The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 54 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities
Open accessAbstract
Current research suggests that the rate of adoption of health information technology (HIT) is low, and that HIT may not have the touted beneficial effects on quality of care or costs. The twin issues of the failure of HIT adoption and of HIT efficacy stem primarily from a series of fallacies about HIT. We discuss 12 HIT fallacies and their implications for design and implementation. These fallacies must be understood and addressed for HIT to yield better results. Foundational cognitive and human factors engineering research and development are essential to better inform HIT development, deployment, and use.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 54 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
In the paper
“Have programming errors and bugs;”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites 16 18 28 35 e 39
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Be dependent on unreliable hardware or software platforms;”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites 16 18 28 35 e 39
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Current research demonstrates that health information technology (HIT) can improve patient safety and healthcare quality, in certain circumstances. 1 e 6”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites 1 e 6
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“which is supported by strong theory and evidence from safety science, industrial and systems engineering, and social psychology. 62 64 65”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites 62 64 65
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we argue that the twin issues of the failure of HIT adoption and of HIT efficacy can be understood by examining a series of misguided beliefs about HIT.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclear- Rests on an assumption: The fallacies described in the paper are widely held by HIT designers and policymakers.
In the paper
“Work well in one context or organization but be unsafe or even fail in another;”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites 16 18 28 35 e 39
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“HIT systems tend to have a ' magnifying ' property, wherein one exchanges a large number of small failures for a small number of large, potentially catastrophic failures.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“because HIT is designed, built, and implemented by humans, it will invariably have ' bugs ' and latent failure modes. 21 22”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites 21 22
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Currently, there are no regulatory requirements to evaluate HIT system safety even though these systems are known to directly affect patient care in both positive and negative ways. 2 17 18 27 e 34”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites 2 17 18 27 e 34
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Have been developed from erroneous or incomplete design specifications;”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites 16 18 28 35 e 39
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 28
- Probably not a substantial claim. 21
In the paper
“Equating HIT usage with design success can be misleading and may promulgate inappropriate policies to improve ' use ' . 67”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [67] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“current efforts aimed at the nationwide deployment of health care ITwill not be sufficient to achieve the vision of 21st-century health care, and may even set back the cause if these efforts continue wholly without change from their present course.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Stead WW Lin HS , eds. Computational Technology for Effective Health Care: Immediate Steps and Strategic Directions. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2009.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Currently, there are no regulatory requirements to evaluate HIT system safety even though these systems are known to directly affect patient care in both positive and negative ways. 2 17 18 27 e 34”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites 2 17 18 27 e 34
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“changing the order of medication options on a drop down pick list will influence clinicians ' ordering behavior.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A passive monitoring approach, as currently suggested by the Office of the National Coordinator, 49 seems likely to be both expensive and ultimately ineffective.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] Egerman P Probst M . Memorandum to David Blumenthal: Adoption-Certification Workgroup HIT Safety Recommendations. http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_11673_911847_0_0_18/AdoptionCertificationLetterHITSafetyFINAL508.pdf (accessed 17 Aug 2010).
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The current passive monitoring approach suggested by the Office of the National Coordinator is likely to be expensive and ineffective.
In the paper
“Change how clinicians do their daily work, thus introducing new potential failure modes. 16 18 28 35 e 39”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites 16 18 28 35 e 39
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“or reduce costs. 13”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] source
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“human factors engineers, social psychologists, and patient safety researchers long ago debunked the bad apple theory of human error, replacing it with the more accurate and useful systems view of error, 21 62 63”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites 21 62 63
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The complexity of HIT systems and the risk of potentiating serious error is sufficiently significant to demand effective regulatory oversight. 46”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [46] Hoffman S Podgurski A . Finding a cure: the case for regulation and oversight of electronic health record systems. Harv J Law Technol 2008;22:104–65.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This mismatch between who benefits and who pays leads to incomplete or inaccurate data entry ( ' garbage in d garbage out ' ), inefficiency, workarounds, and poor adoption. 74”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [74] Abbott P Coenan A . Globalization and advances in information and communication technologies: The impact on nursing and health. Nurs Outlook 2008;58:238–46. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many catastrophes in complex sociotechnical systems (eg, Three Mile Island) occur in such situations, particularly when the technology does not communicate effectively with its human users.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“computers are very good at repeatedly doing whatever they were told to do, just like a well-trained animal (ie, ' sitstay ' ). Computers implement human-derived rules and with a degree of consistency much higher than human workers.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Otherwise, unintended consequences, such as physicians and hospitals investing in HIT to the exclusion of what might actually be more effective local strategies (eg, use of nurse case managers or process redesign), may occur.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Healthcare is a complex sociotechnical system where simple metrics can mislead because they do not adequately consider the context of human decisions at the time they are made.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“computers are much more likely than humans to perform their clever and complex tricks at inappropriate times.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Computers cannot be described as being inherently ' smart ' .”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“As a result, problems have been framed too narrowly, leading to impoverished designs and disappointing ' solutions ' . 85”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [85] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“computer displays are not yet as portable, flexible, or well-designed as paper. 83”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [83] Sellen AJ Harper RHR . The Myth of the Paperless Office. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002. source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“People, on the other hand, are smart, creative, and context sensitive. 79”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [79] Norman DA . Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes In The Age Of The Machine. New York: Basic Books, 1994.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the promulgation of ' meaningful use ' may lead to undesirable consequences if such use is not contextually grounded and tied to improved efficiency, learning, ease of use, task and information flow, cognitive load, situation awareness, clinician and patient satisfaction, reduced errors, and faster error recovery.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“The 'fi eld of dreams ' fallacy is well-known in other domains where it is also referred to as the ' designer fallacy ' or ' designercentered design ' . 77”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [77] Hoffman RR Militello LG . Perspectives on Cognitive Task Analysis. New York: Taylor and Francis, 2009. source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“User-created paper artifacts typically support patientspecific cognition, situational awareness, task and information communication, and coordination, all essential to safe quality patient care.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“most clinicians are not experts in device design, user interface design, or the relationship between HIT design and performance.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The paper forms are not simple data repositories that, once computerized, could be eliminated. Rather such ' scraps ' of paper are sophisticated cognitive artifacts that support memory, forecasting and planning, communication, coordination, and education.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Paper will persist, and should persist, if HIT is not able to provide similar support.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By seeing only what they know, such teams do not understand how clinical work is really carried out, what clinicians ' real needs are, and where the potential hazards and leverage points lie.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“some clinical decision support (CDS) rules force clinicians to stop and respond to the CDS, interrupting their work, substituting the designer ' s judgment for that of the clinician. 71”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [71] Bisantz AM Wears RL . Forcing functions: the need for restraint. Ann Emerg Med 2008;53:477–9. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it is misguided to believe that healthcare is unique or that no one outside of the domain could possibly understand it.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it takes special training and skills to evaluate a human e computer interface, assess the usability of a system, or predict the changes in communication patterns and social structures that a design might induce.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a lack of use is not evidence of a flawed system d clinicians may ignore features like reminders for legitimate reasons.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Technology can be at its worst, and humans at their best, when novel and complex situations arise.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Validation of HITcannot be achieved by asking a clinician if they like the design. Validation requires thorough experimental testing of the design based on well-defined performance criteria.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, use may not truly be meaningful in a clinical sense until HIT truly supports users ' needs.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While it may not take 60 years for HIT to become as safe, if we do not change from our current course, it never will be.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Commercial aviation has become very safe in the more than 60 years since Fitts' publication.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These challenges will only be overcome by collaborating substantively with those who can contribute unique and important expertise such as human factors engineers, applied psychologists, medical sociologists, communication scientists, cognitive scientists, and interaction designers.”
- Also stated in: § WHAT SHOULD WE DO NOW? · p. 5 · plain
“HIT stands to benefit in the same way.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Rests on an assumption: Pilots and nuclear power operators did not improve safety on their own; they worked closely with experts in cognitive, social, and physical performance and safety.
- Also stated in: § WHAT SHOULD WE DO NOW? · p. 5 · plain
In the paper
“Exemplary research on relevant topics has been carried out for several decades, 89 e 98 but it does not seem that commercial HIT has benefited adequately from these findings.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites 89 e 98
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“HITaffords real opportunities for improving quality and safety. However, at the same time, it creates substantial challenges, especially during everyday clinical work.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These steps alone will require a significant investment by vendors, healthcare organizations, and government funders.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Current meaningful use rules and deadlines leave little time for HIT product improvement and testing, incentivizing rapid implementation of whatever is available”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The fallacies described in the paper are widely held by HIT designers and policymakers.
“Many designers and policymakers believe that the risks of HIT are minor and easily manageable.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No other hazardous industry deploys safety critical IT without some form of independent hazard analysis.
“No other hazardous industry deploys safety critical IT without some form of independent hazard analysis (eg, a ' safety case ' ); it is unwise for healthcare to continue to do so.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The current passive monitoring approach suggested by the Office of the National Coordinator is likely to be expensive and ineffective.
“A passive monitoring approach, as currently suggested by the Office of the National Coordinator, 49 seems likely to be both expensive and ultimately ineffective.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are fundamental gaps in awareness, recognition, and application of existing scientific knowledge, especially in human factors, systems engineering, and cognitive engineering, that could help solve some of HIT's biggest problems.
“There are fundamental gaps in the awareness, recognition, and application of existing scientific knowledge bases, especially related to human factors, and systems and cognitive engineering, that could help address some of HIT ' s biggest problems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Pilots and nuclear power operators did not improve safety on their own; they worked closely with experts in cognitive, social, and physical performance and safety.
“Pilots did not improve aviation safety nor did nuclear power operators improve nuclear safety . by themselves. Rather they worked closely with experts in cognitive, social, and physical performance and safety to improve safety.”
The paper relies on this without support.
People have very limited insight into their own performance and even less ability to explain what might improve it.
“Humans have very limited insight into their own performance, and even more limited ability to articulate what might improve it.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Commercial aviation has become very safe in the more than 60 years since Fitts' publication.
“In the more than 60 years since that publication, commercial aviation has become very safe.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Throughout human history, major innovations have always brought new perils.
“Throughout human history, significant innovations have always been associated with new perils.”
The paper relies on this without support.
HIT works best and is safest when customized to local circumstances and workflows.
“Despite compelling evidence that HITworks best (and is safest) when it is customized to local circumstances and workflows”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, emerging evidence suggests that HIT may cause new patient safety concerns and other unintended consequences due to usability issues, disruptions of clinical processes, and unsafe workarounds to circumvent technology-related constraints.2–16”
From An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns (2014) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
(1993) · Cited by 9,879
Reason, J. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139062367 · Cited by 5,108
Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents
REASON, J. T. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315543543 · Cited by 4,523
Chaudhry, B., Wang, J., Wu, S., Maglione, M., Mojica, W., Roth, E., Morton, S. C., & Shekelle, P. G. (2006) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125 · Cited by 3,159
Garg, A. X., Adhikari, N. K. J., McDonald, H., Rosas-Arellano, M. P., Devereaux, P. J., Beyene, J., Sam, J., & Haynes, R. B. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.10.1223 · Cited by 2,936
Kawamoto, K., Houlihan, C. A., Balas, E. A., & Lobach, D. F. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8f · Cited by 2,703
Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion
Cialdini, R. B. (1993) · Cited by 2,563
Role of Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems in Facilitating Medication Errors
Koppel, R. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.10.1197 · Cited by 2,126
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 116 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Sauer C . Deciding the future for IS failures: not the choice you might think. In: Currie W Galliers R , eds. Rethinking Management Information Systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1999:279–309.
- Hoffman S Podgurski A . Finding a cure: the case for regulation and oversight of electronic health record systems. Harv J Law Technol 2008;22:104–65.
- Berg M . Rationalizing Medical Work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.
- Rubin JR . Handbook of Usability Testing. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–372 of 372
Formulating design requirements for a clinical handover system. A usability approach
Kaufmann, D. E. (2012) · Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology)
Buchanan, C., Threatt, A. L., Weinger, M. B., & Miller, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931214581311 · Cited by 1
Self-citationCarayon, P., Kleiner, B. M., Robertson, M. M., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931213571133
Self-citationSafety in health care systems : a synthesis of the literature
Weatherby, J. (2015) · doi:10.6083/m4cf9n4s
Relationships Among Administrative Computerization, Hospital Size, and Administrative Expenses
Gallagher, P. J. (2016) · ScholarWorks (Walden University)
Toward Effective Concept Representation in Decision Support to Improve Patient Safety
Leong, T.-Y. (2010) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1625365
Myers, R. B., Jones, S. L., Sittig, D. F., Meeks, D. W., Takian, A., Singh, H., Barber, N., Smith, M. W., Taylor, L., & Scott, J. (2015) · Apple Academic Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b18371-3
Horsky, J. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31123-4_3
Enforcing Data Integrity in Pharmacy
Butler, C. D. (2012) · Advances in bioinformatics and biomedical engineering book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-0309-7.ch015
The Development of the English National Health Information Infrastructure
Constantinides, P. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2770-3.ch049
Cherian, E. J., & Ryan, T. W. (2013) · Advances in healthcare information systems and administration book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4321-5.ch012
Smart Home Healthcare Settings: A Qualitative Study of the Domain Boundary
Alaiad, A., Ziaei, D., & Al-Ayyad, M. S. (2015) · ScholarWorks - WMU (Western Michigan University)
The Role of Technology and Medical Devices in Enhancing Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Outcomes
King, A. L., Baloğlu, O., & Scanlon, M. C. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-6566-8_29
Preparedness of Nurses at Hospitals to Utilize a Paperless Environment
Ramharuk, V., & Marimuthu, M. (2015)
HITEQI-A framework to implement health information technology-enabled quality improvement.
Jowitt, I. (2014) · e-scholar@UOIT (University of Ontario Institute of Technology)
Factors related to the adoption of electronic health records
Ngcaba, S. (2017) · UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)
Cognitive Considerations for Health Information
Franklin, A., & Zhang, J. (2014)
Facteurs de survenue d’erreurs médicamenteuses et emploi de protocoles informatisés
Charpiat, B., Claudel, É., Serra, M., et al. (2018) · Soins · doi:10.1016/j.soin.2018.04.002
Bar-Code Technology and Nursing Adaptations
Liu, J. (2018) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
Spooner, A. J. (2018) · Griffith Research Online · doi:10.25904/1912/3732
Dharrie-Maharaj, G., Garner, R., & D´Cruz, L. (2019) · BDJ In Practice · doi:10.1038/s41404-019-0098-0
McKesson and the Dutch national electronic patient record
van der Vliet, E. (2012)
Wears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.003.0006
Self-citationWears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.003.0012
Self-citationThe Special Case of Anesthesia
Wears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.003.0004
Self-citationWears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.003.0003
Self-citationWears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.003.0010
Self-citationWears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.003.0005
Self-citationWears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.003.0007
Self-citationIrruption onto the World Stage
Wears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.003.0008
Self-citationTsukada, E., Shibuya, A., Misawa, J., et al. (2020) · Auris Nasus Larynx · doi:10.1016/j.anl.2020.03.002
Remembering Ben-Tzion Karsh's scholarship, impact, and legacy
Valdez, R. S., Holden, R. J., Rivera, A. J., Ho, C. H., Madray, C. R., Bae, J., Wetterneck, T. B., Beasley, J. W., & Carayon, P. (2020) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103308
Healthcare in the Digital Age - The Future of Health Records
Slevin, E. (2017) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17067950
Healthcare in the Digital Age - The Future of Health Records
Slevin, E. (2017) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17067950.v1
McCrorie, C., Benn, J. J., Johnson, O. A., et al. (2019) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.2.12337/v1
A Qualitative Study of Physician Perspectives on Adaptation to Electronic Health RecordsPreprint
Sieck, C. J., Pearl, N., Bright, T. J., et al. (2019) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.2.13132/v1
Taira, K., Murayama, T., Fujita, S., et al. (2019) · doi:10.2196/preprints.13369
The Governance of Information Infrastructures
(2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-1622-6.ch007
Wears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.003.0009
Self-citationWears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.003.0011
Self-citationMueller, M., Knop, M., Niehaves, B., et al. (2020) · doi:10.2196/preprints.20813
From Healthcare Services to E-Health Applications
Spinelli, R., & Benevolo, C. (2017) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-3926-1.ch046
The Development of the English National Health Information Infrastructure
(2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-1622-6.ch005
Wears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.003.0002
Self-citationKnop, M., Mueller, M., & Niehaves, B. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.28151
Wears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.003.0001
Self-citationHealth Information Technology in Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety: Literature Review (Preprint)Preprint
Feldman, S. S., Buchalter, S. E., & Hayes, L. (2018) · doi:10.2196/preprints.10264
A Qualitative Study of Physician Perspectives on Adaptation to Electronic Health RecordsPreprint
Sieck, C. J., Pearl, N., Bright, T. J., et al. (2019) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.2.13132/v2
Peyton, L., Bindra, J., Baarah, A. H., Chamney, A., & Kuziemsky, C. E. (2016) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0549-5.ch005
Cresswell, K. M., Sheikh, A., Franklin, B. D., et al. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.30792
E-enabled Patient-Provider Communication in Context
Kuziemsky, C. E., Nøhr, C. G., Florez-Arango, J. F., & Patel, V. L. (2022) · Cognitive informatics in biomedicine and healthcare · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07696-1_1
Cognitive considerations for health information technology in clinical team environments
Franklin, A., & Zhang, J. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91200-6.00024-3
Wears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.002.0010
Self-citationWears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.002.0007
Self-citationWears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.002.0009
Self-citationWears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.002.0005
Self-citationWears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.002.0003
Self-citationWears, R. L., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190271268.002.0008
Self-citationJohn, J. N., Gorman, S. E., & Scales, D. A. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.67119
Dispensing Medicines: A Necessary Link Between Doctor and Patient
Penati, A. V. (2024) · Research for development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-53294-8_8
Introducing a Computerized Care‐Pathways System for Older Adults in Home‐Care Settings
Dubuc, N., N’Bouké, A., Corbin, C., & Delli-Colli, N. (2025) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1155/hsc/5535495
Examining usability of RxFill: integrating health IT to support medication adherence
Watterson, T. L., Gilson, A. M., Kleinschmidt, P. C., & Stone, J. A. (2026) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-026-03496-z
Heinrichs, H., Kies, A., Nagel, S. K., et al. (2025) · doi:10.2196/preprints.74187
A Comprehensive Decision Support System for Family Physicians
Şimşek, E., Erkat, F. E., Korkmaz, İ., & Anagün, A. S. (2025) · Medical Technologies Congress (TIPTEKNO) · doi:10.1109/tiptekno68206.2025.11270165
Why Medical Informatics (still) Needs Cognitive and Social Sciences
Declerck, G., & Aimé, X. (2013) · Yearbook of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1638837
Reliability in healthcare systems
Kumar, P., Sharma, M., Aziz, M., & Sahai, N. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-33655-3.00013-4
Saikali, M., Baysari, M. T., Lichtner, V., Sylvia Pelayo, A., Carland, J. E., & Marcilly, R. (2026) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106369
Metadata
- Authors
- Karsh, B.-T., Weinger, M. B., Abbott, P. A., & Wears, R. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Karsh, Ben-Tzion
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 617-623
- ISSN
- 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-974X
- PMC
- PMC3000760
- OpenAlex
- W2115602750
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 116
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 62.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R18SH017899)
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R18HS017902, HS016651, U18HS016651)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM008923)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
- Keywords
- health information technology, quality of care, health care costs, human factors engineering, cognitive engineering
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Diffusion of Innovation, Health Policy, Humans, Medical Informatics, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review