The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods
Abstract
Objectives: (A) To gain insights into the experiences of patients invited to view their doctors’ visit notes, with a focus on those who review multiple notes; (B) to examine the relationships among fully transparent electronic medical records and quality of care, the patient-doctor relationship, patient engagement, self-care, self-management skills and clinical outcomes. Design: Mixed methods qualitative study: analyses of survey data, including content analysis of free-text answers, and quantitative-descriptive measures combined with semistructured individual interviews, patient activation measures, and member checks. Setting: Greater Boston, USA. Participants: Patients cared for by primary care physicians (PCPs) at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center who had electronic access to their PCP visit notes. Among those submitting surveys, 576 free-text answers were identified and analysed (414 from female patients, 162 from male patients; 23–88 years). In addition, 13 patients (9 female, 4 male; 58–87 years) were interviewed. Results: Patient experiences indicate improved understanding (of health information), better relationships (with doctors), better quality (adherence and compliance; keeping track) and improved self-care (patient-centredness, empowerment). Patients want more doctors to offer access to their notes, and some wish to contribute to their generation. Those patients with repeated experience reviewing notes express fewer concerns and more perceived benefits. Conclusions: As the use of fully transparent medical records spreads, it is important to gain a deeper understanding of possible benefits or harms, and to characterise target populations that may require varying modes of delivery. Patient desires for expansion of this practice extend to specialty care and settings beyond the physician's office. Patients are also interested in becoming involved actively in the generation of their medical records. The OpenNotes movement may increase patient activation and engagement in important ways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As doctors learn to write their notes with the awareness that their patients may read them, note writing may be leveraged to encourage patient trust.46”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 · Cited by 42,509
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data
Pope, C. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114 · Cited by 8,131
Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines
Malterud, K. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05627-6 · Cited by 5,014
Hibbard, J. H., Stockard, J., Mahoney, E. R., & Tusler, M. (2004) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x · Cited by 2,748 · cited 1×
“on engagement and self-care, and each patient completed the patient activation measure (PAM-13) survey.(68) 69 All interviews were conducted in 2014 (February–March) in Greater Boston and were recorded and transcribed verbatim using a transcription service.”
MethodThe “Meaningful Use” Regulation for Electronic Health Records
Blumenthal, D., & Tavenner, M. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1006114 · Cited by 2,059
Use of Electronic Health Records in U.S. Hospitals
Jha, A. K., DesRoches, C. M., Campbell, E. G., Donelan, K., Rao, S. R., Ferris, T. G., Shields, A., Rosenbaum, S., & Blumenthal, D. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa0900592 · Cited by 1,473
Giacomini, M. K., Cook, D. J., & for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.3.357 · Cited by 931
Earnest, M. A., Ross, S. E., Wittevrongel, L., Moore, L. A., & Lin, C.-T. (2004) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1479 · Cited by 207
Expectations of Patients and Physicians Regarding Patient-Accessible Medical Records
Ross, S. E., Todd, J., Moore, L. A., Beaty, B. L., Wittevrongel, L., & Lin, C.-T. (2005) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7.2.e13 · Cited by 122
Research works printed but not linked: 65
- 10.1197/jamia.M1147 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3109/02813439709035024 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005650-198204000-00008 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM197309272891311 · DOI
- Delbanco, 2011, Patients should have easier access to their doctors’ medical notes, Mod Healthc, 41, 22
- 10.1197/jamia.M1005 · DOI
- Goldberg, 1998, Internet access to patients’ records, Lancet, 351, 1811, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)78772-9 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)78772-9
- 10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00010 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMp0801736 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMsa0802005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1086 · DOI · Paper page
- Joseph, 2014, HITECH spurs EHR vendor competition and innovation, resulting in increased adoption, Am J Manag Care, 20, 734
- 10.1503/cmaj.140834 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.140834
- 10.1007/s11606-009-0906-z · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.292.6520.578 · DOI
- Steiner, 1978, Patient access to the medical record: a study of physician attitudes, Med Rec News, 49, 77
- Britten, 1991, Consultant's and patient's views about patient access to their general practice records, J R Soc Med, 85, 284, 10.1177/014107689108400513 · DOI
- Fisher, 1993, Patient access to records: expectations of hospital doctors and experiences of cancer patients, Br J Gen Pract, 43, 52
- 10.1177/0894318409337026 · doi:10.1177/0894318409337026
- 10.1056/NEJMp0810264 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11060-013-1333-x · DOI
- 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13070913 · DOI
- Dhanireddy, 2014, The urban underserved: attitudes towards gaining full access to electronic medical records, Health Expect, 17, 724, 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00799.x · DOI
- 10.1097/00005650-198604000-00004 · DOI
- Bronson, 1978, Patient education through record sharing, QRB Qual Rev Bull, 4, 2
- Maly, 1999, A randomized controlled trial of facilitating information giving to patients with chronic medical conditions: effects on outcomes of care, J Fam Pract, 48, 356
- 10.2196/jmir.6.2.e12 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmj.39279.482963.AD · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1159 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7326/M13-1798 · DOI
- 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000580 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005650-198101000-00012 · DOI
- 10.1002/jhm.2052 · DOI
- Institute of Medicine: Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm. A new health system for the 21st century. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
- 10.1055/s-0028-1109193 · doi:10.1055/s-0028-1109193
- Mold, 2012, The provision and impact of online patient access to their electronic health records (EHR) and transactional services on the quality and safety in health care: systematic review protocol, Inform Prim Care, 20, 271
- Bjoernes, 2012, A dialogue-based Web application enhances personalized access to healthcare professionals—an intervention study, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 12, 96, 10.1186/1472-6947-12-96 · DOI
- 10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00002 · DOI
- Zulman, 2012, Access to the Medical Record, Ann Intern Med, 156, 668, 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00016 · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00016
- 10.7326/0003-4819-153-2-201007200-00008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmj.g7785 · DOI
- 10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2196/jmir.2356 · DOI · Paper page
- Nazi, 2015, VA OpenNotes: exploring the experiences of early patient adopters with access to clinical notes, J Am Med Infirm Assoc, 22, 380, 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-003144 · DOI
- Weinert C . Giving Doctor's Daily Progress Notes to Hospitalized Patients and Families to Improve Patient Experience. Am J Med Qual 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1177/1062860615610424 · DOI
- Wright, 2015, Sharing Physician Notes Through An Electronic Portal is Associated With Improved Medication Adherence: Quasi-Experimental Study, J Med Internet Res, 10, e226, 10.2196/jmir.4872 · DOI
- Crabtree BF , Miller WL , eds. Doing qualitative research. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1999.
- 10.1001/jama.284.4.478 · DOI · Paper page
- Shenton, 2004, Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects, Educ Inform, 22, 63, 10.3233/EFI-2004-22201 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1370/afm.104 · DOI · Paper page
- Miller WL , Crabtree BF . Clinical research: a multimethod typology and qualitative roadmap. In: Crabtree BF , Miller WL , eds. Doing qualitative research. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1999:3–30.
- Addison RB . A grounded hermeneutic editing approach. In: Crabtree BF , Miller WL , eds. Doing qualitative research. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1999:145–62.
- Borkan J . Immersion/Crystallization. In: Crabtree BF , Miller WL , eds. Doing qualitative research. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1999:179–94.
- Gilchrist VJ , Williams RL . Key informant interviews. In: Crabtree BF , Miller WL , eds. Doing qualitative research. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1999:71–88.
- 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x · DOI · Paper page
- Pyper, 2004, Patients’ experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care, Br J Gen Pract, 54, 38
- Honeyman, 2005, Potential impacts of patients access to their electronic records, Inform Primary Care, 13, 55
- 10.1097/00004479-200701000-00005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11606-013-2407-3 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.2014.1824 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMp1310132 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMp0805631 · DOI
- 10.7326/M14-2128 · DOI · Paper page
- Balogh EP , Miller BT , Ball JR , eds. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington DC: The National Academy of Sciences, The National Academies Press, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Bell, S. K., Mejilla, R., Anselmo, M., Darer, J. D., Elmore, J. G., Leveille, S., Ngo, L., Ralston, J. D., Delbanco, T., & Walker, J. (2017) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004697 · Cited by 213
Self-citationEthical and Legal Implications of Remote Monitoring of Medical Devices
COHEN, I. G., GERKE, S., & KRAMER, D. B. (2020) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12481 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Esch, T., Mejilla, R., Anselmo, M., Podtschaske, B., Delbanco, T., & Walker, J.
- Venue
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e010034
- ISSN
- 2044-6055
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 13
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010034
- The paper
- Esch, T., Mejilla, R., Anselmo, M., Podtschaske, B., Delbanco, T., & Walker, J. (2016). Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.