The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study
Open accessAbstract
Background: Problems of quality and safety persist in health systems worldwide. We conducted a large research programme to examine culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service (NHS). Methods: Mixed-methods study involving collection and triangulation of data from multiple sources, including interviews, surveys, ethnographic case studies, board minutes and publicly available datasets. We narratively synthesised data across the studies to produce a holistic picture and in this paper present a high-level summary. Results: We found an almost universal desire to provide the best quality of care. We identified many ‘bright spots’ of excellent caring and practice and high-quality innovation across the NHS, but also considerable inconsistency. Consistent achievement of high-quality care was challenged by unclear goals, overlapping priorities that distracted attention, and compliance-oriented bureaucratised management. The institutional and regulatory environment was populated by multiple external bodies serving different but overlapping functions. Some organisations found it difficult to obtain valid insights into the quality of the care they provided. Poor organisational and information systems sometimes left staff struggling to deliver care effectively and disempowered them from initiating improvement. Good staff support and management were also highly variable, though they were fundamental to culture and were directly related to patient experience, safety and quality of care. Conclusions: Our results highlight the importance of clear, challenging goals for high-quality care. Organisations need to put the patient at the centre of all they do, get smart intelligence, focus on improving organisational systems, and nurture caring cultures by ensuring that staff feel valued, respected, engaged and supported.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Culture and Leadership
Tierney, W. G., & Schein, E. H. (1986) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258322 · Cited by 9,601
Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents
Reason, J. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315543543 · Cited by 4,430
Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, J., Hsu, R., Katbamna, S., Olsen, R., Smith, L., et al. (2006) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-35 · Cited by 2,289
Self-citationSynthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods
Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/135581960501000110 · Cited by 2,132
Self-citationThe incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review
de Vries, E. N., Ramrattan, M. A., Smorenburg, S. M., Gouma, D. J., & Boermeester, M. A. (2008) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2007.023622 · Cited by 1,784
Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies
O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c4587 · Cited by 1,584
Auditing and the production of legitimacy
Power, M. K. (2003) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(01)00047-2 · Cited by 802
Sources of Public Service Improvement: A Critical Review and Research Agenda
Boyne, G. A. (2003) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mug027 · Cited by 682
Explaining Michigan: Developing an Ex Post Theory of a Quality Improvement Program
DIXON-WOODS, M., BOSK, C. L., AVELING, E. L., GOESCHEL, C. A., & PRONOVOST, P. J. (2011) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00625.x · Cited by 603
Self-citationPatient Safety At Ten: Unmistakable Progress, Troubling Gaps
Wachter, R. M. (2010) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0785 · Cited by 400
Cited by
Burnout in healthcare: the case for organisational change
Montgomery, A., Panagopoulou, E., Esmail, A., Richards, T., & Maslach, C. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l4774 · Cited by 231
Developing compassionate leadership in health care: an integrative review
de Zulueta, P. (2015) · Journal of Healthcare Leadership · doi:10.2147/jhl.s93724 · Cited by 203
Charani, E., Ahmad, R., Rawson, T. M., Castro-Sanchèz, E., Tarrant, C., & Holmes, A. H. (2019) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciy844 · Cited by 152
Litchfield, I., Perryman, K., Avery, A., Campbell, S., Gill, P., & Greenfield, S. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113906 · Cited by 27
Implementation of interprofessional team-based care: A cross-case analysis
Sibbald, S. L., Ziegler, B. R., Maskell, R., & Schouten, K. (2021) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820.2020.1803228 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Dixon-Woods, M., Baker, R., Charles, K., Dawson, J., Jerzembek, G., Martin, G., McCarthy, I., McKee, L., Minion, J., Ozieranski, P., Willars, J., Wilkie, P., & West, M.
- Venue
- BMJ Quality & Safety
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2013-09-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 106-115
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-5415
- 2044-5423
- OpenAlex
- W2111048948
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 58.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001947
- The paper
- Dixon-Woods, M., Baker, R., Charles, K., Dawson, J., Jerzembek, G., Martin, G., McCarthy, I., McKee, L., Minion, J., Ozieranski, P., Willars, J., Wilkie, P., & West, M. (2014). Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study. BMJ Quality & Safety. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001947
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.