Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 293

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long term survival and local control outcomes from single dose targeted intraoperative radiotherapy during lumpectomy (TARGIT-IORT) for early breast cancer: TARGIT-A randomised clinical trial

Open access
Vaidya, Jayant S, Bulsara, Max, Baum, Michael, Wenz, Frederik, Massarut, Samuele, Pigorsch, Steffi, Alvarado, Michael, Douek, Michael, Saunders, Christobel, Flyger, Henrik L, Eiermann, Wolfgang, Brew-Graves, Chris, Williams, Norman R, Potyka, Ingrid, Roberts, Nicholas, Bernstein, Marcelle, Brown, Douglas, Sperk, Elena, Laws, Siobhan, Sütterlin, Marc, Corica, Tammy, Lundgren, Steinar, Holmes, Dennis, Vinante, Lorenzo, Bozza, Fernando, Pazos, Montserrat, Le Blanc-Onfroy, Magali, Gruber, Günther, Polkowski, Wojciech, Dedes, Konstantin J, Niewald, Marcus, Blohmer, Jens, McCready, David, Hoefer, Richard, Kelemen, Pond, Petralia, Gloria, Falzon, Mary, Joseph, David J, Tobias, Jeffrey S·2020·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether risk adapted intraoperative radiotherapy, delivered as a single dose during lumpectomy, can effectively replace postoperative whole breast external beam radiotherapy for early breast cancer. Design: Prospective, open label, randomised controlled clinical trial. Setting: 32 centres in 10 countries in the United Kingdom, Europe, Australia, the United States, and Canada. Participants: 2298 women aged 45 years and older with invasive ductal carcinoma up to 3.5 cm in size, cN0-N1, eligible for breast conservation and randomised before lumpectomy (1:1 ratio, blocks stratified by centre) to either risk adapted targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT-IORT) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Interventions: Random allocation was to the EBRT arm, which consisted of a standard daily fractionated course (three to six weeks) of whole breast radiotherapy, or the TARGIT-IORT arm. TARGIT-IORT was given immediately after lumpectomy under the same anaesthetic and was the only radiotherapy for most patients (around 80%). TARGIT-IORT was supplemented by EBRT when postoperative histopathology found unsuspected higher risk factors (around 20% of patients). Main outcome measures: Non-inferiority with a margin of 2.5% for the absolute difference between the five year local recurrence rates of the two arms, and long term survival outcomes. Results: Between 24 March 2000 and 25 June 2012, 1140 patients were randomised to TARGIT-IORT and 1158 to EBRT. TARGIT-IORT was non-inferior to EBRT: the local recurrence risk at five year complete follow-up was 2.11% for TARGIT-IORT compared with 0.95% for EBRT (difference 1.16%, 90% confidence interval 0.32 to 1.99). In the first five years, 13 additional local recurrences were reported (24/1140 v 11/1158) but 14 fewer deaths (42/1140 v 56/1158) for TARGIT-IORT compared with EBRT. With long term follow-up (median 8.6 years, maximum 18.90 years, interquartile range 7.0-10.6) no statistically significant difference was found for local recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.91 to 1.41, P=0.28), mastectomy-free survival (0.96, 0.78 to 1.19, P=0.74), distant disease-free survival (0.88, 0.69 to 1.12, P=0.30), overall survival (0.82, 0.63 to 1.05, P=0.13), and breast cancer mortality (1.12, 0.78 to 1.60, P=0.54). Mortality from other causes was significantly lower (0.59, 0.40 to 0.86, P=0.005). Conclusion: For patients with early breast cancer who met our trial selection criteria, risk adapted immediate single dose TARGIT-IORT during lumpectomy was an effective alternative to EBRT, with comparable long term efficacy for cancer control and lower non-breast cancer mortality. TARGIT-IORT should be discussed with eligible patients when breast conserving surgery is planned. Trial registration: ISRCTN34086741, NCT00983684.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.m2836

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Metadata

Authors
Vaidya, J. S., Bulsara, M., Baum, M., Wenz, F., Massarut, S., Pigorsch, S., Alvarado, M., Douek, M., Saunders, C., Flyger, H. L., Eiermann, W., Brew-Graves, C., Williams, N. R., Potyka, I., Roberts, N., Bernstein, M., Brown, D., Sperk, E., Laws, S., Sütterlin, M., Corica, T., Lundgren, S., Holmes, D., Vinante, L., Bozza, F., Pazos, M., Le Blanc-Onfroy, M., Gruber, G., Polkowski, W., Dedes, K. J., Niewald, M., Blohmer, J., McCready, D., Hoefer, R., Kelemen, P., Petralia, G., Falzon, M., Joseph, D. J., & Tobias, J. S.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-08-19
Volume
370
Pages
m2836
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3067502370
Cited by
293
References
49
FWCI
13.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long term survival and local control outcomes from single dose targeted intraoperative radiotherapy during lumpectomy (TARGIT-IORT) for early breast cancer: TARGIT-A randomised clinical trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.m2836
The paper
Vaidya, J. S., Bulsara, M., Baum, M., Wenz, F., Massarut, S., Pigorsch, S., Alvarado, M., Douek, M., Saunders, C., Flyger, H. L., Eiermann, W., Brew-Graves, C., Williams, N. R., Potyka, I., Roberts, N., Bernstein, M., Brown, D., Sperk, E., Laws, S., . . . Tobias, J. S. (2020). Long term survival and local control outcomes from single dose targeted intraoperative radiotherapy during lumpectomy (TARGIT-IORT) for early breast cancer: TARGIT-A randomised clinical trial. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2836

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.