START (STrAtegies for RelaTives) study: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a manual-based coping strategy programme in promoting the mental health of carers of people with dementia
Open accessAbstract
Background: Two-thirds of people with dementia live at home, receiving most care from family carers, about 40% of whom have clinically significant depression or anxiety. This impacts on the person with dementia, families and society, predicting care breakdown. There are currently no clinically effective and cost-effective NHS family carer interventions. Objectives: To assess the STrAtegies for RelaTives (START) intervention in the short (4 and 8 months) and long term (1 and 2 years) compared with treatment as usual (TAU). Design: Randomised, parallel-group, superiority trial with blinded assessment recruiting participants 2 : 1 (intervention to TAU) to allow for therapist clustering. Setting: Three UK mental health services and one neurological service. Participants: Family carers of people with dementia. Intervention: Eight-session manual-based coping intervention delivered by supervised psychology graduates to individuals. Main outcome measures: Affective symptoms [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-total (HADS-T)] and cost-effectiveness. Secondary measures: anxiety and depression symptoms and caseness, quality of life (QoL), abusive behaviour and long-term care home admission. Results: Two hundred and sixty participants were randomised (173 intervention, 87 TAU). We used intention-to-treat analysis in the short term (152 intervention, 77 TAU) and in the long term (140 intervention, 69 TAU). In the short term, the intervention group had lower HADS-T [mean difference –1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) –3.29 to –0.31; p = 0.02] and higher quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (mean difference 0.03, 95% CI –0.01 to 0.08). Costs were no different between groups [mean £252 (95% CI –£28 to £565) for intervention group]. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed a greater than 99% chance of being cost-effectiveness at a £30,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold and a high probability of cost-effectiveness based on the HADS-T score. Carers in the intervention group had less case-level depression [odds ratio (OR) 0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.76], a trend towards reduced case-level anxiety (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.05), lower Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-anxiety (HADS-A) (–0.91, 95% CI –1.76 to –0.07; p = 0.03) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-depression (HADS-D) (–0.91, 95% CI –1.71 to –0.10; p = 0.03) and higher Health Status Questionnaire (HSQ) QoL (mean difference 4.09, 95% CI 0.34 to 7.83). Group differences in abusive behaviour (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.27) and the person with dementia’s quality of life-Alzheimer’s disease (QoL-AD) (mean increase 0.59, 95% CI –0.72 to 1.89) were not significant. In the long term, the intervention group had lower HADS-T (mean difference –2.58, 95% CI –4.26 to –0.90; p = 0.03) and higher QALYs (mean difference 0.03, 95% CI –0.01 to 0.06). Carers in the intervention group had less case-level depression (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.53), a trend towards reduced case-level anxiety (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.24), lower HADS-A (–1.16, 95% CI –2.15 to –0.18) and HADS-D (1.45, 95% CI –2.32 to –0.57), and higher HSQ (mean difference 7.47, 95% CI 2.87 to 12.08). Thirty-two (18.7%) people with dementia in the intervention group and 17 (20.2%) in TAU were admitted to a care home (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.56; p = 0.56). There were no significant differences between groups in abusive behaviour (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.94), the person with dementia’s QoL-AD (0.17, 95% CI –1.37 to 1.70) or costs (£336, 95% CI –£223 to £895) for intervention group. The probability that the intervention would be seen as cost-effective at £30,000/QALY threshold and cost-effectiveness on the HADS-T remained high. Conclusions: The START intervention was clinically effective and cost-effective in the short and longer term. The results are robust to the sensitivity analyses performed. Future work is needed to consider mechanism of action; the effects on people with dementia in clinical terms (cognition, neuropsychiatric symptoms, longer-term care home admission); and on health and social care costs. In addition, we will explore the effects of carer abusive behaviour on the care recipient’s care home admission and if this then reduces abusive behaviour. We would also like to implement START and evaluate this implementation in clinical practice. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISCTRN70017938. Funding: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The START pragmatic RCT found that an eight-session manual-based coping intervention delivered by supervised psychology graduates to family carers of people with dementia improved carer affective symptoms and quality of life compared with treatment as usual in the short term (8 months) and long term (2 years). The intervention had a high probability of being cost-effective in the short term, with weaker evidence at 24 months, and did not significantly affect care home admission, abusive behaviour, or the care recipient’s quality of life.
Key findings
- Among 260 randomised carers (173 intervention, 87 TAU), the intervention group had lower HADS-T scores at 8 months (adjusted mean difference –1.80, 95% CI –3.29 to –0.31; p=0.02) and at 24 months (–2.58, 95% CI –4.26 to –0.90).
- Case-level depression was less likely in the intervention group at 8 months (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.76) and at 24 months (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.53); case-level anxiety showed a trend at both points (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.05; OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.24).
- Carer HSQ mental health scores were higher in the intervention group at 8 months (mean difference 4.09, 95% CI 0.34 to 7.83) and 24 months (7.47, 95% CI 2.87 to 12.08); QALY gains were 0.03 in both periods.
- Costs did not differ significantly between groups (8 months: £252, 95% CI –£28 to £565; 24 months: £336, 95% CI –£223 to £895); the probability of cost-effectiveness at £30,000/QALY was >99% at 8 months and 75% at 24 months. Care home admission occurred in 32/171 (18.7%) intervention vs 17/84 (20.2%) TAU (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.56; p=0.56).
Methods
- Pragmatic, parallel-group, superiority randomised controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment, recruiting carers 2:1 to intervention versus treatment as usual to allow for therapist clustering; participants were family carers of people with dementia referred to three UK mental health services and one neurological service.
- The intervention was an eight-session manual-based individual coping strategy programme adapted from the US “Coping with Caregiving” programme and delivered by supervised psychology graduates; adherence was defined as attending five or more sessions, achieved by 130/173 (75.1%).
- Primary outcome was HADS-T; cost-effectiveness used CSRI and EQ-5D QALYs. Intention-to-treat analyses used multilevel mixed models accounting for repeated measures and therapist clustering, adjusted for baseline HADS-T, centre, carer age, sex, NPI and Zarit scores; economic analyses used ICERs, CEACs and net monetary benefit from a health and social care perspective, with 3.5% discounting.
Limitations
- The paper states the study was powered for clinical effectiveness, not costs or cost-effectiveness; the economic evaluation took a health and social care perspective and did not measure costs of services used by people with dementia or attach monetary values to carers’ time.
- The paper notes that translation of the manual was not fully resourced, making effects of delivery through translators difficult to determine; it could not assess how many sessions were necessary for change; and there were no data beyond 2 years.
- The paper acknowledges possible bias because carers knew their allocation and the statistical team knew the intervention group was larger; TAU may have been improved by informing clinical teams about abusive behaviour in the control group. The text also makes evident that economic analyses used complete cases without imputation, and the trial was not powered for care home admission or abusive behaviour outcomes.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 62 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data§ Abstract
In the short term, there was a trend towards reduced case-level anxiety in the intervention group compared with TAU (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.05).
“a trend towards reduced case-level anxiety (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.05)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
In the short term, there was a high probability of cost-effectiveness based on the HADS-T score.
“and a high probability of cost-effectiveness based on the HADS-T score.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
In the short term, costs were no different between intervention and TAU groups (mean £252, 95% CI -£28 to £565 for intervention group).
“Costs were no different between groups [mean £252 (95% CI –£28 to £565) for intervention group].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
In the short term, the intervention group had higher QALYs than TAU (mean difference 0.03, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.08).
“and higher quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (mean difference 0.03, 95% CI –0.01 to 0.08)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
In the short term (up to 8 months), the intervention group had lower HADS-T than TAU (mean difference -1.80, 95% CI -3.29 to -0.31; p=0.02).
“In the short term, the intervention group had lower HADS-T [mean difference –1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) –3.29 to –0.31; p= 0.02]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data§ Abstract
In the short term, carers in the intervention group had less case-level depression than TAU (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.76).
“Carers in the intervention group had less case-level depression [odds ratio (OR) 0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.76]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
In the short term, the intervention group had lower HADS-A than TAU (-0.91, 95% CI -1.76 to -0.07; p=0.03).
“lower Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-anxiety (HADS-A) (–0.91, 95% CI –1.76 to –0.07; p= 0.03)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed a greater than 99% chance of being cost-effective at a £30,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold in the short term.
“The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed a greater than 99% chance of being cost-effectiveness at a £30,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Carers who received the intervention had non-significantly higher health and social care costs (£252, 95% CI -£28 to £565 with QALY outcome and £247, 95% CI £0 to £569 with HADS-T outcome), after adjustment for baseline variables.
“Carers who received the intervention had non-significantly higher health and social care costs (£252, 95% CI –£28 to £565 with QALY outcome and £247, 95% CI £0 to £569 with HADS-T outcome), after adjustment for baseline variables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
In the short term, the intervention group had higher HSQ QoL than TAU (mean difference 4.09, 95% CI 0.34 to 7.83).
“and higher Health Status Questionnaire (HSQ) QoL (mean difference 4.09, 95% CI 0.34 to 7.83)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
In the long term, there were no significant differences between groups in abusive behaviour (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.94).
“There were no significant differences between groups in abusive behaviour (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.94)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
HADS-T scores showed a significant difference in the intervention's favour with an average decrease of -1.46 (95% CI -2.89 to -0.03; p=0.05), adjusting for trust and baseline score.
“Analysis of HADS-T scores, adjusting for trust and baseline score, showed a significant difference in the intervention's favour with an average decrease of –1.46 (95% CI –2.89 to –0.03; p= 0.05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
There was no significant difference between groups in the person with dementia's QoL-AD (mean increase 0.59, 95% CI -0.72 to 1.89).
“There was no significant difference between groups in the person with dementia's QoL-AD (mean increase 0.59, 95% CI –0.72 to 1.89)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
There was no significant difference between groups in abusive behaviour (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.27).
“or in abusive behaviour (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.27).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Adjusted models indicated significant beneficial intervention effects on HADS-D, with average decrease -0.91 (95% CI -1.71 to -0.10; p=0.03).
“Adjusted models for the HADS-A and HADS-D scales indicated significant beneficial intervention effects, with average decreases in scores of –0.91 (95% CI –1.76 to –0.07; p= 0.03) and –0.91 (95% CI –1.71 to –0.10; p= 0.03), respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Sensitivity analyses adjusting for missingness predictors gave similar results (mean difference -1.53, 95% CI -2.96 to -0.10).
“Sensitivity analyses adjusting for missingness predictors gave similar results (mean difference –1.53, 95% CI –2.96 to –0.10)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Further adjustment for factors related to outcome gave similar results (mean difference -1.80 points, 95% CI -3.29 to -0.31; p=0.02).
“Further adjustment for factors related to outcome (carer age and sex, NPI and Zarit scores) gave similar results (mean difference –1.80 points, 95% CI –3.29 to –0.31 points; p= 0.02).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
In the long term, there was a trend towards reduced case-level anxiety in the intervention group compared with TAU (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.24).
“a trend towards reduced case-level anxiety (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.24)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Adjusting for baseline imbalances gave similar results (mean difference -1.78, 95% CI -3.30 to -0.27).
“as did adjusting for baseline imbalances (mean difference –1.78, 95% CI –3.30 to –0.27).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Adjusted models indicated significant beneficial intervention effects on HADS-A, with average decrease -0.91 (95% CI -1.76 to -0.07; p=0.03).
“Adjusted models for the HADS-A and HADS-D scales indicated significant beneficial intervention effects, with average decreases in scores of –0.91 (95% CI –1.76 to –0.07; p= 0.03) and –0.91 (95% CI –1.71 to –0.10; p= 0.03), respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
There was some evidence for a reduction in HADS-A caseness (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.05).
“and some evidence for a reduction in HADS-A caseness (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
Thirty-two (18.7%) people with dementia in the intervention group and 17 (20.2%) in TAU were admitted to a care home (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.56; p=0.56).
“Thirty-two (18.7%) people with dementia in the intervention group and 17 (20.2%) in TAU were admitted to a care home (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.56; p= 0.56).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
In the long term, the intervention group had lower HADS-A than TAU (-1.16, 95% CI -2.15 to -0.18).
“lower HADS-A (–1.16, 95% CI –2.15 to –0.18)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ ABSTRACT
The intervention did not improve the person with dementia's QoL.
“The intervention was cost-effective at both times but did not improve the person with dementia's QoL.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
In the short term, the intervention group had lower HADS-D than TAU (-0.91, 95% CI -1.71 to -0.10; p=0.03).
“and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-depression (HADS-D) (–0.91, 95% CI –1.71 to –0.10; p= 0.03)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
In the long term, there were no significant differences between groups in costs (£336, 95% CI -£223 to £895) for intervention group.
“or costs (£336, 95% CI –£223 to £895) for intervention group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
In the long term (12 to 24 months), the intervention group had lower HADS-T than TAU (mean difference -2.58, 95% CI -4.26 to -0.90; p=0.03).
“In the long term, the intervention group had lower HADS-T (mean difference –2.58, 95% CI –4.26 to –0.90; p= 0.03)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
130 (75%) carers in the intervention group attended five or more therapy sessions.
“One hundred and thirty (75%) carers in the intervention group attended five or more therapy sessions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Carer's HSQ mental health was significantly higher in the intervention group (mean difference 4.09, 95% CI 0.34 to 7.83).
“The carer's HSQ mental health was significantly higher (mean difference 4.09, 95% CI 0.34 to 7.83).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
In the long term, there were no significant differences between groups in the person with dementia's QoL-AD (0.17, 95% CI -1.37 to 1.70).
“the person with dementia's QoL-AD (0.17, 95% CI –1.37 to 1.70)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
HADS-D caseness was significantly reduced in the intervention group compared with TAU (adjusted OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.76).
“We found HADS-D cases in the intervention group compared with TAU was significantly reduced [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.76]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
In the long term, the intervention group had lower HADS-D than TAU (1.45, 95% CI -2.32 to -0.57).
“and HADS-D (1.45, 95% CI –2.32 to –0.57)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
In the long term, the intervention group had higher QALYs than TAU (mean difference 0.03, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.06).
“and higher QALYs (mean difference 0.03, 95% CI –0.01 to 0.06)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Abstract
The results are robust to the sensitivity analyses performed.
“The results are robust to the sensitivity analyses performed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
The probability of cost-effectiveness on the HADS-T was 78% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £50 per 1-point HADS-T improvement.
“The probability of cost-effectiveness on the HADS-T was 78% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £50 per 1-point HADS-T improvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
The cost per QALY was £6000.
“The cost per QALY was £6000.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Long-term mean HADS-T scores were lower in the intervention group than in the TAU group (mean difference adjusted for trust, baseline score, carer age, sex, NPI and Zarit score -2.58, 95% CI -4.26 to -0.90).
“Long-term mean HADS-T scores were lower in the intervention group than in the TAU group [mean difference adjusted for trust, baseline score, carer age, sex, NPI and Zarit score –2.58 (95% CI –4.26 to –0.90)].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
In the 24-month cost-effectiveness analysis, carers in the intervention group had non-significantly higher costs [£336 (95% CI -£223 to £895) for QALYs; £303 (95% CI -£206 to £812) for HADS-T], after adjustment for baseline covariates.
“In the 24-month cost-effectiveness analysis, carers included in this analysis in the intervention group had non-significantly higher costs [£336 (95% CI –£223 to £895) for QALYs; (n= 144); £303 (95% CI –£206 to £812) for HADS-T (n= 156)], after adjustment for baseline covariates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
If the model did not include factors relating to outcome, the results were similar (-1.84, 95% CI -3.50 to -0.17; p=0.03).
“If the model did not include factors relating to outcome then the results were similar [–1.84 (95% CI –3.50 to –0.17; p= 0.03)].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
There was a trend towards reduced case-level anxiety (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.24).
“and there was a trend towards reduced case-level anxiety (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.24).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
There was no significant difference between groups in abusive behaviour (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.94).
“or in abusive behaviour (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.94).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
HADS-A indicated significant beneficial intervention effects, with average score decrease of -1.16 (95% CI -2.15 to -0.18).
“The HADS-A and HADS-D indicated significant beneficial intervention effects, with average score decrease of –1.16 (95% CI –2.15 to –0.18) and –1.45 (95% CI –2.32 to –0.57), respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Carers in the intervention group were less likely to have case-level depression (adjusted OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.53).
“Carers in the intervention group were less likely to have case-level depression (adjusted OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.53)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Intervention carers had a significantly higher HSQ mental health scale score (mean difference 7.47, 95% CI 2.87 to 12.08).
“Intervention carers had a significantly higher HSQ mental health scale score (mean difference 7.47, 95% CI 2.87 to 12.08).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Results
There was no interaction of time with outcome.
“There was no interaction of time with outcome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
There was no significant difference between groups in the person with dementia's QoL (mean QoL-AD score 0.17, 95% CI -1.37 to 1.70).
“There was no significant difference between groups in the person with dementia's QoL (mean QoL-AD score 0.17, 95% CI –1.37 to 1.70)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
HADS-D indicated significant beneficial intervention effects, with average score decrease of -1.45 (95% CI -2.32 to -0.57).
“The HADS-A and HADS-D indicated significant beneficial intervention effects, with average score decrease of –1.16 (95% CI –2.15 to –0.18) and –1.45 (95% CI –2.32 to –0.57), respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 10 17 (9.8)
Two hundred and twenty-nine (88.1%) had HADS-T data for at least one of the 4- and 8-month points and could be included in the primary analyses.
“Two hundred and twenty-nine (88.1%) had HADS-T data for at least one of the 4- and 8-month points and, so, could be included in the primary analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Refitting the main models adjusting for significant predictors of missing values did not have a significant impact on the results, with a mean difference of -1.53 (95% CI -2.96 to -0.10).
“Refitting the main models adjusting for these significant predictors of missing values did not have a significant impact on the results (mean difference –1.53, 95% CI –2.96 to –0.10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
For HADS-A, sensitivity analyses adjusting for significant demographic and clinical predictors of missing values gave a result with no significant difference between groups (mean difference -0.68, 95% CI -1.49 to 0.11; n=229).
“For HADS-A, sensitivity analyses adjusting for significant demographic and clinical predictors of missing values, namely patient living with carer, relationship to carer, carer having dependent children at home, patient ethnicity and COPE dysfunction score, gave a result with no significant difference between groups (mean difference –0.68, 95% CI –1.49 to 0.11; n= 229).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
There was little therapist clustering: ICC at 4 months was 0.02 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.09) and at 8 months was 0.00 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.08).
“There was little therapist clustering: ICC at 4 months was 0.02 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.09) and at 8 months was 0.00 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.08).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
The HSQ mental health scale for the carer indicated significantly higher average scores in the intervention group (mean difference 4.09, 95% CI 0.34 to 7.83).
“The HSQ mental health scale for the carer did, however, indicate significantly higher average scores and, hence, improved mental health (mean difference 4.09, 95% CI 0.34 to 7.83).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Models including an interaction with time showed no evidence of a differential effect of the intervention between the 4- and 8-month time points for either the HSQ mental health or the QoL-AD.
“Models including an interaction with time showed no evidence of a differential effect of the intervention between the 4- and 8-month time points for either the HSQ mental health or the QoL-AD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
There was a significant reduction in the odds of HADS-D cases in the intervention group compared with TAU, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.24 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.76).
“There was a significant reduction in the odds of HADS-D cases in the intervention group compared with TAU, with an odds four times higher for the TAU group [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.76].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Models including an interaction with time showed no evidence of a differential effect of the intervention between the 4- and 8-month time points for either HADS-A or HADS-D.
“Models including an interaction with time showed no evidence of a differential effect of the intervention between the 4- and 8-month time points for either HADS-A or HADS-D.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Analysis of HADS-T, adjusting for trust and baseline score and for factors related to outcome (carer age and sex, NPI and Zarit scores), showed a mean difference of -1.80 points (95% CI -3.29 to -0.31 points; p= 0.02) in favour of the intervention.
“Analysis of HADS-T, adjusting for trust and baseline score and for factors related to outcome (carer age and sex, NPI and Zarit scores), showed a mean difference of –1.80 points (95% CI –3.29 to –0.31 points; p= 0.02) in favour of the intervention (Table 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Missing outcome data are missing at random.
- Findingown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoL
Over the 8-month follow-up, 12 carers from the control group and 21 from the intervention group withdrew or were lost to follow-up.
“Over the 8-month follow-up, 12 carers from the control group and 21 from the intervention group withdrew or were lost to follow-up (see Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoL
There were imbalances in baseline characteristics between treatment groups despite randomisation (carers' work situation, relationship to patient, patients' and carers' education and living situation).
“A second sensitivity analysis adjusted for imbalances in baseline characteristics between the treatment groups that occurred despite randomisation [i.e. adjusting for carers' work situation, relationship to patient, and patients' and carers' education and living situation (coresident or living separately)].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoL
For the QALY outcome, the carer's work situation (employed vs. unemployed) and ethnicity were associated with missingness.
“For the QALY outcome, the carer's work situation (employed vs. unemployed) and ethnicity were associated with 'missingness'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
If the model did not include factors relating to outcome, the results were similar, with an average decrease in score of -1.46 points (95% CI -2.89 to -0.03 points; p= 0.05).
“If the model did not include factors relating to outcome, then the results were similar, with an average decrease in score of –1.46 points (95% CI –2.89 to –0.03 points; p= 0.05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Missing outcome data are missing at random.
- Findingown data§ RESULTS
There was no significant difference between groups in the person with dementia's overall quality of life (QoL-AD).
“There was no significant difference between groups in the person with dementia's overall QoL (QoL-AD).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Of the eight therapy sessions offered, five or more were attended by 130 (75.1%) carers in the intervention group.
“Of the eight therapy sessions offered, five or more were attended by 130 (75.1%) carers in the intervention group (Figure 2 shows details of number of sessions attended).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Models including an interaction with time showed no evidence of a differential effect of the intervention between the 4- and 8-month time points (p=0.90).
“Models including an interaction with time showed no evidence of a differential effect of the intervention between the 4- and 8-month time points (p= 0.90).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
The same sensitivity analysis for HADS-D showed a significant difference between groups (mean difference -0.90, 95% CI -1.70 to -0.11; n=229).
“The same analysis of HADS-D showed a significant difference between groups (mean difference –0.90, 95% CI –1.70 to –0.11; n= 229).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Adjusted models for the HADS-A continuous scale indicated significant beneficial effects of the intervention over 8 months, with an average decrease in score of -0.910 (95% CI -1.763 to -0.070).
“Adjusted models for the individual HADS-A and HADS-D continuous scales indicated significant beneficial effects of the intervention over 8 months, with average decreases in scores of –0.910 (95% CI –1.763 to –0.070) and –0.91 (95% CI –1.71 to –0.10), respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 10 17 (9.8)
Missingness of HADS-T score at 4 months was associated with the patient living with carer (p= 0.007).
“Missingness of HADS-T score at 4 months was associated with the patient living with carer (p= 0.007)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoL
For the analysis of HADS-T scores, the variables found to be associated with missingness were patient living with carer, relationship to carer, carer having children at home, patient ethnicity and COPE dysfunction score.
“For the analysis of HADS-T scores, the variables found to be associated with 'missingness' were patient living with carer, relationship to carer, carer having children at home, patient ethnicity and COPE dysfunction score.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
There was some evidence for a reduction in the odds of HADS-A caseness (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.05).
“Similarly, there was some evidence for a reduction in odds of HADS-A caseness (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
A sensitivity analysis adjusting for baseline imbalances (carer's work situation, relationship to carer and patient, and carer and patient education and living situation) gave similar conclusions, with a mean difference of -1.78 (95% CI -3.30 to -0.27).
“We also carried out a sensitivity analysis to adjust for baseline imbalances, namely carer's work situation, relationship to carer and patient and carer education and living situation, which again gave similar conclusions (mean difference –1.78, 95% CI –3.30 to –0.27).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Adjusted models for the HADS-D continuous scale indicated significant beneficial effects of the intervention over 8 months, with an average decrease in score of -0.91 (95% CI -1.71 to -0.10).
“Adjusted models for the individual HADS-A and HADS-D continuous scales indicated significant beneficial effects of the intervention over 8 months, with average decreases in scores of –0.910 (95% CI –1.763 to –0.070) and –0.91 (95% CI –1.71 to –0.10), respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Mean costs over the study period (1-8 months), excluding the direct cost of the intervention, were £558 in the START group and £625 in the TAU group.
“Excluding the direct cost of the intervention itself, mean costs over the study period (1–8 months) were £558 in the START group and £625 in the TAU group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Sensitivity analyses adjusting for factors imbalanced at baseline (carer work, carer education, patient education, relationship with carer, lives with carer) gave a difference in means of -2.37 (95% CI -4.11 to -0.63; p=0.008).
“as did sensitivity analyses adjusting for factors imbalanced at baseline (carer work, carer education, patient education, relationship with carer, lives with carer; difference in means –2.37, 95% CI –4.11 to –0.63, p= 0.008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Adjusted models for the HADS-D continuous scale indicated significant beneficial effects of the intervention at 24 months, with an average decrease in score of -1.45 (95% CI -2.32 to -0.57).
“Adjusted models for the individual HADS-A and HADS-D continuous scales indicated significant beneficial effects of the intervention at 24 months, with average decreases in scores of –1.16 (–2.15 to –0.18; n= 200) and –1.45 (95% CI –2.32 to –0.57), respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
The mean cost difference was £252 (95% CI -£28 to £565) for sample members on the EQ-5D.
“The mean cost difference was £252 (95% CI –£28 to £565) for sample members on the EQ-5D, and £247 (95% CI £0 to £569) for sample members on the HADS-T measure (Table 9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
If a willingness to pay of £500 is assumed, the probability that the START intervention would be seen as cost-effective would be 95%.
“However, if we assumed a willingness to pay of £500, the probability that the START intervention would be seen as cost-effective would be 95%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Mean costs including the direct costs of intervention and health and social care system costs for the 24-month period for carers in the START group were higher, although not significantly so, than for carers in the TAU group.
“Mean costs (including the direct costs of intervention and health and social care system costs) for the 24-month period for carers in the START group were higher, although not significantly so, than for carers in the TAU group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 28 (29.5)a
There was no significant difference between groups for the person with dementia's overall quality of life (QoL-AD).
“There was no significant difference between groups for the person with dementia's overall QoL (QoL-AD).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Including the cost of intervention itself and adjusting for baseline variables, costs for the START group were slightly but not significantly higher than for the TAU group.
“Including the cost of intervention itself in the comparison between the groups and adjusting for baseline variables as we did in the clinical effectiveness calculations, costs for the START group were slightly but not significantly higher than for the TAU group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ RESULTS
The mean cost of achieving a minimally important clinical difference of 1.6 on the HADS-T with the START intervention would be £189.
“The mean cost of achieving such a change with the START intervention would be £189.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A minimally important clinical difference on the HADS-T is 1.6.
- Findingown data§ RESULTS
Simple analyses indicate no evidence of a statistically significant difference between the groups in care home admission (Fisher's exact test, p=0.56).
“Simple analyses indicate no evidence of a statistically significant difference between the groups (Fisher's exact test, p= 0.56).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
There was no evidence for a decrease in abusive behaviour (adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.93).
“There was no evidence for a decrease in abusive behaviour (adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.93) (Figure 9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
For the HADS-T measure, the mean cost per 1-point difference was £118.
“For the other outcome measure, the HADS-T measure of affective symptoms, the mean cost per 1-point difference on the HADS-T was £118.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ RESULTS
The overall mean direct intervention cost averaged £232.15 per carer.
“Adding in the cost of the relaxation CDs (which totalled £284), the overall mean direct intervention cost averaged £232.15 per carer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Mean costs over the study period (1-24 months) were £1492 in the START group and £1578 in the TAU group.
“Mean costs over the study period (1–24 months) were £1492 in the START group and £1578 in the TAU group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 28 (29.5)a
A sensitivity analysis with additional adjustment for baseline imbalances gave a hazard ratio of 0.62 (95% CI 0.31 to 1.23; p=0.17; n=232).
“Sensitivity analyses fitted the same model with addition adjustment for baseline imbalances (carer work, carer education, patient education, relationship with carer, lives with carer). This gave HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.31 to 1.23; p= 0.17; n= 232).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: In the parametric shared frailty model for time to institutionalisation, the shared frailty follows a gamma distribution and survival times follow a Weibull distribution.
- Findingown data§ RESULTS
Sensitivity analyses adjusting for significant demographic and clinical predictors of missing values (patient living with carer and COPE dysfunction score) still gave a significant difference between groups (difference in means -2.69, 95% CI -4.39 to -0.98; p=0.002; n=200).
“Sensitivity analyses adjusting for significant demographic and clinical predictors of missing values, namely patient living with carer and COPE dysfunction score, still gave a result with significant difference between groups (difference in means –2.69, 95% CI –4.39 to –0.98; p= 0.002; n= 200)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
If the model did not include factors relating to outcome, the results were similar, with an average decrease in score of -1.84 (95% CI -3.50 to -0.17; p=0.03).
“If the model did not include factors relating to outcome then the results were similar, with an average decrease in score of –1.84 (95% CI –3.50 to –0.17; p= 0.03).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
The mean cost per QALY gained was £6000.
“Looking first at QALY as the outcome, the mean cost per QALY gained was £6000.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
The mean cost per session per carer was £36.
“We calculated that the mean cost per session per carer was £36.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
There was some evidence of a decrease in abusive behaviour (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.27).
“There was some evidence of a decrease in abusive behaviour (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.27).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
The mean cost difference was £247 (95% CI £0 to £569) for sample members on the HADS-T measure.
“The mean cost difference was £252 (95% CI –£28 to £565) for sample members on the EQ-5D, and £247 (95% CI £0 to £569) for sample members on the HADS-T measure (Table 9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
After adjustment for baseline characteristics, the standardised difference in costs was £14 (95% CI -£239 to £211), suggesting no significant difference in costs between the two groups.
“After adjustment for baseline characteristics (see above) the standardised difference was £14, with the 95% CI (–£239 to £211) suggesting that there was not a significant difference in costs between the two groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
From the adjusted models there was a significant reduction in the odds of HADS-D cases in the intervention group compared with TAU, with an odds ratio of 0.14 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.53).
“From the adjusted models there was a significant reduction in the odds of HADS-D cases in the intervention group compared with TAU, with an odds seven times higher for the TAU group (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.53).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
After adjustment for baseline characteristics, the standardised difference in costs was £173 (95% CI -£115 to £460), suggesting no significant difference in costs between the two groups.
“After adjustment of baseline characteristics, the standardised difference was £173, with the 95% CI (–£115 to £460) suggesting that there was no significant difference in costs between the two groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
There was some evidence for a reduction in the odds of HADS-A caseness (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.24).
“Similarly, there was some evidence for a reduction in odds of HADS-A caseness (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.24).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Adjusted models for the HADS-A continuous scale indicated significant beneficial effects of the intervention at 24 months, with an average decrease in score of -1.16 (95% CI -2.15 to -0.18; n=200).
“Adjusted models for the individual HADS-A and HADS-D continuous scales indicated significant beneficial effects of the intervention at 24 months, with average decreases in scores of –1.16 (–2.15 to –0.18; n= 200) and –1.45 (95% CI –2.32 to –0.57), respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Analysis of HADS-T scores, adjusting for trust and baseline score and for factors related to outcome (carer age and sex, NPI and Zarit scores), showed a mean difference of -2.58 points (95% CI -4.26 to -0.90; p=0.003) in favour of the intervention.
“Analysis of HADS-T scores, adjusting for trust and baseline score and for factors related to outcome (carer age and sex, NPI and Zarit scores), showed a mean difference of –2.58 points (95% CI –4.26 to –0.90 points; p= 0.003) in favour of the intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 28 (29.5)a
The HSQ mental health scale for the carer indicated significantly higher average scores in the intervention group (mean difference 7.47, 95% CI 2.87 to 12.08; n=183).
“The HSQ mental health scale for the carer did, however, indicate significantly higher average scores and hence improved mental health (mean difference 7.47, 95% CI 2.87 to 12.08; n= 183).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
There was no evidence of an interaction between the intervention and the outcome at the 4- and 8-month follow-ups.
“There was no evidence of an interaction between the intervention and the outcome at the 4- and 8-month follow-ups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
The mean cost difference was £336 (95% CI -£223 to £895) for sample members on the EQ-5D.
“The mean cost difference was £336 (95% CI –£223 to £895) for sample members on the EQ-5D and £303 (95% CI –£206 to £812) for sample members on the HADS-T measure (Table 15).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
Carer QoL improved.
“In keeping with this, carer QoL improved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
Over the 8-month evaluation period, START had a high probability of being seen as cost-effective by reference to both primary outcome measures (improvements in carers' affective symptoms and gains in carers' health-related QoL).
“Over the 8-month evaluation period, the START intervention was found to have a high probability of being seen as cost-effective by reference to both primary outcome measures examined, i.e. improvements in carers' affective symptoms and gains in carers' health-related QoL.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
The mean cost difference was £303 (95% CI -£206 to £812) for sample members on the HADS-T measure.
“The mean cost difference was £336 (95% CI –£223 to £895) for sample members on the EQ-5D and £303 (95% CI –£206 to £812) for sample members on the HADS-T measure (Table 15).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The mean cost per QALY gain was £11,200.
“Looking at QALY as the outcome, the mean cost per QALY gain was £11,200.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Assuming a willingness to pay of £500, the probability that START would be seen as cost-effective was 78%.
“Assuming a willingness to pay of £500, the probability that the START intervention would be seen as cost-effective would be 78%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The mean cost per 1-point difference on the HADS-T was £199.
“For the other outcome measure, the HADS-T measure of affective symptoms, mean cost per 1-point difference on the HADS-T was £199.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
Sensitivity analyses adjusting for missing outcome data showed similar results.
“sensitivity analyses adjusting for missing outcome data showed similar results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
The sensitivity analyses showed the same results as for the primary analysis.
“One of the strengths of the study is the sensitivity analyses, which showed the same results as for the primary analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Discounting the incremental costs and outcomes by 0% and 6% did not greatly alter the findings.
“Discounting the incremental cost and outcomes by 0% and 6% did not greatly alter the findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ DISCUSSION
The study recruited a sample of carers with varying demographic and clinical characteristics from a range of services.
“We recruited a sample of carers with varying demographic and clinical characteristics from a range of services.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ DISCUSSION
Over three-quarters of participants fulfilled the definition of compliance to the intervention.
“Over three-quarters of the participants fulfilled our definition of compliance to the intervention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ DISCUSSION
Most people with dementia had relatively mild dementia at baseline (mean clinical dementia scale rating 1.5-1.6).
“Most of the people with dementia had relatively mild dementia at baseline, with the mean clinical dementia scale rating being 1.5–1.6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ DISCUSSION
Carers in paid work were able to access the intervention.
“We had thought that those carers in paid work might be unable to access the intervention, but this did not appear to be the case”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ DISCUSSION
The additional cost of the START intervention was partly counterbalanced by a reduction in service-related costs.
“This cost-effectiveness advantage arises because the intervention improved carer outcomes while not significantly increasing overall costs, with the additional cost of the intervention being partly counterbalanced by a reduction in service-related costs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ APPENDIX 1
At the 24-month evaluation with 0% discounting, the incremental health and social care cost of the START intervention versus TAU, with QALY as outcome (n=144), was £353 (95% CI -£223 to £929).
“£353 (–£223 to £929)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At the 24-month evaluation with 6% discounting, the incremental health and social care cost with HADS-T as outcome (n=156) was £295 (95% CI -£204 to £794).
“£295 (–£204 to £794)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the sensitivity analysis adjusting for significant predictors of missing values, at the 24-month evaluation with 0% discounting, the incremental health and social care cost with QALY as outcome (n=144) was £308 (95% CI -£277 to £893).
“£308 (–£277 to £893)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
The intervention did not improve care recipients' QoL.
“the lack of effect on care recipients' QoL”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the sensitivity analysis adjusting for significant predictors of missing values, at the 24-month evaluation with 6% discounting, the incremental health and social care cost with QALY as outcome (n=144) was £282 (95% CI -£277 to £842).
“£282 (–£277 to £842)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At the 24-month evaluation with 0% discounting, the incremental health and social care cost with HADS-T as outcome (n=156) was £315 (95% CI -£210 to £840).
“£315 (–£210 to £840)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At the 24-month evaluation with 0% discounting, the ICER was £193 per unit change on HADS-T.
“ICER (£ per unit change on HADS-T) £193 £203”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At the 24-month evaluation with 6% discounting, the ICER was £203 per unit change on HADS-T.
“ICER (£ per unit change on HADS-T) £193 £203”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ APPENDIX 1
At the 24-month evaluation with 6% discounting, the incremental health and social care cost of the START intervention versus TAU, with QALY as outcome (n=144), was £325 (95% CI -£223 to £874).
“£325 (–£223 to £874)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the sensitivity analysis adjusting for significant predictors of missing values, the ICER at 24 months with 0% discounting was £123 per unit change on HADS-T.
“ICER (£ per unit change on HADS-T) £123 £128”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the sensitivity analysis adjusting for baseline imbalances, at the 24-month evaluation with 6% discounting, the incremental health and social care cost with QALY as outcome (n=144) was £248 (95% CI -£332 to £828).
“£248 (–£332 to £828)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the sensitivity analysis adjusting for significant predictors of missing values, the ICER at 24 months with 6% discounting was £128 per unit change on HADS-T.
“ICER (£ per unit change on HADS-T) £123 £128”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Abstract
The START intervention was clinically effective in the short and longer term.
“The START intervention was clinically effective and cost-effective in the short and longer term.”
- Also stated in: § ABSTRACT · plain
“We found that START decreased carers' anxiety and depression and improved their quality of life (QoL) in the short term (8 months after the study started) and that it was as effective on these measures in the longer term (2 years after the study started).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § ABSTRACT · plain
- Study design and conductnone given§ Results
Randomisation generally achieved good between-group balance of patient and carer demographic and clinical characteristics.
“Randomisation generally achieved good between-group balance of patient and carer demographic and clinical characteristics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ Methods
The available sample size (87 TAU, 173 intervention) was calculated to be sufficient to detect a 2.4-point difference in HADS-T score with 80% power at 5% significance.
“We calculated that the available sample size (87 TAU, 173 intervention group) would be sufficient to detect a 2.4-point difference in HADS-T score (with 80% power, 5% significance).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Abstract
The START intervention was cost-effective in the short and longer term.
“The START intervention was clinically effective and cost-effective in the short and longer term.”
- Also stated in: § ABSTRACT · plain
“The intervention was cost-effective at both times but did not improve the person with dementia's QoL.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § ABSTRACT · plain
- Interpretationown data§ Results
The known demographics of those who did or did not consent indicate the study sample had good external validity.
“The known demographics of those who did or did not consent indicate the study sample had good external validity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Conclusion
Only multicomponent interventions have been shown to be effective in preventing institutionalisation.
“Only multicomponent interventions have been shown to be effective in preventing institutionalisation.11,12”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [11] Spijker, 2008, Effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in delaying the institutionalization of patients with dementia: a meta-analysis, J Am Geriatr Soc source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Olazarán, 2010, Nonpharmacological therapies in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review of efficacy, Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Conclusion
A recent unstructured, non-manual-based befriending programme delivered by ex-carers was ineffective in reducing anxiety or depression.
“a recent unstructured, non-manual-based befriending programme delivered by ex-carers was ineffective in reducing anxiety or depression.24”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Charlesworth, 2008, Befriending carers of people with dementia: randomised controlled trial, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ METHODS
The HADS-T was the best measure to use as the primary outcome.
“We therefore concluded that the HADS-T was the best measure to use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ METHODS
The authors' previous systematic review found that therapies worked better with individuals rather than groups.
“our previous systematic review found that therapies worked better with individuals rather than groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Conclusion
In a further systematic review, CBT and other therapies developed primarily to target depression did not effectively treat anxiety.
“In a further systematic review of evidence about treating dementia carer anxiety, we found that cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) and other therapies developed primarily to target depression did not effectively treat anxiety.5”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Cooper, 2007, A systematic review of intervention studies about anxiety in caregivers of people with dementia, Int J Geriatr Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ METHODS
The HADS-total score (HADS-T) has better sensitivity and positive predictive value than either the HADS-depression or HADS-anxiety scale in identifying depression when compared with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) criteria.
“The HADS-T is our chosen primary outcome as it has better sensitivity and positive predictive value than either of the individual scales in identifying depression when compared with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) criteria.34”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Spinhoven, 1997, A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects, Psychol Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoL
The achieved sample size available for analysis was 87 in the TAU group and 173 in the intervention group.
“As recruitment was complete, the sample size available for analysis was fixed with achieved numbers of 87 in the TAU group and 173 in the intervention group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoL
The achieved sample size was adequate to address the new primary objectives based on HADS-T outcomes at 4 and 8 months.
“The following power calculation justified that this achieved sample size was adequate to address the new primary objectives based on the HADS-T outcomes at 4 and 8 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premiseown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoL
Mean HADS-A scores for the pilot group were 7.2 with a standard deviation of 4.
“Mean HADS-A scores for this group were 7.2 with a standard deviation (SD) of 4.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ METHODS
There are three validation studies of HADS in community samples.
“There are three validation studies in community samples (as opposed to solely, for example, people with cancer).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Spinhoven, 1997, A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects, Psychol Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoL
The study sample had good external validity.
“Table 1 compares the known demographic details of those who consented and those who did not and shows that the study sample had good external validity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ RESULTS
In general, randomisation achieved good balance for patient and baseline carer demographic and clinical characteristics between the randomised groups.
“In general, randomisation achieved good balance for patient and baseline carer demographic and clinical characteristics between the randomised groups (Tables 2 and 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ RESULTS
Economic data for the 24-month follow-up period were available for 196 carers (75%): 64 in the TAU group and 132 in the intervention group.
“Economic data for the 24-month follow-up period were available for 196 carers (75%): 64 in the TAU group and 132 in the intervention group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ RESULTS
The 95% CIs around net monetary benefit suggest that there is a strong likelihood that the START intervention is cost-effective at the £30,000 threshold.
“The 95% CIs around NMB suggest that there is a strong likelihood that the START intervention is cost-effective at the £30,000 threshold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ RESULTS
Two hundred and nine (80.4%) patients had HADS-T data for at least one of the long-term follow-up points, and so could be included in the primary analyses.
“Two hundred and nine (80.4%) patients had HADS-T data for at least one of the long-term follow-up points, and so could be included in the primary analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ RESULTS
Taking into account uncertainty in the estimation suggests that a degree of caution should be exercised in concluding that START is necessarily cost-effective.
“Taking into account uncertainty in the estimation suggests that a degree of caution should be exercised in concluding that START is necessarily cost-effective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
There are currently no interventions which have been shown to reduce elder abuse.
“There are currently no interventions which have been shown to reduce elder abuse.56,57”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [56] Ploeg, 2009, A systematic review of interventions for elder abuse, J Elder Abuse Negl source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [57] Cooper, 2009, Knowledge, detection and reporting of abuse by health and social care professionals: a systematic review, Am J Geriatr Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
The study was not powered to find a significant change in abuse.
“Our study was not powered to find a significant change in abuse”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
It is unlikely that there would be a significant difference between groups in abuse.
“Thus, we think it is unlikely that there would be a significant difference between groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
The cost-effectiveness finding is driven more by the outcome differences between the groups than by the cost difference.
“The cost-effectiveness finding is driven more by the outcome differences between the groups than by the cost difference”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
The sensitivity analyses suggest a more cautious conclusion as to the cost-effectiveness of the START intervention.
“The sensitivity analyses considering alternative approaches to the analysis suggest a more cautious conclusion as to the cost-effectiveness of the START intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
This is the first study to show that family carers of people with dementia referred to secondary or tertiary care benefit from a structured psychological intervention delivered by psychology graduates and supervised by a clinical psychologist.
“It is the first study to show that family carers of people with dementia referred to secondary or tertiary care benefit from a structured psychological intervention delivered by psychology graduates and supervised by a clinical psychologist.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: There is no other rigorous study of an intervention delivered by psychology graduates without previous clinical training.
- Study design and conductnone given§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
Follow-up rates were satisfactory at >80%.
“The follow-up rates were satisfactory at > 80%”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
The intervention is clinically important.
“suggesting that the intervention is clinically important”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
Previous research has not suggested that abusive behaviour would go down over time without intervention.
“previous research has not suggested that this is what would happen without intervention.58”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Cooper, 2010, Family carers’ distress and abusive behaviour: longitudinal study, Br J Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
The study used standardised measures validated for the population.
“We used standardised measures validated for the population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSION
Those with more problems may have been more likely to consent to the study.
“and so those with more problems may have been more likely to consent to the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ DISCUSSION
Recent RCTs of psychosocial interventions in Europe using different models have been ineffective in terms of carer psychological symptoms and QoL.
“Recent RCTs of psychosocial interventions in Europe (UK, Denmark and Norway) using different models have been ineffective in terms of carer psychological symptoms and QoL”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [24] Charlesworth, 2008, Befriending carers of people with dementia: randomised controlled trial, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [61] Waldorff, 2012, Efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease: the multicentre, rater blinded, randomised Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY), BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [62] Bruvik, 2013, The effect of psychosocial support intervention on depression in patients with dementia and their family caregivers: an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial, Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ DISCUSSION
Not all psychosocial interventions in family carers of people with dementia are effective.
“Not all psychosocial interventions in family carers of people with dementia are effective.15”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Thompson, 2007, Systematic review of information and support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia, BMC Geriatr source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ DISCUSSION
DAISY did not improve the patient's QoL.
“Like our study, it did not improve the patient's QoL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Waldorff, 2012, Efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease: the multicentre, rater blinded, randomised Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY), BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSION
The intervention can be delivered consistently.
“suggests that the intervention can be delivered consistently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
Randomisation was independent.
“randomisation was independent”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSION
It is difficult to determine the effect of using the manual through a translator.
“It is, thus, difficult to determine the effect of using the manual through a translator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSION
These results suggest that our findings are valid.
“These results suggest that our findings are valid.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ DISCUSSION
Our findings were not explained solely by the offer of a therapist to spend time and attention.
“thus showing that our findings were not explained solely by the offer of a therapist to spend time and attention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
Follow-up raters were blinded to allocation.
“follow-up raters were blinded to allocation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ DISCUSSION
Within the USA, a similar therapy to ours delivered to individuals was found to be significantly cost-effective in completers compared with controls in terms of freeing up caring time.
“Within the USA, a similar therapy to ours delivered to individuals was found to be significantly cost-effective in completers compared with controls in terms of freeing up caring time.21”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Nichols, 2008, The cost-effectiveness of a behavior intervention with caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s disease, J Am Geriatr Soc source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given§ DISCUSSION
There was demographic similarity between those who consented and those who did not.
“Further evidence of external validity is the demographic similarity between those who consented and those who did not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ DISCUSSION
At 2 years, follow-up rate was still over 80%.
“At 2 years, the follow-up rate was still over 80%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ DISCUSSION
Earlier studies of similar interventions in the USA have shown results consistent with ours.
“Earlier studies of similar interventions in the USA have shown results consistent with ours.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Gallagher-Thompson, 2001, A psychoeducational intervention to reduce distress in Hispanic family caregivers, Clin Gerontol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning§ DISCUSSION
The study has not been able to consider how many sessions were necessary to effect change.
“We have not been able to consider how many sessions were necessary to effect change”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given§ DISCUSSION
Sample size was calculated on the basis of power required to demonstrate differences in one of the effectiveness measures and not on the basis of costs or cost-effectiveness.
“Sample size for the study design was calculated on the basis of the power required to demonstrate differences in one of the effectiveness measures and not on the basis of costs or cost-effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSION
The results suggest some lasting effect of the START intervention.
“This study reports carer outcomes and that there was no evidence of a change in the magnitude of effectiveness between 4 and 8 months, or at 12 months and 2 years, thus suggesting some lasting effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSION
Our intervention adds to the evidence that therapies can continue to be effective over years.
“but our intervention adds to the evidence that therapies can continue to be effective over years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ DISCUSSION
The study has no data after 2 years.
“We have no data after 2 years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSION
There is no evidence of a 'top-up' being necessary to maintain the effect.
“and there is no evidence of a 'top-up' being necessary to maintain the effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSION
The START intervention is likely to be perceived as cost-effective by reference to NICE thresholds.
“From these results, it would appear that the intervention is also likely to be perceived as cost-effective by reference to NICE thresholds; there is, therefore, both a clinical and an economic case for supporting carers of people with dementia using such an approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ DISCUSSION
DAISY did not help the carer's QoL.
“Unlike ours, it did not help the carer's QoL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Waldorff, 2012, Efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease: the multicentre, rater blinded, randomised Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY), BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ DISCUSSION
Knowledge by itself is not efficacious.
“This is further evidence that knowledge by itself is not efficacious.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSION
The preventative effect found highlights that these carers can benefit from early intervention.
“The preventative effect that was found highlights that these carers can benefit from early intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ DISCUSSION
Only one of the studies covered by that review employed a similar therapeutic approach to the START intervention.
“However, only one of the studies covered by that review employed a similar therapeutic approach to the START intervention.21”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Nichols, 2008, The cost-effectiveness of a behavior intervention with caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s disease, J Am Geriatr Soc source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 117
- The quote only partly states this claim. 27
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 90
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ AbstractIn the long term, the probability that the intervention would be seen as cost-effective at £30,000/QALY threshold and cost-effectiveness on the HADS-T remained high.
“The probability that the intervention would be seen as cost-effective at £30,000/QALY threshold and cost-effectiveness on the HADS-T remained high.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ AbstractIn the long term, the intervention group had higher HSQ than TAU (mean difference 7.47, 95% CI 2.87 to 12.08).
“and higher HSQ (mean difference 7.47, 95% CI 2.87 to 12.08)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ AbstractIn the long term, carers in the intervention group had less case-level depression than TAU (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.53).
“Carers in the intervention group had less case-level depression (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.53)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ Results260 (55%) of 472 referred carers were randomised.
“We randomised 260 (55%) of 472 carers referred.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ResultsAdherence did not differ by age or work situation.
“Adherence did not differ by age [aged < 60 years, 75 (77%) vs. 55 (73%)] or work situation [paid work 49 (78%) vs. other 81 (74%)].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ ResultsAdherence was better in male carers than in female carers (81% vs 72%).
“in male carers than in female carers [46 (81%) vs. 84 (72%)]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ ResultsAdherence was better in those with at least A-level education than in those with a lower level of education (80% vs 72%).
“and in those with at least A-level education than in those with a lower level of education [56 (80%) vs. 74 (72%)].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Results173 (67%) participants were randomised to the intervention and 87 to TAU.
“We randomised 173 (67%) participants to the intervention and 87 to TAU.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ ResultsAdherence was better in those of white ethnicity than in other ethnic groups (78% vs 61%).
“Adherence was better in those of white ethnicity than in other ethnic groups [110 (78%) vs. 19 (61%)]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ResultsThe intervention had an approximately 95% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective, rising to 98% at the £30,000 threshold.
“The intervention had an approximately 95% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective, rising to 98% at the £30,000 threshold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ResultsThe cost per QALY was £11,200 and the CEAC showed a 75% chance of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30,000 per QALY gained.
“The cost per QALY was £11,200 and the CEAC showed a 75% chance of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30,000 per QALY gained.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ResultsAt the lower NICE threshold of £20,000, the START intervention had a 70% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective, rising to 80% at the £30,000 threshold.
“At the lower NICE threshold of £20,000, the START intervention had a 70% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective, rising to 80% at the £30,000 threshold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ResultsThe CEAC showed a >99% chance of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30,000 per QALY gained and a high probability of cost-effectiveness on the HADS-T.
“The CEAC showed a > 99% chance of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30,000 per QALY gained and a high probability of cost-effectiveness on the HADS-T.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ResultsThe second sensitivity analysis adjusting for baseline imbalances gave similar results; mean ICER values were £5756 per additional QALY and £112 per 1-point difference in HADS-T score.
“The second sensitivity analysis results, adjusting for baseline characteristics imbalances, were again similar. The mean ICER values were £5756 per additional QALY and £112 per 1-point difference in HADS-T score.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ResultsIn the analysis adjusting for baseline imbalances, mean ICER values were £8567 per additional QALY and £209 per 1-point difference in HADS-T score.
“In the analysis adjusting for baseline imbalances, the mean ICER values were £8567 per additional QALY, and £209 per 1-point difference in HADS-T score.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ResultsAt the lower-bound NICE threshold of £20,000, the intervention has a 93% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective, rising to 98% at the £30,000 threshold.
“At the lower-bound NICE threshold of £20,000, the intervention has a 93% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective, rising to 98% at the £30,000 threshold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ResultsThe intervention had an approximately 67% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective, rising to 75% at the £30,000 threshold.
“The intervention had an approximately 67% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective, rising to 75% at the £30,000 threshold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ResultsSensitivity analyses adjusting for predictors of missingness gave similar results; mean ICER values were £5452 per additional QALY and £107 per 1-point difference in HADS-T score.
“Sensitivity analyses adjusting for predictors of missingness gave similar results. The mean ICER values were now £5452 per additional QALY and £107 per 1-point difference in HADS-T score.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ResultsIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for missingness predictors, mean ICER values were £9767 per additional QALY and £125 per 1-point difference in HADS-T score.
“In the sensitivity analysis adjusting for missingness predictors, the mean ICER values were £9767 per additional QALY and £125 per 1-point difference in HADS-T score.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ResultsThere was an indication of a decrease risk of admission to 24-hour care in the intervention group; 17 (20.2%) in TAU and 32 (18.7%) in intervention were admitted to a care home (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.56; p=0.56).
“There was an indication of a decrease risk of admission to 24-hour care in the intervention group. Seventeen participants (20.2%) in the TAU group and 32 (18.7%) in the intervention group were admitted to a care home (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.56; p= 0.56).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ RESULTSSeven (4.0%) of those in the intervention group withdrew before taking part in any therapy sessions.
“Seven (4.0%) of those in the intervention group withdrew before taking part in any therapy sessions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoLThose who consented were slightly more likely to be married to the care recipient than those who did not consent.
“Those who consented were, however, slightly more likely to be married to the care recipient than those who did not consent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ RESULTSAdherence was slightly better for male carers than female carers.
“and slightly better for male carers [46 (80.7%) vs. 84 (72.4%) of female carers]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 10 17 (9.8)The primary outcome (HADS-T score) was missing for 35 (13.5%) patients at 4 months and for 56 (21.5%) patients at 8 months, with a slightly higher proportion missing in the intervention group: 40 (23.0%) in the intervention group and 16 (18.0%) in the TAU group.
“The primary outcome (HADS-T score) was missing for 35 (13.5%) patients at 4 months and for 56 (21.5%) patients at 8 months, with a slightly higher proportion missing in the intervention group: 40 (23.0%) in the intervention group and 16 (18.0%) in the TAU group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 10 17 (9.8)Missingness of HADS-T score at 8 months was associated with having dependent children at home (p= 0.003), patient ethnicity (p= 0.013), patient living with carer (p= 0.002), patient relationship to carer (p= 0.011) and the COPE dysfunction score (p= 0.004).
“for the 8-month outcome with having dependent children at home (p= 0.003), patient ethnicity (p= 0.013), patient living with carer (p= 0.002), patient relationship to carer (p= 0.011) and the COPE dysfunction score (p= 0.004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoLTwo hundred and sixty (55%) of the 472 carers referred were randomised to the trial.
“Two hundred and sixty (55%) of the 472 carers referred were randomised (CIFT= 182, NELFT= 16, DRC= 35, NEPFT= 27) to the trial.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ RESULTSAdherence (attending five or more sessions) was better in those of white ethnicity than in those of other ethnicity.
“Adherence (attending five or more sessions) was better in those of white ethnicity [110 (78.0%) vs. 19 (61.3%)] than in those of other ethnicity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ RESULTSAdherence was slightly better for those with at least A-level education than those without.
“and those with at least A-level education [56 (80.0%) vs. 74 (71.8%)].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ 10 17 (9.8)The mean fidelity score was 4.7 (SD 0.66).
“The mean fidelity score was 4.7 (SD 0.66).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoLThe others declined to participate (n= 181; 38%), did not meet inclusion criteria (n= 22; 5%) or were uncontactable (n= 9; 2%).
“The others declined to participate (n= 181; 38%), did not meet inclusion criteria (n= 22; 5%) or were uncontactable (n= 9; 2%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ RESULTSAdherence was similar by age group and work situation.
“Adherence was similar by age group [aged < 60–75 years (77.3%) vs. 55 years (73.3%)] and work situation [in paid work 49 (77.8%) vs. other 81 (73.6%)].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ RESULTSModels including an interaction with time showed no evidence of a differential effect of the intervention between the 4- and 8-month time points or between the 12- and 24-month time points for HADS-A or HADS-D (p=0.99 and p=0.86, respectively).
“Models including an interaction with time showed no evidence of a differential effect of the intervention between the 4- and 8-month time points or between the 12- and 24-month time points for HADS-A or HADS-D (p= 0.99 and p= 0.86, respectively).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000At the lower-bound NICE threshold of £20,000, the START intervention has an approximately 95% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective, rising to 98% at the £30,000 threshold.
“at the lower-bound NICE threshold of £20,000, the START intervention has an approximately 95% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective, rising to 98% at the £30,000 threshold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000The mean ICER values from the second sensitivity analysis are £5756 per additional QALY and £112 per 1-point difference in HADS-T score.
“The mean ICER values from this further analysis are £5756 per additional QALY, and £112 per 1-point difference in HADS-T score.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ RESULTSModels including an interaction with time showed no evidence of a differential effect of the intervention between the 4- and 8-month time points or between the 12- and 24-month time points for HADS-T score (p=0.92) and indicated a similar long-term treatment effect.
“Models including an interaction with time showed no evidence of a differential effect of the intervention between the 4- and 8-month time points or between the 12- and 24-month time points for HADS-T score (p= 0.92) and indicated a similar long-term treatment effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ RESULTSOutpatient service costs over 9-12 months and 21-24 months were higher in the intervention group as participants in this group used outpatient services more frequently than those in the TAU group.
“outpatient service costs over 9–12 months and 21–24 months were higher in the intervention group as participants in this group used outpatient services more frequently than those in the TAU group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 28 (29.5)aThe estimated hazard ratio for the effect of the intervention compared with TAU on time to care home admission was 0.83 (95% CI 0.44 to 1.56; p=0.56), showing no significant evidence of an effect.
“The estimated hazard ratio (HR) was 0.83 with 95% CI 0.44 to 1.56 (p= 0.56), showing no significant evidence of an effect of the intervention compared with TAU.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: In the parametric shared frailty model for time to institutionalisation, the shared frailty follows a gamma distribution and survival times follow a Weibull distribution.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000At the lower-bound NICE threshold of £20,000, the START intervention has a 93% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective, rising to 98% at the £30,000 threshold.
“At the lower-bound NICE threshold of £20,000, the START intervention has a 93% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective, rising to 98% at the £30,000 threshold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000The mean ICER values in the first sensitivity analysis were £5452 per additional QALY and £107 per 1-point difference in HADS-T score.
“The mean ICER values are now £5452 per additional QALY and £107 per 1-point difference in HADS-T score.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 28 (29.5)aModels including an interaction with time showed no evidence of a differential effect of the intervention between the 4- and 8-month time points or between the 12- and 24-month time points for either QoL-AD or HSQ mental health (p=0.24 and p=0.14, respectively).
“Models including an interaction with time showed no evidence of a differential effect of the intervention between the 4- and 8-month time points or between the 12- and 24-month time points for either QoL-AD or HSQ mental health (p= 0.24 and p= 0.14, respectively).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 28 (29.5)aOf the remaining 84 in the TAU group, 17 (20.2%) were admitted to a care home, and in the intervention group, 32 (18.7%) of the remaining 171 were admitted, within the 24-month follow-up period.
“Of the remaining 84 in the TAU group, 17 (20.2%) were admitted to a care home, and in the intervention group, 32 (18.7%) of the remaining 171 were admitted, within the 24-month follow-up period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ RESULTSFourteen patients were admitted to a care home during the 8-month follow-up period: three (3.6%) in the TAU group and 11 (6.4%) in the intervention group.
“Fourteen patients were admitted to a care home during the 8-month follow-up period (not included in Table 7): three (3.6%) in the TAU group and 11 (6.4%) in the intervention group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000The intervention produced significant improvements in depression and anxiety symptoms, QoL, and depression caseness.
“This change was significant in terms of both depression and anxiety symptoms and also in QoL and depression caseness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000There was an indication of possible reduction in the chances of being admitted to a care home but this was not significant.
“There was an indication of possible reduction in the chances of being admitted to a care home but this was not significant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ RESULTSIn the second sensitivity analysis, at a threshold of £20,000, START had a likelihood of being seen as cost-effective of 70%, rising to 80% at £30,000.
“At a threshold of £20,000, the START intervention has a likelihood of being seen as cost-effective of 70%, rising to 80% at the £30,000 threshold.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000Abusive behaviour reduced in both groups and there was no significant difference between them.
“Abusive behaviour reduced in both groups and there was no significant difference between them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ RESULTSOver 24 months, carers who received the START intervention had slightly but not statistically significantly higher total costs and better, although not statistically significant, outcomes in health-related QoL (QALY) and affective symptoms (HADS-T) compared with TAU.
“Over the 24 months, carers who received the START intervention had slightly, but not statistically significantly, higher total costs and better, although not statistically significant, differences in outcomes whether measured in terms of health-related QoL (QALY) or affective symptoms (HADS-T).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000The study intervention was effective over time and acceptable to most participants.
“Our study was effective over time and acceptable to most participants”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ RESULTSIn the second sensitivity analysis, START had an approximately 72% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective at £500 and remained above 82% if willingness to pay for a 1-point improvement was over £1000.
“In this sensitivity analysis, the START intervention has an approximately 72% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective at £500 and remained above 82% if the willingness to pay for a 1-point improvement in outcome is over £1000.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000At 8 months, the intervention did not show a delay in care home admission, but at 2 years there was an indication that it may tend to delay care home admission.
“The short-term follow-up over 8 months did not show this but at 2 years there was an indication that it may tend to delay care home admission”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt the £20,000 per QALY threshold, the probability that START would be seen as cost-effective was 65%; at the £30,000 threshold it was 75%.
“At the £20,000 per QALY threshold associated with NICE recommendations, the probability that the START intervention would be seen as cost-effective was 65%, and at the higher NICE threshold of £30,000 it was 75%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ RESULTSIn the second sensitivity analysis, adjusting for imbalances in baseline characteristics, the findings were similar to the primary analyses; the mean ICER values were £8567 per additional QALY and £209 per 1-point difference in HADS-T score.
“In the second sensitivity analysis adjusted for imbalances in baseline characteristics, the findings were similar to those from the primary analyses. The results are shown alongside those of the first sensitivity analysis in Table 16. The mean ICER values from this second sensitivity analysis are £8567 per additional QALY and £209 per 1-point difference in HADS-T score.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000At 8 months, those in the TAU group were four times more likely, and at 24 months five times more likely, to have clinically significant depression than the intervention group.
“the ORs indicate that, at follow-up at 8 months, those in the TAU group were four times more likely, and at 24 months were five times more likely, to have clinically significant depression”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ RESULTSIn the first sensitivity analysis, START had an approximately 89% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective at £500, and the likelihood was above 95% if willingness to pay for a 1-point improvement was > £1000.
“The START intervention has an approximately 89% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective at £500. The likelihood of cost-effectiveness is above 95% if the willingness to pay for a 1-point improvement in outcome is > £1000.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ RESULTSIn the first sensitivity analysis, adjusting for significant differences on demographic and clinical predictors of missing values did not alter the results; the mean ICER values were £9767 per additional QALY and £125 per 1-point difference in HADS-T score.
“In the first sensitivity analysis, we adjusted for significant differences on demographic and clinical predictors of missing values. This analysis did not alter the results and is summarised in Table 16. The mean ICER values from this analysis are £9767 per additional QALY and £125 per 1-point difference in HADS-T score.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000This study found the minimally important difference in the HADS-T score to be 1.61 and 1.68 for the emotional function and mastery domains, respectively.
“This study, based on consideration of an emotional function and mastery domain from a scale administered at the same times as the HADS, found the minimally important difference in the HADS-T score to be 1.61 and 1.68 for the former and latter domain, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000The intervention was effective 8 months after randomisation and continued to work 2 years later.
“The intervention was effective 8 months after randomisation and continued to work 2 years later.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000There is little evidence of harm, with withdrawal from treatment at a similar rate to withdrawal from TAU.
“There is little evidence of harm with withdrawal from the treatment being at a similar rate to withdrawal from TAU arm”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000Incidence of clinical depression increased in the control group but not in the intervention group.
“Incidence of clinical depression increased in the control group but not in the intervention group”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ RESULTSIn the first sensitivity analysis, START had an approximately 67% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective at £20,000, rising to 75% at £30,000.
“The START intervention has an approximately 67% likelihood of being seen as cost-effective at the lower bound of NICE threshold of £20,000, rising to 75% at the £30,000 threshold.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ DISCUSSIONMost people did all the sessions, and so the numbers are small.
“In addition, most people did all the sessions, and so the numbers are small.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ DISCUSSIONThe levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms, case-level anxiety and depression, neuropsychiatric symptoms and carer abusive behaviour were slightly higher than in a recent cohort study of newly referred people with dementia.
“The levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms, case-level anxiety and depression, neuropsychiatric symptoms and carer abusive behaviour, however, were slightly higher than in a recent cohort study of newly referred people with dementia”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [9] Cooper, 2009, The determinants of family carers’ abusive behaviour to people with dementia: results of the CARD study, J Affect Disord source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [60] Cooper, 2008, The prevalence of elder abuse and neglect: a systematic review, Age Ageing source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ DISCUSSIONCarers' scores on outcome measures and burden at baseline ranged widely.
“The carers' scores on the outcome measures and burden at baseline ranged widely.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ DISCUSSIONHigh-fidelity ratings and lack of clustering by therapist were observed.
“the high-fidelity ratings and lack of clustering by therapist”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ DISCUSSIONThe researchers saw 19 out of 173 participants in the evenings or out of hours for their intervention sessions.
“The researchers saw 19 out of 173 participants in the evenings or out of hours for their intervention sessions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ DISCUSSIONIt was difficult to deliver the therapy to people who did not speak English.
“We found it difficult to deliver the therapy to people who did not speak English”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ DISCUSSIONParticipants were of either sex (31% male), throughout the adult age range (18-89 years) and from a range of ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds.
“The participants were of either sex (31% male), throughout the adult age range (18–89 years) and from a range of ethnic (around three-quarters white UK) and socioeconomic backgrounds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ DISCUSSIONParticipants were in the main children (44%) or partners (42%) of the person with dementia.
“Participants were in the main children (44%) or partners (42%) of the person with dementia”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for significant predictors of missing values, the incremental QALY gain at 24 months with 6% discounting was 0.03 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.06).
“0.03 (–0.01 to 0.06)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for significant predictors of missing values, the incremental QALY gain at 24 months with 0% discounting was 0.03 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.07).
“0.03 (–0.01 to 0.07)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ DISCUSSIONThe START intervention was effective in the short and long term (2 years); there was no difference between the clinical effects at either time period.
“The START intervention was effective in the short and long term (2 years); there was no difference between the clinical effects at either time period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ DISCUSSIONNeither of the hypothesized patterns (effect wearing off or increasing over time) seemed to be the case.
“Neither of these seemed to be the case (at least alone)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ DISCUSSIONThe START intervention is clinically effective in terms of carer impacts in the short term (8 months) and long term (2 years) both for mood and for QoL.
“The START intervention is clinically effective in terms of carer impacts in the short term (8 months) and long term (2 years) both for mood and for QoL.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAt the 24-month evaluation with 6% discounting, the incremental HADS-T change (reversed so higher scores show better outcomes) was 1.45 (95% CI -0.55 to 3.45).
“1.45 (–0.55 to 3.45)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAt the 24-month evaluation, the incremental QALY gain was 0.03 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.06) at both 0% and 6% discounting.
“0.03 (–0.01 to 0.06) 0.03 (–0.01 to 0.06)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ DISCUSSIONThe START intervention improved carer outcomes while not significantly increasing overall costs.
“This cost-effectiveness advantage arises because the intervention improved carer outcomes while not significantly increasing overall costs, with the additional cost of the intervention being partly counterbalanced by a reduction in service-related costs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ DISCUSSIONThere was no evidence of a change in the magnitude of effectiveness between 4 and 8 months, or at 12 months and 2 years.
“This study reports carer outcomes and that there was no evidence of a change in the magnitude of effectiveness between 4 and 8 months, or at 12 months and 2 years, thus suggesting some lasting effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAt the 24-month evaluation with 0% discounting, the ICER was £11,767 per QALY.
“ICER (£ per QALY) £11,767 £10,833”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAt the 24-month evaluation with 6% discounting, the ICER was £10,833 per QALY.
“ICER (£ per QALY) £11,767 £10,833”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAt the 24-month evaluation with 0% discounting, the incremental HADS-T change (reversed so higher scores show better outcomes) was 1.63 (95% CI -0.61 to 3.88).
“1.63 (–0.61 to 3.88)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for baseline imbalances, at the 24-month evaluation with 6% discounting, the incremental health and social care cost with HADS-T as outcome (n=156) was £274 (95% CI -£262 to £810).
“£274 (–£262 to £810)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for significant predictors of missing values, the ICER at 24 months with 0% discounting was £10,267 per QALY.
“ICER (£ per QALY) £10,267 £9400”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for baseline imbalances, the ICER at 24 months with 0% discounting was £9033 per QALY.
“ICER (£ per QALY) £9033 £8267”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for baseline imbalances, at the 24-month evaluation with 0% discounting, the incremental health and social care cost with QALY as outcome (n=144) was £271 (95% CI -£336 to £877).
“£271 (–£336 to £877)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for baseline imbalances, the incremental HADS-T change (reversed so higher scores show better outcomes) at 24 months with 6% discounting was 1.28 (95% CI -0.90 to 3.45).
“1.28 (–0.90 to 3.45)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for baseline imbalances, the ICER at 24 months with 6% discounting was £214 per unit change on HADS-T.
“ICER (£ per unit change on HADS-T) £203 £214”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for significant predictors of missing values, at the 24-month evaluation with 6% discounting, the incremental health and social care cost with HADS-T as outcome (n=156) was £245 (95% CI -£292 to £782).
“£245 (–£292 to £782)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for significant predictors of missing values, the incremental HADS-T change (reversed so higher scores show better outcomes) at 24 months with 0% discounting was 2.15 (95% CI -0.06 to 4.38).
“2.15 (–0.06 to 4.38)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for baseline imbalances, the ICER at 24 months with 6% discounting was £8267 per QALY.
“ICER (£ per QALY) £9033 £8267”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for baseline imbalances, the incremental HADS-T change (reversed so higher scores show better outcomes) at 24 months with 0% discounting was 1.44 (95% CI -1.01 to 3.90).
“1.44 (–1.01 to 3.90)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for baseline imbalances, the incremental QALY gain at 24 months was 0.03 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.06) at both 0% and 6% discounting.
“0.03 (–0.01 to 0.06) 0.03 (–0.01 to 0.06)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for significant predictors of missing values, at the 24-month evaluation with 0% discounting, the incremental health and social care cost with HADS-T as outcome (n=156) was £264 (95% CI -£298 to £825).
“£264 (–£298 to £825)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for significant predictors of missing values, the ICER at 24 months with 6% discounting was £9400 per QALY.
“ICER (£ per QALY) £10,267 £9400”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for baseline imbalances, at the 24-month evaluation with 0% discounting, the incremental health and social care cost with HADS-T as outcome (n=156) was £293 (95% CI -£269 to £855).
“£293 (–£269 to £855)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for significant predictors of missing values, the incremental HADS-T change (reversed so higher scores show better outcomes) at 24 months with 6% discounting was 1.92 (95% CI -0.05 to 3.90).
“1.92 (–0.05 to 3.90)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the sensitivity analysis adjusting for baseline imbalances, the ICER at 24 months with 0% discounting was £203 per unit change on HADS-T.
“ICER (£ per unit change on HADS-T) £203 £214”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone given§ MethodsAnalyses were carried out on an intention-to-treat basis, excluding carers with missing data at both 4 and 8 months or long term.
“Analyses were carried out on an intention-to-treat basis, but excluded carers for whom data were missing at both 4 and 8 months (short-term follow-up) or long term (12 and 24 months).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ ABSTRACTA computer program was used to decide randomly whether carers were in the intervention or the control group.
“We compared it with usual treatment by using a computer program to decide randomly whether or not carers should be in the intervention or the control group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ AbstractThe trial used intention-to-treat analysis in the short term and in the long term.
“We used intention-to-treat analysis in the short term (152 intervention, 77 TAU) and in the long term (140 intervention, 69 TAU).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ MethodsThe trial used an online computer-generated randomisation system, stratified by trust using random permuted blocks.
“We used an online computer-generated randomisation system, stratified by trust using random permuted blocks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ MethodsSensitivity analyses were used to assess robustness of conclusions by adjusting for baseline characteristics, imbalances between randomised groups, and treatment by time interaction.
“We used sensitivity analyses to assess our conclusions' robustness by adjusting for baseline characteristics, imbalances between randomised groups and differential effects of treatment over time (treatment by time interaction).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ AbstractThe trial was a randomised, parallel-group, superiority trial.
“Randomised, parallel-group, superiority trial with blinded assessment recruiting participants 2 : 1 (intervention to TAU) to allow for therapist clustering.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown data§ MethodsThe analyses adjusted for baseline HADS-T score, centre, carer age, sex, burden, and care recipient neuropsychiatric symptoms.
“We adjusted for baseline HADS-T score and centre (each trust was a centre), and for previously reported factors influencing affective symptoms (carer age, sex, burden and care recipient neuropsychiatric symptoms).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ ResultsFidelity rating was scored for 128 out of 166 (77%) intervention participants, with mean score 4.70 (SD 0.66).
“We scored fidelity rating for 128 out of 166 (77%) intervention participants. The mean score was 4.70 (SD 0.66).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown data§ INTRODUCTIONOutcome assessors were blinded to randomisation status.
“Outcome assessors were blinded to randomisation status, but it was not possible to blind study participants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ AbstractThe trial was registered (Current Controlled Trials ISCTRN70017938).
“Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISCTRN70017938.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ MethodsAll statistical analyses followed a predefined analysis plan.
“All statistical analyses followed a predefined analysis plan, using Stata version 11 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA) for clinical outcomes and Stata version 12 for cost-effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ BackgroundNICE recognises that quality dementia care should include psychological therapy for family carers, but recommends further research regarding cost-effectiveness.
“The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recognises that quality dementia care should include psychological therapy for family carers, but recommends further research regarding cost-effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ INTRODUCTIONThe study was a randomised, parallel-group superiority trial with blinded outcome assessment, recruiting participants 2:1 to intervention and TAU to allow for therapist clustering.
“The study is a randomised, parallel-group superiority trial, with blinded outcome assessment, recruiting participants 2 : 1 to intervention and TAU to allow for therapist clustering.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ AbstractAssessment was blinded.
“Randomised, parallel-group, superiority trial with blinded assessment recruiting participants 2 : 1 (intervention to TAU) to allow for therapist clustering.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoning§ AbstractParticipants were recruited 2:1 (intervention to TAU) to allow for therapist clustering.
“Randomised, parallel-group, superiority trial with blinded assessment recruiting participants 2 : 1 (intervention to TAU) to allow for therapist clustering.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ BackgroundSystematic reviews report that successful interventions to reduce carer depression have been individual rather than group, required active participation, and offered multicomponent strategies tailored to carers' individual needs.
“Systematic reviews report successful interventions to reduce carer depression have been individual rather than group; required active participation; and offered multicomponent strategies to be tailored to carers' individual needs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ BackgroundPreliminary evidence suggests that interventions for anxiety might be effective if they include relaxation techniques and strategies to manage caring demands rather than reducing contact.
“Preliminary evidence suggested that interventions for anxiety might be effective if they include relaxation techniques and strategies to manage caring demands rather than reducing contact.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ DiscussionThis was a pragmatic trial; participants were from NHS services and their diverse backgrounds suggest generalisability.
“This was a pragmatic trial; participants were from NHS services and their diverse backgrounds suggest generalisability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ DiscussionAlthough differences were small, they were clinically significant and sustained post intervention, as reflected in QoL improvements and possibly delayed care home admission.
“Although differences were small, they were clinically significant and sustained post intervention, as reflected in QoL improvements and possibly delayed care home admission.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionIn the team's earlier systematic review, behavioural management and coping strategy-based interventions had been efficacious, interventions targeting individuals tended to work better than group interventions, and the minimum number of sessions of individual behaviour management shown efficacious was six.
“We found that behavioural management and coping strategy-based interventions had been efficacious, that interventions targeting individuals tended to work better than group interventions and that the minimum number of sessions of individual behaviour management which had been shown to be efficacious was six.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Selwood, 2007, Systematic review of the effect of psychological interventions on family caregivers of people with dementia, J Affective Disord source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ DiscussionThe START intervention was clinically effective and cost-effective over 8 months and 2 years.
“The START intervention was clinically effective and cost-effective over 8 months and 2 years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: TAU from the several teaching trusts was based on NICE guidelines (good TAU).
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionCarer psychological morbidity, in particular depression, predicts care breakdown and institutionalisation, as well as elder abuse.
“carer psychological morbidity, in particular depression, predicts care breakdown and, therefore, institutionalisation,7,8 as well as elder abuse.9”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [7] Morris, 1988, The relationship between marital intimacy, perceived strain and depression in spouse caregivers of dementia sufferers, Br J Med Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Gallagher, 2011, Determinants of the desire to institutionalize in Alzheimer’s caregivers, Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Cooper, 2009, The determinants of family carers’ abusive behaviour to people with dementia: results of the CARD study, J Affect Disord source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ ResultsThe CIs around NMB for these sensitivity analyses suggest that these findings are robust, although possibly less strong at the £30,000 threshold.
“The CIs around NMB for these sensitivity analyses, taking into account uncertainty in the estimation, suggest that these findings are robust, although possibly less strong at the £30,000 threshold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionAbout 40% of family carers of people with dementia have clinically significant depression or anxiety, while others have significant psychological symptoms.
“About 40% of family carers of people with dementia have clinically significant depression or anxiety, while others have significant psychological symptoms.5,6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [5] Cooper, 2007, A systematic review of intervention studies about anxiety in caregivers of people with dementia, Int J Geriatr Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] Mahoney, 2005, Anxiety and depression in family caregivers of people with Alzheimer disease: the LASER-AD study, Am J Geriatr Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionSpecialist, individually tailored, psychological support to people with dementia and their family carers has been shown to reduce the rate of, although not necessarily the time to, care home admission in the USA, although there is no evidence in the UK.
“Specialist, individually tailored, psychological support to people with dementia and their family carers has been shown to reduce the rate of, although not necessarily the time to, care home admission in the USA, although there is no evidence in the UK.10,11”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Selwood, 2007, Systematic review of the effect of psychological interventions on family caregivers of people with dementia, J Affective Disord source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Spijker, 2008, Effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in delaying the institutionalization of patients with dementia: a meta-analysis, J Am Geriatr Soc source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ METHODSResearchers in the two groups carried out assessments on carers after receiving training in taking informed consent, good clinical practice and all the assessment tools being administered.
“Researchers in the two groups carried out assessments on carers having received training in taking informed consent, good clinical practice and all the assessment tools being administered.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ METHODSPsychology graduates with no clinical training were employed and trained to deliver the intervention.
“We employed and trained psychology graduates with no clinical training to deliver the intervention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ INTRODUCTIONThere is evidence from systematic reviews that therapies individualised to the carer receiving them are most effective in delaying institutionalisation, and that individual behavioural therapies are more effective than group interventions in reducing carer morbidity.
“There is evidence from systematic reviews that therapies individualised to the carer receiving them are most effective in delaying institutionalisation,11 and that individual behavioural therapies are more effective than group interventions in reducing carer morbidity.10”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [11] Spijker, 2008, Effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in delaying the institutionalization of patients with dementia: a meta-analysis, J Am Geriatr Soc source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Selwood, 2007, Systematic review of the effect of psychological interventions on family caregivers of people with dementia, J Affective Disord source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoning§ METHODSThe psychology graduates were provided with specific training in how to respond to any risks disclosed by carers.
“The psychology graduates were provided with specific training in how to respond to any risks disclosed by carers”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ METHODSThe manual was piloted by the research assistants trying it with PR, GL, CC, DL and each other, and altered whenever it did not flow, or was unclear or repetitive.
“We piloted the manual by the research assistants trying it with PR, GL, CC, DL and each other, and altered it whenever it did not flow, or was unclear or repetitive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionThe Coping with Caregiving programme was developed in the USA as a group intervention; it is a manual-based psychological intervention delivered in weekly group sessions.
“The Coping with Caregiving programme16,17 was developed in the USA as a group intervention. It is a manual-based, psychological intervention delivered in weekly group sessions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] Coon, 2003, Anger and depression management: psychoeducational skill training interventions for women caregivers of a relative with dementia, Gerontologist source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Gallagher-Thompson, 2001, A psychoeducational intervention to reduce distress in Hispanic family caregivers, Clin Gerontol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ METHODSThe largest validation study of HADS in community samples included 6163 participants, more than five times the sum of the other validation studies, and includes random samples of adults throughout the age group and groups of people with psychiatric and physical illnesses.
“The largest of these included 6163 participants, more than five times the sum of the other validation studies and includes random samples of adults throughout the age group and groups of people with psychiatric and physical illnesses.34”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Spinhoven, 1997, A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects, Psychol Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone given§ METHODSIndividual therapy can be tailored to the specific problems faced by the carer.
“Individual therapy also has the advantage that it can be tailored to the specific problems faced by the carer”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionEducation about dementia by itself, group behavioural therapy and supportive therapy were not effective carer interventions.
“Education about dementia by itself, group behavioural therapy and supportive therapy were not effective carer interventions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Selwood, 2007, Systematic review of the effect of psychological interventions on family caregivers of people with dementia, J Affective Disord source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionThere is some evidence that carer support can reduce institutionalisation and that therapies such as the Coping with Caregiving programme, which include problem-solving strategies and offer carers a choice of support strategies tailored to individual needs, are most effective.
“a recent systematic review finds that there is some evidence that carer support can reduce institutionalisation and that therapies such as the Coping with Caregiving programme, which include problem-solving strategies and offer carers a choice of support strategies which can be tailored to their individual needs, are most effective.11”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Spijker, 2008, Effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in delaying the institutionalization of patients with dementia: a meta-analysis, J Am Geriatr Soc source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ METHODSFidelity scores were not high for 7 out of the 131 recorded sessions.
“This was the case for 7 out of the 131 recorded sessions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ METHODSClinical supervision was provided by a clinical psychologist to each of the two teams for 1.5 hours of group supervision fortnightly.
“Our clinical psychologist, PR, met with each of the two teams (of three or four psychology assistants) for 1.5 hours of group supervision a fortnight.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ METHODSSessions were practised with each other to ensure that all researchers had the same understanding of how to deliver the therapy.
“Sessions were practised with each other to ensure that all researchers had the same understanding of how to deliver the therapy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown data§ INTRODUCTIONThe assessment team was not informed of the outcome of randomisation.
“The trial manager told the intervention team (B if the assessment team was A or vice versa) the result, but the assessment team was not informed of the outcome of randomisation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisereasoning§ METHODSIndividual therapies are quicker to deliver than group therapies because in groups time is needed for all group members' problems to be discussed.
“Individual therapies are quicker to deliver, as, in groups, time is needed for all group members' problems to be discussed”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ ConclusionThere are no manual-based therapies currently available for dementia carers in the NHS, nor an evidence base for delivering standardised psychological interventions within NHS services.
“there are no manual-based therapies currently available for dementia carers in the NHS, nor is there an evidence base to demonstrate whether or not such standardised psychological interventions can be realistically, effectively and economically delivered to family carers within NHS services.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionIn the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health project, depression scores were significantly decreased in treatment groups compared with controls in all of the studies and self-efficacy scores were increased.
“depression scores were significantly decreased in treatment groups compared with controls in all of the studies16–19 and self-efficacy scores were increased.18”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [16] Coon, 2003, Anger and depression management: psychoeducational skill training interventions for women caregivers of a relative with dementia, Gerontologist source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Gallagher-Thompson, 2001, A psychoeducational intervention to reduce distress in Hispanic family caregivers, Clin Gerontol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Steffen, 2000, Anger management for dementia caregivers: a preliminary study using video and telephone interventions, Behav Ther source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Gallagher-Thompson, 2003, Change in indices of distress among Latino and Anglo female caregivers of elderly relatives with dementia: site-specific results from the REACH national collaborative study, Gerontologist source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ METHODSTherapists were trained to adhere to the manual and required to demonstrate, by role-play, competence in delivering each session of the intervention.
“We trained therapists to adhere to the manual and required them to demonstrate, by role-play, competence in delivering each session of the intervention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone given§ METHODSCarers face difficulties in attending a group intervention because it can be impossible to make alternative care arrangements for their relative and to be available at a prespecified time.
“Carers face difficulties in attending a group intervention, as it can be impossible to make alternative care arrangements for their relative and to be available at a prespecified time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ METHODSThe Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is validated for all age groups and settings, in people who are physically well or ill, and in Asian and African ethnic groups.
“The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)32 is a self-complete scale, and is validated for all age groups and settings, in people who are physically well or ill, and in Asian and African ethnic groups.33”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ METHODSFidelity to the manualised intervention was monitored by recording one randomly selected session per participant and rating it against a checklist by a therapist not involved in that participant's intervention.
“The session to be recorded was selected at random by the trial manager using a Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) formula before any interventions were carried out. This session was rated for fidelity to the manual by a therapist in the same team who was not involved in that participant's intervention using the standard checklist.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ METHODSThe Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) is a validated instrument with 12 symptom domains that are scored for their severity and frequency and summarised as a single continuous score, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms.
“The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI).42 The NPI is a validated instrument with 12 symptom domains that are scored for their severity and frequency and summarised as a single continuous score (higher scores indicating worse symptoms).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Cummings, 1994, The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia, Neurology source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoLThe study was originally powered for a primary outcome of HADS-A score based on data from a cross-sectional pilot study of family carers.
“This study was originally powered for a primary outcome of HADS-A score based on data from a cross-sectional pilot study of family carers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ METHODSThe Health Status Questionnaire (HSQ) mental health domain measures health-related quality of life throughout the age range, is sensitive to change and has been validated in older and younger people.
“The Health Status Questionnaire (HSQ)38 mental health domain measures health-related QoL throughout the age range, is sensitive to change and has been validated in older and younger people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Pettit, 2001, Validation and normative data of health status measures in older people: the Islington study, Int J Geriatr Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ METHODSThe Zarit Burden Interview is the most consistently used measure of carer burden.
“The Zarit Burden Interview is a 22-item self-report questionnaire and is the most consistently used measure of carer burden;35”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Zarit, 1980, Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden, Gerontologist source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoLAll analyses were carried out by intention to treat, but carers with data missing at both 4- and 8-month follow-up were excluded from the short-term analysis.
“All analyses were carried out by intention to treat, but we excluded. in the short term. carers who had data missing at both 4- and 8-month follow-up and, in the longer term, those with data missing at the 12- and 24-month follow-up.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Missing outcome data are missing at random.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone given§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoLA decrease of 2 points in mean HADS-A score and a 0.5 change in SD was considered to be clinically significant (expert consensus).
“A decrease of 2 points in mean score and a 0.5 change in SD was considered to be clinically significant (expert consensus).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ METHODSThe Modified Conflict Tactic Score (MCTS) has been validated for use in family carers of people with dementia.
“This scale has been validated for use in family carers of people with dementia.37”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Cooper, 2009, The sensitivity and specificity of the Modified Conflict Tactics Scale for detecting clinically significant elder abuse, Int Psychogeriatr source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoning§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoLTo detect such a difference, with 90% power at 5% significance level, 75 participants per group were required.
“To detect such a difference, with 90% power at 5% significance level, 75 participants per group were required.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoning§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoLBased on these calculations and inflating for 20% attrition, the planned recruitment was 90 participants in the TAU group and 168 participants in the intervention group.
“Based on these calculations and inflating for 20% attrition, we planned to recruit 90 participants in the TAU group (no clustering) and 168 participants in the intervention group (clustering).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoning§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoLWith the available sample size, there is 80% power to detect a difference of 2.4 points on the HADS-T and 90% power to detect a 2.7-point difference.
“Based on these values, with the available sample size we have 80% power to detect a difference of 2.4 points on the HADS-T and 90% power to detect a 2.7-point difference, both consistent with differences considered to be clinically important.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoLModel assumptions were examined by checking normality of residuals and plotting residuals against fitted values at individual and therapist cluster level, and these plots did not indicate concerns about model fit.
“Model assumptions were examined by checking the normality of the residuals and also plotting the residuals compared with the fitted values both at the individual and therapist cluster level.”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“These plots are shown in Figure 3 and do not indicate concerns about the model fit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoLTwo sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of results.
“Two sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of our results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoLWe did not collect service use data during the period between 12- and 21-month data collection time points; costs during this period were interpolated from 12- and 24-month data.
“We did not collect service use data during the period between the 12- and 21-month data collection time points (on average 8 months). Costs during this period were interpolated from the 12- and 24-month data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoLAll economic analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis; carers were excluded if data were missing at both 4 and 8 months for the 1-8-month economic analysis, and for the 1-24-month economic analysis, carers were excluded if data were missing at 4, 8 and 24 months.
“All analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis; carers were excluded if data were missing at both 4 and 8 months for the 1–8-month economic analysis, and, for the 1–24-month economic analysis, carers were excluded if data were missing at 4, 8 and 24 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Missing outcome data are missing at random.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoLSensitivity analyses were used to reanalyse outcomes in various ways to assess robustness of conclusions.
“Sensitivity analyses were used to reanalyse the outcomes in various ways to assess robustness of our conclusions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoning§ 3. carer (HSQ mental health45) and care recipient (QoL-AD43) QoLBecause estimation of QALYs requires data at each time point, only complete cases were included in the cost-effectiveness analysis, and no imputation was conducted.
“Because the estimation of QALYs requires data at each time point, only complete cases were included in the cost-effectiveness analysis. No imputation was conducted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Missing outcome data are missing at random.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ RESULTSFidelity rating was carried out for 128 (78%) of the 165 participants who received one or more intervention(s).
“Fidelity rating was carried out for 128 (78%) of the 165 participants who received one or more intervention(s).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 40 (33.3%)Treatment effect estimates (differences and odds ratios) are from models that take into account repeated measurements, therapist clustering in the intervention arm, and are adjusted for baseline characteristics.
“Treatment effect estimates (differences and odds ratios) are from models which take into account the repeated measurements, therapist clustering in the intervention arm and which are adjusted for baseline characteristics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ RESULTSDouble rating for the first 13 participants had a Cohen's kappa value of 0.77, which is substantial agreement.
“Double rating was carried out for the first 13 participants; these had a Cohen's kappa value of 0.77, which is substantial agreement.52”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ RESULTSModel assumptions were examined by checking plots assessing the normality of residuals and plotting residuals versus fitted values at both individual and therapist cluster level; these plots did not indicate concerns about the model fit.
“Model assumptions were examined by checking plots assessing the normality of the residuals and also plotting residuals versus fitted values. These were done for residuals at both the individual and the therapist cluster level. These plots did not indicate concerns about the model fit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ RESULTSThe therapist ICC at 12 months was 0.00 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.07) and at 24 months was 0.00 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.07).
“The therapist ICC at 12 months was 0.00 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.07) and at 24 months was 0.00 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.07).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000The first sensitivity analysis adjusted for significant baseline differences on demographic and clinical predictors of missing values, and the results were similar to those from the primary analyses.
“The first sensitivity analysis adjusted for significant baseline differences on demographic and clinical predictors of missing values. The results were similar to those from the primary analyses and are summarised in the first column of figures in Table 10.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000The second sensitivity analysis adjusted for imbalances in baseline characteristics, and the results were again quite similar to those from the primary analyses.
“The second sensitivity analysis adjusted for imbalances in baseline characteristics. The results were again quite similar to those from the primary analyses and are summarised in the second column of figures in Table 11.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ RESULTSThe primary outcome (HADS-T score) was missing for 55 (21.2%) patients at 12 months and for 64 (24.6%) patients at 24 months.
“The primary outcome (HADS-T score) was missing for 55 (21.2%) patients at 12 months and for 64 (24.6%) patients at 24 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone given§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000Outcome measures were carefully considered for validity.
“outcome measures were carefully considered for validity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000The study was designed as a pragmatic study with broad inclusion criteria and followed Medical Research Council guidance on the evaluation of a complex intervention.
“This was designed as a pragmatic study with broad inclusion criteria and followed closely the Medical Research Council guidance on the evaluation of a complex intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000An economic evaluation was conducted.
“and an economic evaluation was conducted”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone given§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000The clustering of therapists was accounted for in the analysis.
“The clustering of therapists was accounted for by the analysis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000Previous studies of information and advice to people with dementia and their families have suggested that this can improve the patient's QoL but not the carer's psychological symptoms, and an intervention targeted at the carer may not help the person with dementia to the same extent.
“Previous studies of information and advice to people with dementia and their families have suggested this can improve the patient's QoL but not the carer's psychological symptoms and an intervention which is targeted at the carer may not help the person with dementia to the same extent.55”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] Corbett, 2012, Systematic review of services providing information and/or advice to people with dementia and/or their caregivers, Int J Geriatr Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000The global QoL measure used, which considers finance, housing and physical health in addition to well-being, may have made it less likely to change.
“However, QoL is a complex phenomenon and the measure we used is a global one, thus considering finance, housing and physical health in addition to well-being, and this may have made it less likely to change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000The effect size for total mean affective symptoms was small, but previous evidence suggests that treatment effects are in the range that is important to patients.
“The effect size in terms of the total mean affective symptoms was small, but previous evidence from studies in which researchers set out to calculate what a clinically important difference in the HADS would be suggests that treatment effects are in the range that is important to patients.54”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] Puhan, 2008, The minimal important difference of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Health Qual Life Outcomes source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000Family carers inevitably knew which group they were in.
“the family carers inevitably knew which group they were in.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSIONOur intervention is more practical for many carers because we did not require them all to come to a group at the same time.
“but we judge that our intervention is more practical for many carers as we did not require them all to come to a group at the same time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ DISCUSSIONFollow-up rate was 88.1% overall at 8 months with similar rates in both arms.
“There was a very satisfactory follow-up rate of 88.1% overall at 8 months with similar rates in both arms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoning§ DISCUSSIONThe study informed clinical teams about abusive behaviour of carers in the TAU group, which may have improved the outcome for TAU.
“We did, however, inform the clinical teams about abusive behaviour of the carers in the TAU group when there was no intervention in place and, thus, may have improved the outcome for the TAU.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000The impact of different numbers of sessions on carers' outcomes was not the focus of this study.
“the impact that different numbers of sessions might have had on carers' outcomes was not the focus of this study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000The statistical team were aware that the intervention group was the larger group.
“the statistical team were aware that the intervention group was the larger group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ DISCUSSIONThe study from which START was derived used a similar intervention and also alleviated depressive symptoms in carers.
“The study from which we derived START uses a similar intervention and it also alleviated depressive symptoms in carers”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Gallagher-Thompson, 2001, A psychoeducational intervention to reduce distress in Hispanic family caregivers, Clin Gerontol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoning§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000The study did not measure the costs of treatment and care services used by the individuals with dementia, nor attach monetary values to carers' time.
“We did not, therefore, measure the costs of treatment and care services used by the individuals with dementia who were being supported by these carers, nor did we attach monetary values to the time spent by carers in providing support to their relatives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSIONThe intervention is generally acceptable to and the results are generally applicable to family carers around the time people present to secondary care with dementia in the UK.
“Thus, we think that the intervention is generally acceptable to and the results are generally applicable to the family carers around the time people present to secondary care with dementia in the UK.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ DISCUSSIONThe earliest study of the three used trained ex-carers in a voluntary sector befriending intervention and was not taken up by many carers.
“The earliest study of the three used trained ex-carers in a voluntary sector befriending intervention and was not taken up by many carers.24”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Charlesworth, 2008, Befriending carers of people with dementia: randomised controlled trial, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSIONAcceptability, as well as the theoretical background, needs to be a major focus of any intervention.
“This suggests that acceptability, as well as the theoretical background, needs to be a major focus of any intervention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000The evaluation was conducted from a health and social care perspective and concentrated on carer outcomes.
“The evaluation was conducted from a health and social care perspective, and concentrated on outcomes experienced by carers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000Data were entered and cleaned while blind to intervention status.
“the data were entered and cleaned while blind to intervention status”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ DISCUSSIONThe intervention was manual based, standardised and supervised.
“The intervention was manual based, standardised and supervised”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ DISCUSSIONThe instruments were validated and standardised.
“The instruments were validated and standardised.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ DISCUSSIONTen therapist-delivered sessions of CBT over the internet were effective in reducing depression at 4 and 8 months.
“Ten therapist-delivered sessions of CBT over the internet were effective in reducing depression at 4 and 8 months (equivalent to our short-term measures).71”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] Kessler, 2009, Therapist-delivered Internet psychotherapy for depression in primary care: a randomised controlled trial, Lancet source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ DISCUSSIONA recent structured intervention in family carers of people with stroke did not improve their mood, QoL or burden, or improve patient outcome.
“A recent structured intervention in family carers of people with stroke with care competencies taught and assessed by nurses did not improve their mood, QoL or burden, or improve patient outcome.15”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Thompson, 2007, Systematic review of information and support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia, BMC Geriatr source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ DISCUSSIONCBT treatment for health anxiety was effective at 6 months, 1 and 2 years with no significant increase in costs for anxiety and depression, but was ineffective in increasing health-related QoL.
“CBT treatment for health anxiety was effective at 6 months, 1 and 2 years with no significant increase in costs for anxiety and depression, but was ineffective in increasing health-related QoL.72”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] Tyrer, 2013, Clinical and cost-effectiveness of cognitive–behaviour therapy for health anxiety in medical patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial, Lancet source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ DISCUSSIONPrevious research in carers had shown that interventions continue to work for an average of 7-11 months.
“Previous research in carers had shown that interventions continue to work for an average of 7–11 months.66”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66] Sörensen, 2006, Dementia care: mental health effects, intervention strategies, and clinical implications, Lancet Neurol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ DISCUSSIONThat study examined the cost-effectiveness of a modular multicomponent intervention delivered in carers' homes and found a significant difference over the 6-month study period, with carers in the intervention group having more time to dedicate to activities unrelated to caregiving.
“It examined the cost-effectiveness of a modular multicomponent intervention delivered in carers' homes, with three sessions by telephone, supplemented by five group sessions (five or six carers in each) delivered by telephone. Focusing on hours of care-giving, the authors found a significant difference over the 6-month study period, with carers in the intervention group having more time to dedicat”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Nichols, 2008, The cost-effectiveness of a behavior intervention with caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s disease, J Am Geriatr Soc source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ DISCUSSIONA RCT of CBT as an adjuvant therapy for treatment-resistant depression was effective at the 6- and 12-month follow-up.
“In contrast, a RCT of CBT as an adjuvant therapy for treatment-resistant depression found that it was effective at the 6- and 12-month follow-up.70”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] Wiles, 2013, Cognitive–behavioural therapy as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy for primary care based patients with treatment resistant depression: results of the CoBalT randomised controlled trial, Lancet source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSIONThe content of the intervention, as well as its acceptability in terms of take-up, is important.
“This suggests that the content of the intervention, as well as its acceptability in terms of take-up, is also important.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ DISCUSSIONA RCT of telephone-administered psychotherapy for depressive symptoms worked over the 16 weeks it was administered, but was no longer significantly efficacious at 1 year.
“Previous work has found that a RCT of telephone-administered psychotherapy for depressive symptoms worked over the 16 weeks it was administered, but was no longer significantly efficacious at 1 year.68”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] Mohr, 2005, Telephone-administered psychotherapy for depression, Arch Gen Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSIONThe cost-effectiveness advantage of the START intervention arises because it improved carer outcomes without significantly increasing overall costs, with additional intervention costs partly offset by reduced service-related costs.
“This cost-effectiveness advantage arises because the intervention improved carer outcomes while not significantly increasing overall costs, with the additional cost of the intervention being partly counterbalanced by a reduction in service-related costs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ DISCUSSION72% of participants in DAISY completed the intervention according to the study's definition.
“In contrast to the former study, 72% of participants completed the intervention according to the study's definition (attending three or more of individual and educational sessions).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Waldorff, 2012, Efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease: the multicentre, rater blinded, randomised Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY), BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ DISCUSSIONOur earlier studies have found that family carers tend to become more anxious and depressed over time without intervention, and that this is associated with an increase in abusive behaviour.
“Our earlier studies have found that family carers tend to become more anxious and depressed over time without intervention, and that this is associated with an increase in abusive behaviour”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [63] Cooper, 2008, Coping strategies, anxiety and depression in caregivers of people with Alzheimer’s disease, Int J Geriatr Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [64] Cooper, 2009, Abuse of people with dementia by family carers: representative cross sectional survey, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ DISCUSSIONA RCT of a 'coping with depression' psychoeducational group programme was effective in reducing depression at 6 months but not at 12 months.
“Similarly, a RCT of a 'coping with depression' psychoeducational group programme, with booster session up to 4 months after the intervention had finished, was effective in reducing depression at 6 months but not at 12 months.69”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] Ellison, 2009, Maintenance of gains following experiential therapies for depression, J Consult Clin Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ DISCUSSIONA recent review found some evidence that psychosocial interventions for carers of people with dementia could lead to greater improvements in outcome and also generate cost savings.
“A recent review found some evidence that such interventions could lead to greater improvements in outcome and also generate cost savings.20”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Knapp, 2013, Dementia care costs and outcomes: a systematic review, Int J Geriatr Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
About 40% of family carers of people with dementia have clinically significant depression or anxiety.
“about 40% of whom have clinically significant depression or anxiety.”
“About 40% of those family carers of people with dementia have clinically significant depression or anxiety”
The paper relies on this without support.
Carer psychological morbidity predicts care breakdown and institutionalisation.
“This impacts on the person with dementia, families and society, predicting care breakdown.”
“carer psychological morbidity predicts care breakdown and, therefore, institutionalisation, as well as elder abuse.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are currently no clinically effective and cost-effective NHS family carer interventions.
“There are currently no clinically effective and cost-effective NHS family carer interventions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are no manual-based therapies currently available for dementia carers in the NHS.
“There are no manual-based therapies currently available for dementia carers in the NHS”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no evidence regarding whether or not standardised psychological interventions can be realistically, effectively and economically delivered to family carers within NHS services.
“and no evidence regarding whether or not standardised psychological interventions can be realistically, effectively and economically delivered to family carers within NHS services.”
The paper relies on this without support.
NICE recognises that quality dementia care should include psychological therapy for family carers.
“The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recognises that quality dementia care should include psychological therapy for family carers”
The paper relies on this without support.
Two-thirds of people with dementia live at home, receiving most care from family carers.
“Two-thirds of people with dementia live at home, receiving most care from family carers”
“Two-thirds of people with dementia live at home, with family providing most of their care.”
The paper relies on this without support.
TAU from the several teaching trusts was based on NICE guidelines (good TAU).
“We expected TAU from the several teaching trusts to be based on NICE guidelines, i.e. good 'TAU'.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are no manual-based therapies currently available for dementia carers in the NHS, nor an evidence base for delivering standardised psychological interventions within NHS services.
“there are no manual-based therapies currently available for dementia carers in the NHS, nor is there an evidence base to demonstrate whether or not such standardised psychological interventions can be realistically, effectively and economically delivered to family carers within NHS services.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Treatment as usual (TAU) is similar to good TAU throughout the UK and based on the NICE guidelines.
“As several teaching trusts were involved, we expected the TAU to be similar to good TAU throughout the UK and based on the NICE guidelines.31”
The paper relies on this without support.
Neuropsychiatric symptoms are associated with carer psychological morbidity.
“This was included as neuropsychiatric symptoms have been shown to be associated with carer psychological morbidity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Carers with more burden are expected to be more stressed.
“We used it to adjust for the baseline burden on carers as those who have more burden may be expected to be more stressed.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Stress is the mismatch between primary appraisal (perceived demand) and secondary appraisal (perceived ability to cope and available resources and options).
“In this, stress is seen as the mismatch between primary appraisal (perceived demand) and secondary appraisal (perceived ability to cope and available resources and options, and principles from CBT).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Changes in the rate of admissions to 24-hour care may become more apparent over a longer time.
“This is because changes in the rate of admissions may become more apparent over a longer time.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Missing outcome data are missing at random.
“thus making missing at random assumptions more plausible.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In the parametric shared frailty model for time to institutionalisation, the shared frailty follows a gamma distribution and survival times follow a Weibull distribution.
“A parametric shared frailty model assuming a gamma distribution for the shared frailty with a Weibull survival distribution was fitted for the time to institutionalisation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A minimally important clinical difference on the HADS-T is 1.6.
“We can also refer to a previous suggestion that a minimally important clinical difference on the HADS-T is 1.6.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no other rigorous study of an intervention delivered by psychology graduates without previous clinical training.
“There is no other rigorous study of an intervention delivered by psychology graduates without previous clinical training, a group who are relatively available and inexpensive but with a background in understanding the concepts.”
The paper relies on this without support.
We are not aware of any other interventions in this group for which health economic evaluations have been undertaken.
“We are not aware of any other interventions in this group for which health economic evaluations have been undertaken and we discuss this below.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a paucity of literature which considers how long it takes for a psychological intervention to work and the period for which it continues to work.
“There is a paucity of literature which considers how long it takes for a psychological intervention to work and the period for which it continues to work.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is little previous evidence on the cost-effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for carers of people with dementia.
“There is little previous evidence on the cost-effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for carers of people with dementia.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Five included RCTs implemented group activities; those with standard activities reduced mean agitation levels and decreased symptoms in care homes while they were in place.
“Five of the included RCTs implemented group activities; those with standard activities reduced mean agitation levels, and decreased symptoms in care homes while they were in place. 22,23”
From Non-pharmacological interventions for agitation in dementia: systematic review of randomised controlled trials (2014) · cites this paper as [23]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn a recent trial, caregivers from the intervention group reported less but insignificant abusive behaviors toward care receipts.
“In a recent trial, caregivers from the intervention group reported less but insignificant abusive behaviors toward care receipts [40].”
From Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Caregivers of Frail Older Chinese Adults: A Study Protocol (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
There are no conclusive results for validation and reminiscence therapy, the effectiveness of light therapy is not clear, and aromatherapy is better than no treatment for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.
“In particular, there are no conclusive results for validation and reminiscence therapy, the effectiveness of light therapy is not clear, aromatherapy is better than no treatment.”
From The Multidisciplinary Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia. A Narrative Review of Non-Pharmacological Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [106]
Potential benefits of non-pharmacological treatments for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia have been documented, but the strength of evidence is overall low and heterogeneity in intervention type, follow-up duration, and outcome measures hampers comparison across studies.
“Potential benefits of these interventions have been documented, but the strength of evidence is overall low and the great heterogeneity in terms of type of intervention, follow-up duration, type of outcome measures hamper comparison across studies.”
From The Multidisciplinary Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia. A Narrative Review of Non-Pharmacological Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [106]
The small body of evidence for massage and touch therapy suggests they could be viable treatment options, especially given the ease of implementation and minimal training involved.
“The small body of evidence for other sensory interventions, such as massage and touch therapy, suggests they could be viable treatment options, especially given the ease of implementation and minimal training involved.”
From The Multidisciplinary Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia. A Narrative Review of Non-Pharmacological Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [106]
No effect has been documented for acupuncture and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.
“No effect has been documented for acupuncture and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.”
From The Multidisciplinary Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia. A Narrative Review of Non-Pharmacological Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [106]
Some reports indicate that non-pharmacological treatments for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia are potentially cost-effective.
“Some reports indicate the NPT to BPSD to be potentially cost-effective (70, 99, 106), but further research is needed on this point.”
From The Multidisciplinary Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia. A Narrative Review of Non-Pharmacological Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [106]
Music therapy and behavioral management techniques seem to cause a short-term reduction of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, but long-term efficacy is unclear.
“Music therapy and behavioral management techniques seem to cause a short-term reduction of BPSD, but long-term efficacy is unclear.”
From The Multidisciplinary Approach to Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia. A Narrative Review of Non-Pharmacological Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [106]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Table 13's 12-month outpatient percentage uses a different denominator
MinorTable 13 lists 19 outpatient-service users among 67 TAU carers at 12 months, which is 28.36%, not the reported 24.7%. Other percentages in the table also do not match the stated group sizes.
Reported 24.7 · recomputed 28.358209
“TAU (N= 67), % (n) using service Intervention (N= 138), % (n) using service TAU (N= 64), % (n) using service Intervention (N= 132), % (n) using service Outpatient services Outpatient hospital services 24.7 (19) 32.7 (50) 27.6 (24) 32.9 (53)”
Table 13's 24-month outpatient percentage does not match its group size
MinorFor the 24-month TAU group, 24 users among the stated 64 carers is 37.5%, rather than the reported 27.6%.
Reported 27.6 · recomputed 37.5
“TAU (N= 64), % (n) using service Intervention (N= 132), % (n) using service Outpatient services Outpatient hospital services 24.7 (19) 32.7 (50) 27.6 (24) 32.9 (53)”
Conflicting p-values for the adjusted long-term HADS-T effect
MinorThe abstract gives p=0.03 for the -2.58-point effect, whereas the detailed results give p=0.003 for the same estimate and confidence interval.
“had lower HADS-T (mean difference –2.58, 95% CI –4.26 to –0.90; p= 0.03)”
“showed a mean difference of –2.58 points (95% CI –4.26 to –0.90 points; p= 0.003) in favour of the intervention.”
Long-term depression effect has the wrong sign in the abstract
MinorThe abstract reports a positive HADS-D difference of 1.45 while describing lower depression scores. The detailed results report the difference as -1.45, consistent with its entirely negative confidence interval.
“lower HADS-A (–1.16, 95% CI –2.15 to –0.18) and HADS-D (1.45, 95% CI –2.32 to –0.57)”
“The HADS-A and HADS-D indicated significant beneficial intervention effects, with average score decrease of –1.16 (95% CI –2.15 to –0.18) and –1.45 (95% CI –2.32 to –0.57), respectively.”
Fidelity calculation accounts for only 118 of 128 ratings
MinorThe described calculation combines the first 13 participants with 105 remaining participants, accounting for 118 ratings. The section says fidelity ratings were available for 128 participants.
“Overall mean fidelity was calculated by adding each average rating (rating 1 plus rating 2, divided by 2) of the first 13 participants to the ratings of the remaining 105 participants, and dividing by the overall number of participants with available fidelity ratings.”
“Fidelity rating was carried out for 128 (78%) of the 165 participants who received one or more intervention(s).”
Fidelity-rating denominator differs between sections
MinorThe scientific summary says 166 intervention participants received sessions, while the detailed fidelity section calls this group 165. The latter section's 128 rated plus 38 not rated also totals 166.
“We scored fidelity rating for 128 out of 166 (77%) intervention participants.”
“Fidelity rating was carried out for 128 (78%) of the 165 participants who received one or more intervention(s). The remaining 38 either refused to be audiotaped (10) or withdrew before”
Twelve-month TAU HADS-T sample size conflicts with missing-outcome count
MinorTable 12 gives 64 TAU carers with a 12-month HADS-T score. Table 11 reports 20 missing among the 87 randomised TAU carers, implying 67 available scores; Table 12 also lists 67 for each HADS subscale.
“HADS-T scores 14.6 (8.9) (n= 64)”
“TABLE 11 Missing outcomes at 12 and 24 months' follow-up Measure Missing at 12 months, n (%) Missing at 24 months, n (%) Randomised group Randomised group TAU Intervention TAU Intervention HADS-A 20 (23) 35 (20) 23 (26) 41 (24) HADS-D 20 (23) 35 (20) 23 (26) 41 (24) HADS-T 20 (23) 35 (20) 23 (26) 41 (24)”
The 78% HADS-T cost-effectiveness probability is assigned to different thresholds
MinorThe scientific summary assigns a 78% probability to willingness to pay of £50 per point, but the detailed results assign that probability to £500 per point. This tenfold difference changes the interpretation of the economic result.
“The probability of cost-effectiveness on the HADS-T was 78% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £50 per 1-point HADS-T improvement.”
“Assuming a willingness to pay of £500, the probability that the START intervention would be seen as cost-effective would be 78%.”
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282 · see citing works
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148 · see citing works
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · Cited by 47,139 · see citing works
EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
(1990) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 · Cited by 15,736 · see citing works
The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Bjelland, I., Dahl, A. A., Haug, T. T., & Neckelmann, D. (2002) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3 · Cited by 9,779 · see citing works
The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: Comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia
Cummings, J. L., Mega, M., Gray, K., Rosenberg-Thompson, S., Carusi, D. A., & Gornbein, J. (1994) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.44.12.2308 · Cited by 7,568 · see citing works
Relatives of the Impaired Elderly: Correlates of Feelings of Burden
Zarit, S. H., Reever, K. E., & Bach-Peterson, J. (1980) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/20.6.649 · Cited by 5,810 · see citing works
Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study
Ferri, C. P., Prince, M. J., Brayne, C., Brodaty, H., Fratiglioni, L., Ganguli, M., Hall, K. S., Hasegawa, K., Hendrie, H. C., Huang, Y., et al. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67889-0 · Cited by 5,336 · see citing works
The Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale.
(2003) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-1-29 · Cited by 2,391 · see citing works
SPINHOVEN, P., ORMEL, J., SLOEKERS, P. P. A., KEMPEN, G. I. J. M., SPECKENS, A. E. M., & HEMERT, A. M. V. (1997) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291796004382 · Cited by 2,158 · see citing works
Morris, J. C. (1997) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610297004870 · Cited by 1,641 · see citing works
Assessing Quality of Life in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment
Logsdon, R. G., Gibbons, L. E., McCurry, S. M., & Teri, L. (2002) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-200205000-00016 · Cited by 1,381 · see citing works
Living Well with Dementia: A National Dementia Strategy
(2009) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e608082011-001 · Cited by 1,118 · see citing works
Nonpharmacological therapies in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review of efficacy
Olazarán, J., Reisberg, B., Clare, L., Cruz, I., Peña-Casanova, J., del Ser, T., Woods, B., Beck, C., Auer, S., Lai, C., et al. (2010) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000316119 · Cited by 937 · see citing works
Pinquart, M., & Sorensen, S. (2006) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610206003462 · Cited by 827 · see citing works
Slade, M., & Thornicroft, G. (2025) · doi:10.1093/med/9780198898818.003.0007 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
The prevalence of elder abuse and neglect: a systematic review
Cooper, C., Selwood, A., & Livingston, G. (2008) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afm194 · Cited by 650 · see citing works
Improving caregiver well-being delays nursing home placement of patients with Alzheimer disease
Mittelman, M. S., Haley, W. E., Clay, O. J., & Roth, D. L. (2006) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000242727.81172.91 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Puhan, M. A., Frey, M., Büchi, S., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-6-46 · Cited by 586 · see citing works
Anxiety and depression in family caregivers of people with Alzheimer disease: the LASER-AD study.
Mahoney, R., Regan, C., Katona, C., & Livingston, G. (2005) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00019442-200509000-00008 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Self-citationDementia care: mental health effects, intervention strategies, and clinical implications
Sörensen, S., Duberstein, P., Gill, D., & Pinquart, M. (2006) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70599-3 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Kessler, D., Lewis, G., Kaur, S., Wiles, N., King, M., Weich, S., Sharp, D. J., Araya, R., Hollinghurst, S., & Peters, T. J. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61257-5 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Mittelman, M. S., Roth, D. L., Coon, D. W., & Haley, W. E. (2004) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.5.850 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Risk Factors for Potentially Harmful Informal Caregiver Behavior
Beach, S., Schulz, R., Williamson, G., Miller, L., Weiner, M., & Lance, C. (2005) · Journal of The American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53111.x · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Systematic review of information and support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia
Thompson, C. A., Spilsbury, K., Hall, J., Birks, Y., Barnes, C., & Adamson, J. (2007) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/1471-2318-7-18 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Selwood, A., Johnston, K., Katona, C., Lyketsos, C., & Livingston, G. (2007) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2006.10.025 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Self-citationWiles, N., Thomas, L., Abel, A., Ridgway, N., Turner, N., Campbell, J., Garland, A., Hollinghurst, S., Jerrom, B., Kessler, D., et al. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61552-9 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
The Depression Report: A New Deal for Depression and Anxiety DisordersPreprint
Layard, R. (2006) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Coping strategies, anxiety and depression in caregivers of people with Alzheimer’s disease
Cooper, C., Katona, C., Orrell, M., & Livingston, G. (2008) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.2007 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Self-citationDesign and analysis of clinical trials with clustering effects due to treatment
Roberts, C., & Roberts, S. A. (2005) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1191/1740774505cn076oa · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Telephone-administered psychotherapy for depression
Mohr, D. C., Hart, S. L., Julian, L., Catledge, C., Honos-Webb, L., Vella, L., & Tasch, E. T. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.9.1007 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Coon, D. W., Thompson, L., Steffen, A., Sorocco, K., & Gallagher-Thompson, D. (2003) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/43.5.678 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Gallagher-Thompson, D., Coon, D. W., Solano, N., Ambler, C., Rabinowitz, Y., & Thompson, L. W. (2003) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/43.4.580 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Livingston, G., Leavey, G., Manela, M., Livingston, D., Rait, G., Sampson, E., Bavishi, S., Shahriyarmolki, K., & Cooper, C. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c4184 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Self-citationLivingston, G., Barber, J., Rapaport, P., Knapp, M., Griffin, M., King, D., Livingston, D., Mummery, C., Walker, Z., Hoe, J., et al. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f6276 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Self-citationSpijker, A., Vernooij‐Dassen, M., Vasse, E., Adang, E., Wollersheim, H., Grol, R., & Verhey, F. (2008) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01705.x · Cited by 223 · see citing works
A systematic review of interventions for elder abuse
Ploeg, J., Fear, J., Hutchison, B., MacMillan, H., & Bolan, G. (2009) · Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1080/08946560902997181 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Abuse of people with dementia by family carers: representative cross sectional survey
Cooper, C., Selwood, A., Blanchard, M., Walker, Z., Blizard, R., & Livingston, G. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b155 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Self-citationTyrer, P., Cooper, S., Salkovskis, P., Tyrer, H., Crawford, M., Byford, S., Dupont, S., Finnis, S., Green, J., McLaren, E., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61905-4 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Hoe, J., Katona, C., Orrell, M. W., & Livingston, G. (2007) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.1786 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Self-citationMorris, L. W., Morris, R. G., & Britton, P. G. (1988) · British Journal of Medical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1988.tb02784.x · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Cooper, C., Selwood, A., Blanchard, M., Walker, Z., Blizard, R., & Livingston, G. (2010) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.05.001 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Self-citationValidation and normative data of health status measures in older people: the Islington study
Pettit, T., Livingston, G., Manela, M., Kitchen, G., Katona, C., & Bowling, A. (2001) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.479 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citationDementia care costs and outcomes: a systematic review
Knapp, M., Iemmi, V., & Romeo, R. (2013) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.3864 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citationA systematic review of intervention studies about anxiety in caregivers of people with dementia
Cooper, C., Balamurali, T. B. S., Selwood, A., & Livingston, G. (2007) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.1656 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Self-citationNichols, L. O., Chang, C., Lummus, A., Burns, R., Martindale‐Adams, J., Graney, M. J., Coon, D. W., Czaja, S., & for the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregivers Health II Investigators (2008) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01569.x · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Cooper, C., Selwood, A., & Livingston, G. (2009) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/jgp.0b013e3181b0fa2e · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationCoen, R. F., O’Boyle, C. A., Coakley, D., & LAWLOR, B. A. (2002) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000048648 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Waldorff, F. B., Buss, D. V., Eckermann, A., Rasmussen, M. L. H., Keiding, N., Rishoj, S., Siersma, V., Sorensen, J., Sorensen, L. V., Vogel, A., et al. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e4693 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Gallagher-Thompson, D., Arean, P., Rivera, P., & Thompson, L. W. (2001) · Clinical Gerontologist · doi:10.1300/j018v23n01_03 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Gonyea, J. G., O’Connor, M. K., Carruth, A., & Boyle, P. A. (2005) · American Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias® · doi:10.1177/153331750502000505 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Walwyn, R., & Roberts, C. (2010) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280209105017 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Family carers' distress and abusive behaviour: Longitudinal study
Cooper, C., Blanchard, M., Selwood, A., Walker, Z., & Livingston, G. (2010) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.109.071811 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationMaintenance of gains following experiential therapies for depression
Ellison, J. A., Greenberg, L. S., Goldman, R. N., & Angus, L. (2009) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0014653 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Corbett, A., Stevens, J., Aarsland, D., Day, S., Moniz‐Cook, E., Woods, R., Brooker, D., & Ballard, C. (2012) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.2762 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Knapp, M., King, D., Romeo, R., Schehl, B., Barber, J., Griffin, M., Rapaport, P., Livingston, D., Mummery, C., Walker, Z., et al. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f6342 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationSteffen, A. M. (2000) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(00)80016-7 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Befriending carers of people with dementia: randomised controlled trial
Charlesworth, G., Shepstone, L., Wilson, E., Reynolds, S., Mugford, M., Price, D., Harvey, I., & Poland, F. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39549.548831.ae · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Determinants of the desire to institutionalize in Alzheimer’s caregivers
Gallagher, D., Ni Mhaolain, A., Crosby, L., Ryan, D., Lacey, L., Coen, R. F., Walsh, C., Coakley, D., Walsh, J. B., Cunningham, C., et al. (2011) · American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias® · doi:10.1177/1533317511400307 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Burns, A. S., Banerjee, S., Morris, J., Woodward, Y., Baldwin, R., Proctor, R., Tarrier, N., Pendleton, N., Sutherland, D., Andrew, J. G., et al. (2006) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01016.x · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Cooper, C., Maxmin, K., Selwood, A., Blanchard, M., & Livingston, G. (2009) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610209009387 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationReliability, Validity, and Scoring of the Health Status Questionnaire-12 Version 2.0
Hultquist, T. B., Kaiser, K. L., & Atwood, J. R. (2007) · Journal of Nursing Measurement · doi:10.1891/106137407780851778 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
The National Dementia strategy in England
Burns, A. S., & Robert, P. H. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b931 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Bruvik, F. K., Allore, H. G., Ranhoff, A. H., & Engedal, K. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000355912 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Sommerlad, A., Manela, M., Cooper, C., Rapaport, P., & Livingston, G. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005273 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationThe CARD study – abuse of people with dementia by family carers
Cooper, C., Selwood, A., Blanchard, M. R., et al. (2009) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Knapp, 2007, Dementia UK
- 2006, Dementia: Supporting People with Dementia and their Carers in Health and Social Care
- Radosevich, 1995, Twelve-Item Health Status Questionnaire: HSQ-12 Version 2.0
- Dolan, 1995, A Social Tariff for EuroQol: Results from a UK Population Survey
- 2010, National Schedule of Reference Costs 2008–09 for NHS Trusts and PCTs Combined
- Curtis, 2010, Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2010
- 2004, Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal
- 2008, Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal
- 2008, Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Implementation Plan: National Guidelines for Regional Delivery
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care
Livingston, G., Sommerlad, A., Orgeta, V., Costafreda, S. G., Huntley, J., Ames, D., Ballard, C., Banerjee, S., Burns, A., Cohen-Mansfield, J., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31363-6 · Cited by 6,072 · see citing works
Self-citationLivingston, G., Kelly, L., Lewis-Holmes, E., Baio, G., Morris, S., Patel, N., Omar, R. Z., Katona, C., & Cooper, C. (2014) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.141119 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Self-citationZucchella, C., Sinforiani, E., Tamburin, S., Federico, A., Mantovani, E., Bernini, S., Casale, R., & Bartolo, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.01058 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
“In contrast, as caregiver is often the only figure that manage patients’ BPSD at home, future studies should address the role of NPT for BPSD in non-institutionalized people with dementia (106).”
BackgroundResultMoyle, W., Jones, C. J., Murfield, J. E., Thalib, L., Beattie, E. R. A., Shum, D. K. H., O'Dwyer, S. T., Mervin, M. C., & Draper, B. M. (2017) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2017.03.018 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Management of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia
Bessey, L. J., & Walaszek, A. (2019) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-019-1049-5 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Baird, A., & Samson, S. (2015) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2014.11.028 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Sun, Y., Ji, M., Leng, M., Li, X., Zhang, X., & Wang, Z. (2022) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104204 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Determinants of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: A scoping review of the evidence
Kolanowski, A., Boltz, M., Galik, E., Gitlin, L. N., Kales, H. C., Resnick, B., Van Haitsma, K. S., Knehans, A., Sutterlin, J. E., Sefcik, J. S., et al. (2017) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2017.06.006 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Tetrahydrocannabinol for neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia
van den Elsen, G. A. H., Ahmed, A. I. A., Verkes, R., Kramers, C., Feuth, T. B., Rosenberg, P. B., van der Marck, M. A., & Rikkert, M. G. M. O. (2015) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001675 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Livingston, G., Barber, J., Marston, L., Rapaport, P., Livingston, D., Cousins, S., Robertson, S., La Frenais, F., & Cooper, C. (2017) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjpo.bp.117.005181 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Self-citationSense of coherence, burden and mental health in caregiving: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Casado, R. D. P., Espinosa-Medina, A., López‐Martínez, C., & Orgeta, V. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.002 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Hazzan, A. A., Dauenhauer, J. A., Follansbee, P., Hazzan, J. O., Allen, K., & Omobepade, I. (2022) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-022-02787-0 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Carer‐related research and knowledge: Findings from a scoping review
Larkin, M., Henwood, M., & Milne, A. J. (2018) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.12586 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Greenwood, N., & Smith, R. (2019) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1185-0 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Schreckenberger, P. C., & McAdam, A. J. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00382-15 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Baker, F. A., Lee, C., Sousa, T. V., Stretton-Smith, P. A., Tamplin, J., Sveinsdóttir, V. Ó., Geretsegger, M., Wake, J. D., Aßmus, J., & Gold, C. (2022) · The Lancet Healthy Longevity · doi:10.1016/s2666-7568(22)00027-7 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Travers, C., Brooks, D., Hines, S. J., OʼReilly, M., McMaster, M., He, W., MacAndrew, M., Fielding, E., Karlsson, L. J. E., & Beattie, E. (2016) · The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2016-003230 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Whitty, E., Mansour, H., Aguirre, E., Palomo, M., Charlesworth, G. M., Ramjee, S., Poppe, M., Brodaty, H., Kales, H. C., Morgan‐Trimmer, S., et al. (2020) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2020.101113 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“If all items asterisked below were answered affirmatively, the paper was rated as at lower ROB; we have developed this tool (modified from the Cochrane ROB tool) and used it in numerous previous reviews (Cooper et al., 2014a; Livingston et al., 2014; Lord et al., 2015; Mukadam et al., 2011; Scott et al., 2019).”
MethodSelf-citationThomas, K. S., Baier, R. R., Kosar, C. M., Ogarek, J. A., Trepman, A. Z., & Mor, V. (2017) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2017.04.008 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Jutkowitz, E., Brasure, M., Fuchs, E. L., Shippee, T. P., Kane, R. A., Fink, H. A., Butler, M. E., Sylvanus, T., & Kane, R. L. (2016) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.13936 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Legere, L., McNeill, S., Martin, L. S., Acorn, M., & An, D. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.14007 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia
Radue, R. M., Walaszek, A., & Asthana, S. (2019) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804766-8.00024-8 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Dementia care frameworks and assistive technologies for their implementation: a review
Koumakis, L., Chatzaki, C., Kazantzaki, E., Maniadi, E., & Tsiknakis, M. (2019) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2019.2892614 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Missing data in trial‐based cost‐effectiveness analysis: An incomplete journey
Leurent, B., Gomes, M., & Carpenter, J. R. (2018) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.3654 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Figueiro, M. G., Sahin, L., Kalsher, M. J., Plitnick, B., & Rea, M. S. (2020) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease Reports · doi:10.3233/adr-200212 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Cooper, C., Barber, J., Griffin, M., Rapaport, P., & Livingston, G. (2015) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610215002033 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationNickel, F., Barth, J., & Kolominsky-Rabas, P. L. (2018) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-018-0751-1 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“Of these, two articles are based on results from the British START (STrAtegies for RelaTives) study [18, 19].”
BackgroundNon-pharmacological interventions for sleep disturbances in people with dementia
Wilfling, D., Calo, S., Dichter, M. N., Meyer, G., Möhler, R., & Köpke, S. (2023) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011881.pub2 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Fox, S., Fitzgerald, C., Dening, K. H., Irving, K., Kernohan, G. W., Treloar, A. J., Oliver, D., Guérin, S., & Timmons, S. (2017) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-017-0221-0 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“The trial demonstrated reduced depression and anxiety in family carers of people with Dementia at 8 months and 2 years post intervention and also suggested savings [55].”
Costa, N., Wübker, A., Mauléon, A. D., Zwakhalen, S. M. G., Challis, D., Leino‐Kilpi, H., Hallberg, I. R., Stephan, A., Zabalegui, A., Saks, K., et al. (2017) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.013 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Treatment of psychotic symptoms in patients with Parkinson disease
Chen, J. J. (2017) · Mental Health Clinician · doi:10.9740/mhc.2017.11.262 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Manual massage for persons living with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Margenfeld, F., Klocke, C., & Joos, S. (2019) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.12.012 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Bunn, F., Lynch, J. K., Goodman, C. M., Sharpe, R., Walshe, C., Preston, N. J., & Froggatt, K. A. (2018) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-018-0995-9 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Levin, C., & Chisholm, D. (2016) · Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 4): Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders · doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0426-7_ch12 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Cognitive Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease: Is it Feasible?
Biundo, R., Weis, L., Fiorenzato, E., & Antonini, A. (2017) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/acx092 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Review of Programs to Combat Elder Mistreatment: Focus on Hospitals and Level of Resources Needed
Rosen, T., Elman, A., Dion, S., Delgado, D., Demetres, M. R., Breckman, R., Haggerty, K. L., Dash, K., Lang, D., Bonner, A., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.15773 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Progresses in treating agitation: a major clinical challenge in Alzheimer’s disease
Panza, F., Solfrizzi, V., Seripa, D., Imbimbo, B. P., Santamato, A., Lozupone, M., Prete, C., Greco, A., Pilotto, A., & Logroscino, G. (2015) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1517/14656566.2015.1092520 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Level of Need, Divertibility, and Outcomes of Newly Admitted Nursing Home Residents
Tanuseputro, P., Hsu, A. T., Kuluski, K., Chalifoux, M., Donskov, M., Beach, S., & Walker, P. (2017) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2017.02.008 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Lee, M., Ryoo, J. H., Chung, M., Anderson, J. G., Rose, K. M., & Williams, I. C. (2019) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/1471301218822640 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Resnick, B. M., Kolanowski, A. M., Haitsma, K. S. V., Galik, E. M., Boltz, M. P., Ellis, J., Behrens, L. L., Flanagan, N. M., Eshraghi, K. J., & Zhu, S. (2018) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.21866 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“…Resnick, Hammersla, & Brightwater, 2014; Galik, Resnick, Lerner, Hammersla, & Gruber-Baldini, 2015; Grabowski et al., 2014; Kolanowski & Buettner, 2008; Kolanowski, Litaker, Buettner, Moeller, & Costa, 2011; Livingston et al., 2014; Richter, Meyer, Möhler, & Köpke, 2012; Van Haitsma et al., 2015).”
Gustavsson, A., Green, C., Jones, R. W., Förstl, H., Simsek, D., de Vulpillieres, F. D. R., Luthman, S., Adlard, N., Bhattacharyya, S., & Wimo, A. B. (2017) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.12.005 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Institutionalization risk and costs associated with agitation in Alzheimer's disease
Cloutier, M., Gauthier‐Loiselle, M., Gagnon‐Sanschagrin, P., Guérin, A., Hartry, A., Baker, R. A., Duffy, R. A., Gwin, K., Aigbogun, M. S., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2019) · Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.trci.2019.10.004 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Farran, C. J., Paun, O., Cothran, F. A., Etkin, C. D., Rajan, K. B., Eisenstein, A., & Navaie, A. M. (2015) · AIMS Medical Science · doi:10.3934/medsci.2016.1.15 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Drug Therapy for Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia
Wang, F., Feng, T.-Y., Yang, S., Preter, M., Zhou, J., & Wang, X. (2016) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/1570159x14666151208114232 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Kaymaz, T. T., & Özdemir, L. (2016) · Geriatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2016.11.001 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Travers, C., MacAndrew, M., Hines, S. J., OʼReilly, M., Fielding, E., Beattie, E., & Brooks, D. (2015) · The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2058 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Comparing proxy rated quality of life of people living with dementia in care homes
Robertson, S., Cooper, C., Hoe, J., Lord, K., Rapaport, P., Marston, L., Cousins, S., Lyketsos, C. G., & Livingston, G. (2019) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291718003987 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationTrivedi, D. P., Braun, A., Dickinson, A. M., Gage, H., Hamilton, L. K., Goodman, C. M., Ashaye, K., Iliffe, S., & Manthorpe, J. (2018) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/1471301218762851 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“…many studies of the of BPSD focus on one type of intervention or symptom, or on a narrow range of either (Brasure et al., 2016; Forrester et al., 2014; Holle et al., 2016; Livingston et al., 2014; Orgeta et al., 2014; Vernooij-Dassen et al., 2011; Reilly et al., 2015; van der Steen et al., 2017).”
BackgroundStrategies for coping with family members of patients with mental disorders
Pompeo, D. A., de Carvalho, A., Olive, A. M., Souza, M. D. G. G., & Galera, S. A. F. (2016) · Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem · doi:10.1590/1518-8345.1311.2799 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Middelstädt, J., Folkerts, A., Blawath, S., & Kalbe, E. (2016) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-160181 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Burley, C. V., Livingston, G., Knapp, M. R. J., Wimo, A. B., Norman, R., & Brodaty, H. (2020) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s104161022000037x · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“In a systematic review of worldwide studies costing individual BPSD (Livingston et al., 2014) the cost of 30 interventions that had a significant impact on agitation was calculated, 11 of which used the CMAI.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationLi, R., Lu, F., Sun, X., He, L.-Y., Duan, H., Peng, W., & Wu, C. (2022) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s339979 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Holopainen, A., Siltanen, H., Pohjanvuori, A., Mäkisalo-Ropponen, M., & Okkonen, E. (2017) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/1471301217716725 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Richter, C., Berg, A., Fleischer, S., Köpke, S., Balzer, K., Fick, E.-M., Sönnichsen, A. C., Löscher, S., Vollmar, H. C., Haastert, B., et al. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0268-3 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Balzotti, A., Filograsso, M., Altamura, C., Fairfield, B., Bellomo, A., Daddato, F., Vacca, R. A., & Altamura, M. (2018) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.4961 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Burley, C. V., Burns, K. A., Lam, B. C. P., & Brodaty, H. (2022) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2022.101669 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Sommerlad, A., Manela, M., Cooper, C., Rapaport, P., & Livingston, G. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005273 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Clinical implications and future research This analysis indicates aspects of the START intervention which were helpful and suggests some possible reasons for lasting clinical efficacy.(23) Participants took part in a structured and guided intervention and their comments indicated a range of opinions about which parts…”
BackgroundSelf-citationKolanowski, A. M., Mogle, J. A., Fick, D. M., Campbell, N. L., Hill, N. L., Mulhall, P. M., Behrens, L. L., Colancecco, E. M., Boustani, M. A., & Clare, L. (2015) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2015.07.004 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Greten, S., Müller-Funogea, J. I., Wegner, F., Höglinger, G. U., Simon, N., Junius‐Walker, U., Gerbel, S., Krause, O., & Klietz, M. (2020) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-020-02276-x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Li, R., Lü, F., Sun, X., He, L., Duan, H., Peng, W., & Wu, C. (2022) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Schmedt, N., Kollhorst, B., Enders, D., Jobski, K., Krappweis, J., Garbe, E., & Schink, T. (2016) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.07.006 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Certified Nursing Assistants: A Key to Resident Quality of Life
Morley, J. E. (2014) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2014.06.016 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Challenging behaviour in dementia care: a novel framework for translating knowledge to practice
James, I. A., Reichelt, K., Moniz-Cook, E. D., & Lee, K. (2020) · The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist · doi:10.1017/s1754470x20000434 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“In contrast, the evidence for other methods (aromatherapy, music therapy, psychomotor) is relatively poor and efficacy rather inconsistent (Livingston et al., 2014).”
ResultLourida, I., Gwernan‐Jones, R., Abbott, R. A., Rogers, M., Green, C., Ball, S., Hemsley, A. G., Cheeseman, D., Clare, L., Moore, D. A., et al. (2020) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-020-01534-7 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Wiggin, D. A., Timmons, S., Rukundo, A., & Walsh, K. A. (2021) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2021.1922601 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Person-Centered Dementia Care in the Community: A Perspective From the United Kingdom
DOWNS, M. G., & Lord, K. (2017) · Journal of Gerontological Nursing · doi:10.3928/00989134-20170515-01 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Use of multisensory stimulation interventions in the treatment of major neurocognitive disorders
Cheng, C. M. C., Baker, G. B., & Dursun, S. M. (2019) · Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1080/24750573.2019.1699738 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Music Therapy Clinical Practice in Hospice: Differences Between Home and Nursing Home Delivery
Xiaodi, L., Burns, D. S., Hilliard, R. E., Stump, T. E., & Unroe, K. T. (2015) · Journal of Music Therapy · doi:10.1093/jmt/thv012 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Verreault, P., Turcotte, V., Ouellet, M., Robichaud, L.-A., & Hudon, C. (2020) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2020.1819867 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Gillis, K., Lahaye, H., Dom, S., Lips, D., Arnouts, H., & Bogaert, P. V. (2019) · International Journal of Older People Nursing · doi:10.1111/opn.12269 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Burton, A., Rapaport, P., Palomo, M., Lord, K., Budgett, J., Barber, J., Hunter, R. M., Butler, L. T., Vickerstaff, V., Rockwood, K. J., et al. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05851-z · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationZeng, M., Feng, A., Li, M., et al. (2022) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154114 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Shaw, C. A., Williams, K. N., Lee, R. H., & Coleman, C. (2020) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.22076 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“Health care and social costs also increase as behavioral symptoms such as agitation increase (Livingston et al., 2014).”
BackgroundPhysical environmental designs in residential care to improve quality of life of older people
Harrison, S. L., Dyer, S. M., Laver, K. E., Milte, R., Fleming, R., & Crotty, M. (2022) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012892.pub2 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Complex Clinical Intersection: Palliative Care in Patients with Dementia
Lee, E., Chang, B., Huege, S., & Hirst, J. M. (2017) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2017.06.015 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Fake bus stops for persons with dementia? On truth and benevolent lies in public health
Lorey, P. (2019) · Israel Journal of Health Policy Research · doi:10.1186/s13584-019-0301-0 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Gielis, K., Abeele, M.-E. V., Croon, R. D., Dierick, P., Ferreira-Brito, F., Assche, L. V., Verbert, K., Tournoy, J., & Abeele, V. V. (2021) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/18359 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“[31,32,34], or support patients and families with the appropriate counseling [35].”
BackgroundZhu, A., Cao, W., Zhou, Y., Xie, A., Cheng, Y., & Chu, S.-F. (2021) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.612404 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep disturbances in people with dementia
Wilfling, D., Junghans, A., Marshall, L., Eisemann, N., Meyer, G., Mohler, R. A., & Köpke, S. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011881 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Psychiatric and Medical Comorbidity in the Primary Care Geriatric Patient—An Update
Kennedy, G. J., Castro, J., Chang, M., Chauhan-James, J., & Fishman, M. (2016) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-016-0700-7 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The role of the music therapist in training caregivers of people who have advanced dementia
Beer, L. E. (2016) · Nordic Journal of Music Therapy · doi:10.1080/08098131.2016.1186109 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“Livingston et al. (2014) acknowledged the distracting and sometimes violent behavioral aspects of agitation, and said, person-centered care “is effective for symptomatic and severe agitation … and helps prevent emergent agitation” (p. 83).”
BackgroundAmador-Marín, B., & Guerra-Martín, M. D. (2017) · Gaceta Sanitaria · doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.09.006 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Psychotropic drug use and mortality in old people with dementia: investigating sex differences
Brännström, J., Boström, G., Rosendahl, E., Nordström, P., Littbrand, H., Lövheim, H., & Gustafson, Y. (2017) · BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s40360-017-0142-9 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Perceptions of music therapy for older people among healthcare professionals
Khan, W. U., Yap, I. A. M. O., O’Neill, D. J., & Moss, H. (2015) · Medical Humanities · doi:10.1136/medhum-2015-010778 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Cooper, C., & Livingston, G. (2020) · International perspectives on aging · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25093-5_10 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationPiau, A., Vautier, C., Mauléon, A. D., Tchalla, A. E., Rumeau, P., Nourhashémi, F., & Soto‐Martin, M. (2020) · Geriatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.07.009 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Moreover, the best evidence-based NPS treatment is demonstrated by non-pharmacological approaches that provide education and training for caregivers.(18)”
Biundo, R., Fiorenzato, E., & Antonini, A. (2017) · International review of neurobiology · doi:10.1016/bs.irn.2017.05.031 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Kröll, L., Böhning, N., Müßigbrodt, H., Stahl, M. K., Halkin, P., Liehr, B., Grunow, C., Kujumdshieva, B., Freise, C., Hopfenmüller, W., et al. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02573-5 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Palliative care in dementia: a fragmented pathway?
Dening, K. H., Scates, C., & Lloyd‐Williams, M. (2018) · International Journal of Palliative Nursing · doi:10.12968/ijpn.2018.24.12.585 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Burley, C. V., Casey, A., Chenoweth, L., & Brodaty, H. (2022) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610222000849 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“…dementia (2021b; Ballard et al., 2017, Burns et al., 2012; Chenoweth et al., 2014; Livingston et al., 2017; 2020; Burley et al., 2020; Dyer et al., 2018), acceptance and implementation of these approaches and changing practice is more challenging (Chenoweth et al., 2021a; Livingston et al., 2014).”
BackgroundKinnunen, K. M., Rapaport, P., Webster, L., Barber, J., Kyle, S. D., Hallam, B., Cooper, C., Horsley, R., Pickett, J., Vikhanova, A., et al. (2018) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta22710 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationIntervening to reduce elder abuse: challenges for research
Cooper, C., & Livingston, G. (2016) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afw007 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationPoptsi, E., Tsolaki, M., Bergh, S., Cesana, B. M., Ciccone, A., Fabbo, A., Frisoni, G. B., Frölich, L., Lavolpe, S., Guazzarini, A. G., et al. (2021) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-201215 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“While non-pharmaceutical treatment for BPSD is in the first line of therapy [45, 48, 67], the pharmaceutical treatment is associated with noteworthy side effects that range from severe medical conditions and mortality to cognitive decline and deterioration of the functionality in activities of daily living [45, 68, 69…”
BackgroundLiu, M., Zhao, X., & Liu, Z. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14127100 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Pilot Testing of the EIT-4-BPSD Intervention
Resnick, B. M., Kolanowski, A. M., Haitsma, K. S. V., Boltz, M. P., Galik, E. M., Bonner, A., Vigne, E. O., Holtzman, L., & Mulhall, P. M. (2016) · American Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias® · doi:10.1177/1533317516662337 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Dichter, M., Trutschel, D., Schwab, C. G. G., Haastert, B., Quasdorf, T., & Halek, M. (2017) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s104161021700148x · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Moreover, dementia is not curable, and psychosocial interventions are thus widely recognized as frontline interventions for reducing challenging behavior in people with dementia (Bartholomeyczik et al., 2006; Livingston et al., 2014).”
BackgroundScreening for Mild Cognitive Impairment through Digital Biomarkers of Cognitive Performance in Games
Gielis, K. (2019) · Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play · doi:10.1145/3341215.3356332 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
On behalf of the TITRATE study group, Mian, A., Ibrahim, F., Scott, D. L., & Galloway, J. B. (2016) · Arthritis Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13075-016-1028-8 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Stuart‐Röhm, K., Baker, F. A., & Clark, I. N. (2023) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2023.2180485 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Laybourne, A. H., Livingston, G., Cousins, S., Rapaport, P., Lambe, K., Frenais, F. L., Savage, H., Manela, M., Stringer, A., Marston, L., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.4994 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“31.(20) To detect this magnitude of correlation with 90% power and”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Livingston, G., Barber, J., Rapaport, P., Knapp, M., Griffin, M., Romeo, R., King, D., Livingston, D., Lewis-Holmes, E., Mummery, C., Walker, Z., Hoe, J., & Cooper, C.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- King's College London (GB)
- Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, London, UK
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Livingston, Gill
- ORCID
- Venue
- Health Technology Assessment
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 61
- Pages
- 1-242
- ISSN
- 1366-5278 (ISSN-L)
- 2046-4924
- PMC
- PMC4781467
- OpenAlex
- W1995140156
- Semantic Scholar
- 23871b9bd0810a17340afc1d1e87e0646628a00a
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 18.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Technology Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- UWL Repository (University of West London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health Research (08/14/06)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Keywords
- family caregivers, dementia, coping interventions, depression, anxiety, cost-effectiveness, quality-adjusted life years, quality of life, abusive behavior
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety Disorders, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Dementia, Depressive Disorder, Family, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Regression Analysis, State Medicine, Caregivers, Health Care Costs, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Quality-Adjusted Life Years
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review