Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of iron deficiency anaemia in adults

Open access
Snook, Jonathon, Bhala, Neeraj, Beales, Ian L P, Cannings, David, Kightley, Chris, Logan, Robert PH, Pritchard, D Mark, Sidhu, Reena, Surgenor, Sue, Thomas, Wayne, Verma, Ajay M, Goddard, Andrew F·2021·Gut

Abstract

Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is a major cause of morbidity and burden of disease worldwide. It can generally be diagnosed by blood testing and remedied by iron replacement therapy (IRT) using the oral or intravenous route. The many causes of iron deficiency include poor dietary intake and malabsorption of dietary iron, as well as a number of significant gastrointestinal (GI) pathologies. Because blood is iron-rich it can result from chronic blood loss, and this is a common mechanism underlying the development of IDA—for example, as a consequence of menstrual or GI blood loss. Approximately a third of men and postmenopausal women presenting with IDA have an underlying pathological abnormality, most commonly in the GI tract. Therefore optimal management of IDA requires IRT in combination with appropriate investigation to establish the underlying cause. Unexplained IDA in all at-risk individuals is an accepted indication for fast-track secondary care referral in the UK because GI malignancies can present in this way, often in the absence of specific symptoms. Bidirectional GI endoscopy is the standard diagnostic approach to examination of the upper and lower GI tract, though radiological scanning is an alternative in some situations for assessing the large bowel. In recurrent or refractory IDA, wireless capsule endoscopy plays an important role in assessment of the small bowel. IDA may present in primary care or across a range of specialties in secondary care, and because of this and the insidious nature of the condition it has not always been optimally managed despite the considerable burden of disease— with investigation sometimes being inappropriate, incorrectly timed or incomplete, and the role of IRT for symptom relief neglected. It is therefore important that contemporary guidelines for the management of IDA are available to all clinicians. This document is a revision of previous British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines, updated in the light of subsequent evidence and developments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325210

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Snook, J., Bhala, N., Beales, I. L. P., Cannings, D., Kightley, C., Logan, R. P., Pritchard, D. M., Sidhu, R., Surgenor, S., Thomas, W., Verma, A. M., & Goddard, A. F.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2021-09-08
Volume
70
Issue
11
Pages
2030-2051
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W3198574699
Cited by
303
References
13
FWCI
33.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of iron deficiency anaemia in adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325210
The paper
Snook, J., Bhala, N., Beales, I. L. P., Cannings, D., Kightley, C., Logan, R. P., Pritchard, D. M., Sidhu, R., Surgenor, S., Thomas, W., Verma, A. M., & Goddard, A. F. (2021). British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of iron deficiency anaemia in adults. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325210

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.