Cited by 71Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Meaningful benefits: A framework to assess disease-modifying therapies in preclinical and early Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Assunção, Sheila Seleri, Sperling, Reisa A., Ritchie, Craig, Kerwin, Diana R., Aisen, Paul S., Lansdall, Claire, Atri, Alireza, Cummings, Jeffrey·2022·Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The need for preventive therapies that interrupt the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) before the onset of symptoms or when symptoms are emerging is urgent and has spurred the ongoing development of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in preclinical and early AD (mild cognitive impairment [MCI] to mild dementia). Assessing the meaningfulness of what are likely small initial treatment effects in these earlier stages of the AD patho-clinical disease continuum is a major challenge and warrants further consideration. BODY: To accommodate a shift towards earlier intervention in AD, we propose meaningful benefits as a new umbrella concept that encapsulates the spectrum of potentially desirable outcomes that may be demonstrated in clinical trials and other studies across the AD continuum, with an emphasis on preclinical AD and early AD (i.e., MCI due to AD and mild AD dementia). The meaningful benefits framework applies to data collection, assessment, and communication across three dimensions: (1) multidimensional clinical outcome assessments (COAs) including not only core disease outcomes related to cognition and function but also patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes, health and economic outcomes, and neuropsychiatric symptoms; (2) complementary analyses that help contextualize and expand the understanding of COA-based assessments, such as number-needed-to-treat or time-to-event analyses; and (3) assessment of both cumulative benefit and predictive benefit, where early changes on cognitive, functional, or biomarker assessments predict longer-term clinical benefit. CONCLUSION: The concept of meaningful benefits emphasizes the importance of multidimensional reporting of clinical trial data while, conceptually, it advances our understanding of treatment effects in preclinical AD and mild cognitive impairment due to AD. We propose that such an approach will help bridge the gap between the emergence of DMTs and their clinical use, particularly now that a DMT is available for patients diagnosed with MCI due to AD and mild AD dementia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13195-022-00984-y

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [47]Hauber B Paulsen R Callahan L Potashman M Lee D Hartry A Quantifying what matters most to patients and care partners in Alzheimer’s disease. Poster presented at: 2020 Alzheimer’s Association Virtual International Conference (AAIC) 2020
  2. [48]Hartry A Menne H Wronski S Paulsen R Callahan L Potashman M Evaluation of what matters most in existing clinical outcomes assessments in Alzheimer’s disease. Poster presented at: 2020 Alzheimer’s Association Virtual International Conference (AAIC) 2020
  3. [51]Cognition Working Group. Prepared for: 11th Annual PRO Consortium workshop; April 22-23, 2020. PRO Consortium Critical Path Institute. https://c-path.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/2020_Cognition_WG_Poster.pdf Accessed 20 Oct 2021.
  4. [79]Patient-Focused Drug Development Guidance Public Workshop: Incorporating Clinical Outcome Assessments into Endpoints for Regulatory Decision-Making. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC; 2019. https://www.fda.gov/media/132505/download. Accessed 21 Oct 2021.
  5. [81]Cummings JL Zhong K Cummings JL Pillai JA Clinical trials and drug development in neurodegenerative diseases: unifying principles Neurodegenerative Diseases Unifying Principles 2017 Oxford Oxford University Press 323 336

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Assunção, S. S., Sperling, R. A., Ritchie, C., Kerwin, D. R., Aisen, P. S., Lansdall, C., Atri, A., & Cummings, J.
Affiliations
  • Roche (United States) (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Corresponding author
Assunção, Sheila Seleri
Venue
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Published
2022-04-19
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
54-54
ISSN
1758-9193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224216819
Cited by
71
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s Research & Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Genentech
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, disease-modifying therapy, preclinical Alzheimer's disease, early Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, mild dementia, clinical outcome assessment, patient-reported outcomes, caregiver-reported outcomes, number needed to treat, neuropsychiatric symptoms, economic outcomes, biomarkers
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Cognition, Dementia, Humans, Disease Progression, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review