The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence for distinct cognitive deficits after focal cerebellar lesions
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Anatomical evidence and lesion studies, as well as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies, indicate that the cerebellum contributes to higher cognitive functions. Cerebellar posterior lateral regions seem to be relevant for cognition, while vermal lesions seem to be associated with changes in affect. However, the results remain controversial. Deficits of patients are sometimes still attributed to motor impairment. METHODS: We present data from a detailed neuropsychological examination of 21 patients with cerebellar lesions due to tumour or haematoma, and 21 controls matched for age, sex, and years of education. RESULTS: Patients showed deficits in executive function, and in attentional processes such as working memory and divided attention. Further analysis revealed that patients with right-sided lesions were in general more impaired than those with left-sided lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Those hypotheses that suggest that lesions of the right cerebellar hemisphere lead to verbal deficits, while those of the left lead to non-verbal deficits, have in part been confirmed. The generally greater impairment of those patients with a right-sided lesion has been interpreted as resulting from the connection of the right cerebellum to the left cerebral hemisphere, which is dominant for language functions and crucial for right hand movements. Motor impairment was correlated with less than half of the cognitive measures, with no stronger tendency for correlation with cognitive tests that require motor responses discernible. The results are discussed on the basis of an assumption that the cerebellum has a predicting and preparing function, indicating that cerebellar lesions lead to a "dysmetria of thought."
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-2400 · Cited by 6,120
The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome
Schmahmann, J. (1998) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/121.4.561 · Cited by 3,230
Higher cortical functions in man
Lurii︠a︡, A. R., Teuber, H., Pribram, K. H., & Haigh, B. (1966) · Basic Books · Cited by 2,857
A Modified Card Sorting Test Sensitive to Frontal Lobe Defects
Nelson, H. E. (1976) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(76)80035-4 · Cited by 2,454
Schmahmann, J. D. (2019) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.005 · Cited by 1,625
Practice-related Changes in Human Brain Functional Anatomy during Nonmotor Learning
Raichle, M. E., Fiez, J. A., Videen, T. O., MacLeod, A.-M. K., Pardo, J. V., Fox, P. T., & Petersen, S. E. (1994) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/4.1.8 · Cited by 1,593
Positron Emission Tomographic Studies of the Processing of Singe Words
Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., Posner, M. I., Mintun, M., & Raichle, M. E. (1989) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1989.1.2.153 · Cited by 1,289
Attentional Activation of the Cerebellum Independent of Motor Involvement
Allen, G., Buxton, R. B., Wong, E. C., & Courchesne, E. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5308.1940 · Cited by 785
Schmahmann, J. D., & Pandya, D. N. (1997) · International Review of Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7742(08)60346-3 · Cited by 774
Cited by
Functional topography in the human cerebellum: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies
STOODLEY, C., & SCHMAHMANN, J. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.039 · Cited by 2,183
Cerebellum and nonmotor function
Strick, P. L., Dum, R. P., & Fiez, J. A. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125606 · Cited by 1,777
Schmahmann, J. D. (2019) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.005 · Cited by 1,625
Stoodley, C. J., & Schmahmann, J. D. (2010) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.008 · Cited by 1,360
Distinct cerebellar contributions to intrinsic connectivity networks
Habas, C., Kamdar, N., Nguyen, D., Prater, K., Beckmann, C. F., Menon, V., & Greicius, M. D. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1868-09.2009 · Cited by 1,115
Metadata
- Authors
- Gottwald, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2004-11-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1524-1531
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107187807
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for distinct cognitive deficits after focal cerebellar lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jnnp.2003.018093
- The paper
- Gottwald, B. (2004). Evidence for distinct cognitive deficits after focal cerebellar lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2003.018093
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.