Cited by 129Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Differentiating between right-lateralised semantic dementia and behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia: an examination of clinical characteristics and emotion processing

Open access
Kamminga, Jody, Kumfor, Fiona, Burrell, James R, Piguet, Olivier, Hodges, John R, Irish, Muireann·2015·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Right-lateralised semantic dementia (right SD) and behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) appear clinically similar, despite different patterns of underlying brain changes. This study aimed to elucidate distinguishing clinical and cognitive features in right SD versus bvFTD, emphasising emotion processing and its associated neural correlates. METHODS: 12 patients with right SD and 19 patients with bvFTD were recruited. Clinical features were documented. All patients were assessed on standardised neuropsychological tests and a facial emotion processing battery. Performance was compared to 20 age-matched and education-matched controls. Grey matter intensity was related to emotion processing performance using whole-brain voxel-based morphometry analysis. RESULTS: Patients with right SD exhibited disproportionate language dysfunction, prosopagnosia and a suggestion of increased obsessive personality/behavioural changes versus patients with bvFTD. In contrast, patients with bvFTD demonstrated pronounced deficits in attention/working memory, increased apathy and greater executive dysfunction, compared to patients with right SD. Decreased empathy, disinhibition and diet changes were common to both dementia subtypes. Emotion processing deficits were present in both FTD syndromes but were associated with divergent patterns of brain atrophy. In right SD, emotion processing dysfunction was associated with predominantly right medial and lateral temporal integrity, compared to mainly left temporal, inferior frontal and orbitofrontal and right frontal gyrus integrity in bvFTD. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates comparable deficits in facial emotion processing in right SD and bvFTD, in keeping with their similar clinical profiles. These deficits are attributable to divergent neural substrates in each patient group, namely, right lateralised regions in right SD, versus predominantly left lateralised regions in bvFTD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp-2014-309120

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differential diagnosis of sbvFTD remains challenging because of clinical overlap in socioemotional functioning with bvFTD and lexical semantic deficits with svPPA.

    “Differential diagnosis of sbvFTD remains challenging because of the clinical overlap in socioemotional functioning with bvFTD and lexical semantic deficits with the left-lateralized semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA).3,7,10”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamminga, J., Kumfor, F., Burrell, J. R., Piguet, O., Hodges, J. R., & Irish, M.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Irish, Muireann
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-12-15
Volume
86
Issue
10
Pages
1082-1088
ISSN
  • 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-330X
OpenAlex
W2170304225
Cited by
129
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, emotional processing, facial emotion recognition, prosopagnosia, language disorders, apathy, executive dysfunction, gray matter atrophy, hemispheric lateralization, differential diagnosis, empathy deficits
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrophy, Brain, Cognition, Dementia, Diagnosis, Differential, Emotions, Face, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Social Perception, Frontotemporal Dementia, Gray Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review