Family caregivers of advanced cancer patients: self-perceived competency and meaning-making
Abstract
Background Family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer have been reported to provide long hours of care and be at risk for poor psychological outcomes. Although research has focused on the nature of caregiving burden, little attention has been paid to identifying protective factors that improve caregiver psychological outcomes. Aim We examined the relationship between caregivers' time spent caregiving and the following psychological outcomes: anxiety, depression and caregiving esteem. Subsequently, we explored the main and moderating effects of caregiver-perceived self-competency and sense of meaning on caregiver psychological outcomes. Design/participants Cross-sectional analysis was conducted using the baseline data from an ongoing cohort study. Family caregivers of advanced cancer patients (n=287) were recruited from two tertiary hospitals in Singapore. Results Time spent caregiving was not significantly associated with caregiver anxiety, depression or caregiving esteem. However, significant main effects of self-competency on anxiety and caregiving esteem; and sense of meaning on anxiety, depression and caregiving esteem were observed. Moderator analyses further indicated that self-competency attenuated the positive relationship between time spent caregiving and anxiety, while sense of meaning attenuated the negative relationship between time spent caregiving and caregiving esteem. Conclusion Greater perceived self-competency and sense of meaning are related to bett…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Con niveles bajos de autocompetencia, la ansiedad aumentó proporcionalmente con las horas de cuidado, por lo que la autocompetencia actuó moderando la relación entre la ansiedad y las horas de cuidado (p<0,05).
“además con niveles bajos de auto competencia la ansiedad aumentó proporcionalmente con las horas de cuidado, por lo que la auto competencia actuó moderando la relación entre la ansiedad y las horas de cuidado (p<0,05).”
From Sobrecarga de trabajo en cuidadores de pacientes en cuidados paliativos oncológicos: Una revisión bibliográfica (2023) · cites this paper as Teo et al., 2020
El sentido del significado tuvo un efecto inverso y significativo sobre la estima del cuidador, la depresión y la ansiedad (p <0,01).
“El sentido del significado también tuvo un efecto inverso y significativo sobre la estima del cuidador, la depresión y la ansiedad (p <0,01).”
From Sobrecarga de trabajo en cuidadores de pacientes en cuidados paliativos oncológicos: Una revisión bibliográfica (2023) · cites this paper as Teo et al., 2020
Las horas de cuidado estuvieron asociadas positivamente a la autocompetencia (p<0,01).
“Mientras que las horas de cuidado estuvieron asociadas positivamente a la auto competencia (p<0,01)”
From Sobrecarga de trabajo en cuidadores de pacientes en cuidados paliativos oncológicos: Una revisión bibliográfica (2023) · cites this paper as Teo et al., 2020
El efecto de la autocompetencia se correlacionó inversamente proporcional y significativamente con la estima del cuidador y la ansiedad (p<0,01 y p<0,05, respectivamente).
“En este estudio el efecto de la autocompencia se correlacionó inversamente proporcional y significativamente con la estima del cuidador y la ansiedad (p<0,01 y p<0,05, respectivamente).”
From Sobrecarga de trabajo en cuidadores de pacientes en cuidados paliativos oncológicos: Una revisión bibliográfica (2023) · cites this paper as Teo et al., 2020
Cites
Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Brady, M. J., Hernandez, L., & Cella, D. (2002) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2401_06 · Cited by 1,751 · see citing works
Interventions with Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
Northouse, L. L., Katapodi, M. C., Song, L., Zhang, L., & Mood, D. W. (2010) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20081 · Cited by 857 · see citing works
Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer
Stenberg, U., Ruland, C. M., & Miaskowski, C. (2010) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1670 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Hodges, L. J., Humphris, G. M., & Macfarlane, G. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.04.018 · Cited by 533 · see citing works
Contributors to and Mediators of Psychological Well-Being for Informal Caregivers
Yates, M. E., Tennstedt, S., & Chang, B.-H. (1999) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/54b.1.p12 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Randomized clinical trial of a family intervention for prostate cancer patients and their spouses
Northouse, L. L., Mood, D. W., Schafenacker, A., Montie, J. E., Sandler, H. M., Forman, J. D., Hussain, M., Pienta, K. J., Smith, D. C., & Kershaw, T. (2007) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.23114 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Lemay, K. R., Tulloch, H. E., Pipe, A. L., & Reed, J. L. (2019) · Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention · doi:10.1097/hcr.0000000000000379 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding and supporting informal cancer caregivers
Molassiotis, A., & Wang, M. (2022) · Current Treatment Options in Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11864-022-00955-3 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Burns, M. F., Secinti, E., Johns, S. A., Wu, W., Helft, P. R., Turk, A. A., Loehrer, P. J., Sehdev, A., Al-Hader, A. A., & Mosher, C. E. (2023) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.01.001 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Villa Clavijo, C. G., Feijoo Espinosa, M. A., Huayllasaca Sarmiento, W. C., Chávez Prieto, H. S., & Cualchi Alvarracin, G. P. (2023) · Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar · doi:10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i2.6094
- Authors
- Teo, I., Baid, D., Ozdemir, S., Malhotra, C., Singh, R., Harding, R., Malhotra, R., Yang, M. G., Neo, S. H.-S., Cheung, Y. B., Neo, P. S. H., Kanesvaran, R., Kumarakulasinghe, N. B., Lee, L. H., Koh, G. C. H., & Finkelstein, E. A.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
- King's College London (GB)
- National Cancer Centre Singapore (SG)
- Tampere University (FI)
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (SG)
- Singapore General Hospital (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Teo, Irene
- ORCID
- Venue
- BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2019-12-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 435-442
- ISSN
- 2045-435X (ISSN-L)
- 2045-4368
- OpenAlex
- W2994064876
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 5.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care (LCPC-IN14–0003)
- Singapore Millennium Foundation (2015-SMF-0003)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- family caregivers, advanced cancer, meaning-making, caregiver anxiety, caregiver depression, caregiver burden, protective factors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Clinical Competence, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Self Concept, Singapore, Social Support, Caregivers, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review