What is newsworthy? Longitudinal study of the reporting of medical research in two British newspapers
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To assess the characteristics of medical research that is press released by general medical journals and reported in newspapers. Design: Longitudinal study. Data sources: All original research articles published in Lancet and BMJ during 1999 and 2000. Main outcome measures: Inclusion of articles in Lancet or BMJ press releases, and reporting of articles in Times or Sun newspapers. Results: Of 1193 original research articles, 517 (43%) were highlighted in a press release and 81 (7%) were reported in one or both newspapers. All articles covered in newspapers had been press released. The probability of inclusion in press releases was similar for observational studies and randomised controlled trials, but trials were less likely to be covered in the newspapers (odds ratio 0.15 (95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.37)). Good news and bad news were equally likely to be press released, but bad news was more likely to be reported in newspapers (1.74 (1.07 to 2.83)). Studies of women's health, reproduction, and cancer were more likely to be press released and covered in newspapers. Studies from industrialised countries other than Britain were less likely to be reported in newspapers (0.51 (0.31 to 0.82)), and no studies from developing countries were covered. Conclusions: Characteristics of articles were more strongly associated with selection for reporting in newspapers than with selection for inclusion in press releases, although each stage influenced the reporting process. Newspapers underreported randomised trials, emphasised bad news from observational studies, and ignored research from developing countries. What is already known on this topic: Newspapers are an important source of information about the results of medical research There are two stages on the path to newspaper coverage—selection by medical journal editors of articles to be press released and the selection of newsworthy articles by journalists What this study adds: Examination of press releasing by the Lancet and BMJ and reporting by the Times and Sun showed that selection processes acted at both stages The net effect meant that newspapers emphasised results from observational studies, in particular studies of women's health, reproduction, and cancer Good news and bad news were equally likely to be press released, but bad news was more likely to be reported in newspaper articles
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If STROBE is adopted, it might help temper the over-enthusiastic reporting of new findings in the scientific community and popular media.
“which might help temper the over-enthusiastic reporting of new findings in the scientific community and popular media [29]”
From The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007) · cites this paper as [29]
The Discussion (page not available) finds that newspapers favored observational studies and bad news while underreporting randomized trials, supporting concern about selective popular-media coverage. The paper does not address STROBE, whether adopting it would temper reporting, or over-enthusiastic reporting within the scientific community. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Prenatal origin of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children
Wiemels, J., Cazzaniga, G., Daniotti, M., et al. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)09403-9 · Cited by 658 · see citing works
Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation
Grilli, R., Ramsay, C., & Minozzi, S. (2002) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000389 · Cited by 533 · see citing works
Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications
Moynihan, R., Bero, L., Ross-Degnan, D., Henry, D., Lee, K., Watkins, J., Mah, C., & Soumerai, S. B. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200006013422206 · Cited by 500 · see citing works
Blair, P. S., Fleming, P. J., Smith, I. J., Platt, M. W., Young, J., Nadin, P. S., Berry, P. J., Golding, J., & Mitchell, E. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1457 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Snowdon, C., Garcia, J., & Elbourne, D. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00063-4 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Featherstone, K., & Donovan, J. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1177 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Gundestrup, M., & Storm, H. H. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)05093-x · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Reporting research in medical journals and newspapers
Entwistle, V. A. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6984.920 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Hansen, D., Møller, H., & Olsen, J. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7209.548 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Press Releases of Science Journal Articles and Subsequent Newspaper Stories on the Same Topic
de Semir, V. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.294 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
An index of scientific quality for health reports in the lay press
Oxman, A. D., Guyatt, G. H., Cook, D. J., Jaeschke, R., Heddle, N. M., & Keller, J. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90166-x · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Medical Journals and Medical Reporting
Steinbrook, R. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200006013422212 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Prenatal ultrasound examinations and risk of childhood leukaemia: case-control study
Naumburg, E. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7230.282 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Mortality in joggers: population based study of 4658 men
Schnohr, P. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7261.602 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
van Trigt, A. M., den Berg, L. T. W. D. J.-V., Voogt, L. M., Willems, J., Tromp, F. T. J., & Haaijer‐Ruskamp, F. M. (1995) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)00389-b · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Epidemiology, biology, and chemoprevention of aerodigestive cancer
Lippman, S. M., Spitz, M. R., Trizna, Z., Benner, S. E., & Hong, W. K. (1994) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19941101)74:9+ · Cited by 33 · see citing works
The case of Norplant as an example of media coverage over the life of a new health technology
Entwistle, V. A., Watt, I. S., & Johnson, F. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02226-1 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Medical research and the popular media
Deary, I. J., Whiteman, M. C., & Fowkes, F. G. R. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)10317-8 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Peer-Reviewed Articles and Public Health
Girardi, E., Petrosillo, N., Aloisi, M. S., Ravà, L., & Ippolito, G. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.292 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
This is what the game is about
Laurance, J. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)02390-3 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Blair PS, Fleming PJ, Smith IJ, Platt MW, Young J, Nadin P, et al. Babies sleeping with parents: case-control study of factors influencing the risk of the sudden infant death syndrome. CESDI SUDI research group. BMJ 1999;319:1457-61.
- Roberson NL. Clinical trial participation. Viewpoints from racial/ethnic groups. Cancer 1994;74:2687-91.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296 · Cited by 23,020 · see citing works
Self-citationvon Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61602-x · Cited by 21,320 · see citing works
Self-citationvon Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010 · Cited by 17,796 · see citing works
Self-citationvon Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 · Cited by 17,893 · see citing works
Self-citationElm, E. V., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.ad · Cited by 10,766 · see citing works
Self-citationvon Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2014) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013 · Cited by 9,909 · see citing works
Self-citationvon Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.08.012 · Cited by 2,698 · see citing works
Self-citationvon Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.07.045120 · Cited by 1,632 · see citing works
Self-citationSumner, P., Vivian-Griffiths, S., Boivin, J., Williams, A., Venetis, C. A., Davies, A., Ogden, J., Whelan, L., Hughes, B., Dalton, B., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g7015 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2008) · Gaceta Sanitaria · doi:10.1157/13119325 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Self-citationThe False-positive to False-negative Ratio in Epidemiologic Studies
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Tarone, R., & McLaughlin, J. K. (2011) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e31821b506e · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., Andrews, A., & Stukel, T. A. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d8164 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Poor replication validity of biomedical association studies reported by newspapers
Dumas-Mallet, E., Smith, A., Boraud, T., & Gonon, F. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0172650 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bartlett, C., Sterne, J., & Egger, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Egger, Matthias
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-07-13
- Volume
- 325
- Issue
- 7355
- Pages
- 81-84
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- PMC
- PMC117129
- OpenAlex
- W2109898933
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 35.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Bristol
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
- Keywords
- media coverage of medical research, press releases, newspaper reporting, news selection, randomized controlled trials, observational studies, women's health, cancer research, developing countries, Lancet, The Times, The Sun newspaper
- MeSH terms
- United Kingdom, Longitudinal Studies, Newspapers as Topic, Periodicals as Topic, Research, Bibliometrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
