Cited by 774Motor Control and AdaptationVestibular and auditory disordersMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The cerebrocerebellar system

Schmahmann, Jeremy D., Pandya, Deepak N.·1997·International Review of Neurobiology

Abstract

If there is a cerebellar contribution to nonmotor function, particularly to cognitive abilities and affective states, then there must be corresponding anatomic substrates that support this. The cerebellum is strongly interconnected with the cerebral hemispheres in both feedforward (cerebral hemispheres to cerebellum) and feedback directions. This relationship has long been recognized, particularly with respect to the motor and sensory cortices. Investigations performed over the last decade however, have demonstrated for the first time the organization and strength of the connections that link the cerebellum with areas of the cerebral cortex known to be concerned with higher order behavior rather than with motor control. The feedforward projections from these higher order areas, namely the associative and paralimbic cortices, seem to be matched, at least in the limited but definite demonstrations to date, by cerebellar projections back to these same areas. These observations are important because they are congruent with the notion that cognitive functions are distributed among multiple cortical and subcortical nodes, each of which functions in concert but in a unique manner to produce an ultimate behavior pattern. This chapter describes the neural circuitry postulated to subserve the cerebellar contribution to nonmotor processing, particularly cognitive and affective modulation, and discusses the theoretical implications of these anatomic findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0074-7742(08)60346-3

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Support for long-range signals likely involves the cerebellum's closed-loop connections with numerous regions in the cerebral cortex.

    “Support for these long-range signals likely involves the cerebellum’s closed-loops connections with numerous regions in the cerebral cortex (for reviews, see Schmahmann and Pandya, 1997; Strick et al., 2009; Bostan et al., 2013; Lena, 2016).”

    From Cerebellum, Predictions and Errors (2019) · cites this paper as Schmahmann and Pandya, 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmahmann, J. D., & Pandya, D. N.
Affiliations
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Venue
International Review of Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1997
Volume
41
Pages
31-60
ISSN
0074-7742 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1589968137
Cited by
774
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 29
FWCI
15.44
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International review of neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
cerebellum, cognitive function, affective states, association cortex, paralimbic cortex, neural circuits
MeSH terms
Affect, Animals, Cerebellum, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Feedback, Humans, Nerve Fibers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review