The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate version two of the QRISK cardiovascular disease risk algorithm (QRISK2) to provide accurate estimates of cardiovascular risk in patients from different ethnic groups in England and Wales and to compare its performance with the modified version of Framingham score recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). DESIGN: Prospective open cohort study with routinely collected data from general practice, 1 January 1993 to 31 March 2008. SETTING: 531 practices in England and Wales contributing to the national QRESEARCH database. PARTICIPANTS: 2.3 million patients aged 35-74 (over 16 million person years) with 140,000 cardiovascular events. Overall population (derivation and validation cohorts) comprised 2.22 million people who were white or whose ethnic group was not recorded, 22,013 south Asian, 11,595 black African, 10,402 black Caribbean, and 19,792 from Chinese or other Asian or other ethnic groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: First (incident) diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (coronary heart disease, stroke, and transient ischaemic attack) recorded in general practice records or linked Office for National Statistics death certificates. Risk factors included self assigned ethnicity, age, sex, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, ratio of total serum cholesterol:high density lipoprotein cholesterol, body mass index, family history of coronary heart disease in first degree relative under 60 years, Townsend deprivation score, treated hypertension, type 2 diabetes, renal disease, atrial fibrillation, and rheumatoid arthritis. RESULTS: The validation statistics indicated that QRISK2 had improved discrimination and calibration compared with the modified Framingham score. The QRISK2 algorithm explained 43% of the variation in women and 38% in men compared with 39% and 35%, respectively, by the modified Framingham score. Of the 112,156 patients classified as high risk (that is, >or=20% risk over 10 years) by the modified Framingham score, 46,094 (41.1%) would be reclassified at low risk with QRISK2. The 10 year observed risk among these reclassified patients was 16.6% (95% confidence interval 16.1% to 17.0%)-that is, below the 20% treatment threshold. Of the 78 024 patients classified at high risk on QRISK2, 11,962 (15.3%) would be reclassified at low risk by the modified Framingham score. The 10 year observed risk among these patients was 23.3% (22.2% to 24.4%)-that is, above the 20% threshold. In the validation cohort, the annual incidence rate of cardiovascular events among those with a QRISK2 score of >or=20% was 30.6 per 1000 person years (29.8 to 31.5) for women and 32.5 per 1000 person years (31.9 to 33.1) for men. The corresponding figures for the modified Framingham equation were 25.7 per 1000 person years (25.0 to 26.3) for women and 26.4 (26.0 to 26.8) for men). At the 20% threshold, the population identified by QRISK2 was at higher risk of a CV event than the population identified by the Framingham score. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating ethnicity, deprivation, and other clinical conditions into the QRISK2 algorithm for risk of cardiovascular disease improves the accuracy of identification of those at high risk in a nationally representative population. At the 20% threshold, QRISK2 is likely to be a more efficient and equitable tool for treatment decisions for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. As the validation was performed in a similar population to the population from which the algorithm was derived, it potentially has a "home advantage." Further validation in other populations is therefore advised.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Many risk assessment systems are available and have been comprehensively reviewed, including different Framingham models, 41 Systemic Coronary Risk Estimation (SCORE), 42 ASSIGN (CV risk estimation model from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network), 43 Q-Risk, 44 Prospective Cardiovascular Munster Study (PROCAM), 45 Reynolds, 46,47 CUORE, 48 the Pooled Cohort equations 49 and Globorisk. 5”
From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yusuf, S., Hawken, S., Ôunpuu, S., Dans, T., Avezum, A., Lanas, F., McQueen, M., Budaj, A., Pais, P., Varigos, J., et al. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17018-9 · Cited by 12,026
Missing data: our view of the state of the art
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147 · Cited by 11,638
General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care: The Framingham Heart Study
D’Agostino, R. B., Vasan, R. S., Pencina, M. J., Wolf, P. A., Cobain, M., Massaro, J. M., & Kannel, W. B. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.699579 · Cited by 7,491
Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on the Risk of Death: The Framingham Heart Study
Benjamin, E. J., Wolf, P. A., D’Agostino, R. B., Silbershatz, H., Kannel, W. B., & Levy, D. (1998) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.98.10.946 · Cited by 4,575
Sarnak, M. J., Levey, A. S., Schoolwerth, A. C., Coresh, J., Culleton, B., Hamm, L. L., McCullough, P. A., Kasiske, B. L., Kelepouris, E., Klag, M. J., et al. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000095676.90936.80 · Cited by 3,768
Multiple Imputation of Missing Values
Royston, P. (2004) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0400400301 · Cited by 2,340 · cited 1×
“We used fractional polynomials to model non-linear risk relations with continuous variables where appropriate.”
Cardiovascular disease risk profiles
Anderson, K. M., Odell, P. M., Wilson, P. W. F., & Kannel, W. B. (1991) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/0002-8703(91)90861-b · Cited by 2,163
Wang, T. J., Larson, M. G., Levy, D., Vasan, R. S., Leip, E. P., Wolf, P. A., D’Agostino, R. B., Murabito, J. M., Kannel, W. B., & Benjamin, E. J. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000072767.89944.6e · Cited by 1,970
Probability of stroke: a risk profile from the Framingham Study.
Wolf, P. A., D'Agostino, R. B., Belanger, A. J., & Kannel, W. B. (1991) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.22.3.312 · Cited by 1,782
McKeigue, P. M., Shah, B., & Marmot, M. G. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)91164-p · Cited by 1,618
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Gail M, Pfeiffer R. On evaluating models of absolute risk. Biostatistics 2005;6:227-39.
- Erika Graf CSWSMS. Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data. Stat Med 1999;18:2529-45.
- Maradit-Kremers H, Crowson C, Nicola P, Ballman K, Roger V, Jacobsend S, et al. Increased unrecognized coronary heart disease and sudden deaths in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based cohort study. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:402-11.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,000
Dalton, A. R., Soljak, M., Samarasundera, E., Millett, C. J., & Majeed, A. (2011) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/1741826711428797 · Cited by 38
Screening for chronic comorbid diseases in people with HIV : the need for a strategic approach
Peters, B., Post, F. A., Wierzbicki, A. S., Phillips, A. N., Power, L., Das, S., Johnson, M. A., Moyle, G. J., Hughes, L., Wilkins, E., et al. (2012) · HIV Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1293.2012.01055.x · Cited by 37
Gabriel, R., Brotons, C., Tormo, M. J., Segura, A., Rigo, F., Elosúa, R., Herencia, J. A. C., Gavrila, D., Moral, I., Tuomilehto, J. O., et al. (2014) · Revista Española de Cardiología · doi:10.1016/j.recesp.2014.03.019 · Cited by 38
“VIVA(13,14) 365 48,6 9,1 72,9 27,1 3,6 20,3 1,2 0,3 5,7 1,0 20,5 5,6 1,1 5,5 124,2 18,4 26,3 17 15 (5) 4,11 (9,3 1,4)”
Thomas, C., Man, M., O’Cathain, A., Hollinghurst, S. P., Large, S., Edwards, L., Nicholl, J. P., Montgomery, A. A., & Salisbury, C. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-36 · Cited by 37
“The minimisation categories for QRISK2 score are 20.0 to 24.9, 25.0 to 29.9 and ≥30.0, and for PHQ-9 score they are 10 to 14, 15 to 19 and ≥20 [21].”
MethodInfluentialAccelerated atherosclerosis in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatologic conditions
Hong, J., Maron, D. J., Shirai, T., & Weyand, C. M. (2015) · International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.2217/ijr.15.33 · Cited by 37
Štiglic, G., Kocbek, P., Fijačko, N., Sheikh, A., & Pajnkihar, M. (2017) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458217733288 · Cited by 37
Self-citationGad, M. M., Lord, J. L., Chalkidou, K., Asare, B. A., Gyansa‐Lutterodt, M., & Ruiz, F. J. (2019) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2019.09.2749 · Cited by 37
Clare, L., Hindle, J. V., Jones, I. R., Thom, J. M., Nelis, S. M., Hounsome, B., & Whitaker, C. J. (2012) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-13-115 · Cited by 37
Riley, R. A., Coghill, N. F., Montgomery, A. A., Feder, G. S., & Horwood, J. P. (2015) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdv121 · Cited by 36
Jenkinson, C. E., Asprey, A., Clark, C. E., & Richards, S. H. (2015) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0244-7 · Cited by 36
“Individuals identified at high risk (>20%) of developing CVD within the next ten years, based on a QRISK2 score [3], are offered clinical management, such as prescribing and lifestyle interventions.”
BackgroundSimplifying cardiovascular risk estimation using resting heart rate
Cooney, M. T., Vartiainen, E. A., Laatikainen, T. K., Joulevi, A., Dudina, A. L., & Graham, I. M. (2010) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq164 · Cited by 36
Guthrie, B., Thompson, A., Dumbreck, S., Flynn, A., Alderson, P., Nairn, M., Treweek, S. P., & Payne, K. (2017) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr05160 · Cited by 36
Prediction of all-cause mortality in haemodialysis patients using a Bayesian network
Siga, M. M., Ducher, M., Florens, N., Roth, H., Mahloul, N., Fouque, D. P., & Fauvel, J. (2020) · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfz295 · Cited by 37
Taylor, R. J., Umar, F., Moody, W. E., Meyyappan, C., Stegemann, B., Townend, J., Hor, K. N., Miszalski−Jamka, T., Mazur, W. M., Steeds, R. P., et al. (2014) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.268 · Cited by 36
Polygenic Risk Score for Cardiovascular Diseases in Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Review
Khanna, N. N., Singh, M., Maindarkar, M. A., Kumar, A., Johri, A. M., Mantella, L. E., Laird, J. R., Paraskevas, K. I., Ruzsa, Z., Singh, N., et al. (2023) · Journal of Korean Medical Science · doi:10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e395 · Cited by 36
Rheumatoid arthritis: is it a coronary heart disease equivalent?
John, H., Toms, T. E., & Kitas, G. D. (2011) · Current Opinion in Cardiology · doi:10.1097/hco.0b013e32834703b5 · Cited by 35
Usher‐Smith, J. A., Šilarova, B., Ward, A. R., Youell, J., Muir, K. R., Campbell, J. A., & Warcaba, J. (2017) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp17x689401 · Cited by 35
Cardiovascular Risk Assessment
Pletcher, M. J., & Moran, A. E. (2017) · Medical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2017.03.002 · Cited by 42
Jeemon, P., Prabhakaran, D., Huffman, M. D., Ramakrishnan, L., Goenka, S., Thankappan, K. R., Mohan, V., Joshi, P. P., Mohan, B. V. M., Ahmed, F., et al. (2011) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000068 · Cited by 36
Özen, G., İnanç, N., Unal, A. U., Korkmaz, F. N., Sünbül, M., Özmen, M., Akar, S., Deniz, R., Dönmez, S., Pamuk, Ö. N., et al. (2016) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.22852 · Cited by 35
“QRisk II also involves the presence of family history of early CVD, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, BMI, and Townsend deprivation score (33).”
BackgroundMethodStam‐Slob, M. C., Visseren, F. L. J., Jukema, J. W., van der Graaf, Y., Poulter, N. R., Gupta, A. K., Sattar, N. A., Macfarlane, P. W., Kearney, P. M., de Craen, A. J. M., et al. (2016) · Clinical Research in Cardiology · doi:10.1007/s00392-016-1023-8 · Cited by 35
“Since the QRISK2 score estimates a 10-year risk C10 % for every patient aged C70 years and almost all older patients have at least one vascular risk factor besides age, statin therapy would be indicated for nearly all elderly patients [10].”
Review on cardiovascular risk prediction
Ruwanpathirana, T., Owen, A., & Reid, C. M. (2015) · Cardiovascular Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/1755-5922.12110 · Cited by 31
Kerrison, R., Jones, A., Peng, J., Price, G., Verne, J., Barley, E. A., & Lugton, C. (2023) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-023-02249-3 · Cited by 38
“Sensitivity analysis was carried out on imputed ‘unknown’ data and ethnicity coded as ‘White’, in line with previous research using primary care data that suggest that more than 93% of individuals without ethnicity recorded are from a white ethnic group [29]—there was no impact on study outcomes compared to coding dat…”
MethodPersonalizing cardiovascular risk prediction for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
Choi, M. Y., Guan, H., Yoshida, K., Paudel, M. L., Kargère, B., Li, D., Ellrodt, J., Stevens, E. F., Cai, T. A., Weber, B., et al. (2024) · Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism · doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152468 · Cited by 38
“…young, female), Sivakumaran et al. also showed that the mFRS and other SLE CVD models (QRESEARCH risk estimator version 3 or QRISK3 [50] [22 variables], and SLECRE [51]) did not have greater accuracy (c-statistic 0.67–0.73) over the traditional tools (FRS, QRISK2 [52]) (c-statistic 0.72–0.73) [38].”
InfluentialGoh, L. G. H., Dhaliwal, S. S., Welborn, T. A., Lee, A. H., & Della, P. R. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004702 · Cited by 42
Vatandoost, M., & Litkouhi, S. (2019) · Hospital Practices and Research · doi:10.15171/hpr.2019.01 · Cited by 35
CT screening for lung cancer: Are we ready to implement in Europe?
Balata, H., Evison, M., Sharman, A., Crosbie, P. A. J., & Booton, R. (2019) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.05.028 · Cited by 34
Perry, B. I., Upthegrove, R., Crawford, O., Jang, S.-H., Lau, E., McGill, I., Carver, E., Jones, P. B., & Khandaker, G. M. (2020) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.13212 · Cited by 36
“We reviewed 362 full texts, of which 110 studies met inclusion criteria (28-30, 33-138).”
MethodNavarini, L., Caso, F., Costa, L., Currado, D., Stola, L., Perrotta, F., Delfino, L., Sperti, M., Deriu, M. A., Ruscitti, P., et al. (2020) · Rheumatology and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40744-020-00233-4 · Cited by 32
Sivakumaran, J., Harvey, P., Omar, A., Tayer-Shifman, O. E., Urowitz, M. B., Gladman, D. D., Anderson, N. M., Su, J., & Touma, Z. (2021) · Lupus Science & Medicine · doi:10.1136/lupus-2020-000448 · Cited by 34
Múñoz, Ó., Rodriguez, N. I., Ruiz, Á. J., & Rondón, M. (2014) · Revista Colombiana de Cardiología · doi:10.1016/j.rccar.2014.02.001 · Cited by 37
Nurmohamed, M. T., & Kitas, G. D. (2011) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.2010.145839 · Cited by 34
Bhopal, R. S., Humphry, R. W., & Fischbacher, C. (2013) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003485 · Cited by 33
“The accuracy and validity of such methods is still debatable,(48) particularly in multiethnic settings,(49) 50 although some advances are being made; for example, QRISK.(51) Such a method would produce a single number for each ethnic group, which would simplify the analysis but not necessarily the interpretation of fi…”
Özen, G., Sünbül, M., Atagündüz, P., Di̇reskeneli̇, H., Tigen, K., & İnanç, N. (2015) · Lara D. Veeken · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kev363 · Cited by 34
Lin, S.-Y., Lee, W., Chou, M.-Y., Peng, L., Chiou, S.-T., & Chen, L. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161456 · Cited by 33
Statin-prescribing trends for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Brown, F., Singer, A. G., Katz, A., & Konrad, G. (2017) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 33
Improving cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Checks: a qualitative study
Hawking, M. K. D., Timmis, A., Wilkins, F., Potter, J., & Robson, J. P. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026058 · Cited by 33
Self-citationYang, Y., Xie, M., Yuan, S., Zeng, Y., Dong, Y., Wang, Z., Xiao, Q., Dong, B., Ma, J., & Hu, J. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-11316-4 · Cited by 36
Navarini, L., Currado, D., Marino, A., Donato, S. D., Biaggi, A., Caso, F., Costa, L., Tasso, M., Ruscitti, P., Pavlych, V., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-11640-8 · Cited by 33
Cardiovascular Disease Risk Modeling for Astronauts: Making the Leap From Earth to Space
Huff, J. L., Plante, I., Blattnig, S. R., Norman, R. B., Little, M. P., Khera, A., Simonsen, L. C., & Patel, Z. S. (2022) · Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.873597 · Cited by 34
Cancer rates and mortality in people with severe mental illness: Further evidence of lack of parity
Launders, N., Scolamiero, L., Osborn, D., & Hayes, J. (2022) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2022.07.008 · Cited by 33
“Patients with missing smoking or BMI data were coded as non-smoker or normal range BMI respectively, since general practitioners are less likely to report a value that is within the norm (Hippisley-Cox et al., 2008; Marston et al., 2014).”
BackgroundNoble, M., Burden, A., Stirling, S., Clark, A., Musgrave, S. D., Alsallakh, M. A., Price, D. B., Davies, G. A., Pinnock, H., Pond, M., et al. (2021) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp.2020.1042 · Cited by 32
“79 in females and males, respectively(30).”
Self-citationBeaney, K. E., Cooper, J. A., Shahid, S. U., Ahmed, W., Qamar, R., Drenos, F., Crockard, M. A., & Humphries, S. E. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130754 · Cited by 31
“These include the Framingham risk score [10], SCORE [11] and QRISK2 [12].”
MethodFenton, S. A. M., Zanten, J. V., Metsios, G. S., Rouse, P. C., Yu, C.-A., Ntoumanis, N., Kitas, G. D., & Duda, J. L. (2020) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibaa022 · Cited by 32
“, C-reactive protein, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), and the QRISK2 score was used to indicate global 10-year CVD risk [37].”
MethodBu, F., Steptoe, A., & Fancourt, D. E. (2021) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2020-215539 · Cited by 36
Sphingolipid Profiling: A Promising Tool for Stratifying the Metabolic Syndrome-Associated Risk
Berkowitz, L., Cabrera-Reyes, F., Salazar, C., Ryff, C. D., Coe, C. L., & Rigotti, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.3389/fcvm.2021.785124 · Cited by 32
“Some guidelines also add in LDL cholesterol (LDLc) levels, obesity, and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (15).”
BackgroundComorbidities in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Narrative Review
Panagiotopoulos, A. G., & Fragoulis, G. (2023) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.01.006 · Cited by 35
Keogh, C., Wallace, E., O’Brien, K. K., Murphy, P., Teljeur, C., McGrath, B., Smith, S. M., Doherty, N., Dimitrov, B. D., & Fahey, T. P. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.011 · Cited by 35
Lindbohm, J. V., Sipilä, P. N., Mars, N., Pentti, J., Ahmadi‐Abhari, S., Brunner, E. J., Shipley, M. J., Singh‐Manoux, A., Tabák, Á. G., & Mika Kivimaki, B. (2019) · The Lancet Public Health · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(19)30023-4 · Cited by 32
Improving interMediAte Risk management. MARK study
Martí‐Lluch, R., Parramon, D., García‐Ortiz, L., Rigo, F., Gómez-Marcos, M. Á., Sempere, I., Regalado, N. G., Recio-Rodriguez, J. I., Agudo‐Conde, C., Feuerbach, N., et al. (2011) · BMC Cardiovascular Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2261-11-61 · Cited by 32
Introduction to Clinical Prediction Models
Iwagami, M., & Matsui, H. (2022) · Annals of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.37737/ace.22010 · Cited by 32
Gourdy, P., Schiele, F., Halimi, J., Kownator, S., Hadjadj, S., & Valensi, P. E. (2023) · Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1227769 · Cited by 34
“Of note, the ASCVD risk calculated by QRISK2 is likely to be underestimated in individuals from deprived areas and overestimated for those from affluent areas (22).”
BackgroundClinical management of older persons with haemophilia
Hermans, C. R. J. R., de Moerloose, P., & Dolan, G. (2013) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.07.005 · Cited by 31
Dislipidemias: un reto pendiente en prevención cardiovascular. Documento de consenso CEIPC/SEA
Royo‐Bordonada, M. Á., Bejarano, J. M. L., Núñez-Cortés, J. M., Álvarez, F. V., Cuixart, C. B., Camafort, M., Guijarro, C., Zarzosa, C. D. P., Pedro‐Botet, J., & Nocito, A. D. S. (2011) · Medicina Clínica · doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2011.02.008 · Cited by 30
MACGREGOR, M. S., & Taal, M. W. (2011) · Nephron Clinical Practice · doi:10.1159/000328062 · Cited by 31
Begh, R. A., Aveyard, P. N., Upton, P., Bhopal, R. S., White, M. J., Amos, A., Prescott, R. J., Bedi, R., Barton, P. M., Fletcher, M. J., et al. (2011) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-12-197 · Cited by 33
Self-citationAre Genetic Tests for Atherosclerosis Ready for Routine Clinical Use?
Paynter, N. P., Ridker, P. M., & Chasman, D. I. (2016) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.115.306360 · Cited by 31
“blood pressure, and a family history of angina or heart attack in a first-degree relative under 60.(28) These models target a range of related CVD outcomes, and all have strong baseline”
BackgroundKim, Y. J., Saqlain, M., & Lee, J. Y. (2019) · Personal and Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1007/s00779-019-01248-7 · Cited by 32
“Currently, Framingham risk score (FRS) [3 – 5], QRISK [6, 7], TIMI [8, 9], and GRACE [10 – 12] models are available in regression-based cardiovascular risk prediction models.”
MethodChowdhury, M., Yeasmin, F., Rabi, D. M., Ronksley, P. E., & Turin, T. C. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025579 · Cited by 31
Liew, S. M., Blacklock, C., Hislop, J., Glasziou, P., & Mant, D. (2013) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp13x668195 · Cited by 31
Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment: Strengths and Limitations
Redón, J. (2016) · High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention · doi:10.1007/s40292-016-0139-2 · Cited by 33
Johns, I., Moschonas, K., Medina, J., Ossei‐Gerning, N., Kassianos, G. C., & Halcox, J. (2018) · Open Heart · doi:10.1136/openhrt-2018-000849 · Cited by 34
“The most frequently used risk algorithm is the QRISK2 risk assessor, which is calibrated using UK patient data and assesses an extensive array of risk factors, incorporating body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, an area of residence–based deprivation index, type 2 diabetes mellitus, antihypertensive treatment status, fami…”
MethodCardiovascular Disease Risk in a Semirural Community in Malaysia
Chia, Y. C., & Pengal, S. (2009) · Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1177/1010539509343973 · Cited by 32
Monitoring and Managing Cardiovascular Risk in Immune Mediated Inflammatory Diseases
Anyfanti, P., Dara, A., Angeloudi, E., Bekiari, E., Dimitroulas, T., & Kitas, G. D. (2021) · Journal of Inflammation Research · doi:10.2147/jir.s276986 · Cited by 33
Cardiometabolic risk estimation using exposome data and machine learning
Atehortúa, A., Gkontra, P., Camacho, M., Díaz, O., Bulgheroni, M., Simonetti, V., Chadeau‐Hyam, M., Felix, J. F., Sebert, S. P., & Lekadir, K. (2023) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105209 · Cited by 32
Nandish, S., Wyatt, J., Bailon, O., Smith, M., OLIVEROS, R. A., & CHILTON, R. J. (2011) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.015 · Cited by 29
Vedanthan, R., Kamano, J. H., Lee, H., Andama, B., Bloomfield, G. S., DeLong, A. K., Edelman, D. E., Finkelstein, E. A., Hogan, J. W., Horowitz, C. R., et al. (2017) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2017.03.012 · Cited by 30
“A key secondary outcome measure is one-year change in overall CVD risk as measured by the QRISK2 score, which has been validated for calculating 10-year CVD event risk for Black Africans.(72,73) Other secondary outcome measures will include: (1) percentage of participants with controlled BP; (2) change in individual C…”
MethodWeech, M., Altowaijri, H., Mayneris‐Perxachs, J., Vafeiadou, K., Madden, J., Todd, S., Jackson, K. G., Lovegrove, J. A., & Yaqoob, P. (2018) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqy018 · Cited by 30
Mercer, T., Njuguna, B., Bloomfield, G. S., Dick, J. J., Finkelstein, E. A., Kamano, J. H., Mwangi, A., Yebei, V. N., Pastakia, S. D., Valente, T. W., et al. (2019) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3661-4 · Cited by 30
DAPSA, carotid plaque and cardiovascular events in psoriatic arthritis: a longitudinal study
Lam, S. H. M., Cheng, I. T., Li, E. K., Wong, P. C. H., Lee, J., Yip, R. M.-L., Yim, C.-W., Ying, S. K. Y., Li, M., Li, T. K., et al. (2020) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217595 · Cited by 30
Robinson, L., Dickinson, C., Magklara, E., Newton, L., Prato, L., & Bamford, C. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018677 · Cited by 26
“34 With electronic vascular disease risk assessment tools such as Q-RISK2, which allow health-care professionals to quickly calculate an individual’s future risk, 38 39 now embedded in routine primary care practice, similar methods have been used to develop a dementia risk tool.”
Genetic Risk Factors for Type 2 Diabetes: Insights from the Emerging Genomic Evidence
Ntzani, E., & Kavvoura, F. K. (2012) · Current Vascular Pharmacology · doi:10.2174/157016112799305030 · Cited by 29
Chia, Y. C. (2011) · PubMed · Cited by 29
The ESC Textbook of Preventive Cardiology
Nixdorff, U., Achenbach, S., Bengel, F., Faggiano, P., Fernández, S., Heiß, C., Mengden, T., Mureddu, F., Nagel, E. C., Püntmann, V. O., et al. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780199656653.001.0001 · Cited by 31
Widén, E., Raben, T. G., Lello, L., & Hsu, S. (2021) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes12070991 · Cited by 33
“Examples of such scores include Framingham [26,27], SCORE [28], ASSIGN–SCORE [29], QRISK1 [30], QRISK2 [31], QRISK3 [32], PROCAM [33], Pooled Cohort Studies Equations [34–36], CUORE [37], Globorisk [38], Reynolds risk score [39,40], World Health Organization (WHO) risk chart [41,42], MyRisk_stroke calculator [43], NIP…”
MethodThe Framingham Study on Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Stress-Defenses: A Historical Review
Abohelwa, M., Kopel, J. J., Shurmur, S. W., Ansari, M. M., Awasthi, S., & Awasthi, S. (2023) · Journal of Vascular Diseases · doi:10.3390/jvd2010010 · Cited by 43
Donfrancesco, C., Palmieri, L., Cooney, M. T., Vanuzzo, D., Panico, S., Cesana, G., Ferrario, M., Pilotto, L., Graham, I. M., & Giampaoli, S. (2010) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/hjr.0b013e328334ea70 · Cited by 29
Cardiovascular screening in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional primary care database study
Monk, H. L., Müller, S., Mallen, C. D., & Hider, S. (2013) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/1471-2296-14-150 · Cited by 29
“QRISK2 is the only validated CVD risk assessment tool to include RA as an independent risk factor for CVD [7], and indeed other UK guidance from the Joint British Societies Guidance 2 [8] fails to mention rheumatoid arthritis, further contributing to the lack of awareness of the increased risk of CVD in patients with…”
BackgroundO’Cathain, A., Drabble, S. J., Foster, A., Horspool, K., Edwards, L., Thomas, C., & Salisbury, C. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5879 · Cited by 34
“The primary outcome was response to treatment defined as maintenance or reduction in 10-year risk of CVD (measured by QRISK2 score [19]) after 12 months.”
QRISK or Framingham for predicting cardiovascular risk?
Jackson, R., Marshall, R., Kerr, A., Riddell, T., & Wells, S. J. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2673 · Cited by 29
Strategies for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Prevention Over the Life Course
Vasan, R. S., & Kannel, W. B. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.881995 · Cited by 29
Sherazi, S. W. A., Zheng, H., & Lee, J. Y. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23031351 · Cited by 29
Peacock, O. J., Western, M. J., Batterham, A. M., Stathi, A., Standage, M., Tapp, A., Bennett, P., & Thompson, D. (2015) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0892-x · Cited by 30
The Use of Primary Prevention Statin Therapy in Those Predisposed to Atherosclerosis
Garshick, M. S., & Underberg, J. A. (2017) · Current Atherosclerosis Reports · doi:10.1007/s11883-017-0685-7 · Cited by 28
Bayley, A., Ståhl, D., Ashworth, M., Cook, D., Whincup, P., Treasure, J., Greenough, A., Ridge, K., Winkley, K., & Ismail, K. (2018) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5939-y · Cited by 18
Duncan, A., Peters, B. S., Rivas, C. A., & Goff, L. M. (2019) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.13927 · Cited by 31
Tonhajzerová, I., Olexova, L. B., Jurko, A., Spronck, B., Jurko, T., Sekaninova, N., Višňovcová, Z., Mestanikova, A., Kúdela, E., & Mestanik, M. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20153720 · Cited by 28
“, the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease risk score from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology [66], United Kingdom QRISK2 model [67], European SCORE risk estimator [68], Framingham risk score [69], and others [70].”
MethodIsmail, K., Stahl, D. R., Bayley, A., Twist, K., Stewart, K., Ridge, K., Britneff, E., Ashworth, M. J., de Zoysa, N., Rundle, J., et al. (2019) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta23690 · Cited by 29
Viswanathan, V., Jamthikar, A. D., Gupta, D., Puvvula, A., Khanna, N. N., Saba, L., Višković, K., Mavrogeni, S. I., Turk, M., Laird, J. R., et al. (2020) · International Angiology · doi:10.23736/s0392-9590.20.04338-2 · Cited by 28
Thomas, C., Brennan, A., Goka, E., Squires, H., Brenner, G., Bagguley, D., Woods, H. B., Gillett, M., Leaviss, J., Clowes, M., et al. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037486 · Cited by 28
Implications of incidental findings from lung screening for primary care: data from a UK pilot
Bartlett, E., Belsey, J., Derbyshire, J., Morris, R. K., Chen, M., Addis, J., Martins, M., Ridge, C. A., Desai, S. R., Mirsadraee, S., et al. (2021) · npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41533-021-00246-8 · Cited by 28
Khunti, K., Griffin, S. J., Brennan, A., Dallosso, H. M., Davies, M. J., Eborall, H., Edwardson, C. L., Gray, L. J., Hardeman, W., Heathcote, L., et al. (2021) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta25770 · Cited by 33
Hippisley‐Cox, J., & Coupland, C. A. C. (2012) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp12x636074 · Cited by 27
Self-citationUse of ethnic identifiers to narrow health inequality gaps
van Apeldoorn, J. A. N., Agyemang, C. O., & van Charante, E. P. M. (2022) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100411 · Cited by 28
“9 Recently, the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the need for collecting ethnicity data; countries like the UK could detect clear ethnic disparities early, which fuelled subsequent policy directives.”
Should Your Family History of Coronary Heart Disease Scare You?
Prabhakaran, D., & Jeemon, P. (2012) · Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine A Journal of Translational and Personalized Medicine · doi:10.1002/msj.21348 · Cited by 28
Macfarlane, T. V., Murchie, P., & Watson, M. C. (2015) · Cancer Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.canep.2015.10.030 · Cited by 28
Glorioso, T. J., Grunwald, G. K., Ho, P. M., & Maddox, T. M. (2018) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0517-7 · Cited by 27
Bainey, K. R., Gupta, M., Ali, I. S., Bangalore, S., Chiu, M., Kaila, K., Kaul, P., Khan, N. A., King‐Shier, K. M., Palaniappan, L. P., et al. (2019) · CJC Open · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2019.09.004 · Cited by 29
“The modified Framingham risk score (advocated by the United Kingdom) applies a correction factor to the Framingham risk score in SAs.(77,78) Other scoring algorithms, including the ETHRISK score, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association ASCVD, score, and Reynolds score, have yet to be independently va…”
MethodMonogenic and Polygenic Models of Coronary Artery Disease
Muse, E. D., Chen, S.-F., & Torkamani, A. (2021) · Current Cardiology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11886-021-01540-0 · Cited by 27
Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cardio-Oncology: A Comprehensive Review
Guha, A., Shah, V., Nahle, T., Singh, S., Kunhiraman, H. H., Shehnaz, F., Nain, P., Makram, O. M., Mahmoudi, M., Al-Kindi, S. G., et al. (2025) · Current Cardiology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11886-025-02215-w · Cited by 33
“In the general population, there are several algorithms used to estimate ASCVD risk, such as the Framingham Risk Score [37], Pooled Cohort ASCVD Risk Equations [38 ], Prospective CV Munster (PROCAM) calculator [ 39], QRISK2 [40], and ASSIGN-SCORE [41 ].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Hippisley-Cox, J., Coupland, C., Vinogradova, Y., Robson, J., Minhas, R., Sheikh, A., & Brindle, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Medway NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-06-23
- Volume
- 336
- Issue
- 7659
- Pages
- 1475-1482
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- PMC
- PMC2440904
- OpenAlex
- W2055838663
- Cited by
- 1,459
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 106 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 102 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 90 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 80
- FWCI
- 62.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- University of Nottingham
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Keywords
- QRISK2, cardiovascular risk prediction, risk reclassification, coronary artery disease, stroke, transient ischemic attack, ethnic groups, South Asian patients, risk discrimination and calibration, cardiovascular disease prevention, NICE guidelines, QResearch database, England and Wales, general practice records, family history of coronary heart disease
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Cardiovascular Diseases, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Wales, Epidemiologic Studies, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review