Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 903

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension

Open access
O'Brien, Eoin, Waeber, Bernard, Parati, Gianfranco, Staessen, Jan, Myers, Martin G·2001·BMJ
DOI 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.531
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

status: Published

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.531

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. O'Brien, 1993, The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices, J Hypertens, 11, S43
  2. O'Brien, 1998, Formation of the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension, Blood Press Monit, 3, 133
  3. 10.1097/00004872-199007000-00004 · DOI · Paper page
  4. O'Brien, 1994, A comparison of the BHS and AAMI protocols for validating blood pressure measuring devices: can the two be reconciled?, J Hypertens, 12, 1089
  5. 10.1161/01.HYP.26.5.835 · DOI · Paper page
  6. O'Brien, 1998, Automated blood pressure measurement: state of the market in 1998 and the need for an international validation protocol for blood pressure measuring devices, Blood Press Monit, 3, 205
  7. 10.1097/00004872-199007000-00005 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0140-6736(90)93177-Q · DOI
  9. 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000405 · DOI
  10. Lones, 2000, Are aneroid devices suitable replacements for mercury sphygmomanometers?, J Hum Hypertens, 14, 843
  11. 10.1136/bmj.285.6340.469 · DOI
  12. Anwar, 1997, Evaluation of the Datascope Accutorr Plus according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, Blood Press Monit, 2, 105
  13. Alpert, 1996, Validation of CAS model 9010 automated blood pressure monitor: children/adult and neonatal studies, Blood Press Monit, 1, 69
  14. Bobrie, 1999, Assessment of Tensionic Mod EPS 112 semi-automatic device of blood pressure measurement (Manufactured by Spengler - France) [Abstract], J Hypertens, 17, S22
  15. Zorn, 1997, Validation of an automated arterial tonometry monitor using Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards, Blood Press Monit, 2, 185
  16. 10.1097/00004872-199307000-00012 · doi:10.1097/00004872-199307000-00012
  17. O'Brien, 2000, Devices and validation, Blood Press Monit, 5, 93
  18. O'Brien, 1996, Evaluation of three devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the revised British Hypertension Society Protocol: the Omron HEM-705CP, Phillips HP5332, and Nissei DS-175, Blood Press Monit, 1, 55
  19. Foster, 1994, Accuracy of the Omron HEM 706 portable monitor for home measurement of blood pressure, J Hum Hypertens, 8, 661
  20. Walma, 1995, Accuracy of an oscillometric automatic blood pressure device: the Omron HEM403C, J Hum Hypertens, 9, 169
  21. Rithalia, 1994, Comparison of oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure and pulse measurement, J Med Eng Technol, 18, 179, 10.3109/03091909409030249 · DOI
  22. Artigao, 1998, Evaluation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the Britsih Hypertension Society protocol: the Omron M4 and MX2 [Abstract], Am J Hypertens, 16, S276
  23. Córdoba, 1997, Validation of a self-monitoring blood pressure monitor: the Omron-HM 722C, Aten Primaria, 20, 247
  24. 10.1097/00126097-199904010-00004 · DOI
  25. Mufunda, 1996, Comparison of the Omron HEM-713C automated blood pressure monitor with a standard auscultatory method using a mercury manometer, Cent Afr J Med, 42, 230
  26. Anwar, 1998, Evaluation of the efficacy of the Omron HEM-737 Intellisense device for use on adults according to the recommendations of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, Blood Press Monit, 3, 261
  27. Dieterle, 1998, Accuracy and ‘range of uncertainity’ of oscillometric blood pressure monitors around the upper arm and wrist, Blood Press Monit, 3, 339
  28. Eckert, 1997, Validation of the Omron R3 blood pressure self-measuring device through simultaneous comparative invasive measurements according to protocol 58130 of the German Institute for Validation, Blood Press Monit, 2, 189
  29. 10.1046/j.1440-1681.1999.03059.x · DOI
  30. Shennan, 1998, An accurate oscillometric wrist blood pressure monitor: validation of the Omron Rx [HEM-608], J Hum Hypertens, 12, 794
  31. Taylor, 1993, Accutracker II (version 30/23) ambulatory blood pressure monitor: clinical validationusing the British Hypertension Society and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards, J Hypertens, 11, 1275, 10.1097/00004872-199311000-00016 · DOI
  32. O'Brien, 1993, Accuracy of the CH- Druck/Pressure ERKA ambulatory blood pressure measuring system determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol, J Hypertens, 11, S1
  33. 10.1016/S0895-7061(96)00320-2 · doi:10.1016/s0895-7061(96)00320-2
  34. O'Brien, 1991, Accuracy of the Novacor DIASYS 200 determined by the British Hypertension Society Protocol, J Hypertens, 9, S9
  35. Kuwajima, 1998, The accuracy and clinical performance of a new compact ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device, the ES-H531, Am J Hypertens, 11, 1328, 10.1016/S0895-7061(98)00155-1 · DOI
  36. Manning, 1994, Technical and clinical evaluation of the Medilog ABP non-invasive blood pressure monitor, J Ambulatory Monitoring, 7, 255
  37. Barna, 1998, Evaluation of Meditech ABPM-04 ambulatory blood pressure measuring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, Blood Press Monit, 3, 363
  38. Mee, 1994, Validation of the Nissei DS-240 ambulatory blood pressure measuring system as determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol, J Hum Hypertens, 8, 295
  39. Germanó, 1998, Evaluation of a new ambulatory blood pressure device, Am J Hypertens, 11, 1486, 10.1016/S0895-7061(98)00147-2 · DOI
  40. 10.1097/00004872-199106000-00013 · doi:10.1097/00004872-199106000-00013
  41. O'Brien, 1993, Accuracy of the Profilomat ambulatory blood pressure measuring system determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol, J Hypertens, 11, S9
  42. Franx, 1997, Comparison of an auscultatory versus an oscillometric ambulatory blood pressure monitor in normotensive, hypertensive and preeclamptic pregnancy, Hypertens Pregnancy, 16, 187, 10.3109/10641959709031636 · DOI
  43. Mee, 1999, Evaluation of the Profilomat II ambulatory blood pressure system according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, Blood Press Monit, 3, 353
  44. 10.1093/ajh/7.6.509 · DOI
  45. O'Shea, 1994, Evaluation of the Tycos Quiet Trak ambulatory pressure recorder using British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol [Abstract], Am J Hypertens, 7, 118A
  46. 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70109-2 · DOI
  47. Penny, 1996, Validation of the Welch Allyn QuietTrak ambulatory blood pressure monitor in pregnancy, Hypertens Pregnancy, 15, 313, 10.3109/10641959609009592 · DOI
  48. Modesti, 1996, Clinical evaluation of the QuietTrak blood pressure recorder according to the protocol of the British Hypertension Society, Blood Press Monit, 1, 63
  49. De Gaudemaris, 1999, Evaluation du moniteur de pression artérielle en ambulatoire Save 33 modèle 2, Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss, 92, 1133
  50. Mee, 1999, Evaluation of the Shiller BR-102 ambulatory blood pressure system according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, Blood Press Monit, 4, 35, 10.1097/00126097-199904010-00006 · DOI
  51. O'Brien, 1991, Evaluation of the SpaceLabs 90202 according to the AAMI standard and BHS criteria, J Hum Hypertens, 5, 223
  52. O'Brien, 1991, Accuracy of the SpaceLabs 90207 determined by to the British Hypertension Society Protocol, J Hypertens, 9, S25
  53. O'Brien, 1993, Accuracy of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure measuring system in normotensive pregnant women determined by the British Hypertension Society Protocol, J Hypertens, 11, S282
  54. Shennan, 1993, Validation of the Spacelabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 100, 904, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15104.x · DOI
  55. Shennan, 1996, Oscillometric blood pressure measurements in severe preeclampsia: validation of the SpaceLabs 90207, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 103, 171, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09671.x · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09671.x
  56. Belsha, 1996, Accuracy of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitor in children and adolescents, Blood Press Monit, 1, 127
  57. Iqbal, 1996, Validation of the SpaceLabs 90207 automatic non-invasive blood pressure monitor in elderly subjects, Blood Press Monit, 1, 367
  58. Peixoto, 1999, Validation of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure device for hemodialysis patients, Blood Press Monit, 4, 217, 10.1097/00126097-199910000-00003 · doi:10.1097/00126097-199910000-00003
  59. Baumgart, 1998, Accuracy of the SpaceLabs Medical 90217 ambulatory blood pressure monitor, Blood Press Monit, 3, 303
  60. 10.1097/00004872-199106000-00015 · DOI
  61. 10.1093/ajh/4.11.890 · DOI
  62. Palatini, 1991, Validation of the accuracy of the A&D TM2420 Model 7 for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and effect of microphone replacement on its performance, J Ambul Monit, 4, 281
  63. 10.1093/ajh/5.10.719 · DOI
  64. O'Sullivan, 1998, Validation of the Takeda 2421 ambulatory blood pressure monitor in children, J Med Eng Technol, 22, 101, 10.3109/03091909809062474 · DOI
  65. Palatini, 1998, Validation of the A&D TM-2430 device for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and evaluation of performance according to subjects' characteristics, Blood Press Monit, 3, 255
  66. Omboni, 1997, Performance of the AM-5600 blood pressure monitor: comparison with ambulatory intra-arterial pressure, J Appl Physiol, 82, 698, 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.2.698 · DOI
  67. Omboni, 1998, Estimation of blood pressure variability from 24 hour ambulatory finger blood pressure, Hypertension, 32, 52, 10.1161/01.HYP.32.1.52 · DOI
  68. 10.1097/00004872-199602000-00014 · DOI
  69. Nara, 1996, Performance review of a noninvasive blood pressure monitor, Med Electron, 27, 63
  70. Ng, 1994, Survey of automated noninvasive blood pressure monitors, J Clin Eng, 19, 452, 10.1097/00004669-199403000-00012 · DOI
  71. 1995, Automated noninvasive blood pressure measurement, Intensive Care World, 12, 89
  72. O'Brien, 1997, Accuracy of the Dinamap portable monitor, model 8100: a review of the evidence for accuracy, Blood Press Monit, 2, 31
  73. 10.1016/0895-7061(95)00341-X · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1136/bmj.320.7242.1128 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1016/S0895-7061(99)00199-5 · DOI
  76. O'Brien, 2000, Proposals for simplyfing the validation protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, Blood Press Monit, 5, 43, 10.1097/00126097-200002000-00010 · DOI

Cited by

See all 903

Metadata

Authors
O'Brien, E., Waeber, B., Parati, G., Staessen, J., & Myers, M. G.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2001-03-03
Volume
322
Issue
7285
Pages
531.1-536
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
DOI
10.1136/bmj.322.7285.531
OpenAlex
W2041502303
Cited by
903
References
0
FWCI
33.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.322.7285.531
The paper
O'Brien, E., Waeber, B., Parati, G., Staessen, J., & Myers, M. G. (2001). Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7285.531

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.