Cited by 212Electronic Health Records SystemsHealthcare Quality and ManagementHealthcare Policy and Management

Hospital Computing and the Costs and Quality of Care: A National Study

Himmelstein, David U., Wright, Adam, Woolhandler, Steffie·2010·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background Many believe that computerization will improve health care quality, reduce costs, and increase administrative efficiency. However, no previous studies have examined computerization's cost and quality impacts at a diverse national sample of hospitals.Methods We linked data from an annual survey of computerization at approximately 4000 hospitals for the period from 2003 to 2007 with administrative cost data from Medicare Cost Reports and cost and quality data from the 2008 Dartmouth Health Atlas. We calculated an overall computerization score and 3 subscores based on 24 individual computer applications, including the use of computerized practitioner order entry and electronic medical records. We analyzed whether more computerized hospitals had lower costs of care or administration, or better quality. We also compared hospitals included on a list of the "100 Most Wired" with others.Results More computerized hospitals had higher total costs in bivariate analyses (r=0.06, P=.001) but not multivariate analyses (P=.69). Neither overall computerization scores nor subscores were consistently related to administrative costs, but hospitals that increased computerization faster had more rapid administrative cost increases (P=.0001). Higher overall computerization scores correlated weakly with better quality scores for acute myocardial infarction (r=0.07, P=.003), but not for heart failure, pneumonia, or the 3 conditions combined. In multivariate analyses, more computerized hospitals had slightly better quality. Hospitals on the "Most Wired" list performed no better than others on quality, costs, or administrative costs.Conclusion As currently implemented, hospital computing might modestly improve process measures of quality but does not reduce administrative or overall costs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.09.004

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Himmelstein, D. U., Wright, A., & Woolhandler, S.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Himmelstein, David U.
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
123
Issue
1
Pages
40-46
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148157394
Cited by
212
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 27
FWCI
54.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Dartmouth College
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
hospital digitalization, health information technology, hospital costs, quality of care, administrative costs, electronic health records, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, pneumonia
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Medicare, Hospital Administration, Hospital Information Systems, Humans, Male, Medicaid, Quality of Health Care, Research Design, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Linear Models, Databases, Factual, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Hospital Costs, Health Care Surveys, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review