The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Implement and demonstrate feasibility of in situ simulations to identify latent safety threats (LSTs) at a higher rate than lab-based training, and reinforce teamwork training in a paediatric emergency department (ED). Methods: Multidisciplinary healthcare providers responded to critical simulated patients in an urban ED during all shifts. Unannounced in situ simulations were limited to 10 min of simulation and 10 min of debriefing, and were video recorded. A standardised debriefing template was used to assess LSTs. The primary outcome measure was the number and type of LSTs identified during the simulations. Secondary measures included: participants’ assessment of impact on patient care and value to participants. Blinded video review using a modified Anaesthetists Non-Technical Skills scale was used to assess team behaviours. Results: 218 healthcare providers responded to 90 in situ simulations conducted over 1 year. A total of 73 LSTs were identified; a rate of one every 1.2 simulations performed. In situ simulations were cancelled at a rate of 28% initially, but the cancellation rate decreased as training matured. Examples of threats identified include malfunctioning equipment and knowledge gaps concerning role responsibilities. 78% of participants rated the simulations as extremely valuable or valuable, while only 5% rated the simulation as having little or no value. Of those responding to a postsimulation survey, 77% reported little or no clinical impact. Video recordings did not indicate changes in non-technical skills during this time. Conclusions: In situ simulation is a practical method for the detection of LSTs and to reinforce team training behaviours. Embedding in situ simulation as a routine expectation positively affected operations and the safety climate in a high risk clinical setting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human error: models and management
Reason, J. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768 · Cited by 5,665
Leonard, M. (2004) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i85 · Cited by 2,322
Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity
(2002) · Work Study · doi:10.1108/ws.2002.07951dae.003 · Cited by 1,950
Fletcher, G., Flin, R., McGeorge, P., Glavin, R., Maran, N., & Patey, R. (2003) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aeg112 · Cited by 958
Understanding adverse events: human factors.
Reason, J. (1995) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.4.2.80 · Cited by 938
Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine
Vincent, C., Taylor-Adams, S., & Stanhope, N. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7138.1154 · Cited by 906
Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: A review of the literature
Yule, S., Flin, R., Paterson-Brown, S., & Maran, N. (2006) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.017 · Cited by 756
Development of a rating system for surgeons' non‐technical skills
Yule, S., Flin, R., Paterson‐Brown, S., Maran, N., & Rowley, D. (2006) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02610.x · Cited by 603
Yule, S., Flin, R., Maran, N., Rowley, D., Youngson, G., & Paterson‐Brown, S. (2008) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9320-z · Cited by 505
Identifying and training non-technical skills for teams in acute medicine
Flin, R. (2004) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i80 · Cited by 493
Cited by
Wong, J., Goh, Q. Y., Tan, Z., Lie, S. A., Tay, Y. C., Ng, S. Y., & Soh, C. R. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-020-01620-9 · Cited by 695
Buljac-Samardzic, M., Doekhie, K. D., & van Wijngaarden, J. D. H. (2020) · Human Resources for Health · doi:10.1186/s12960-019-0411-3 · Cited by 515
The recommended description of an entrustable professional activity: AMEE Guide No. 140
Ten Cate, O., & Taylor, D. R. (2021) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2020.1838465 · Cited by 357
Sørensen, J. L., Østergaard, D., LeBlanc, V., Ottesen, B., Konge, L., Dieckmann, P., & Van der Vleuten, C. (2017) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0838-3 · Cited by 267
Fent, G., Blythe, J., Farooq, O., & Purva, M. (2015) · BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000065 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Patterson, M. D., Geis, G. L., Falcone, R. A., LeMaster, T., & Wears, R. L.
- Venue
- BMJ Quality & Safety
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2012-12-20
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 468-477
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-5415
- 2044-5423
- OpenAlex
- W2110317260
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 9.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000942
- The paper
- Patterson, M. D., Geis, G. L., Falcone, R. A., LeMaster, T., & Wears, R. L. (2013). In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department. BMJ Quality & Safety. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000942
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.