Cited by 29Nursing care and researchPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic Care

Family caregivers of advanced cancer patients: self-perceived competency and meaning-making

Teo, Irene, Baid, Drishti, Ozdemir, Semra, Malhotra, Chetna, Singh, Ratna, Harding, Richard, Malhotra, Rahul, Yang, Meijuan Grace +8 more·2020·BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care

Abstract

Background Family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer have been reported to provide long hours of care and be at risk for poor psychological outcomes. Although research has focused on the nature of caregiving burden, little attention has been paid to identifying protective factors that improve caregiver psychological outcomes. Aim We examined the relationship between caregivers' time spent caregiving and the following psychological outcomes: anxiety, depression and caregiving esteem. Subsequently, we explored the main and moderating effects of caregiver-perceived self-competency and sense of meaning on caregiver psychological outcomes. Design/participants Cross-sectional analysis was conducted using the baseline data from an ongoing cohort study. Family caregivers of advanced cancer patients (n=287) were recruited from two tertiary hospitals in Singapore. Results Time spent caregiving was not significantly associated with caregiver anxiety, depression or caregiving esteem. However, significant main effects of self-competency on anxiety and caregiving esteem; and sense of meaning on anxiety, depression and caregiving esteem were observed. Moderator analyses further indicated that self-competency attenuated the positive relationship between time spent caregiving and anxiety, while sense of meaning attenuated the negative relationship between time spent caregiving and caregiving esteem. Conclusion Greater perceived self-competency and sense of meaning are related to bett…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001979

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teo, I., Baid, D., Ozdemir, S., Malhotra, C., Singh, R., Harding, R., Malhotra, R., Yang, M. G., Neo, S. H.-S., Cheung, Y. B., Neo, P. S. H., Kanesvaran, R., Kumarakulasinghe, N. B., Lee, L. H., Koh, G. C. H., & Finkelstein, E. A.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • National Cancer Centre Singapore (SG)
  • Tampere University (FI)
  • National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (SG)
  • Singapore General Hospital (SG)
Corresponding author
Teo, Irene
Venue
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-12-05
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
435-442
ISSN
  • 2045-435X (ISSN-L)
  • 2045-4368
OpenAlex
W2994064876
Cited by
29
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Lien Centre for Palliative Care (LCPC-IN14–0003)
  • Singapore Millennium Foundation (2015-SMF-0003)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
family caregivers, advanced cancer, meaning-making, caregiver anxiety, caregiver depression, caregiver burden, protective factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Clinical Competence, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Self Concept, Singapore, Social Support, Caregivers, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review