Cited by 24Endometriosis Research and TreatmentOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentGynecological conditions and treatments

Use of tumor markers to distinguish endometriosis-related ovarian neoplasms from ovarian endometrioma

Open access
Shinmura, Hiroki, Yoneyama, Koichi, Harigane, Eika, Tsunoda, Yohei, Fukami, Takehiko, Matsushima, Takashi, Takeshita, Toshiyuki·2020·International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Only few studies have focused on tumor markers used in the preoperative diagnosis of endometriosis-related ovarian neoplasms, and previous studies have only assessed serum CA125 levels. This study investigated the significance of preoperative tumor markers and clinical characteristics in distinguishing endometriosis-related ovarian neoplasms from ovarian endometrioma. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted on 283 women who were diagnosed with confirmed pathology with endometriosis-related ovarian neoplasms (n=21) and ovarian endometrioma (n=262) at a single institution from April 2008 to April 2018. The serum CA125, CA19-9, carcinoembryogenic antigen (CEA), sialyl Lewis-x antigen (SLX), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, age, tumor size, and the presence of mural nodule of the patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with endometriosis-related ovarian neoplasms were more likely to be older (48 (range, 26-81) vs 39 (range, 22-68) years, P<0.001), have higher levels of CA19-9 (42 vs 19 U/mL, P=0.013), CEA (1.3 vs 0.84 ng/mL, P=0.007), SLX (41 vs 33 U/mL, P=0.050), and LDH (189 vs 166 U/mL, P<0.001) and larger tumor size (79 vs 55 mm, P=0.001), and present with mural nodule (85.7 vs 4.5 %, P<0.001) than those with ovarian endometrioma. The CA125 levels did not significantly differ between the two groups. The area under the curve for each factor was as follows: CA19-9 level, 0.672 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.83; P=0.013); CEA level, 0.725 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.87; P=0.007); SLX level, 0.670 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.84; P=0.050); LDH level, 0.800 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.90; P<0.001); age, 0.775 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.90; P<0.001); and tumor size, 0.709 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.86; P=0.001). Age was a better marker than CA19-9, CEA, and SLX levels according to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The optimal cut-off values for age and tumor size were 47 years and 80 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of serum CA19-9, CEA, SLX, and LDH levels may be a useful tool in the preoperative evaluation to differentiate between endometriosis-related ovarian neoplasms and ovarian endometrioma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001210

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]Shimada M, Terakawa N Management of chocolate cyst from the view point of malignant transformation of endometriosis. J Jpn Obstet Gynecol Soc 2007; 59: 1045– 50.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shinmura, H., Yoneyama, K., Harigane, E., Tsunoda, Y., Fukami, T., Matsushima, T., & Takeshita, T.
Affiliations
  • Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital (JP)
  • Nippon Medical School (JP)
Corresponding author
Shinmura, Hiroki
Venue
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
831-836
ISSN
1048-891X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3021420087
Cited by
24
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecological Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
endometrioma, tumor markers, CA19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen, sialyl Lewis X, lactate dehydrogenase, CA125, preoperative diagnosis, differential diagnosis, mural nodules, tumor size, age, ovarian cancer risk stratification, endometriosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diagnosis, Differential, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review