The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate version two of the QRISK cardiovascular disease risk algorithm (QRISK2) to provide accurate estimates of cardiovascular risk in patients from different ethnic groups in England and Wales and to compare its performance with the modified version of Framingham score recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). DESIGN: Prospective open cohort study with routinely collected data from general practice, 1 January 1993 to 31 March 2008. SETTING: 531 practices in England and Wales contributing to the national QRESEARCH database. PARTICIPANTS: 2.3 million patients aged 35-74 (over 16 million person years) with 140,000 cardiovascular events. Overall population (derivation and validation cohorts) comprised 2.22 million people who were white or whose ethnic group was not recorded, 22,013 south Asian, 11,595 black African, 10,402 black Caribbean, and 19,792 from Chinese or other Asian or other ethnic groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: First (incident) diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (coronary heart disease, stroke, and transient ischaemic attack) recorded in general practice records or linked Office for National Statistics death certificates. Risk factors included self assigned ethnicity, age, sex, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, ratio of total serum cholesterol:high density lipoprotein cholesterol, body mass index, family history of coronary heart disease in first degree relative under 60 years, Townsend deprivation score, treated hypertension, type 2 diabetes, renal disease, atrial fibrillation, and rheumatoid arthritis. RESULTS: The validation statistics indicated that QRISK2 had improved discrimination and calibration compared with the modified Framingham score. The QRISK2 algorithm explained 43% of the variation in women and 38% in men compared with 39% and 35%, respectively, by the modified Framingham score. Of the 112,156 patients classified as high risk (that is, >or=20% risk over 10 years) by the modified Framingham score, 46,094 (41.1%) would be reclassified at low risk with QRISK2. The 10 year observed risk among these reclassified patients was 16.6% (95% confidence interval 16.1% to 17.0%)-that is, below the 20% treatment threshold. Of the 78 024 patients classified at high risk on QRISK2, 11,962 (15.3%) would be reclassified at low risk by the modified Framingham score. The 10 year observed risk among these patients was 23.3% (22.2% to 24.4%)-that is, above the 20% threshold. In the validation cohort, the annual incidence rate of cardiovascular events among those with a QRISK2 score of >or=20% was 30.6 per 1000 person years (29.8 to 31.5) for women and 32.5 per 1000 person years (31.9 to 33.1) for men. The corresponding figures for the modified Framingham equation were 25.7 per 1000 person years (25.0 to 26.3) for women and 26.4 (26.0 to 26.8) for men). At the 20% threshold, the population identified by QRISK2 was at higher risk of a CV event than the population identified by the Framingham score. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating ethnicity, deprivation, and other clinical conditions into the QRISK2 algorithm for risk of cardiovascular disease improves the accuracy of identification of those at high risk in a nationally representative population. At the 20% threshold, QRISK2 is likely to be a more efficient and equitable tool for treatment decisions for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. As the validation was performed in a similar population to the population from which the algorithm was derived, it potentially has a "home advantage." Further validation in other populations is therefore advised.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Many risk assessment systems are available and have been comprehensively reviewed, including different Framingham models, 41 Systemic Coronary Risk Estimation (SCORE), 42 ASSIGN (CV risk estimation model from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network), 43 Q-Risk, 44 Prospective Cardiovascular Munster Study (PROCAM), 45 Reynolds, 46,47 CUORE, 48 the Pooled Cohort equations 49 and Globorisk. 5”
From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yusuf, S., Hawken, S., Ôunpuu, S., Dans, T., Avezum, A., Lanas, F., McQueen, M., Budaj, A., Pais, P., Varigos, J., et al. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17018-9 · Cited by 12,026
Missing data: our view of the state of the art
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147 · Cited by 11,638
General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care: The Framingham Heart Study
D’Agostino, R. B., Vasan, R. S., Pencina, M. J., Wolf, P. A., Cobain, M., Massaro, J. M., & Kannel, W. B. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.699579 · Cited by 7,491
Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on the Risk of Death: The Framingham Heart Study
Benjamin, E. J., Wolf, P. A., D’Agostino, R. B., Silbershatz, H., Kannel, W. B., & Levy, D. (1998) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.98.10.946 · Cited by 4,575
Sarnak, M. J., Levey, A. S., Schoolwerth, A. C., Coresh, J., Culleton, B., Hamm, L. L., McCullough, P. A., Kasiske, B. L., Kelepouris, E., Klag, M. J., et al. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000095676.90936.80 · Cited by 3,768
Multiple Imputation of Missing Values
Royston, P. (2004) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0400400301 · Cited by 2,340 · cited 1×
“We used fractional polynomials to model non-linear risk relations with continuous variables where appropriate.”
Cardiovascular disease risk profiles
Anderson, K. M., Odell, P. M., Wilson, P. W. F., & Kannel, W. B. (1991) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/0002-8703(91)90861-b · Cited by 2,163
Wang, T. J., Larson, M. G., Levy, D., Vasan, R. S., Leip, E. P., Wolf, P. A., D’Agostino, R. B., Murabito, J. M., Kannel, W. B., & Benjamin, E. J. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000072767.89944.6e · Cited by 1,970
Probability of stroke: a risk profile from the Framingham Study.
Wolf, P. A., D'Agostino, R. B., Belanger, A. J., & Kannel, W. B. (1991) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.22.3.312 · Cited by 1,782
McKeigue, P. M., Shah, B., & Marmot, M. G. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)91164-p · Cited by 1,618
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Gail M, Pfeiffer R. On evaluating models of absolute risk. Biostatistics 2005;6:227-39.
- Erika Graf CSWSMS. Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data. Stat Med 1999;18:2529-45.
- Maradit-Kremers H, Crowson C, Nicola P, Ballman K, Roger V, Jacobsend S, et al. Increased unrecognized coronary heart disease and sudden deaths in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based cohort study. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:402-11.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,000
Revisiting the links between glycaemia, diabetes and cardiovascular disease
Sattar, N. (2013) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-012-2817-5 · Cited by 163
The Aging Risk and Atherosclerosis: A Fresh Look at Arterial Homeostasis
Head, T., Daunert, S., & Goldschmidt‐Clermont, P. J. (2017) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2017.00216 · Cited by 172
“Algorithms designed to interpret these factors and provide relative individual risk scores [Framingham (D’Agostino et al., 2008), QRISK R©2-2016 (Hippisley-Cox et al., 2008), ACC/AHA ASCVD Goff et al., 2014] have concluded that the strongest risk factor for atherosclerosis and CVD is indisputably age; using existing a…”
BackgroundAssessment of Cardiovascular Disease Risk
Goldsborough, E. F., Osuji, N., & Blaha, M. J. (2022) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2022.02.005 · Cited by 169
F. Piepoli, M. (2017) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-016-9583-6 · Cited by 162
“mation model from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) [53], Q-Risk [54, 55], PROCAM (Prospective Cardiovascular Munster Study) [56],”
Garg, N. K., Muduli, S. K., Kapoor, A., Tewari, S., Kumar, S., Khanna, R., & Goel, P. K. (2017) · Indian Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ihj.2017.01.015 · Cited by 171
Astbury, N. M., Aveyard, P., Nickless, A., Hood, K., Corfield, K., Lowe, R., & Jebb, S. A. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k3760 · Cited by 155
The Framingham Heart Study's Impact on Global Risk Assessment
Bitton, A., & Gaziano, T. A. (2010) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2010.04.001 · Cited by 164
O’Mahony, C., Tome, M., Lambiase, P. D., Pantazis, A. A., Dickie, S., McKenna, W. J., & Elliot, P. M. (2013) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303271 · Cited by 159
van Staa, T. P., Dyson, L., McCann, G., Padmanabhan, S., Belatri, R., Goldacre, B. M., Cassell, J., Pirmohamed, M., Torgerson, D. J., Ronaldson, S. J., et al. (2014) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta18430 · Cited by 162
“The CVD risks as predicted by QRISK2 and Framingham risk score were then estimated.(33,34) The Framingham risk score uses an algorithm based on age, sex, ethnicity, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, ratio of cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein and history of diabetes mellitus and left ventricular hypertroph…”
MethodTHE GOLDEN AGE : MASA EFEKTIF MERANCANG KUALITAS ANAK
Uce, L. (2017) · Bunayya Jurnal Pendidikan Anak · doi:10.22373/bunayya.v1i2.1322 · Cited by 191
Hippisley-Cox, J., Coupland, C., & Brindle, P. (2013) · British medical journal · doi:10.1136/bmj.f2573 · Cited by 164
Self-citationPatient Similarity Networks for Precision Medicine
Pai, S., & Bader, G. D. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2018.05.037 · Cited by 159
Crowson, C. S., Gabriel, S. E., Semb, A. G., van Riel, P. L. C. M., Karpouzas, G. A., Dessein, P. H., Hitchon, C. A., Pascual‐Ramos, V., Kitas, G. D., Douglas, K., et al. (2017) · Lara D. Veeken · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kex038 · Cited by 152
Inflammation, Autoimmunity, Infection, and Stroke
Parikh, N. S., Merkler, A. E., & Iadecola, C. (2020) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.119.024157 · Cited by 151
“Rheumatoid Arthritis Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased risk of CVD and has been included alongside conventional risk factors in a CVD risk score.(41) Data specific to stroke are less abundant but consistent.”
BackgroundInvestigation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure in Young People
Hinton, T., Adams, Z. H., Baker, R. P., Hope, K. A., Paton, J. F. R., Hart, E. C., & Nightingale, A. K. (2019) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.119.13820 · Cited by 161
“In the United Kingdom, QRISK2 is the preferred 10-year risk assessment tool but was validated on 35- to 74-year olds.(42) The latest version of QRISK3 has been extended to 25 to 84 years of age and includes relative risk, heart age, and lifetime risk calculation.”
MethodJagpal, A., & Navarro-Millán, I. Y. (2018) · BMC Rheumatology · doi:10.1186/s41927-018-0014-y · Cited by 155
“The QRISK-2 calculator is the only calculator that takes RA into account as a CVD risk factor in addition to traditional risk factors [148].”
BackgroundA risk-stratified approach to colorectal cancer prevention and diagnosis
Hull, M. A., Rees, C. J., Sharp, L., & Koo, S. (2020) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-020-00368-3 · Cited by 145
Rapsomaniki, E., Shah, A. D., Perel, P., Denaxas, S., George, J., Nicholas, O., Udumyan, R., Feder, G. S., Hingorani, A. D., Timmis, A., et al. (2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht533 · Cited by 142
Hippisley‐Cox, J., & Coupland, C. A. C. (2012) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp13x660733 · Cited by 140
Self-citationCardiovascular risk assessment: a global perspective
Zhao, D. H., Liu, J., Xie, W., & Qi, Y. (2015) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2015.28 · Cited by 143
Hippisley‐Cox, J., & Coupland, C. A. C. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i1450 · Cited by 148
Self-citationJenkins, D. A., Martin, G. P., Sperrin, M., Riley, R. D., Debray, T. P. A., Collins, G. S., & Peek, N. (2021) · Diagnostic and Prognostic Research · doi:10.1186/s41512-020-00090-3 · Cited by 131
“For example, models such as QRISK are now updated yearly [3, 20] using contemporary data and also revised to include additional predictors (such as the revision of QRIS K2 [21] into QRISK3 [3]).”
Method2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice
Piepoli, M. F., Hoes, A. W., Agewall, S., Albus, C., Brotons, C., Catapano, A. L., Cooney, M. T., Corrà, U., Cosyns, B., Deaton, C., et al. (2016) · Kardiologia Polska · doi:10.5603/kp.2016.0120 · Cited by 152
Cardiovascular risk in renal transplant recipients
Devine, P. A., Courtney, A. E., & Maxwell, A. P. (2018) · Journal of Nephrology · doi:10.1007/s40620-018-0549-4 · Cited by 137
Waldron, C.-A., van der Weijden, T., Ludt, S., Gallacher, J., & Elwyn, G. J. (2010) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.014 · Cited by 135
Schembri, S., Williamson, P. A., Short, P. M., Singanayagam, A., Akram, A. R., Taylor, J., Singanayagam, A., Hill, A. T., & Chalmers, J. D. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f1235 · Cited by 135
Hippisley‐Cox, J., & Coupland, C. A. C. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d4656 · Cited by 132
Self-citationTillin, T., Hughes, A. D., Whincup, P., Mayet, J., Sattar, N., McKeigue, P. M., Chaturvedi, N., & On behalf of the SABRE Study Group (2014) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304474 · Cited by 130
Snell, K. I. E., Ensor, J., Debray, T. P. A., Moons, K. G. M., & Riley, R. D. (2017) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280217705678 · Cited by 130
“Section 4 then illustrates the key finding using a random-effects meta-analysis to summarise the performance of the QRISK2 model across multiple general practices.(25) Section 5 concludes with discussion, including recommendations for the scale on which to pool the C-statistic and calibration measures.”
MethodCar, J., Sheikh, A., Wicks, P., & Williams, M. S. (2019) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1382-x · Cited by 126
Self-citationShannon, O. M., Stephan, B. C. M., Granic, A., Lentjes, M. A. H., Hayat, S. A., Mulligan, A. A., Brayne, C., Khaw, K., Bundy, R., Aldred, S., et al. (2019) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqz114 · Cited by 127
Pétursson, H., Sigurdsson, J. A., Bengtsson, C., Nilsen, T. I. L., & Getz, L. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026621 · Cited by 128
Hippisley-Cox, J., & Coupland, C. (2013) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003482 · Cited by 123
Self-citationHighly accurate prediction of food challenge outcome using routinely available clinical data
DunnGalvin, A., Daly, D., Cullinane, C., Stenke, E., Keeton, D., Erlewyn‐Lajeunesse, M., Roberts, G. C., Lucas, J. S., & Hourihane, J. O. (2011) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.004 · Cited by 122
How much does HDL cholesterol add to risk estimation? A report from the SCORE Investigators
Cooney, M. T., Dudina, A., De Bacquer, D., Fitzgerald, A., Conroy, R., Sans, S., Menotti, A., De Backer, G., Jousilahti, P., Keil, U., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/hjr.0b013e3283213140 · Cited by 121
Kitas, G. D., Nightingale, P., Armitage, J., Sattar, N. A., Belch, J. J. F., & Symmons, D. P. M. (2019) · Arthritis & Rheumatology · doi:10.1002/art.40892 · Cited by 126
Adding socioeconomic status to Framingham scoring to reduce disparities in coronary risk assessment
Fiscella, K. A., Tancredi, D. J., & Franks, P. J. (2009) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2009.03.019 · Cited by 121
Hinton, W., McGovern, A. P., Coyle, R. M., Han, T. S., Sharma, P., Correa, A., Ferreira, F. M., & de Lusignan, S. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020282 · Cited by 118
“Design Cross-sectional study of adults with and without CVD. setting The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) is an English primary care sentinel network.”
BackgroundInfluentialHippisley‐Cox, J., & Coupland, C. A. C. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i3477 · Cited by 123
Self-citationAre People With Chronic Diseases Interested in Using Telehealth? A Cross-Sectional Postal Survey
Edwards, L., Thomas, C., Gregory, A. C., Yardley, L., O’Cathain, A., Montgomery, A. A., & Salisbury, C. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3257 · Cited by 117
“We calculated QRISK2 to assess CVD risk where possible, but since this score was not available through all general practice computer systems, we used Framingham risk scores in some practices.”
MethodPeiris, D., Joshi, R., Webster, R. J., Groenestein, P., Usherwood, T. P., Heeley, E. L., Turnbull, F., Lipman, A., & Patel, A. A. (2009) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1258 · Cited by 120
Wald, N., Simmonds, M. C., & Morris, J. K. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018742 · Cited by 113
A Review of Emerging Technologies for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus
Zarkogianni, K., Litsa, E. E., Mitsis, K., Wu, P.-Y., Kaddi, C. D., Cheng, C., Wang, M. D., & Nikita, K. S. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2015.2470521 · Cited by 117
“CVD and diabetic retinopathy constitute the most commonly target complications.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCardiovascular Risk Prediction Models and Scores in the Era of Personalized Medicine
Sofogianni, A., Stalikas, N., Antza, C., & Τζιόμαλος, Κ. (2022) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm12071180 · Cited by 120
Hippisley‐Cox, J., & Coupland, C. A. C. (2012) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp13x660724 · Cited by 107
Self-citationSharma, V., Ali, I., van der Veer, S. N., Martin, G. P., Ainsworth, J. D., & Augustine, T. (2021) · BMJ Health & Care Informatics · doi:10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100253 · Cited by 110
Hippisley‐Cox, J., & Coupland, C. A. C. (2011) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp12x616346 · Cited by 110
Self-citationJepson, R. G., Harris, F., Bowes, A. M., Robertson, R., Avan, G., & Sheikh, A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045333 · Cited by 105
Self-citationMarston, L., Carpenter, J. R., Walters, K. R., Morris, R. W., Nazareth, I., White, I. R., & Petersen, I. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004958 · Cited by 105
Franks, P. J., Winters, P., Tancredi, D. J., & Fiscella, K. A. (2011) · BMC Cardiovascular Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2261-11-28 · Cited by 103
Recent Update to the US Cholesterol Treatment Guidelines
Nayor, M. G., & Vasan, R. S. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.116.021407 · Cited by 106
“Compared with the Pooled Cohort equations and SCORE risk assessment tool, the QRISK2 multivariable model includes additional risk factors such as ethnicity, family history of premature CHD, socioeconomic deprivation, body mass index, rheumatoid arthritis, CKD, and atrial fibrillation (in addition to age, sex, systolic…”
Distribution of short and lifetime risks for cardiovascular disease in Italians
Castelnuovo, A. F. D., Costanzo, S., Persichillo, M., Olivieri, M., Curtis, A. D., Zito, F., Donati, M. B., de Gaetano, G., & Iacoviello, L. (2011) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/1741826711410820 · Cited by 102
Barriers to cardiovascular disease risk scoring and primary prevention in Europe
Hobbs, R. F., Jukema, J. W., Silva, P. M. D., McCormack, T., & Catapano, A. L. (2010) · QJM · doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcq122 · Cited by 104
Du, Z., Yang, Y., Zheng, J., Li, Q., Lin, D., Li, Y., Fan, J., Cheng, W., Chen, X.-H., & Cai, Y. (2020) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/17257 · Cited by 107
“Several well-known risk scales such as the Framingham scales [3-5], American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association scales [6], QRISK [7], QRISK2 [8], and SCORE [9] have been established following years of population cohort studies, which provide an effective reference for clinicians to carry out disease pre…”
BackgroundCommunicating risk to patients and the public
Naik, G., Ahmed, H., & Edwards, A. (2012) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp12x636236 · Cited by 100
Wang, T., Li, Y., & Zheng, X. (2023) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s10389-023-01825-4 · Cited by 100
“Extensive studies have demonstrated that CVD may be associated with socioeconomic status (SES) and cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) (Havranek et al. 2015; Kaplan and Keil 1993; Woodward et al. 2007; Hippisley-Cox et al. 2008).”
Sutcliffe, P. A., Connock, M. J., Gurung, T., Freeman, K., Johnson, S. A., Kandala, N., Grove, A., Gurung, B., Morrow, S., & Clarke, A. (2013) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta17430 · Cited by 99
Mohd Faizal, A. S., Thevarajah, T. M., Khor, S. M., & Chang, S.-W. (2021) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106190 · Cited by 113
Timpka, S., Fraser, A., Schyman, T., Stuart, J. J., Åsvold, B. O., Mogren, I., Franks, P. W., & Rich-Edwards, J. W. (2018) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-018-0429-1 · Cited by 99
Dziopa, K., Asselbergs, F. W., Gratton, J., Chaturvedi, N., & Schmidt, A. F. (2022) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-021-05640-y · Cited by 106
Cardiovascular risk scores do not account for the effect of treatment: a review
Liew, S. M., Doust, J. A., & Glasziou, P. (2011) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.2010.220442 · Cited by 95
George, J., Mathur, R., Shah, A. D., Pujades‐Rodríguez, M., Denaxas, S., Smeeth, L. L., Timmis, A., & Hemingway, H. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178945 · Cited by 98
“[59] Additionally, QRISK2,[60] the only cardiovascular screening tool currently recommended for use in the UK by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, [61] whether for individual patients or to prioritise patients for programmes such as NHS PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178945 J…”
MethodInfluentialKhanna, N. N., Jamthikar, A. D., Gupta, D., Piga, M., Saba, L., Carcassi, C., Giannopoulos, A. A., Nicolaides, A. N., Laird, J. R., Suri, H. S., et al. (2019) · Current Atherosclerosis Reports · doi:10.1007/s11883-019-0766-x · Cited by 96
Hippisley-Cox, J., & Coupland, C. (2014) · British medical journal · doi:10.1136/bmj.g4606 · Cited by 96
Self-citationThe New Pooled Cohort Equations Risk Calculator
Preiss, D., & Kristensen, S. L. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2015.02.001 · Cited by 100
Putting polypills into practice: challenges and lessons learned
Webster, R. J., Castellano, J. M., & Onuma, O. K. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30558-5 · Cited by 93
Longitudinal associations between loneliness, social isolation and cardiovascular events
Bu, F., Zaninotto, P., & Fancourt, D. E. (2020) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316614 · Cited by 104
Personalized medicine—a modern approach for the diagnosis and management of hypertension
Savoia, C., Volpe, M., Grassi, G., Borghi, C., Rosei, E. A., & Touyz, R. M. (2017) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs20160407 · Cited by 97
Hippisley‐Cox, J., & Coupland, C. A. C. (2011) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp11x606627 · Cited by 92
Self-citationDevelopment of scoring system for risk stratification in clinical medicine: a step-by-step tutorial
Zhang, Z., Zhang, H., & Khanal, M. K. (2017) · Annals of Translational Medicine · doi:10.21037/atm.2017.08.22 · Cited by 92
Weale, M. E., Riveros-Mckay, F., Selzam, S., Seth, P., Moore, R., Tarran, W. A., Gradovich, E., Giner-Delgado, C., Palmer, D. S., Wells, D., et al. (2021) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.02.032 · Cited by 86
van Staa, T. P., Gulliford, M. C., Ng, E. S. W., Goldacre, B. M., & Smeeth, L. L. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106455 · Cited by 94
“The number of people with a follow-up exceeding 10 years was also larger than that in the studies for ASSIGN, Framingham and QRISK1 [5,6,8].”
InfluentialMärz, W., Dippel, F.-W., Theobald, K., Gorcyca, K., Iorga, Ş. R., & Ansell, D. (2018) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.11.020 · Cited by 87
Ethnic differences in associations between blood pressure and stroke in south Asian and European men
Eastwood, S. V., Tillin, T., Chaturvedi, N., & Hughes, A. D. (2015) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.115.05672 · Cited by 82
“been proposed that SBP should be the sole target for intervention,(8) and many risk estimators only include SBP in their calculations.(9,10) Such assumptions need to be tested in non-European”
BackgroundNavarro-Millán, I. Y., Yang, S., DuVall, S. L., Chen, L., Baddley, J. W., Cannon, G. W., Delzell, E., Zhang, J., Safford, M. M., Patkar, N. M., et al. (2015) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204987 · Cited by 89
Hippisley‐Cox, J., & Coupland, C. A. C. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j4208 · Cited by 86
Self-citationJonnagaddala, J., Liaw, S., RAY, P. K., Kumar, M., Chang, N., & Dai, H.-J. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.08.003 · Cited by 89
“However, a few studies have previously recommended modifications to the existing FRS to improve its accuracy [31].”
BackgroundDerivation and Validation of a New Cardiovascular Risk Score for People With Type 2 Diabetes
Elley, C. R., Robinson, E., Kenealy, T. W., Bramley, D. M., & Drury, P. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-1444 · Cited by 88
Rahman, M. S., Ambler, G., Choodari‐Oskooei, B., & Omar, R. (2017) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0336-2 · Cited by 89
“org/publicdomain/ze risk of in-hospital mortality following heart valve surgery and to predict the risk of developing cardiovascular disease within the next 10 years [3, 4].”
BackgroundWeng, S. F., Kai, J., Guha, I. N., & Qureshi, N. (2015) · Open Heart · doi:10.1136/openhrt-2015-000272 · Cited by 84
“This approach follows the same imputation procedures utilised in the original QRISK2 algorithm.(3) A descriptive analysis was performed, reporting number (%), mean (SD) and median (IQR) for categorical, normal continuous and non-normal continuous variables, respectively.”
MethodKandula, N. R., Kanaya, A. M., Liu, K., Lee, J. Y., Herrington, D. M., Hulley, S. B., Persell, S. D., Lloyd‐Jones, D. M., & Huffman, M. D. (2014) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.114.001117 · Cited by 85
O’Keeffe, A. G., Nazareth, I., & Petersen, I. (2016) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s104258 · Cited by 82
Benefits and Harms of Antihypertensive Treatment in Low-Risk Patients With Mild Hypertension
Sheppard, J. P., Stevens, S., Stevens, R., Martin, U., Mant, J., Hobbs, R. F., & McManus, R. J. (2018) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4684 · Cited by 85
“8%) had available risk factor information to calculate a QRISK2 score.(2) It was possible to estimate a QRISK2 score for the remaining”
InfluentialBarriers to Routine Risk-Score Use for Healthy Primary Care Patients
Müller‐Riemenschneider, F. (2010) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.66 · Cited by 87
Graham, N., Ward, J., Mackay, D., Pell, J. P., Cavanagh, J., Padmanabhan, S., & Smıth, D. J. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024433 · Cited by 84
“Although patients were not directly involved with the design of the specific research questions in this study, the hypotheses tested were developed in the context of clinical experience that depression and hypertension may interact to impact on CVD. UK Biobank has an active and ongoing programme of participant involve…”
InfluentialChun, M., Clarke, R., Cairns, B. J., Clifton, D. A., Bennett, D., Chen, Y., Guo, Y., Pei, P., Lv, J., Yu, C., et al. (2021) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocab068 · Cited by 89
“841] [8-35] 1722 Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2021, Vol.”
BackgroundBandyopadhyay, S., Wolfson, J. A., Vock, D. M., Vazquez‐Benitez, G., Adomavičius, G., Elidrisi, M., Johnson, P. E., & O’Connor, P. J. (2014) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-014-0386-6 · Cited by 89
“Recent systematic reviews found that there are over 100 risk models produced between 1999 and 2009 [Cooney et al., 2009, 2010, Matheny et al., 2011] including the well-known Framingham [D’Agostino et al., 2008], SCORE [Conroy et al., 2003], ASSIGN-SCORE [Woodward et al., 2007], QRISK1 [Hippisley-Cox et al., 2007, 2008…”
McKay, A. J., Hogan, H., Humphries, S. E., Marks, D., Ray, K. K., & Miners, A. H. (2018) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.05.047 · Cited by 84
The Maudsley environmental risk score for psychosis
Vassos, E., Sham, P. C., Kempton, M. J., Trotta, A., Stilo, S. A., Gayer-Anderson, C. E., Forti, M. D., Lewis, C. M., Murray, R. M., & Morgan, C. (2019) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291719002319 · Cited by 88
Consensus statement on management of dyslipidemia in Indian subjects
Chandra, K. S., Bansal, M., Nair, T., Iyengar, S. S., Gupta, R., Manchanda, S. C., Mohanan, P. P., Rao, V. D., Manjunath, C. N., Sawhney, J. P. S., et al. (2014) · Indian Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ihj.2014.12.001 · Cited by 86
Lipids, lipid modifying agents and cardiovascular risk: a review of the evidence
Preiss, D., & Sattar, N. A. (2008) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03490.x · Cited by 80
Kimenai, D. M., Pirondini, L., Gregson, J., Prieto, D., Pocock, S. J., Perel, P., Hamilton, T., Welsh, P., Campbell, A., Porteous, D. J., et al. (2022) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.122.060042 · Cited by 76
“30 In addition, incorporation of socioeconomic status to the Framingham Risk Score was evaluated in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study.”
MethodReducing health inequalities through general practice
Gkiouleka, A., Wong, G., Sowden, S. L., Bambra, C. L., Siersbaek, R., Manji, S., Moseley, A., Harmston, R. R., Kuhn, I. L., & Ford, J. A. (2023) · The Lancet Public Health · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(23)00093-2 · Cited by 89
Nickson, D., Meyer, C., Walasek, L., & Toro, C. T. (2023) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02341-x · Cited by 99
“…led to cardiovascular risk prediction becoming established in routine clinical care and the UK QRISK versions 2 and 3 show significant improvements in discrimination performance over the Framingham Risk Score and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) score methods [34] that preceded them.”
MethodSamani, N. J., Beeston, E., Greengrass, C., Riveros-Mckay, F., Dębiec, R., Lawday, D., Wang, Q., Budgeon, C. A., Braund, P. S., Bramley, R., et al. (2024) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae342 · Cited by 86
Cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis: assessment, management and next steps
Zegkos, T., Kitas, G. D., & Dimitroulas, T. (2016) · Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease · doi:10.1177/1759720x16643340 · Cited by 81
South Asians and coronary disease: is there discordance between effects on incidence and prognosis?
Zaman, M., Philipson, P., Chen, R., Farag, A., Shipley, M. J., Marmot, M. G., Timmis, A., & Hemingway, H. (2013) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302925 · Cited by 81
Handling missing predictor values when validating and applying a prediction model to new patients
Hoogland, J., van Barreveld, M., Debray, T. P. A., Reitsma, J. B., Verstraelen, T. E., Dijkgraaf, M. G. W., & Zwinderman, A. H. (2020) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.8682 · Cited by 90
Socioeconomic Status and Coronary Heart Disease Risk Prediction
Fiscella, K. A. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2008.792 · Cited by 78
Cardiovascular risk age: concepts and practicalities
Cooney, M. T., Vartiainen, E. A., Laatikainen, T. K., Bacquer, D. D., McGorrian, C., Dudina, A. L., Graham, I. M., & on behalf of the SCORE and FINRISK investigators (2012) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301478 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Hippisley-Cox, J., Coupland, C., Vinogradova, Y., Robson, J., Minhas, R., Sheikh, A., & Brindle, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Medway NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-06-23
- Volume
- 336
- Issue
- 7659
- Pages
- 1475-1482
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- PMC
- PMC2440904
- OpenAlex
- W2055838663
- Cited by
- 1,459
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 106 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 102 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 90 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 80
- FWCI
- 62.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- University of Nottingham
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Keywords
- QRISK2, cardiovascular risk prediction, risk reclassification, coronary artery disease, stroke, transient ischemic attack, ethnic groups, South Asian patients, risk discrimination and calibration, cardiovascular disease prevention, NICE guidelines, QResearch database, England and Wales, general practice records, family history of coronary heart disease
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Cardiovascular Diseases, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Wales, Epidemiologic Studies, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review