Cited by 65Migration, Health and TraumaMigration and Exile StudiesEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugees

Gender differences in the mental health of unaccompanied refugee minors in Europe: a systematic review

Open access
Mohwinkel, Lea-Marie, Nowak, Anna Christina, Kasper, Anne, Razum, Oliver·2018·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives: Our aim was to summarise the current evidence regarding gender differences in the mental health of unaccompanied refugee minors (URM) and to identify gaps in research. Setting: We focused on quantitative studies presenting primary data from Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development(OECD)countries. Language was restricted to English or German. Participants: To be eligible, a study had to involve (former) URM who immigrated to an OECD country. Design: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, LIVIVO, PSYNDEX and PsycINFO were searched from 1990 to 2017. Studies were judged for eligibility by two independent reviewers each. We narratively summarised our results. Results: 9 primary studies, all from Europe, examined gender differences in the mental health of URM. The majority of the included studies found female URM to be more often affected by post-traumatic or depressive symptoms than their male counterparts. There is only weak evidence regarding other mental health outcomes. Two studies each conducted gender-specific analyses on anxiety and externalising behaviour, but no statistically significant differences between female and male URM were detected. Conclusions: Female gender is associated with a higher vulnerability towards certain mental health problems among URM residing in Europe. However, the lack of representative studies using reliable diagnostic methods indicates that the findings so far should be treated with caution. Further research is needed to clarify the role of gender for mental health in URM and to examine underlying mechanisms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022389

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Female unaccompanied minors are still extremely underrepresented in the current literature and gender differences in unaccompanied minors are under-researched.

    “Despite this knowledge, female UM are still extremely underrepresented in the current literature and gender differences in UM are under-researched [87].”

    From Examining cognitive behavioral therapy interventions for unaccompanied minors: a systematic review and qualitative research synthesis. (2025) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Discussion (‘Challenges for further research’) says that no included study explicitly focused on gender differences and that the numbers of girls were low. This supports the claim for research on unaccompanied minors’ mental health, but the review does not establish that girls and gender differences are under-researched across the literature on unaccompanied minors generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The methodological drawbacks observed in this study have been reported in previous literature between 2018 and 2021.

    “As the methodological drawbacks observed in this study have been reported in previous literature between 2018 and 2021 [45, 80, 84, 87] it is alarming that significant strides towards addressing these limitations have yet to be addressed.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohwinkel, L.-M., Nowak, A. C., Kasper, A., & Razum, O.
Affiliations
Bielefeld University (DE)
Corresponding author
Mohwinkel, Lea-Marie
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-07
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
e022389
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2885672889
Cited by
65
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Ministry of Culture and Science of the German Federal State of North Rhine-Westphalia
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees
Keywords
unaccompanied refugee children, gender differences, mental health, posttraumatic stress symptoms, depressive symptoms, anxiety, externalizing problems, women's vulnerability, refugee youth
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Child, Depression, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Refugees, Sex Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Minors, Vulnerable Populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review