Cited by 402Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of incident chronic kidney disease: an updated meta-analysis

Open access
Mantovani, Alessandro, Petracca, Graziana, Beatrice, Giorgia, Csermely, Alessandro, Lonardo, Amedeo, Schattenberg, Jörn M, Tilg, Herbert, Byrne, Christopher D +1 more·2022·Gut

Abstract

Objective Studies reported a significant association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and increased risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, whether this risk changes with increasing severity of NAFLD remains uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis of observational studies to quantify the magnitude of the association between NAFLD and risk of incident CKD. Design We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus from January 2000 to August 2020 using predefined keywords to identify observational studies with a follow-up duration of ≥1 year, in which NAFLD was diagnosed by blood biomarkers/scores, International Classification of Diseases codes, imaging techniques or biopsy. Data from selected studies were extracted, and meta-analysis was performed using random-effects modelling. Results 13 studies with 1 222 032 individuals (28.1% with NAFLD) and 33 840 cases of incident CKD stage ≥3 (defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , with or without accompanying overt proteinuria) over a median follow-up of 9.7 years were included. NAFLD was associated with a moderately increased risk of incident CKD (n=10 studies; random-effects HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.54; I 2 =60.7%). All risks were independent of age, sex, obesity, hypertension, diabetes and other conventional CKD risk factors. Sensitivity analyses did not alter these findings. Funnel plot did not reveal any significant publication bias. Conclusion This large and updated meta-analysis indicates that NAFLD is significantly associated with a~1.45-fold increased long-term risk of incident CKD stage ≥3. Further studies are needed to examine the association between the severity of NAFLD and risk of incident CKD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323082

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a large meta-analysis including 1,222,032 individuals, the risk of incident chronic kidney disease stage >=3 was 1.45-fold higher in individuals with MASLD, independent of demographic and CKD risk factors.

    “In a large meta-analysis including 1,222,032 individuals, the risk of incident chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage &gt; -3 was 1.45-fold higher in individuals with MASLD, independent of demographic and CKD risk factors. 226”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [226]

    The Discussion reports 1,222,032 participants and an approximately 1.45-fold higher risk of incident CKD stage ≥3; the 'NAFLD increases risk of CKD' section gives the pooled adjusted HR as 1.43. The paper studied NAFLD, not MASLD, and the pooled risk estimate came from 1,215,872 participants rather than all 1,222,032. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008-2012.
  2. Sinn DH, Kang D, Jang HR, Gu S, Cho SJ, Paik SW, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and development of chronic kidney disease: a cohort study. J Hepatol 2017;67:1274- 1280.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mantovani, A., Petracca, G., Beatrice, G., Csermely, A., Lonardo, A., Schattenberg, J. M., Tilg, H., Byrne, C. D., & Targher, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Targher, Giovanni
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-12-10
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
156-162
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W3111270904
Cited by
402
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, chronic kidney disease, incident CKD risk, estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, NAFLD severity, CKD risk factors
MeSH terms
Humans, Risk Assessment, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Observational Studies as Topic, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review