Cited by 160Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsPsychological Testing and Assessment

ADCOMS: a composite clinical outcome for prodromal Alzheimer's disease trials

Open access
Wang, Jinping, Logovinsky, Veronika, Hendrix, Suzanne B, Stanworth, Stephanie H, Perdomo, Carlos, Xu, Lu, Dhadda, Shobha, Do, Ira +4 more·2016·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Development of new therapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is increasingly focused on more mildly affected populations, and requires new assessment and outcome strategies. Patients in early stages of AD have mild cognitive decline and no, or limited, functional impairment. To respond to these assessment challenges, we developed a measurement approach based on established scale items that exhibited change in previous amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI) trials. METHODS: Partial least squares regression with a longitudinal clinical decline model identified items from commonly used clinical scales with the highest combined sensitivity to change over time in aMCI and weighted these items according to their relative contribution to detecting clinical progression in patients' early stages of AD. The resultant AD Composite Score (ADCOMS) was assessed for its ability to detect treatment effect in aMCI/prodromal AD (pAD) clinical trial populations. RESULTS: ADCOMS consists of 4 Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale items, 2 Mini-Mental State Examination items, and all 6 Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes items. ADCOMS demonstrated improved sensitivity to clinical decline over individual scales in pAD, aMCI and in mild AD dementia. ADCOMS also detected treatment effects associated with the use of cholinesterase inhibitors in these populations. Improved sensitivity predicts smaller sample size requirements when ADCOMS is used in early AD trials. CONCLUSIONS: ADCOMS is proposed as new standard outcome for pAD and mild AD dementia trials, and is progressing in a CAMD-sponsored qualification process for use in registration trials of pAD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp-2015-312383

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AD Composite Score has been a useful measure of cognitive outcome in trials concerning early-stage Alzheimer disease with limited cognitive deficits.

    “AD Composite Score (ADCOMS), which combines scores on items derived from the AD Assessment Scale–cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog), clinical dementia rating (CDR) score, and Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), has been a useful measure of cognitive outcome in trials concerning early-stage AD with limited cognitive deficits [38].”

    From Clinical trials of new drugs for Alzheimer disease (2020) · cites this paper as [38]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [3]Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, et al Revising the definition of Alzheimer's disease: a new lexicon. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 1118– 27. 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70223-4 20934914 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [4]Hampel H, Frank R, Broich K et al Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: academic, industry and regulatory perspectives. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2010; 9: 560– 74. 10.1038/nrd3115 20592748 · DOI
  3. [6]Diniz BS, Yassuda MS, Nunes PV, et al Mini-mental State Examination performance in mild cognitive impairment subtypes. Int Psychogeriatr 2007; 19: 647– 56. 10.1017/S104161020700542X 17502007 · DOI
  4. [7]Cano SJ, Posner HB, Moline ML, et al The ADAS-cog in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: psychometric evaluation of the sum and its parts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010; 81: 1363– 8. 10.1136/jnnp.2009.204008 20881017 · DOI
  5. [8]Petersen RC, Thomas RG, Grundman M, et al Vitamin E and donepezil for the treatment of mild cognitive impairment. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2379– 88. 10.1056/NEJMoa050151 15829527 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [9]Doody RS, Ferris SH, Salloway S, et al Donepezil treatment of patients with MCI: a 48-week randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 2009; 72: 1555– 61. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000344650.95823.03 19176895 · DOI
  7. [11]Romero K, de Mars M, Frank D, et al The Coalition Against Major Diseases: developing tools for an integrated drug development process for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2009; 86: 365– 7. 10.1038/clpt.2009.165 19763117 · DOI
  8. [12]Jelic V, Kivipelto M, Winblad B Clinical trials in mild cognitive impairment: lessons for the future. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006; 77: 429– 38. 10.1136/jnnp.2005.072926 16306154 PMC2077499 · DOI
  9. [13]Aisen PS, Schneider LS, Sano M, et al High-dose B vitamin supplementation and cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008; 300: 1774– 83. 10.1001/jama.300.15.1774 18854539 PMC2684821 · DOI
  10. [14]Rogers SL, Farlow MR, Doody RS, et al A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Donepezil Study Group. Neurology 1998; 50: 136– 45. 10.1212/WNL.50.1.136 9443470 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [15]Harrison J, Minassian SL, Jenkins L, et al A neuropsychological test battery for use in Alzheimer disease clinical trials. Arch Neurol 2007; 64: 1323– 9. 10.1001/archneur.64.9.1323 17846273 · DOI
  12. [16]Lasser R, Ostrowitzki S, Scheltens P, et al Efficacy and safety of gantenerumab from the phase 3 SCarlet RoAD trial, a study of ganenerumab in patients with prodromal AD. J Prev Alzheimer Dis 2015; 2: 275– 6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J., Logovinsky, V., Hendrix, S. B., Stanworth, S. H., Perdomo, C., Xu, L., Dhadda, S., Do, I., Rabe, M., Luthman, J., Cummings, J., & Satlin, A.
Affiliations
  • Eisai (United States) (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Cummings, Jeffrey
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-03-23
Volume
87
Issue
9
Pages
993-999
ISSN
  • 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-330X
OpenAlex
W2306039713
Cited by
160
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3
FWCI
11.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (K01AG030514, P30AG010129, U01 AG024904)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-12-2-0012)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
prodromal Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, composite endpoints, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Clinical Dementia Rating, Mini-Mental State Examination, partial least squares regression, sensitivity to change, cholinesterase inhibitors, sample size requirements
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Biomarkers, Least-Squares Analysis, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Disease Progression, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review