Cited by 157Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CarePain Management and Opioid Use

Transitions to palliative care in acute hospitals in England: qualitative study: Table 1

Open access
Gott, Merryn, Ingleton, Christine, Bennett, Michael I, Gardiner, Clare·2011·BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care

Abstract

Objective: To explore how transitions to a palliative care approach are perceived to be managed in acute hospital settings in England. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: Secondary or primary care settings in two contrasting areas of England. Participants: 58 health professionals involved in the provision of palliative care in secondary or primary care. Results: Participants identified that a structured transition to a palliative care approach of the type advocated in UK policy guidance is seldom evident in acute hospital settings. In particular they reported that prognosis is not routinely discussed with inpatients. Achieving consensus among the clinical team about transition to palliative care was seen as fundamental to the transition being effected; however, this was thought to be insufficiently achieved in practice. Secondary care professionals reported that discussions about adopting a palliative care approach to patient management were not often held with patients; primary care professionals confirmed that patients were often discharged from hospital with “false hope” of cure because this information had not been conveyed. Key barriers to ensuring a smooth transition to palliative care included the difficulty of “standing back” in an acute hospital situation, professional hierarchies that limited the ability of junior medical and nursing staff to input into decisions on care, and poor communication. Conclusion: Significant barriers to implementing a policy of structured transitions to palliative care in acute hospitals were identified by health professionals in both primary and secondary care. These need to be addressed if current UK policy on management of palliative care in acute hospitals is to be established.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.d1773

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Palliative care is perceived as 'a place to die,' and this stigma is a barrier to timely referrals and to patient acceptance of treatment.

    “Patients and health professionals may perceive PC as ‘a place to die,’ and this stigma is a barrier to timely referrals and to patient acceptance of treatment.”

    From A phase II study in advanced cancer patients to evaluate the early transition to palliative care (the PREPArE trial): protocol study for a randomized controlled trial. (2015) · cites this paper as [10]

    The sections on recognising the transition to palliative care and on communication with patients describe late transitions, prognostic uncertainty and difficulties discussing care. Searches for ‘a place to die,’ stigma, referral delays and treatment acceptance found no passage attributing those barriers to stigma. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gott M, Gardiner C, Payne S, Small N, Seamark D, Halpin D. Barriers to advance care planning in COPD. Palliat Med 2009;23:642-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gott, M., Ingleton, C., Bennett, M. I., & Gardiner, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Northern General Hospital (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Gott, Merryn
Venue
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-06
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
42-48
ISSN
  • 2045-435X (ISSN-L)
  • 2045-4368
OpenAlex
W2129141673
Cited by
157
References
22
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
14.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (08/1809/233)
  • Service Delivery and Organisation Programme
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
palliative care, transition to palliative care, acute care hospitals, prognosis disclosure, barriers to palliative care, professional hierarchy, communication, hospital discharge, health policy implementation, primary care, secondary care
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Communication, Decision Making, Delivery of Health Care, England, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Palliative Care, Patient Care Team, Patient Transfer, Primary Health Care, Professional-Family Relations, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review