Cited by 151Reproductive System and PregnancyPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy

Miscarriage and future maternal cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Oliver-Williams, Clare Teresa, Heydon, Emma E, Smith, Gordon C S, Wood, Angela M·2013·Heart

Abstract

Context: The 2011 American Heart Association guidelines identified pregnancy complications as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in women. However, miscarriage was not mentioned within the guidelines, and there is no consensus on the association between miscarriage and future risk of cardiovascular disease. Objective: To confirm or refute the association, a meta-analysis of published papers was conducted. Data sources: PubMed, Web of Knowledge and Scopus were systematically searched to identify appropriate articles. Reference lists were then hand searched for additional relevant titles. Study Selection: To be included, articles had to assess the association between miscarriage and subsequent cardiovascular disease in otherwise healthy women. Only women who had miscarriages were considered exposed. Pooled association measures, using random effects meta-analysis, were calculated for coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease. Publication bias and between-study heterogeneity were evaluated. Data Extraction: Two authors individually reviewed all studies and extracted data on patient and study characteristics along with cardiovascular outcomes. Results: 10 studies were identified, with 517 504 individuals included in the coronary heart disease meta-analysis and 134 461 individuals in the cerebrovascular disease analysis. A history of miscarriage was associated with a greater odds of developing coronary heart disease, OR (95% CI) =1.45 (1.18 to 1.78), but not with cerebrovascular disease, OR=1.11 (0.72 to 1.69). There was a strong association between recurrent miscarriage and coronary heart disease OR=1.99 (1.13 to 3.50). Evidence was found for moderate between-study heterogeneity and publication bias in the coronary heart disease analysis. Conclusions: The meta-analysis indicates that a history of miscarriage or recurrent miscarriage is associated with a greater risk of subsequent coronary heart disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303237

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [26]Winkelstein WJ Stenchever M Lilenfeld AM Occurrence of pregnancy, abortion, and artificial menopause among women with coronary artery disease: a preliminary study. J Chronic Dis 1958; 7: 273– 86 13539140
  2. [27]Winkelstein WJ Rekate A Age trend of mortality from coronary artery disease in women and observations on the reproductive patterns of those affected. Am Heart J 1964; 67: 481– 8 14138810

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oliver-Williams, C. T., Heydon, E. E., Smith, G. C. S., & Wood, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-03-28
Volume
99
Issue
22
Pages
1636-1644
ISSN
  • 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-201X
OpenAlex
W2101718326
Cited by
151
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Heart (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10165)
  • British Heart Foundation (RG/08/014/24067)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/L003120/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Keywords
miscarriage, recurrent pregnancy loss, maternal cardiovascular disease, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, pregnancy complications, cardiovascular risk factors, postpartum women
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review