The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate version two of the QRISK cardiovascular disease risk algorithm (QRISK2) to provide accurate estimates of cardiovascular risk in patients from different ethnic groups in England and Wales and to compare its performance with the modified version of Framingham score recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). DESIGN: Prospective open cohort study with routinely collected data from general practice, 1 January 1993 to 31 March 2008. SETTING: 531 practices in England and Wales contributing to the national QRESEARCH database. PARTICIPANTS: 2.3 million patients aged 35-74 (over 16 million person years) with 140,000 cardiovascular events. Overall population (derivation and validation cohorts) comprised 2.22 million people who were white or whose ethnic group was not recorded, 22,013 south Asian, 11,595 black African, 10,402 black Caribbean, and 19,792 from Chinese or other Asian or other ethnic groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: First (incident) diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (coronary heart disease, stroke, and transient ischaemic attack) recorded in general practice records or linked Office for National Statistics death certificates. Risk factors included self assigned ethnicity, age, sex, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, ratio of total serum cholesterol:high density lipoprotein cholesterol, body mass index, family history of coronary heart disease in first degree relative under 60 years, Townsend deprivation score, treated hypertension, type 2 diabetes, renal disease, atrial fibrillation, and rheumatoid arthritis. RESULTS: The validation statistics indicated that QRISK2 had improved discrimination and calibration compared with the modified Framingham score. The QRISK2 algorithm explained 43% of the variation in women and 38% in men compared with 39% and 35%, respectively, by the modified Framingham score. Of the 112,156 patients classified as high risk (that is, >or=20% risk over 10 years) by the modified Framingham score, 46,094 (41.1%) would be reclassified at low risk with QRISK2. The 10 year observed risk among these reclassified patients was 16.6% (95% confidence interval 16.1% to 17.0%)-that is, below the 20% treatment threshold. Of the 78 024 patients classified at high risk on QRISK2, 11,962 (15.3%) would be reclassified at low risk by the modified Framingham score. The 10 year observed risk among these patients was 23.3% (22.2% to 24.4%)-that is, above the 20% threshold. In the validation cohort, the annual incidence rate of cardiovascular events among those with a QRISK2 score of >or=20% was 30.6 per 1000 person years (29.8 to 31.5) for women and 32.5 per 1000 person years (31.9 to 33.1) for men. The corresponding figures for the modified Framingham equation were 25.7 per 1000 person years (25.0 to 26.3) for women and 26.4 (26.0 to 26.8) for men). At the 20% threshold, the population identified by QRISK2 was at higher risk of a CV event than the population identified by the Framingham score. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating ethnicity, deprivation, and other clinical conditions into the QRISK2 algorithm for risk of cardiovascular disease improves the accuracy of identification of those at high risk in a nationally representative population. At the 20% threshold, QRISK2 is likely to be a more efficient and equitable tool for treatment decisions for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. As the validation was performed in a similar population to the population from which the algorithm was derived, it potentially has a "home advantage." Further validation in other populations is therefore advised.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Many risk assessment systems are available and have been comprehensively reviewed, including different Framingham models, 41 Systemic Coronary Risk Estimation (SCORE), 42 ASSIGN (CV risk estimation model from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network), 43 Q-Risk, 44 Prospective Cardiovascular Munster Study (PROCAM), 45 Reynolds, 46,47 CUORE, 48 the Pooled Cohort equations 49 and Globorisk. 5”
From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yusuf, S., Hawken, S., Ôunpuu, S., Dans, T., Avezum, A., Lanas, F., McQueen, M., Budaj, A., Pais, P., Varigos, J., et al. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17018-9 · Cited by 12,026
Missing data: our view of the state of the art
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147 · Cited by 11,638
General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care: The Framingham Heart Study
D’Agostino, R. B., Vasan, R. S., Pencina, M. J., Wolf, P. A., Cobain, M., Massaro, J. M., & Kannel, W. B. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.699579 · Cited by 7,491
Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on the Risk of Death: The Framingham Heart Study
Benjamin, E. J., Wolf, P. A., D’Agostino, R. B., Silbershatz, H., Kannel, W. B., & Levy, D. (1998) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.98.10.946 · Cited by 4,575
Sarnak, M. J., Levey, A. S., Schoolwerth, A. C., Coresh, J., Culleton, B., Hamm, L. L., McCullough, P. A., Kasiske, B. L., Kelepouris, E., Klag, M. J., et al. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000095676.90936.80 · Cited by 3,768
Multiple Imputation of Missing Values
Royston, P. (2004) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0400400301 · Cited by 2,340 · cited 1×
“We used fractional polynomials to model non-linear risk relations with continuous variables where appropriate.”
Cardiovascular disease risk profiles
Anderson, K. M., Odell, P. M., Wilson, P. W. F., & Kannel, W. B. (1991) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/0002-8703(91)90861-b · Cited by 2,163
Wang, T. J., Larson, M. G., Levy, D., Vasan, R. S., Leip, E. P., Wolf, P. A., D’Agostino, R. B., Murabito, J. M., Kannel, W. B., & Benjamin, E. J. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000072767.89944.6e · Cited by 1,970
Probability of stroke: a risk profile from the Framingham Study.
Wolf, P. A., D'Agostino, R. B., Belanger, A. J., & Kannel, W. B. (1991) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.22.3.312 · Cited by 1,782
McKeigue, P. M., Shah, B., & Marmot, M. G. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)91164-p · Cited by 1,618
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Gail M, Pfeiffer R. On evaluating models of absolute risk. Biostatistics 2005;6:227-39.
- Erika Graf CSWSMS. Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data. Stat Med 1999;18:2529-45.
- Maradit-Kremers H, Crowson C, Nicola P, Ballman K, Roger V, Jacobsend S, et al. Increased unrecognized coronary heart disease and sudden deaths in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based cohort study. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:402-11.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
Authors Task Force Members, Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redon, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cífková, R., Backer, G. D., et al. (2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht151 · Cited by 13,739
European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012)
Authors/Task Force Members:, Perk, J., De Backer, G., Gohlke, H., Graham, I., Reiner, Ž., Verschuren, M., Albus, C., Benlian, P., Boysen, G., et al. (2012) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs092 · Cited by 8,490
2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice
Piepoli, M. F., Hoes, A. W., Agewall, S., Albus, C., Brotons, C., Catapano, A. L., Cooney, M.-T., Corrà, U., Cosyns, B., Deaton, C., et al. (2016) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106 · Cited by 6,457
Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cifkova, R., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc · Cited by 5,655
Moons, K. G. M., Altman, D. G., Reitsma, J. B., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Macaskill, P., Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Ransohoff, D. F., & Collins, G. S. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-0698 · Cited by 5,147
“stated in journal articles (for example, QRISK2 [139]).”
BackgroundInfluential2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias
Catapano, A. L., Graham, I., De Backer, G., Wiklund, O., Chapman, M. J., Drexel, H., Hoes, A. W., Jennings, C. S., Landmesser, U., Pedersen, T. R., et al. (2016) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw272 · Cited by 3,162
PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies
Wolff, R. F., Moons, K. G. M., Riley, R. D., Whiting, P. F., Westwood, M., Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Kleijnen, J., Mallett, S., & for the PROBAST Group† (2019) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m18-1376 · Cited by 2,984
Hippisley-Cox, J., Coupland, C., & Brindle, P. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j2099 · Cited by 1,703
Self-citationGraham (2007) · doi:10.1097/01.hjr.0000277983.23934.c9 · Cited by 1,647
2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias
Catapano, A. L., Graham, I., De Backer, G., Wiklund, O., Chapman, M. J., Drexel, H., Hoes, A. W., Jennings, C. S., Landmesser, U., Pedersen, T. R., et al. (2016) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.08.018 · Cited by 1,582
Socioeconomic Status and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Challenges and Interventions
Schultz, W. M., Kelli, H. M., Lisko, J. C., Varghese, T., Shen, J., Sandesara, P., Quyyumi, A. A., Taylor, H. A., Gulati, M., Harold, J. G., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.117.029652 · Cited by 1,408
2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice
Authors/Task Force Members, Piepoli, M. F., Hoes, A. W., Agewall, S., Albus, C., Brotons, C., Catapano, A. L., Cooney, M. T., Corrà, U., Cosyns, B., et al. (2016) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/2047487316653709 · Cited by 1,435
Agca, R., Heslinga, S. C., Rollefstad, S., Heslinga, M., McInnes, I. B., Peters, M. J. L., Kvien, T. K., Dougados, M., Radner, H., Atzeni, F., et al. (2017) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209775 · Cited by 1,380
Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data?
Weng, S. F., Reps, J., Kai, J., Garibaldi, J. M., & Qureshi, N. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174944 · Cited by 1,346
Peters, M. J. L., Symmons, D. P. M., McCarey, D., Dijkmans, B. A. C., Nicola, P., Kvien, T. K., McInnes, I. B., Haentzschel, H., Gonzalez-Gay, M. A., Provan, S., et al. (2010) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.2009.113696 · Cited by 1,325
Riley, R. D., Snell, K. I., Ensor, J., Burke, D. L., Harrell Jr, F. E., Moons, K. G., & Collins, G. S. (2019) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.7992 · Cited by 1,409
“1 Using the LR statistic to derive the Cox-Snell Radj If the R(2)CS_app or R 2 CS_adj is not available in the publication of an existing model, the LR value may be reported, which would allow R(2)CS_app to be derived using Equation (6), then SVH for the model derived using Equation (7) (assuming the model's n and p ar…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPolygenic risk scores: from research tools to clinical instruments
Lewis, C. M., & Vassos, E. (2020) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-020-00742-5 · Cited by 1,360
Ahmed, Z., Mohamed, K., Zeeshan, S., & Dong, X. (2020) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baaa010 · Cited by 1,035
“ML is becoming the transformational force in healthcare (89) for guiding individual and population health with several computational benefits, which includes realtime patient monitoring; disease patterns analysis (90); disease diagnosis and prescription of medicines; patientcentric care provision with enhanced treatme…”
BackgroundArtificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety
Challen, R., Denny, J., Pitt, M., Gompels, L., Edwards, T., & Tsaneva-Atanasova, K. (2019) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008370 · Cited by 956
“Clinical decision support systems (DSS) are in widespread use in medicine and have had most impact providing guidance on the safe prescription of medicines, 12 guideline adherence, simple risk screening 13 or prognostic scoring.”
Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review
Damen, J. A. A. G., Hooft, L., Schuit, E., Debray, T. P. A., Collins, G. S., Tzoulaki, I., Lassale, C. M., Siontis, G. C. M., Chiocchia, V., Roberts, C., et al. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i2416 · Cited by 935
Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation
Collins, G. S., Dhiman, P., Ma, J., Schlussel, M. M., Archer, L., Van Calster, B., Harrell, F. E., Martin, G. P., Moons, K. G. M., van Smeden, M., et al. (2024) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-074819 · Cited by 798
“41 As with the random split approach, researchers might be tempted to split the data (eg, into different time periods and lengths, different centres) repeatedly until satisfactory performance has been achieved—this approach should be avoided.”
BackgroundNational Lipid Association Recommendations for Patient-Centered Management of Dyslipidemia: Part 2
Jacobson, T. A., Maki, K. C., Orringer, C. E., Jones, P. H., Kris-Etherton, P., Sikand, G., La Forge, R., Daniels, S. R., Wilson, D. P., Morris, P. B., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Lipidology · doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2015.09.002 · Cited by 784
2013 ESH/ESC Practice Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension
Mancia, G., Fagard, R. H., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T. C., Cífková, R., Backer, G. D., Dominiczak, A. F., et al. (2013) · Blood Pressure · doi:10.3109/08037051.2014.868629 · Cited by 749
ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias
Catapano, A. L., Reiner, Ž., De Backer, G., Graham, I., Taskinen, M.-R., Wiklund, O., Agewall, S., Alegria, E., Chapman, M. J., Durrington, P., et al. (2011) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.06.028 · Cited by 706
Collins, G. S., Ogundimu, E. O., & Altman, D. G. (2016) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.6787 · Cited by 665
“9 million person years of observation) contributing 96709 cardiovascular events from the QRESEARCH database [20].”
BackgroundMethodSiervo, M., Lara, J., Chowdhury, S., Ashor, A., Oggioni, C., & Mathers, J. C. (2015) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114514003341 · Cited by 656
JBS3 Board (2014) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305693 · Cited by 608
Alaa, A. M., Bolton, T. R., Angelantonio, E. D., Rudd, J. H. F., & van der Schaar, M. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213653 · Cited by 652
Barnes, T. R. E., Drake, R., Paton, C., Cooper, S. J., Deakin, J. F. W., Ferrier, I. N., Gregory, C. J., Haddad, P. M., Howes, O. D., Jones, I. R., et al. (2019) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881119889296 · Cited by 615
Riley, R. D., Ensor, J., Snell, K. I. E., Debray, T. P. A., Altman, D. G., Moons, K. G. M., & Collins, G. S. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i3140 · Cited by 585
“example, after development of the QRISK2 model using routinely collected data from 355 primary care practices, Hippisley-Cox et al.(5) immediately evaluated the model’s performance”
MethodHypertension and cardiovascular risk: General aspects
Kjeldsen, S. E. (2018) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2017.11.003 · Cited by 694
Foley, C. N., Staley, J. R., Breen, P. G., Sun, B. B., Kirk, P., Burgess, S., & Howson, J. M. M. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20885-8 · Cited by 552
Machine learning prediction in cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis
Krittanawong, C., Virk, H. H., Bangalore, S., Wang, Z., Johnson, K. W., Pinotti, R., Zhang, H.-J., Kaplin, S. L., Narasimhan, B., Kitai, T., et al. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72685-1 · Cited by 447
Hippisley‐Cox, J., & Coupland, C. A. C. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c2197 · Cited by 511
Self-citation2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice
Piepoli, M. F., Hoes, A. W., Agewall, S., Albus, C., Brotons, C., Catapano, A. L., Cooney, M. T., Corrà, U., Cosyns, B., Deaton, C., et al. (2016) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.05.037 · Cited by 502
Management of hypertension: summary of NICE guidance
Krause, T., Lovibond, K., Caulfield, M. J., McCormack, T., Williams, B., & on behalf of the Guideline Development Group (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d4891 · Cited by 481
Hippisley‐Cox, J., & Coupland, C. A. C. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b4229 · Cited by 493
Self-citationElliott, J., Bodinier, B., Bond, T. A., Chadeau‐Hyam, M., Εvangelou, Ε., Moons, K. G. M., Dehghan, A., Muller, D. C., Elliott, P., & Tzoulaki, I. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.22241 · Cited by 472
Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease: risks and implications for care
Clark, A. M., DesMeules, M., Luo, W., Duncan, A. S., & Wielgosz, A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2009.163 · Cited by 533
The Swedish CArdioPulmonary BioImage Study: objectives and design
Bergström, G. M. L., Berglund, G., Blomberg, A., Brandberg, J., Engström, G., Engvall, J. E., Eriksson, M., Fairé, U. D., Flinck, A., HANSSON, M. G., et al. (2015) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.12384 · Cited by 458
Volgman, A. S., Palaniappan, L. S., Aggarwal, N. T., Gupta, M., Khandelwal, A., Krishnan, A. V., Lichtman, J. H., Mehta, L. S., Patel, H. N., Shah, K. S., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000580 · Cited by 552
Value and Limitations of Existing Scores for the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk
Cooney, M. T., Dudina, A. L., & Graham, I. M. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.020 · Cited by 436
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Artificial intelligence and machine learning in precision and genomic medicine
Quazi, S. (2022) · Medical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12032-022-01711-1 · Cited by 466
Retracted2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
Mancia, G., Fagard, R. H., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T. C., Cífková, R., Backer, G. D., Dominiczak, A. F., et al. (2013) · Blood Pressure · doi:10.3109/08037051.2013.812549 · Cited by 430
Pavlou, M., Ambler, G., Seaman, S. R., Iorio, M. D., & Omar, R. (2015) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.6782 · Cited by 441
“Since last decade, risk models that are commonly used in practice such as the ‘QRISK-2’ and the ‘Framingham’ calculator for the risk of cardiovascular disease [4, 5] and the ‘HCM-SCD calculator’ for the risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic”
MethodRole of artificial intelligence in patient safety outcomes: systematic literature review
Choudhury, A., & Asan, O. (2020) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/18599 · Cited by 440
Hippisley‐Cox, J., Coupland, C. A. C., Robson, J. P., Sheikh, A., & Brindle, P. M. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b880 · Cited by 373
Self-citationHippisley-Cox, J., Coupland, C., Robson, J., & Brindle, P. (2010) · British medical journal · doi:10.1136/bmj.c6624 · Cited by 366
Self-citationCarbone, M., Sharp, S. J., Flack, S., Paximadas, D., Spiess, K., Adgey, C., Griffiths, L., Lim, R., Trembling, P., Williamson, K., et al. (2016) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.28017 · Cited by 354
“Following convention,((15,16)) we randomly allocated 60% of these UDCA-treated participants to a derivation cohort and the remaining 40% to a validation cohort.”
Hippisley-Cox, J., & Coupland, C. (2012) · British medical journal · doi:10.1136/bmj.e3427 · Cited by 357
Self-citationGrundy, S. M. (2013) · Journal of clinical lipidology · doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2013.10.001 · Cited by 353
SCORE2-Diabetes: 10-year cardiovascular risk estimation in type 2 diabetes in Europe
SCORE2-Diabetes Working Group and the ESC Cardiovascular Risk Collaboration, Pennells, L., Kaptoge, S., Østergaard, H. B., Read, S. H., Carinci, F., Franch-Nadal, J., Petitjean, C., Taylor, O., Hageman, S. H. J., et al. (2023) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad260 · Cited by 329
“The discrimination ability reported for SCORE2-Diabetes, was somewhat lower than that previously reported for CVD risk scores in the general population.(4,5,37,38) However, higher C-indices are expected to be seen in general population cohorts given the wider age range and heterogeneity in risk factor values.”
ResultPersonalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests
Edwards, A., Naik, G., Ahmed, H., Elwyn, G. J., Pickles, T., Hood, K., & Playle, R. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001865.pub3 · Cited by 331
Cardiovascular comorbidity in rheumatic diseases
Nurmohamed, M. T., Heslinga, M., & Kitas, G. D. (2015) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2015.112 · Cited by 338
Grundy, S. M., Arai, H., Barter, P. J., Bersot, T. P., Betteridge, D. J., Carmena, R., Cuevas, A. M., Davidson, M. H., Genest, J. J., Kesäniemi, Y. A., et al. (2013) · Journal of clinical lipidology · doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2013.12.005 · Cited by 334
Valtorta, N. K., Kanaan, M., Gilbody, S., & Hanratty, B. (2018) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/2047487318792696 · Cited by 323
Comparisons of established risk prediction models for cardiovascular disease: systematic review
Siontis, G. C. M., Tzoulaki, I., Siontis, K. C., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e3318 · Cited by 300
Greaves, C. J., Gillison, F., Stathi, A., Bennett, P., Reddy, P., Dunbar, J., Perry, R. A., Messom, D., Chandler, R., Francis, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-014-0159-z · Cited by 302
Rabar, S., Harker, M., O'Flynn, N., Wierzbicki, A. S., & On behalf of the Guideline Development Group (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g4356 · Cited by 292
Talmud, P. J., Hingorani, A. D., Cooper, J. A., Marmot, M. G., Brunner, E. J., Meena Kumari, B., Mika Kivimaki, B., & Humphries, S. E. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b4838 · Cited by 297
Arts, E., Popa, C. D., den Broeder, A. A., Semb, A. G., Toms, T. E., Kitas, G. D., van Riel, P. L., & Fransen, J. (2014) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204024 · Cited by 279
Backholer, K., Peters, S. A. E., Bots, S. H., Peeters, A., Huxley, R., & Woodward, M. (2016) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2016-207890 · Cited by 271
Cardiovascular disease risk factors in chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Major, R., Cheng, M. R. I., Grant, R. A., Shantikumar, S., Xu, G., Oozeerally, I., Brunskill, N. J., & Gray, L. J. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192895 · Cited by 254
Alexander, M., Loomis, A. K., van der Lei, J., Duarte-Salles, T., Prieto-Alhambra, D., Ansell, D., Pasqua, A., Lapi, F., Rijnbeek, P., Mosseveld, M., et al. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l5367 · Cited by 254
Myocardial strain measurement with feature-tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance: normal values
Taylor, R. J., Moody, W. E., Umar, F., Edwards, N. C., Taylor, T. J., Stegemann, B., Townend, J., Hor, K. N., Steeds, R. P., Mazur, W. M., et al. (2015) · European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1093/ehjci/jev006 · Cited by 264
Collins, P. G. S., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c2442 · Cited by 250
Collins, P. G. S., & Altman, D. G. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e4181 · Cited by 245
Liu, J., Davidson, E., Bhopal, R., White, M., Johnson, M., Netto, G., Deverill, M., & Sheikh, A. (2012) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta16440 · Cited by 237
Self-citationLangrish, J. P., Mills, N. L., Chan, J. K. K., Leseman, D. L. A. C., Aitken, R. J., Fokkens, P. H. B., Cassee, F. R., Li, J., Donaldson, K., Newby, D. E., et al. (2009) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/1743-8977-6-8 · Cited by 246
INDO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Baru, P. C. R. (2014) · ADVANCED SCIENCES INDEX · Cited by 236
Tonelli, M., Wanner, C., & for the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Lipid Guideline Development Work Group Members* (2014) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m13-2453 · Cited by 226
Generating high-fidelity synthetic patient data for assessing machine learning healthcare software
Tucker, A., Wang, Z., Rotalinti, Y., & Myles, P. R. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00353-9 · Cited by 257
Ramos, R., Comas-Cufí, M., Martí-Lluch, R., Balló, E., Ponjoan, A., Alves-Cabratosa, L., Blanch, J., Marrugat, J., Elosua, R., Grau, M., et al. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k3359 · Cited by 215
“Tools exist to predict CVD risk in patients aged up to 79 years, 19 or even 84 years, 41 but older populations are heterogeneous, with diverse life expectancy, different degrees of frailty or special comorbid conditions, and use of drug combinations.”
BackgroundNishimura, K., Okamura, T., Watanabe, M., Nakai, M., Takegami, M., Higashiyama, A., Kokubo, Y., Okayama, A., & Miyamoto, Y. (2014) · Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis · doi:10.5551/jat.19356 · Cited by 228
Cooney, M. T., Dudina, A., D'Agostino, R., & Graham, I. M. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.852756 · Cited by 222
Black, C., Sharma, P., Scotland, G., McCullough, K., McGurn, D., Robertson, L. M., Fluck, N., MacLeod, A. M., McNamee, P., Prescott, G. J., et al. (2010) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta14210 · Cited by 223
Hippisley‐Cox, J., & Coupland, C. A. C. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j5019 · Cited by 220
“10 29-32 An initial analysis was performed based on patients with complete data.”
MethodSelf-citationvan Dieren, S., Beulens, J. W. J., Kengne, A. P., Peelen, L. M., Rutten, G. E. H. M., Woodward, M., van der Schouw, Y. T., & Moons, K. G. M. (2011) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300734 · Cited by 219
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention in rheumatoid arthritis
Semb, A. G., Ikdahl, E., Wibetoe, G., Crowson, C. S., & Rollefstad, S. (2020) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/s41584-020-0428-y · Cited by 221
Should people at low risk of cardiovascular disease take a statin?
Abramson, J. D., Rosenberg, H. G., Jewell, N., & Wright, J. M. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f6123 · Cited by 208
Hippisley-Cox, J., & Coupland, C. (2012) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp12x616355 · Cited by 208
Self-citationZhao, J., Feng, Q., Wu, P., Lupu, R. A., Wilke, R. A., Wells, Q. S., Denny, J. C., & Wei, W. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-36745-x · Cited by 223
Two Risk-Scoring Systems for Predicting Incident Diabetes Mellitus in U.S. Adults Age 45 to 64 Years
Kahn, H. S., Cheng, Y. J., Thompson, T. J., Imperatore, G., & Gregg, E. W. (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-150-11-200906020-00002 · Cited by 204
Sterne, J. A. C., Bodalia, P. N., Bryden, P. A., Davies, P. A., López-López, J. A., Okoli, G. N., Thom, H. H. Z., Caldwell, D. M., Dias, S., Eaton, D., et al. (2017) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta21090 · Cited by 206
Basu, S., Sussman, J. B., Berkowitz, S. A., Hayward, R. A., & Yudkin, J. S. (2017) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(17)30221-8 · Cited by 206
Sex Differences in Peripheral Artery Disease
Pabón, M. A., Cheng, S. C., Altin, S. E., Sethi, S. S., Nelson, M. D., Moreau, K. L., Hamburg, N. M., & Hess, C. N. (2022) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.121.320702 · Cited by 208
Collins, P. G. S., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2584 · Cited by 192
The NHS Health Check in England: an evaluation of the first 4 years
Robson, J., Dostal, I., Sheikh, A., Eldridge, S., Madurasinghe, V., Griffiths, C., Coupland, C., & Hippisley-Cox, J. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008840 · Cited by 184
Self-citationCollins, G. S., Ogundimu, E. O., Cook, J. A., Manach, Y. L., & Altman, D. G. (2016) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.6986 · Cited by 185
“For convenience and simplicity, the models were developed using a subset of variables that were chosen from the total list of predictors contained in the QRISK2 [28] and QFracture [29] risk prediction models.”
MethodFrench, D., Cameron, E., Benton, J. S., Deaton, C., & Harvie, M. (2017) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-017-9895-z · Cited by 189
Hippisley‐Cox, J., & Coupland, C. A. C. (2010) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/1471-2296-11-49 · Cited by 178
Self-citationRisk prediction models for contrast induced nephropathy: systematic review
Silver, S. A., Shah, P. S., Chertow, G. M., Harel, S., Wald, R., & Harel, Z. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h4395 · Cited by 179
Hippisley‐Cox, J., & Coupland, C. A. C. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007825 · Cited by 177
“independent studies have examined other risk algorithms,(85) 86 88 89 they have demonstrated comparable performance compared with the validation in the QResearch database.(19) 80 84 We (or another academic team) intend to conduct a separate validation on an independent database using a different clinical system (CPRD)…”
MethodResultSelf-citationCurrent and future perspectives on the management of polypharmacy
Molokhia, M., & Majeed, A. (2017) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-017-0642-0 · Cited by 200
“cular risk, such as QRISK in the UK [23, 24].”
BackgroundWestwood, M. E., Al, M., Burgers, L. T., Redekop, K., Lhachimi, S. K., Armstrong, N., Raatz, H., Misso, K., Severens, J. L., & Kleijnen, J. (2013) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta17090 · Cited by 177
Cardiovascular risk estimation in older persons: SCORE O.P
Cooney, M. T., Selmer, R., Lindman, A., Tverdal, A., Menotti, A., Thomsen, T., DeBacker, G., De Bacquer, D., Tell, G. S., Njolstad, I., et al. (2016) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/2047487315588390 · Cited by 172
Risk scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease
Karmali, K. N., Persell, S. D., Perel, P., Lloyd‐Jones, D. M., Berendsen, M. A., & Huffman, M. D. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006887.pub4 · Cited by 182
Systemic inflammatory response and neuromuscular involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Lu, C., Allen, K., Oei, F., Leoni, E., Kühle, J., Tree, T. I. M., Fratta, P., Sharma, N., Sidle, K. C. L., Howard, R., et al. (2016) · Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1212/nxi.0000000000000244 · Cited by 181
“QRISK2, a cerebrovascular disease risk score, was included in the statistical analyses.(12)”
MethodDrury, P. L., Ting, R., Zannino, D., Ehnholm, C., Flack, J., Whiting, M., Fassett, R., Ansquer, J.-C., Dixon, P., Davis, T. M. E., et al. (2011) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-010-1854-1 · Cited by 195
Solomon, D. H., Greenberg, J. D., Curtis, J. R., Liu, M., Farkouh, M. E., Tsao, P., Kremer, J. M., & Etzel, C. J. (2015) · Arthritis & Rheumatology · doi:10.1002/art.39195 · Cited by 169
“rigorously or in such a large cohort with RA (18,19).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Hippisley-Cox, J., Coupland, C., Vinogradova, Y., Robson, J., Minhas, R., Sheikh, A., & Brindle, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Medway NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-06-23
- Volume
- 336
- Issue
- 7659
- Pages
- 1475-1482
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- PMC
- PMC2440904
- OpenAlex
- W2055838663
- Cited by
- 1,459
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 106 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 102 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 90 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 80
- FWCI
- 62.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- University of Nottingham
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Keywords
- QRISK2, cardiovascular risk prediction, risk reclassification, coronary artery disease, stroke, transient ischemic attack, ethnic groups, South Asian patients, risk discrimination and calibration, cardiovascular disease prevention, NICE guidelines, QResearch database, England and Wales, general practice records, family history of coronary heart disease
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Cardiovascular Diseases, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Wales, Epidemiologic Studies, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review