Cited by 390
Meta-analysis to assess risk factors for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection
Garey, K. W., Sethi, S., Yadav, Y., & DuPont, H. L. (2008) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2008.08.012 · Cited by 375
Nadeem, S. M., Zahir, Z. A., Naveed, M., & Arshad, M. (2007) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/w07-081 · Cited by 369
Lamanna, C., Monami, M., Marchionni, N., & Mannucci, E. (2010) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01349.x · Cited by 369
Cardi, V., Leppanen, J., & Treasure, J. (2015) · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.011 · Cited by 312
Complications in Head and Neck Surgery
Paydarfar, J. A., & Birkmeyer, N. J. O. (2006) · Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/archotol.132.1.67 · Cited by 348
Pierdomenico, S., & Cuccurullo, F. (2011) · American Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1038/ajh.2010.203 · Cited by 314
Mantovani, A., Zaza, G., Byrne, C. D., Lonardo, A., Zoppini, G., Bonora, E., & Targher, G. (2017) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2017.11.003 · Cited by 348
Blood serotonin levels in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Gabriele, S., Sacco, R., & Persico, A. M. (2014) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.02.004 · Cited by 346
Fowkes, F. J. I., Richards, J. S., Simpson, J. A., & Beeson, J. G. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000218 · Cited by 345
Meta-analysis of probiotics for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome
McFarland, L. V., & Dublin, S. (2008) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.14.2650 · Cited by 341
Effects of increased soil nitrogen on the dominance of alien annual plants in the Mojave Desert
Brooks, M. L. (2003) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00789.x · Cited by 343
Soomro, G. M., Altman, D. G., Rajagopal, S., & Oakley Browne, M. (2008) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001765.pub3 · Cited by 342
Chen, Y., Jobanputra, P., Barton, P. M., Bryan, S., Fry-Smith, A., Harris, G., & Taylor, R. (2008) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta12110 · Cited by 343
Cognitive deficits in individuals with methamphetamine use disorder: A meta-analysis
Potvin, S., Pelletier, J., Grot, S., Hébert, C., Barr, A. M., & Lecomte, T. (2018) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.01.021 · Cited by 368
Metadata
- Authors
- Egger, M., Smith, G. D., & Phillips, A. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1997-12-06
- Volume
- 315
- Issue
- 7121
- Pages
- 1533-1537
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- PMC
- PMC2127925
- OpenAlex
- W2155132414
- Cited by
- 2,415
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 104 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 95 · 2015: 116 · 2014: 116 · 2013: 136 · 2012: 125
- FWCI
- 41.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Keywords
- meta-analysis methodology, eligibility criteria, literature searching, study heterogeneity, forest plots, sensitivity analysis
- MeSH terms
- Meta-Analysis as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
