The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the disease burden of the most important complications of postoperative abdominal adhesions: small bowel obstruction, difficulties at reoperation, infertility, and chronic pain. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analyses. DATA SOURCES: Searches of PubMed, Embase, and Central, from January 1990 to December 2012, without restrictions to publication status or language. STUDY SELECTION: All types of studies reporting on the incidence of adhesion related complications were considered. DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was the incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction in patients with a history of abdominal surgery. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of small bowel obstruction by any cause, difference in operative time, enterotomy during adhesiolysis, and pregnancy rate after abdominal surgery. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were done to study the robustness of the results. A random effects model was used to account for heterogeneity between studies. RESULTS: We identified 196 eligible papers. Heterogeneity was considerable for almost all meta-analyses. The origin of heterogeneity could not be explained by study design, study quality, publication date, anatomical site of operation, or operative technique. The incidence of small bowel obstruction by any cause after abdominal surgery was 9% (95% confidence interval 7% to 10%; I(2)=99%). the incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction was 2% (2% to 3%; I(2)=93%); presence of adhesions was generally confirmed by emergent reoperation. In patients with a known cause of small bowel obstruction, adhesions were the single most common cause (56%, 49% to 64%; I(2)=96%). Operative time was prolonged by 15 minutes (95% confidence interval 9.3 to 21.1 minutes; I(2)=85%) in patients with previous surgery. Use of adhesiolysis resulted in a 6% (4% to 8%; I(2)=89%) incidence of iatrogenic bowel injury. The pregnancy rate after colorectal surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease was 50% (37% to 63%; I(2)=94%), which was significantly lower than the pregnancy rate in medically treated patients (82%, 70% to 94%; I(2)=97%). CONCLUSIONS: This review provides detailed and systematically analysed knowledge of the disease burden of adhesions. Complications of postoperative adhesion formation are frequent, have a large negative effect on patients' health, and increase workload in clinical practice. The quantitative effects should be interpreted with caution owing to large heterogeneity. REGISTRATION: The review protocol was registered through PROSPERO (CRD42012003180).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Higgins, J. P. T., Green, S., & Ben Van Den, A. (2020) · International Coaching Psychology Review · doi:10.53841/bpsicpr.2020.15.2.123 · Cited by 5,670
Cited by
Prevention of Post-Operative Adhesions: A Comprehensive Review of Present and Emerging Strategies
Fatehi Hassanabad, A., Zarzycki, A. N., Jeon, K., Dundas, J. A., Vasanthan, V., Deniset, J. F., & Fedak, P. W. M. (2021) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom11071027 · Cited by 178
Advancement of Biomaterial-Based Postoperative Adhesion Barriers
Chandel, A. K. S., Shimizu, A., Hasegawa, K., & Ito, T. (2021) · Macromolecular Bioscience · doi:10.1002/mabi.202000395 · Cited by 138
Allègre, L., Le Teuff, I., Leprince, S., Warembourg, S., Taillades, H., Garric, X., Letouzey, V., & Huberlant, S. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0202285 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- ten Broek, R. P. G., Issa, Y., van Santbrink, E. J. P., Bouvy, N. D., Kruitwagen, R. F. P. M., Jeekel, J., Bakkum, E. A., Rovers, M. M., & van Goor, H.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2013-10-03
- Volume
- 347
- Issue
- oct03 1
- Pages
- f5588-f5588
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154410358
- Cited by
- 686
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.