Cited by 96Health Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionPrimary Care and Health OutcomesPublic Health and Social Inequalities

Barriers to uptake of services for coronary heart disease: qualitative study

Open access
Tod, Angela M, Read, Cathy, Lacey, Anne, Abbott, Jo·2001·BMJ

Abstract

Objectives: To identify factors within the South Yorkshire coalfields that influence use of health services by people with angina. Design: Qualitative study using semistructured individual and group interviews. Setting: General practice and community settings in Barnsley and Rotherham health authorities. Participants: 14 patients with stable angina and nine primary care staff had individual interviews plus five community groups and one group of general practitioners. Main outcome measures: Barriers to accessing health services. Results: A complex web of factors was identified that prevented, delayed, or facilitated referral to secondary care. Delay, denial, and self management by patients meant that the full extent of symptoms often remained hidden from general practitioners, resulting in a delayed or missed referral. Barriers identified fell into six categories: structural, personal, social and cultural, past experience and expectations, diagnostic confusion, and knowledge and awareness. Conclusions: Many of the factors influencing referral operate before general practitioners become involved. Community development could be one way of tackling inequalities and promoting sustainable change. Structural changes are needed to improve access and increase the acceptability of general practice services. Primary care staff should be educated to detect underreporting of symptoms and promote appropriate referral. What is already known on this topic: An inverse correlation has been shown between deprivation and cardiac revascularisation Fear of hospitals, denial of ill health, and low expectations may prevent people with angina accessing health services What this study adds: Fear, denial, and low expectations were important barriers to accessing health services, reinforcing earlier findings Other factors may be specific to the study population—for example, coping, independence, and attributing symptoms to industrially related lung disease Many of the barriers operate before general practitioners are involved, making it difficult to identify solutions

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.323.7306.214

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Gordon D, Shaw M, Dorling D, Davey Smith G. Inequalities in health: the evidence. Bristol: Policy Press, 2000.
  2. Gardner K, Chapple A. Barriers to referral in patients with angina: quali- tative study. BMJ 1999;319:418-22.
  3. Ruston A, Clayton J, Calnan M. Patients' action during their cardiac event: qualitative study exploring differences and modifiable factors. BMJ 1998;316:1060-5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tod, A. M., Read, C., Lacey, A., & Abbott, J.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Tod, Angela M
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2001-07-28
Volume
323
Issue
7306
Pages
214.1
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2015018872
Cited by
96
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
coronary artery disease, stable angina, barriers to care, secondary care referral, late referral, symptom underreporting, fear of hospitals, denial of illness, patient expectations, diagnostic confusion, health disparities, coalfield communities, primary care, community development, South Yorkshire
MeSH terms
Aged, Angina Pectoris, Anxiety, England, Fear, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychosocial Deprivation, Referral and Consultation, Self Care, Social Class

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review