Cited by 102Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Barriers to referral in patients with angina: qualitative study Commentary: Generalisability and validity in qualitative research

Open access
Gardner, K., Chapple, A., Green, J.·1999·BMJ

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: To explore barriers to patients being referred for possible revascularisation. Design: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Participants: 16 patients aged under 75 years with stable angina and their doctors. Setting: General practice in Toxteth, Liverpool. Results: Fear of both hospitals and medical tests was common and largely hidden from the doctors. Patients felt they were old, had low expectations of treatment, viewed angina as a chronic illness, and knew little about new developments in angina treatment. Patients and doctors had difficulty in recognising angina symptoms that were not textbook definitions amid multiple comorbidity. Patients saw doctors as busy and did not want to bother them with their condition. Cultural gaps and communication difficulties existed despite all but one patient having English as their first language. Conclusions: Listening to patients is vital to address inequitable access to health services: how patients are treated by doctors today affects acceptability of referral tomorrow. Primary care groups in deprived areas should work with communities to address local fears. This will involve collaboration between primary, secondary, and tertiary care Cultural gaps exist between patients and doctors in deprived areas, and diagnostic confusion can occur particularly in the presence of other psychological and physical morbidity. Adequate time and resources—for example, education for doctors and patients and provision of interpreters—need to be provided if inequitable access to revascularisation procedures is to be addressed. Key messages In different communities and patient groups different myths and fears operate and need to be addressed, as experiences of hospital can profoundly affect patients9 confidence Patients in deprived areas with high mortality rates perceive themselves as “old” at a young age, and expectations of treatment are limited Angina symptoms in inner city primary care may not be the same as those in a textbook, and this has implications for care of patients Cultural gaps exist even between committed doctors and their patients in deprived areas—time and resources are needed to address these gaps Qualitative studies are necessary to understand quantitative evidence of inequitable access to specialist health services

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.319.7207.418

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]Forrest D. Heart disease prevention and management in Liverpool. Liverpool: Liverpool Health Authority; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  2. [12]Tesch R. Analysis types and software tools. Basingstoke: Falmer; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  3. [15]Morse JM. Qualitative generalizability. Qual Health Res. 1999;9:5–6. [Google Scholar]
  4. BMJ. 1999 Aug 14;319(7207):418–421.
  5. 1-1.Silverman D. The quality of qualitative health research: the open ended interview and its alternatives. Soc Sci Health. 1998;4:104–118. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gardner, K., Chapple, A., & Green, J.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Gardner, K.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1999-08-14
Volume
319
Issue
7207
Pages
418-421
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2159635031
Cited by
102
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
stable angina, referral barriers, revascularization, general practice, patient-physician communication, cultural barriers, underserved areas, comorbidities, patient expectations, interpreters, qualitative research validity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Angina Pectoris, Attitude to Health, Culture, Family Practice, United Kingdom, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Referral and Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review