The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of restrictions on smoking at home, at school, and in public places on teenage smoking: cross sectional study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relation between extent of restrictions on smoking at home, at school, and in public places and smoking uptake and smoking prevalence among school students. DESIGN: Cross sectional survey with merged records of extent of restrictions on smoking in public places. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: 17 287 high school students. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Five point scale of smoking uptake; 30 day smoking prevalence. RESULTS: More restrictive arrangements on smoking at home were associated with a greater likelihood of being in an earlier stage of smoking uptake (P<0.05) and a lower 30 day prevalence (odds ratio 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.91), P<0.001). These findings applied even when parents were smokers. More pervasive restrictions on smoking in public places were associated with a higher probability of being in a earlier stage of smoking uptake (P<0.05) and lower 30 day prevalence (0.91 (0.83 to 0.99), P=0.03). School smoking bans were related to a greater likelihood of being in an earlier stage of smoking uptake (0.89 (0.85 to 0.99), P<0.05) and lower prevalence (0. 86 (0.77 to 0.94), P<0.001) only when the ban was strongly enforced, as measured by instances when teenagers perceived that most or all students obeyed the rule. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that restrictions on smoking at home, more extensive bans on smoking in public places, and enforced bans on smoking at school may reduce teenage smoking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In contrast to studies assessing the presence of anti-tobacco policies, cross-sectional observational studies evaluating the level of enforcement of these policies more consistently found links between stronger enforcement and lower rates of smoking among students.”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [452]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The rand 36‐item health survey 1.0
Hays, R. D., Sherbourne, C. D., & Mazel, R. M. (1993) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.4730020305 · Cited by 2,971
DiClemente, C. C., Prochaska, J. O., Fairhurst, S., Velicer, W. F., Velasquez, M. M., & Rossi, J. S. (1991) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.59.2.295 · Cited by 2,402
DiClemente, C. C., Prochaska, J. O., Fairhurst, S., et al. (1991) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.59.2.295 · Cited by 1,838
Pierce, J. P., Choi, W. S., Gilpin, E. A., Farkas, A. J., & Merritt, R. K. (1996) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.15.5.355 · Cited by 1,065
A Multicommunity Trial for Primary Prevention of Adolescent Drug Abuse
Pentz, M. A. (1989) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.261.22.3259 · Cited by 629
The effects of excise taxes and regulations on cigarette smoking
Wasserman, J., Manning, W. G., Newhouse, J. P., & Winkler, J. D. (1991) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/0167-6296(91)90016-g · Cited by 479
Nicotine Addiction: Principles and Management
(1993) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195064414.001.0001 · Cited by 290
Price, Tobacco Control Policies and Youth Smoking
Chaloupka, F. J., & Grossman, M. B. (1996) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w5740 · Cited by 281
The effects of household and workplace smoking restrictions on quitting behaviours
Farkas, A. J., Gilpin, E. A., Distefan, J. M., & Pierce, J. P. (1999) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.8.3.261 · Cited by 259
Chapman, S. F., Borland, R., Scollo, M., Brownson, R. C., Dominello, A., & Woodward, S. D. (1999) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.89.7.1018 · Cited by 230
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Doll R, Peto R, Wheatley K, Gray R, Sutherland I. Mortality in relation to smoking: 40 years' observation on male British doctors. BMJ 1994;309:901-11.
- Glasgow R, Klesges R, Klesges L, Vasey M, Gunnarson D. Long-term effects of a controlled smoking program: a two and a half year follow-up. Behav Ther 1985;16:303-7.
- Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The Fagerström test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the Fagerström tolerance questionnaire. Br J Addiction 1991;86:1119-27.
- Hocking B, Borland R, Owen N. A total ban is acceptable and effective. J Occup Med 1991;33:163-7.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vandenbroucke, J. P., von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., Egger, M., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297 · Cited by 8,613
“Issues that may be examined include the criteria for inclusion in analyses, the definitions of exposures or outcomes [122], which confounding variables merit adjustment, the handling of missing data [120,123], possible selection bias or bias from inaccurate or inconsistent measurement of exposure, disease and other va…”
Vandenbroucke, J. P., Elm, E. V., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., Egger, M., & initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010-w1 · Cited by 3,543
Vandenbroucke, J. P., von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., & Egger, M. (2014) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.014 · Cited by 2,969
“Issues that may be examined include the criteria for inclusion in analyses, the definitions of exposures or outcomes [122], which confounding variables merit adjustment, the handling of missing data [120,123], possible selection bias or bias from inaccurate or inconsistent measurement of exposure, disease and other va…”
BackgroundVandenbroucke, J. P., von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., & Egger, M. (2007) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e3181577511 · Cited by 2,779
Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review
Fichtenberg, C. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7357.188 · Cited by 1,072
Metadata
- Authors
- Wakefield, M. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wakefield, M. A
- ORCID
- Wakefield, M. A
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-08-05
- Volume
- 321
- Issue
- 7257
- Pages
- 333-337
- ISSN
- 0959-8138 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC27448
- OpenAlex
- W1968649612
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 14.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › School Health and Nursing Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- adolescent smoking, smoking restrictions, smoking bans, school smoking bans, household smoking, smoking in public places, smoking prevalence, smoking uptake, parental smoking, adolescents
- MeSH terms
- Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Social Control Policies, Public Health, School Health Services, Smoking, Social Control, Informal, Social Environment, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, United States, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
