Cited by 266Electronic Health Records SystemsInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationERP Systems Implementation and Impact

Kaiser Permanente's experience of implementing an electronic medical record: a qualitative study

Open access
Scott, J Tim, Rundall, Thomas G, Vogt, Thomas M, Hsu, John·2005·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine users' attitudes to implementation of an electronic medical record system in Kaiser Permanente Hawaii. DESIGN: Qualitative study based on semistructured interviews. SETTING: Four primary healthcare teams in four clinics, and four specialty departments in one hospital, on Oahu, Hawaii. Shortly before the interviews, Kaiser Permanente stopped implementation of the initial system in favour of a competing one. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty six senior clinicians, managers, and project team members. RESULTS: Seven key findings emerged: users perceived the decision to adopt the electronic medical record system as flawed; software design problems increased resistance; the system reduced doctors' productivity, especially during initial implementation, which fuelled resistance; the system required clarification of clinical roles and responsibilities, which was traumatic for some individuals; a cooperative culture created trade-offs at varying points in the implementation; no single leadership style was optimal--a participatory, consensus-building style may lead to more effective adoption decisions, whereas decisive leadership could help resolve barriers and resistance during implementation; the process fostered a counter climate of conflict, which was resolved by withdrawal of the initial system. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation involved several critical components, including perceptions of the system selection, early testing, adaptation of the system to the larger organisation, and adaptation of the organisation to the new electronic environment. Throughout, organisational factors such as leadership, culture, and professional ideals played complex roles, each facilitating and hindering implementation at various points. A transient climate of conflict was associated with adoption of the system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.38638.497477.68

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If patient loads are not decreased temporarily during training periods, clinicians work longer hours to complete their combined electronic and clinical work.

    “If their patient loads are not decreased temporarily during training periods, clinicians work longer hours to complete their combined electronic and clinical work.13”

    From Types of Unintended Consequences Related to Computerized Provider Order Entry (2006) · cites this paper as [13]

    In “Adaptation of the organisation to the new electronic medical record environment” (p. 1314), clinicians report an additional 30–75 minutes of electronic-record work per day, and the implementation provided extra clinicians to help with the initial workload. The paper does not establish the claimed condition that patient loads were not temporarily reduced during training, or that this caused clinicians to work longer hours. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Other qualitative studies of EHR implementations have mainly focused on implementation barriers, system-wide challenges, or overall benefits and concerns rather than patient safety.

    “Other qualitative investigations have analyzed EHR implementations, but primarily focused on barriers to implementation, system-wide challenges, or overall benefits and concerns rather than patient safety . 35 -39”
  • Health care providers' frustration from software problems can promptly escalate and result in resistance to continue using the system.

    “Extensive software testing of the vendor's claims for the baseline functionality and system adaptability to local needs is critical before the implementation, as health care providers' frustration from software problems can promptly escalate and result in resistance to continue using the system [128].”
  • Health care providers' participatory process is essential to fine-tune the eHealth system's capabilities after thorough workflow analysis.

    “After the workflow is analyzed thoroughly with health care providers’ involvement, their participatory process is also essential to fine-tune the system’s capabilities [128].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Scott JT, Rundall TG, Vogt TM, Hsu J. Kaiser Permanente's experience of implementing an electronic medical record: a qualitative study. BMJ 2005;331:1313-6.
  2. Teasdale S. Shaping sands, shifting services [editorial]. Inform Prim Care 2005;13:81-2.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scott, J. T., Rundall, T. G., Vogt, T. M., & Hsu, J.
Affiliations
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
Corresponding author
Scott, J Tim
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-11-03
Volume
331
Issue
7528
Pages
1313-1316
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2116134825
Cited by
266
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
28.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Commonwealth Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
Keywords
electronic health records, health information technology implementation, Kaiser Permanente, user attitudes, implementation resistance, software design, clinician productivity, leadership styles, organizational culture, system selection, primary care, hospital departments
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Hawaii, Humans, Leadership, Medical Staff, Hospital, Organizational Culture, Medical Records Systems, Computerized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review