Cited by 58Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyObesity, Physical Activity, DietEconomic and Fiscal Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The distributional impact of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: findings from an extended cost-effectiveness analysis in South Africa

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Facing increasing obesity prevalence and obesity-related disease burden, South Africa has devised an obesity prevention strategy that includes a recently implemented tax on the sugar content of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB). We assess the potential distributional impact (across socioeconomic groups) of this tax on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) incidence and associated mortality and its financial burden on households. METHODS: We conducted an extended cost-effectiveness analysis of the new 10% tax on SSBs in South Africa, and estimated: the averted premature deaths related to T2DM, the financial benefits to households (out-of-pocket (OOP) medical costs and indirect costs due to productivity losses averted), the increased government tax revenues and healthcare savings for the government, all across income quintiles. FINDINGS: A 10% SSB tax increase would avert an estimated 8000 T2DM-related premature deaths over 20 years, with most deaths averted among the third and fourth income quintiles. The government would save about South African rand (ZAR) 2 billion (US$140 million) in subsidised healthcare over 20 years; and would raise ZAR6 billion (US$450 million) in tax revenues per annum. The bottom two quintiles would bear the smallest tax burden increase (36% of the additional taxes). The bottom two income quintiles would also have the lowest savings in OOP payments due to significant subsidisation provided by government healthcare. Lastly, an estimated 32 000 T2DM-related cases of catastrophic expenditures and 12 000 cases of poverty would be averted. CONCLUSIONS: SSB taxation would have a substantial distributional impact on obesity-related premature deaths, cost savings to the government and the financial outcomes of South Africa's population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001317

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other health taxes, such as on SSBs or alcohol products, may exhibit similar progressive impacts to tobacco taxes.

    “While less commonly examined, other health taxes, such as on SSBs or alcohol products, may exhibit similar impacts.218,230–232”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1111/obr.12040 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1093/ajcn/84.2.274 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Blecher, 2017, Global trends in the affordability of sugar-sweetened beverages, 1990-2016, Prev Chronic Dis, 14, 10.5888/pcd14.160406 · DOI
  4. National Treasury . Budget review 2018. Pretoria National Treasury; 2018.
  5. Colchero MA , Popkin BM , Rivera JA , et al . Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. BMJ 2016;352.doi:10.1136/bmj.h6704 · DOI
  6. 10.3945/jn.117.251892 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.013 · DOI
  8. 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302881 · DOI
  9. Silver, 2017, Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: a before-and-after study, PLoS Med, 14, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283 · DOI
  10. Berardi, 2016, The impact of a ‘soda tax’ on prices: evidence from French micro data, Appl Econ, 48, 3976, 10.1080/00036846.2016.1150946 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.ehb.2015.08.007 · DOI
  12. Cawley, 2018, Pass-through of a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages at the Philadelphia International Airport, JAMA, 319, 305, 10.1001/jama.2017.16903 · DOI
  13. Grogger J . Soda taxes and the prices of sodas and other drinks: evidence from Mexico. NBER working paper No. 21197, 2015. · DOI
  14. Russell, 2016, How does a change in the excise tax on beer impact beer retail prices in South Africa?, South African Journal of Economics, 84, 555, 10.1111/saje.12123 · DOI
  15. Mayosi, 2009, The burden of non-communicable diseases in South Africa, The Lancet, 374, 934, 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61087-4 · DOI
  16. Backholer, 2016, The impact of a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages according to socio-economic position: a systematic review of the evidence, Public Health Nutr, 19, 3070, 10.1017/S136898001600104X · DOI
  17. Manyema, 2015, Decreasing the burden of type 2 diabetes in South Africa: the impact of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages, PLoS One, 10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0143050 · DOI
  18. Manyema, 2014, The potential impact of a 20% tax on sugar-sweetened beverages on obesity in South African adults: a mathematical model, PLoS One, 9, 10.1371/journal.pone.0105287 · DOI
  19. Manyema, 2016, Modelling the potential impact of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax on stroke mortality, costs and health-adjusted life years in South Africa, BMC Public Health, 16, 10.1186/s12889-016-3085-y · DOI
  20. Tugendhaft, 2016, Cost of inaction on sugar-sweetened beverage consumption: implications for obesity in South Africa, Public Health Nutr, 19, 2296, 10.1017/S1368980015003006 · DOI
  21. Stacey, 2018, Simulating the impact of excise taxation for disease prevention in low-income and middle-income countries: an application to South Africa, BMJ Glob Health, 3, 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000568 · DOI
  22. Stacey, 2017, Sugary beverage taxation in South Africa: household expenditure, demand system elasticities, and policy implications, Prev Med, 105, S26, 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.026 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s40273-016-0414-z · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1002/hec.3019 · DOI
  25. Postolovska, 2018, The health gains, financial risk protection benefits, and distributional impact of increased tobacco taxes in Armenia, Health Systems & Reform, 4, 30, 10.1080/23288604.2017.1413494 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054378 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.020 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Verguet, 2017, Distributional benefits of tobacco tax and smoke-free workplaces in China: a modeling study, J Glob Health, 7, 10.7189/jogh.07.020701 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60812-X · DOI · Paper page
  30. Lal, 2017, Modelled health benefits of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax across different socioeconomic groups in Australia: a cost-effectiveness and equity analysis, PLoS Med, 14, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002326 · DOI
  31. Veerman, 2016, The impact of a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages on health and health care costs: a modelling study, PLoS One, 11, 10.1371/journal.pone.0151460 · DOI
  32. 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Barendregt, 2010, Categorical versus continuous risk factors and the calculation of potential impact fractions, J Epidemiol Community Health, 64, 10.1136/jech.2009.090274 · DOI
  34. O’Donnell O , van Doorslaer E , Wagstaff A , et al . Catastrophic Payments for Health Care. In: Analyzing health equity using household survey data: a guide to techniques and their implementation. Washington DC: The World Bank, 2008: 203–12. · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.2165/00019053-199813010-00001 · DOI
  36. Guariguata, 2012, Diabetes, HIV and other health determinants associated with absenteeism among formal sector workers in Namibia, BMC Public Health, 12, 10.1186/1471-2458-12-44 · DOI
  37. Bommer, 2017, The global economic burden of diabetes in adults aged 20-79 years: a cost-of-illness study, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 5, 423, 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30097-9 · DOI
  38. Seuring T , Serneels P , Suhrcke M . The impact of diabetes on labor market outcomes in Mexico: a panel data and biomarker analysis. IZA Discussion Paper No. 10123 IZA; 2016. · DOI
  39. Bourke EJ , Veerman JL . The potential impact of taxing sugar drinks on health inequality in Indonesia. BMJ Glob Health 2018;3.doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000923 · DOI
  40. Ganz ML , Wintfeld N , Li Q , et al . The association of body mass index with the risk of type 2 diabetes: a case–control study nested in an electronic health records system in the United States. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2014;6.doi:10.1186/1758-5996-6-50 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009256 · DOI
  42. 10.1136/jech.54.8.596 · DOI
  43. Guerrero-López, 2017, Price elasticity of the demand for soft drinks, other sugar-sweetened beverages and energy dense food in Chile, BMC Public Health, 17, 10.1186/s12889-017-4098-x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Saxena, A., Stacey, N., Puech, P. D. R., Mudara, C., Hofman, K., & Verguet, S.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
Corresponding author
Verguet, Stéphane
Venue
BMJ Global Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-08
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
e001317
ISSN
2059-7908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2969579482
Cited by
58
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 5
FWCI
10.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
International Development Research Center (D1612160-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
Keywords
sugar-sweetened beverage tax, distributional effects, type 2 diabetes, obesity prevention, tax revenue, out-of-pocket medical costs, productivity loss, catastrophic health expenditure, poverty, income inequality, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review