Cited by 28Schizophrenia research and treatmentMedication Adherence and ComplianceBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Effectiveness of long-acting injectable antipsychotics: a clinical perspective

Open access
Castillo, Enrico G, Stroup, T Scott·2015·Evidence Based Mental Health

Abstract

The personal and societal costs of schizophrenia spectrum disorders are immense. Affected individuals may experience positive, negative and mood symptoms; medical and substance use comorbidities; and cognitive impairment that significantly impair social and occupational functioning. Globally, schizophrenia is a leading cause of years lost to disability, with a particularly large burden among adolescents and young adults.1 Treatment of schizophrenia spectrum disorders aims at improved functioning and recovery across the lifespan, but symptom reduction and relapse prevention are important interim goals. Although antipsychotic medications reduce psychotic symptoms and greatly decrease the risk of relapse, their effectiveness in real-world practice is decreased by non-adherence.2 A meta-analysis of studies that used trained personnel to measure antipsychotic medication adherence found that not ‘regularly taking medications as prescribed’ is prevalent in an average of 41% of participants across 10 studies.3 Despite this high prevalence, providers are often unaware of this issue and generally overestimate medication adherence in their patients.4 Long-acting injectable (LAI) formulations of antipsychotic medications were developed to improve adherence. The first LAIs, fluphenazine enanthate and decanoate, were introduced in 1966 in the context of large-scale deinstitutionalisation of patients with serious mental illnesses and the consequent need for effective community-based treatment. Numerous LAI antipsychotics have been developed and marketed in the meantime. Table 1 lists the LAI antipsychotic medications currently available in the USA and the UK.5 ,6 View this table: Table 1 Long-acting antipsychotic injectable medications available in the USA and the UK5 ,6 LAIs reduce the frequency at which a patient has to decide whether to take medication. Rather than deciding to take a medication once or twice daily, the patient must only decide to have an injection administered once or twice monthly. Pharmacokinetically, LAIs provide a more stable steady-state concentration of medication in the blood compared with daily oral …

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/eb-2015-102086

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fewer adverse ANS effects of long-acting injectable antipsychotics are likely due to different pharmacokinetic profiles, with a single injection once or twice a month providing a more steady state of antipsychotic in the blood than daily oral dosing.

    “This finding is likely due to the different pharmacokinetic profiles of these drug formulations given that a single injection once or twice a month provides a more steady state of the AP in the blood than daily oral dosing would55.”

    From Autonomic nervous system dysfunction in schizophrenia: impact on cognitive and metabolic health (2021) · cites this paper as [55]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castillo, E. G., & Stroup, T. S.
Affiliations
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Stroup, T Scott
Venue
Evidence Based Mental Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-04-08
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
36-39
ISSN
  • 1362-0347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-960X
OpenAlex
W2171715667
Cited by
28
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evidence-Based Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
long-acting injectable antipsychotics, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, medication adherence, relapse prevention, fluphenazine, decanoate, deinstitutionalization, community-based treatment, pharmacokinetics, treatment effectiveness
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Delayed-Action Preparations, Humans, Injections, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review